Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

肝门周胆管癌
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:孤立的免疫球蛋白(Ig)G4相关性硬化性胆管炎(IgG4-SC)和胆管癌的鉴别诊断具有挑战性。我们旨在阐明内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)相关程序在孤立性IgG4-SC和肝门部胆管癌(PHCC)的鉴别诊断中的作用。
    方法:纳入了在广岛大学医院诊断的7例肺门型孤立IgG4-SC患者和65例手术切除的侵袭性PHCC患者,和导管内超声检查(IDUS)的诊断率,经口胆道镜检查(POCS),并进行病理检查。
    结果:在7例分离的IgG4-SC患者中有6例(86%),狭窄在肝门周围胆管。IDUS显示对称的壁增厚(40%vs.5%,p=0.04),均匀内部回波(80%与5%,p<0.001),和平滑的外缘(80%与6%,p<0.001)在分离的IgG4-SC中比在PHCC中更频繁。POCS在分离的IgG4-SC中表现出更频繁的光滑粘膜表面(75%与7%,p=0.006)。只有一名患者具有IgG4-SC的两种病理特征。使用两种或多种联合采样方法诊断PHCC的敏感性为81%。
    结论:病理学检查在孤立性IgG4-SC和PHCC的鉴别诊断中具有局限性,以及结合多种ERCP相关程序的诊断策略,包括IDUS和POCS,是推荐的。
    OBJECTIVE: Differential diagnosis of isolated immunoglobin (Ig)G4-related sclerosing cholangitis (IgG4-SC) and cholangiocarcinoma is challenging. We aimed to clarify the role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERCP)-related procedures in the differential diagnosis of isolated IgG4-SC and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC).
    METHODS: Seven patients with hilar-type isolated IgG4-SC diagnosed at Hiroshima University Hospital and sixty-five patients with surgically resected invasive PHCC were enrolled, and the diagnostic yields of intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS), peroral cholangioscopy (POCS), and pathological examinations were determined.
    RESULTS: In six of seven (86%) patients with isolated IgG4-SC, the stricture was in the perihilar bile duct. IDUS showed that symmetrical wall thickening (40% vs. 5%, p = 0.04), homogeneous internal echo (80% vs. 5%, p < 0.001), and smooth outer margins (80% vs. 6%, p < 0.001) were more frequent in isolated IgG4-SC than in PHCC. POCS showed a smooth mucosal surface more frequent in isolated IgG4-SC (75% vs. 7%, p = 0.006). Only one patient had two pathological findings characteristic of IgG4-SC. The sensitivity for diagnosing PHCC was 81% using two or more combined sampling methods.
    CONCLUSIONS: Pathological examinations have limitations in the differential diagnosis of isolated-IgG4-SC and PHCC, and a diagnostic strategy that combines multiple ERCP-related procedures, including IDUS and POCS, is recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肝门部胆管癌(pCCA)是一种高致死性肝胆管肿瘤。根治性切除术提供了延长生存期的最佳机会,但左侧肝切除术(LH)与右侧肝切除术(RH)的疗效仍存在争议.
    方法:对可切除pCCA患者LH和RH的非随机队列研究进行系统评价和荟萃分析。根据出版年份进行子分析,区域,病例数和铋分类(BC)≥III。
    结果:纳入了涉及3838名患者的19项研究,1779例(46%)接受LH,2059例(54%)接受RH。在报告风险比(HR)的亚组分析中,LH与总生存期(OS)增加相关(logHR0.59;p=0.04)。LH显示动脉切除率较高(14%vs.1%),输血(51%vs.41%),操作时间(MD31.44分钟),和胆漏(21%vs.18%),但肝切除术后肝功能衰竭的发生率较低(9%vs.21%)和90天死亡率(8%vs16%)。西部中心的三年无病生存率增加,但东部中心下降。
    结论:在本分析中,LH与较高的OS相关,但它是一种要求更高的技术。切除侧的决定应考虑几个因素,包括未来的肝脏残留物,肿瘤位置,血管受累,和外科专业知识。
    BACKGROUND: Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) is a highly lethal hepatobiliary cancer. Radical resection offers the best chance for extended survival, but the efficacy of left-sided hepatectomy (LH) versus right-sided hepatectomy (RH) remains controversial.
    METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized cohort studies comparing LH and RH in patients with resectable pCCA was conducted. Subanalyses were performed based on year of publication, region, number of cases and Bismuth classification (BC) ≥ III.
    RESULTS: Nineteen studies involving 3838 patients were included, with 1779 (46 %) undergoing LH and 2059 (54 %) undergoing RH. LH was associated with increased overall survival (OS) in subgroup analysis of studies reporting hazard ratios (HR) (logHR 0.59; p = 0.04). LH showed higher rates of arterial resection (14 % vs. 1 %), transfusion (51 % vs. 41 %), operation time (MD 31.44 min), and bile leakage (21 % vs. 18 %), but lower rates of post-hepatectomy liver failure (9 % vs. 21 %) and 90-day mortality (8 % vs 16 %). Three-year disease-free survival rates increased in Western centers but decreased in Eastern centers.
    CONCLUSIONS: LH is linked to higher OS in this analysis but is a more demanding technique. Resection side decision should consider several factors, including future liver remnant, tumor location, vascular involvement, and surgical expertise.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肝内胆管癌(iCCA)是第二常见的恶性原发性肝癌。iCCA可能在潜在的慢性肝病上发展,其发病率与肥胖和代谢性疾病的流行有关。相比之下,肝门部胆管癌(pCCA)可能伴随着胆道慢性炎症性疾病的病史。CCA的初始管理通常很复杂,需要多学科的专业知识。法国肝脏研究协会希望组织指南,以便总结关于iCCA和pCCA几个关键点的最佳证据。这些指南是根据文献中现有的证据水平制定的,并对每项建议进行了分析,由专家小组讨论和投票。他们描述了CCA的流行病学以及从诊断到治疗如何管理iCCA或pCCA患者。还强调了个性化医学和靶向疗法的使用的最新发展。
    Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common malignant primary liver cancer. iCCA may develop on an underlying chronic liver disease and its incidence is growing in relation with the epidemics of obesity and metabolic diseases. In contrast, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) may follow a history of chronic inflammatory diseases of the biliary tract. The initial management of CCAs is often complex and requires multidisciplinary expertise. The French Association for the Study of the Liver wished to organize guidelines in order to summarize the best evidence available about several key points in iCCA and pCCA. These guidelines have been elaborated based on the level of evidence available in the literature and each recommendation has been analysed, discussed and voted by the panel of experts. They describe the epidemiology of CCA as well as how patients with iCCA or pCCA should be managed from diagnosis to treatment. The most recent developments of personalized medicine and use of targeted therapies are also highlighted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:术中不可切除,在肝内胆管癌(iCCA)和肝门周胆管癌(pCCA)的外科治疗中,术后死亡和早期复发仍然是破坏性的徒劳事件.本研究旨在确定胆管癌无效手术的术前预测因素。
    方法:连续肝切除术用于iCCA和pCCA,包括2010年9月至2022年6月。手术的实用性被定义为术中不可切除,术后30天死亡率或术后6个月内复发。多变量逻辑回归用于确定无效性的预测因子。
    结果:在这段时间内,有150名iCCA和pCCA患者接受了手术。97例iCCA患者中有37例(38.1%)和53例pCCA患者中有25例(47.16%)进行了徒劳的切除。iCCA手术无效的预测因素是肿瘤数量(≥2)(OR,9.705;95CI,2.378-39.614;p=0.002),血清天冬氨酸转氨酶(OR,8.31;95CI,2.796-24.703;p<0.001)和血清CA-19.9(>37U/ml)(OR,2.95;95CI,1.051-8.283;p=0.04)。pCCA无效的预测因素是淋巴结受累(OR,7.636;95CI,1.824-31.979;p=0.005)和血清碱性磷酸酶(>562.5U/L)(OR,11.211;95CI,1.752-71.750;p=0.011)。
    结论:在超过三分之一的患者中观察到了错误的手术。确定了五个强有力的术前无效预测因子。仔细分析这些因素可能会减少徒劳的手术探查。
    BACKGROUND: Intraoperative unresectability, postoperative deaths and early recurrences remain devastating futile events in the surgical management of Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCA) and Perihilar cholangiocarcinomas (pCCA). The present study aims to determine the preoperative predictors of futile surgery in cholangiocarcinomas.
