Reconstruction of eyelid defects, especially the posterior lamella, remains challenging because of its anatomical complexity, functional considerations, and aesthetic concerns. The goals of eyelid reconstruction include restoring eyelid structure and function and achieving an aesthetically acceptable appearance. An in-depth understanding of the complex eyelid anatomy and several reconstructive principles are mandatory to achieve these goals. Currently, there are multiple surgical treatment options for eyelid reconstruction, including different flaps, grafts, and combinations of them. This comprehensive review outlines the principles of reconstruction and discusses the indications, advantages, and disadvantages of currently available surgical techniques. We also propose our clinical thinking for solving specific clinical questions in eyelid reconstruction and offer perspectives on new potential methodologies in the future.

OBJECTIVE: To review the results of medial canthal reconstruction with the medial (transnasal or transglabellar) semicircular flap.
METHODS: Medical charts of 38 patients who underwent the described procedure were reviewed. After tumor excision, a semicircular flap created along the nasal bridge or glabella was advanced to the canthal defect; if necessary, this flap was combined with other reconstructive methods.
RESULTS: The patients (19 male, 19 female; mean age, 66 years) had basal cell (n = 36) or squamous cell (n = 2) carcinomas. The mean tumor diameter was 9.2 mm (range, 3-21 mm). Tumor epicenters were in the midcanthal area in 21 patients (55%) and in the infra- or supracanthal areas in 17 patients (45%). After excision, 22 patients had only canthal defects, and 16 had an associated upper and/or lower eyelid defect. To cover the defect, the medial semicircular flap alone was used in 19 patients (50%) and in association with other flaps in 19 patients (50%). The excisional defect was primarily closed in 37 patients (97%). Flap necrosis or infection did not occur. During follow-up (range, 1-91 months; median, 19 months), 10 patients (26%) developed a total of 17 complications. Three patients (8%) required secondary surgery for eyelid reconstruction-related complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Transnasal or transglabellar semicircular flap may be a good alternative for medial canthal reconstruction. For large or complex defects, the medial semicircular flap can be combined with other periocular flaps. In the latter case, postoperative complications requiring secondary surgery may develop.

Aim: To describe and evaluate surgical outcomes of the Modified Cheek Advancement Flap (MCAF) to reconstruct defects involving medial lower eyelid, nasal sidewall and infraorbital cheek following Mohs micrographic surgery for basal cell carcinoma (BCC).Materials and Methods: All patients who underwent MCAF between 2012 and 2018 under the care of a single surgeon (LCA) were identified. The technique described in this report is a significant modification of the traditional cheek advancement flap. The MCAF was undertaken without subciliary or infraorbital incisions, less extensive dissection and use of flap advancement rather than rotation. A retrospective chart review was completed using a pro-forma which included risk factors for flap failure, early and late complications and additional reconstructive procedures. Patient satisfaction was rated using a five-point Likert-type scale.Results: 42 patients underwent the MCAF. Mean follow up was 28.4 months (±19.9 months). Early complications were found in 11.9% of the patients and resolved completely within the first four post-operative weeks. There were no long term complications secondary to the reconstruction. No lower eyelid ectropion was noted. 78.6% of the patients cited they were \'extremely satisfied\' with the final cosmetic outcome.Conclusion: The MCAF proves a valuable and safe option in periocular reconstructive surgery with excellent cosmetic results and no post-operative ectropion. The necessity for eyelid tightening as part of the reconstructive process should encourage oculoplastic surgeons to use the MCAF when reconstructing defects involving medial lower eyelid, infraorbital cheek and nasal sidewall.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the aesthetic and functional outcomes of autologous fat transfer using the SEFFI (superficial enhanced fluid fat injection) technique for reconstruction of the periocular area.
METHODS: Autologous fat injections prepared with the 0.5 mL and 0.8 mL SEFFI technique were used in four patients for periocular rehabilitation.
RESULTS: Case 1 (C1): A patient with left-sided progressive facial hemiatrophy underwent ipsilateral volumizing with 0.8 SEFFI in the superior, temporal, and inferior periorbital areas, and 0.5 SEFFI in both eyelids. C2: A 21-year-old female with a post trauma frontal scar, left ptosis, and lower eyelid retraction was treated with 0.5 SEFFI applied in the scar area associated with an upper eyelid conjunctivomullerectomy and resection of the lower eyelid retractors. C3: A patient with previous left-eye evisceration and orbital floor and medial wall fractures underwent socket reconstruction with buccal mucosal graft in the lower fornix and 0.5 SEFFI injections in both superior and inferior eyelids. SEFFI was also applied in the intraorbital space for correction of the enophthalmos. C4: A patient with lower lid retraction post blepharoplasty was treated with 0.8 SEFFI injections in lower eyelids and malar areas, complemented with a bilateral lateral cantopexy.
CONCLUSIONS: Autologous fat transfer with SEFFI technique is an effective and safe procedure in cases of periocular rehabilitation.

Although the majority of lesions present in the periocular region are benign, periocular cutaneous malignancies are certainly not uncommon and must be considered. The management of nonmelanoma cutaneous malignancies is predominately surgical with Mohs micrographic surgery or excision with frozen sections. The approach to reconstruction of the resulting defects depends on the defect location and size. When able, it is preferable to close lesions directly or with the recruitment of adjacent tissue in an effort to preserve the inherent anatomy. The eyelid\'s dynamic function is thus maintained, which is essential for optimal ocular surface protection. However, larger and more extensive defects will require complex reconstructions that are able to restore the necessary structural integrity to the eyelids. The authors review the various reconstruction approaches for defects of all sizes involving the periocular area including nonmarginal defects and defects of the lower and upper eyelids, as well as those of the medial canthal region.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the shared care and outcomes of patients with periocular skin tumours who underwent Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) performed by dermatologists, followed by oculoplastic reconstruction undertaken by ophthalmologists at two teaching and one private hospital in Ireland.
METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review at the Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital, St James Hospital and the Hermitage Clinic.
RESULTS: One hundred and twenty seven patients had periocular Mohs surgery between November 2006 and January 2013 mainly indicated for basal cell carcinoma. The mean follow-up time was 2 years and to date there have been no local recurrences.
CONCLUSIONS: MMS is available in Ireland and should be considered for patients with facial tumours in the ocular region.