Enzymatic fructosylation has emerged as a strategy to enhance the hydrophilicity of polyphenols by introducing sugar moieties, leading to the development of phenolic glycosides, which exhibit improved solubility, stability, and biological activities compared to their non-glycosylated forms. This study provides a detailed analysis of the interactions between five phenolic fructosides (4MFPh, MFF, DFPh, MFPh, and MFPu) and twelve proteins (11β-HS1, CRP, DPPIV, IRS, PPAR-γ, GK, AMPK, IR, GFAT, IL-1ß, IL-6, and TNF-α) associated with the pathogenesis of T2DM. The strongest interactions were observed for phlorizin fructosides (DFPh) with IR (-16.8 kcal/mol) and GFAT (-16.9 kcal/mol). MFPh with 11β-HS1 (-13.99 kcal/mol) and GFAT (-12.55 kcal/mol). 4MFPh with GFAT (-11.79 kcal/mol) and IR (-12.11 kcal/mol). MFF with AMPK (-9.10 kcal/mol) and PPAR- γ (-9.71 kcal/mol), followed by puerarin and ferulic acid monofructosides. The fructoside group showed lower free energy binding values than the controls, metformin and sitagliptin. Hydrogen bonding (HB) was identified as the primary interaction mechanism, with specific polar amino acids such as serin, glutamine, glutamic acid, threonine, aspartic acid, and lysine identified as key contributors. ADMET results indicated favorable absorption and distribution characteristics of the fructosides. These findings provide valuable information for further exploration of phenolic fructosides as potential therapeutic agents for T2DM.

This study characterizes the acceptor specificity of levansucrases (LSs) from Gluconobacter oxydans (LS1), Vibrio natriegens (LS2), Novosphingobium aromaticivorans (LS3), and Paraburkholderia graminis (LS4) using sucrose as fructosyl donor and selected phenolic compounds and carbohydrates as acceptors. Overall, V. natriegens LS2 proved to be the best biocatalyst for the transfructosylation of phenolic compounds. More than one fructosyl unit could be attached to fructosylated phenolic compounds. The transfructosylation of epicatechin by P. graminis LS4 resulted in the most diversified products, with up to five fructosyl units transferred. In addition to the LS source, the acceptor specificity of LS towards phenolic compounds and their transfructosylation products were found to greatly depend on their chemical structure: the number of phenolic rings, the reactivity of hydroxyl groups and the presence of aliphatic chains or methoxy groups. Similarly, for carbohydrates, the transfructosylation yield was dependent on both the LS source and the acceptor type. The highest yield of fructosylated-trisaccharides was Erlose from the transfructosylation of maltose catalyzed by LS2, with production reaching 200 g/L. LS2 was more selective towards the transfructosylation of phenolic compounds and carbohydrates, while reactions catalyzed by LS1, LS3 and LS4 also produced fructooligosaccharides. This study shows the high potential for the application of LSs in the glycosylation of phenolic compounds and carbohydrates.