    METHODS: Consecutive hepatectomies for iCCA and pCCA, between September 2010 and June 2022 were included. Futility of surgery was defined as either intraoperative unresectability, postoperative 30-day mortality or recurrence within six months of surgery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of futility.
    RESULTS: One hundred and fifty patients of iCCA and pCCA underwent surgery during the time period. Thirty-seven (38.1 %) out of 97 patients of iCCA and 25(47.16 %) out of 53 patients of pCCA underwent futile resection. The predictive factors of futile surgery for iCCA were tumour number (≥2) (OR, 9.705; 95%CI, 2.378-39.614; p = 0.002), serum aspartate transaminase (OR, 8.31; 95%CI, 2.796-24.703; p < 0.001) and serum CA-19.9 (>37 U/ml) (OR, 2.95; 95%CI, 1.051-8.283; p = 0.04). The predictive factors of futility for pCCA were lymph node involvement (OR, 7.636; 95%CI, 1.824-31.979; p = 0.005) and serum alkaline phosphatase (>562.5 U/L) (OR, 11.211; 95%CI, 1.752-71.750; p = 0.011).
    CONCLUSIONS: Futile surgery was observed in over one third of our patients. Five strong preoperative predictors of futility were identified. Careful analysis of these factors may reduce futile surgical explorations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究的目的是研究接受根治性切除术的肝门部胆管癌(pCCA)患者术前体重指数(BMI)与手术感染之间的关系。方法:2008年至2022年连续纳入四家三级医院的pCCA患者。根据术前BMI,患者分为三组:低BMI(≤18.4kg/m2),正常BMI(18.5-24.9kg/m2),BMI高(≥25.0kg/m2)。比较3组患者手术感染的发生率。采用多因素logistic回归模型确定与手术感染相关的独立危险因素。结果:共纳入371例患者,其中BMI正常组283例(76.3%),低BMI组30例(8.1%),高BMI组58例(15.6%)。低BMI和高BMI组的患者手术感染发生率明显高于正常BMI组。多因素logistic回归模型显示,低BMI和高BMI与手术感染的发生具有独立的相关性。结论:与BMI异常的pCCA患者相比,接受根治性切除治疗的BMI正常的pCCA患者可能具有更低的手术感染风险。
    Background: The objective of this study was to investigate the association between pre-operative body mass index (BMI) and surgical infection in perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) patients treated with curative resection. Methods: Consecutive pCCA patients were enrolled from four tertiary hospitals between 2008 and 2022. According to pre-operative BMI, the patients were divided into three groups: low BMI (≤18.4 kg/m2), normal BMI (18.5-24.9 kg/m2), and high BMI (≥25.0 kg/m2). The incidence of surgical infection among the three groups was compared. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the independent risk factors associated with surgical infection. Results: A total of 371 patients were enrolled, including 283 patients (76.3%) in the normal BMI group, 30 patients (8.1%) in the low BMI group, and 58 patients (15.6%) in the high BMI group. The incidence of surgical infection was significantly higher in the patients in the low BMI and high BMI groups than in the normal BMI group. The multivariable logistic regression model showed that low BMI and high BMI were independently associated with the occurrence of surgical infection. Conclusions: The pCCA patients with a normal BMI treated with curative resection could have a lower risk of surgical infection than pCCA patients with an abnormal BMI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肝胰十二指肠切除术(HPD)是一种高风险的外科手术。据报道,胰腺实质的延迟分裂(DDPP)是HPD中一种减少术后胰瘘的新技术。然而,通常很难解剖胰头神经丛,同时保持胰腺实质完整,特别是在有血管侵犯的大肿瘤患者中。在各种报道的肠系膜上动脉的方法中,右侧入路可以为HPD中进行DDPP提供有用的手术视野。
    方法:一名78岁男子因瘙痒和黄疸就诊于当地诊所。实验室检查显示肝胆酶升高,总胆红素,和肿瘤标志物。增强计算机断层扫描,内镜逆行胰胆管造影术,并进行胆管导管内超声检查,诊断为肝门部胆管癌侵犯肝右动脉(40×15mm,铋IIIa,cT3N0M0cStageIII)。新辅助化疗后,他做了左肝切除和尾状叶切除,胰十二指肠切除术,并使用DDPP与肠系膜上动脉的右外侧入路联合切除右肝动脉。病理诊断为肝门部胆管癌ypT3N1M0ypIII期,R0切除。他在术后第57天出院,身体健康,自手术以来6个月一直状况良好。
    结论:我们提出了HPD期间DDPP肠系膜上动脉右外侧入路的有效应用。该程序可以提供清晰的手术视野,以便在横切胰腺实质之前轻松划分胰头神经丛。
    BACKGROUND: Hepatopancreatoduodenectomy (HPD) is a high-risk surgical procedure. Delayed division of the pancreatic parenchyma (DDPP) was reported as a novel technique in HPD for reducing postoperative pancreatic fistula. However, it is often difficult to dissect the pancreatic head nerve plexus while leaving the pancreatic parenchyma intact, particularly in patients with a bulky tumor with vascular invasion. Of the various reported approaches to the superior mesenteric artery, the right lateral approach can provide a useful surgical field to conduct DDPP in HPD.
