Speech audiometry has become an essential component of the audiological test battery. Various speech audiometry materials have been developed in different languages and also revised later to meet criteria such as familiarity of the words, phonetic/phonemic balance, number of test items, and dialectal variations. The current study focused on developing a PB word list in Tamil for adults. The study was carried out in two phases. Phase I involved the development of a PB word list in Tamil. Phase II included evaluating the effectiveness of the developed word lists on adults with normal hearing sensitivity and hearing impairment. A total of 500 bisyllabic words were used in creating a master list. The collected words were subjected to familiarity testing with 40 native Tamil speakers. From the master list of 500 words, 90% of the participants rated 320 words as most familiar, and those words were included in the study. The 320 words were validated by eight experts working in the fields of audiology, speech-language pathology, linguistics, and psychology. The disagreed-with words were excluded from the list, and only 270 words that were agreed upon by all the experts were included in the final list. The final lists comprised four-word lists with 25 phonetically balanced (PB) words per list. The final word lists were recorded and tested for goodness. These final words were then administered to find SIS scores for two groups. Group I consisted of adults with 120 normal hearing sensitivity, and Group II consisted of 130 adults with hearing impairment. The results were analysed using SPSS software. The mean SIS in adults with normal hearing sensitivity ranged from 99.4 to 99.8%. The SIS of adults with normal hearing sensitivity revealed no significant difference (p > .05) with respect to gender, ears, or across the four-word lists. All four-word lists provided similar scores, establishing the equivalency of word lists in individuals with normal hearing sensitivity as well as hearing impairment. A psychometric curve of performance intensity function in adults with normal hearing sensitivity revealed that the SIS score increased as the sensation level increased from 10 to 40 dB SL. There is a linear increase in SIS scores from 10 to 20 dB SL. A plateau was attained at 40 dB SL with 100% SIS scores. Thus, the present study recommends the use of 40 dB SL for SIS testing. Mean SIS scores for adults with mild, moderate, and severe hearing loss were found to be 90.1%, 65.4%, and 41.8%, respectively. A significant decrease in SIS was observed as the degree of hearing loss increased.

The primary aim of the study was to develop phonemically balanced passage, Oral passage and Nasal passage in Punjabi language. Development of the passage: The words in the passage were chosen to represent the way sounds are distributed in spoken Punjabi language, and the relative phonemic distribution of each word inside each paragraph matched how frequently each sound occurs in Punjabi. The paragraph was constructed using words that were rated as extremely familiar and familiar. The developed passages were given to five speech-language pathologists for the purpose of content validation. 100 people with normal hearing between the ages of 18 and 25 were enrolled in the study (50 female and 50 male). Each subject\'s nasalence was measured using a Nasometer. The individuals were given passages written in Punjabi to read, and their nasalence scores for each text were recorded. The nasalance mean for Punjabi phonemically balanced passage was 36.41 ± 4.61% and 38.57 ± 4.22% in male and female subjects. The Punjabi oral passage mean were 27.36 ± 4.14% and 28.46 ± 4.01% in male and female subjects. The means for Punjabi nasal passage were 46.15 ± 4.09% in male subjects and 47.04 ± 4.91% in the female subjects. The Intraclass correlation coefficient for Female and male subjects for the Punjabi Phonemically balanced passage, Punjabi oral passage, Punjabi nasal passage were 0.904, 0.945; 0.807, 0.909, and 0.956, 0.913 respectively. The developed passages have good test retest reliability and their normative scores can be used for assessment of different resonance disorders.