    METHODS: A 78-year-old man visited a local clinic with itching and jaundice. Laboratory tests revealed elevated hepatobiliary enzyme, total bilirubin, and tumor markers. Enhanced computed tomography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and intraductal ultrasonography of the bile duct were performed, and he was diagnosed with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma with invasion to the right hepatic artery (40 × 15 mm, Bismuth IIIa, cT3N0M0 cStage III). After neoadjuvant chemotherapy, he underwent left hepatectomy with caudate lobectomy, pancreatoduodenectomy, and combined resection of right hepatic artery using DDPP with a right lateral approach to the superior mesenteric artery. The pathological diagnosis was perihilar cholangiocarcinoma ypT3N1M0 ypStage IIIC, R0 resection. He was discharged on postoperative day 57 in good health and has been doing well for 6 months since the surgery.
    CONCLUSIONS: We present an effective application of the right lateral approach to the superior mesenteric artery in DDPP during HPD. This procedure can provide a clear surgical field to easily divide the pancreatic head nerve plexus before transection of the pancreatic parenchyma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肝门部胆管癌,肝内胆管癌,胆囊癌是很难治疗的恶性肿瘤,其特点是局部复发倾向和预后普遍不利。手术切除是唯一潜在的治疗方法,通常通过开放式方法执行。虽然微创方法显示出希望,数据仍然有限。
    方法:经IRB批准,我们前瞻性随访了2013-2023年间100例接受机器人手术切除肺门周围的患者,肝内(IHCC)和胆囊胆管癌。数据表示为中值(平均值±标准偏差)。在p≤0.05时接受显著性。
    结果:患者年龄中位数为70岁,中位手术时间为333分钟,估计失血量为200mL。重要的是,没有计划外的转换,IHCC队列中仅发生1例术中并发症。中位住院时间为4天。术后并发症共19例,30天内再入院19例。此外,有3例住院死亡率和5例90天死亡率。87%的患者实现了R0切除,R1切除13%。在中位随访36个月时,62%的患者无病生存,而6%的人继续患有这种疾病,32%的人没有存活。
    结论:我们的经验证明了机器人切除这些复杂恶性肿瘤的可行性和安全性,产生有希望的短期结果。需要进一步的调查以确定长期的肿瘤学结果。
    BACKGROUND: Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC), and gall bladder cancer are difficult malignancies to treat and are characterized by a tendency for local recurrence and a generally unfavorable prognosis. Surgical resection offers the only potential cure, conventionally performed via the open approach. Although minimally invasive approaches show promise, data remain limited.
    METHODS: With the institutional review board\'s approval, we prospectively followed 100 patients between 2013 and 2023 who underwent robotic surgical resection for perihilar, IHCC, and gallbladder cholangiocarcinoma. Data are presented as median (mean ± SD). Significance was accepted at P ≤ .05.
    RESULTS: The median patient age was 70 years, and the median operative duration was 333 min, with an estimated blood loss of 200 mL. Importantly, no unplanned conversions occurred, and only 1 intraoperative complication occurred within the IHCC cohort. The median length of stay was 4 days. There were a total of 19 postoperative complications and 19 readmissions within 30 days. Additionally, there were 3 in-hospital mortalities and 5 90-day mortalities. R0 resection was achieved in 87% of patients and R1 resection in 13%. At a median follow-up of 36 months, 62% of patients demonstrated disease-free survival, whereas 6% continued to live with the disease, and 32% did not survive.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our experience demonstrates the feasibility and safety of robotic resection for these complex malignancies, yielding promising short-term outcomes. Further investigation is required to ascertain the long-term oncologic outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在肝门部胆管癌(pCCA)切缘处进行浸润性癌的额外切除已成为共识。然而,关于残余胆管上皮内瘤变(BilIN)是否需要额外切除仍存在争议.
    方法:纳入来自两家医院的连续pCCA患者。总结切缘BilIN的发生率和规律。分析切缘阴性(R0)和BilIN切缘患者的预后。森林图的Cox回归用于确定与总生存率(OS)和无复发生存率(RFS)相关的独立危险因素。根据BilIN特征和肿瘤特征进行亚组分析。
    结果:306例pCCA患者接受根治性切除。255有R0边缘,51有BilIN边缘。两组间OS(P=0.264)和RFS(P=0.149)差异无统计学意义。具体来说,BilIN在远端胆管19例,在近端胆管32例。42例患者显示低级别BilIN,和9显示高品位。进一步分析显示,不同位置之间的长期生存率没有显着差异(P=0.354),或不同等级之间(P=0.772)。门静脉浸润,分化差和淋巴结转移被认为是OS和RFS的独立危险因素,而Bilin不是。亚组分析显示,淋巴结转移亚组之间的长期生存没有显着差异,或门静脉浸润亚组之间。
    结论:对于接受根治性切除术的pCCA患者,切除边缘残留Bilin是可以接受的。这些患者不需要额外的切除以达到绝对R0边缘。
    BACKGROUND: Additional resection for invasive cancer at perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) resection margins has become a consensus. However, controversy still exists regarding whether additional resection is necessary for residual biliary intraepithelial neoplasia (BilIN).
    METHODS: Consecutive patients with pCCA from two hospitals were enrolled. The incidence and pattern of resection margin BilIN were summarized. Prognosis between patients with negative margins (R0) and BilIN margins were analyzed. Cox regression with a forest plot was used to identify independent risk factors associated with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Subgroup analysis was performed based on BilIN features and tumor characteristics.
    RESULTS: 306 pCCA patients receiving curative resection were included. 255 had R0 margins and 51 had BilIN margins. There was no significant difference in OS (P = 0.264) or RFS (P = 0.149) between the two group. Specifically, 19 patients with BilIN at distal bile ducts and 32 at proximal bile ducts. 42 patients showed low-grade BilIN, and 9 showed high-grade. Further analysis revealed no significant difference in long-term survival between different locations (P = 0.354), or between different grades (P = 0.772). Portal vein invasion, poor differentiation and lymph node metastasis were considered independent risk factors for OS and RFS, while BilIN was not. Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference in long-term survival between the lymph node metastasis subgroup, or between the portal vein invasion subgroup.
    CONCLUSIONS: For pCCA patients underwent curative resection, residual BilIN at resection margin is acceptable. Additional resection is not necessary for such patients to achieve absolute R0 margin.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    染色体外DNA(eccDNA)经常携带扩增的癌基因。这项研究旨在检查eccDNAs在诊断为晚期肝门部胆管癌(pCCA)并表现出不同预后结果的个体中的发生和作用。从2021年6月至2022年6月接受一线肝动脉灌注化疗的患者中选择了5例生存结果较差的患者和5例预后较好的患者。扩增提取的eccDNA用于高通量测序。使用基因本体论(GO)和京都基因和基因组百科全书(KEGG)途径分析来分析与差异表达的eccDNAs相关的基因。差异表达的胆汁eccDNA相关基因用于构建预后模型。在所有10名患者中,在胆汁和血浆中总共鉴定出19,024和3,048个eccDNAs,分别。胆汁中检测到的eccDNA浓度是血浆中的9倍。胆汁和匹配血浆之间eccDNA的染色体分布相似。GO和KEGG通路分析显示,在生存结果较差的患者中,有丝分裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPK)和Wnt/β-catenin通路富集。根据eccDNA相关基因构建的预后模型,高危组胆管癌患者的总生存期显著缩短(p<0.001).此外,高危组患者的免疫抑制细胞浸润程度更高。总之,可以在pCCA患者的胆汁和血浆中检测到EccDNA,浓度较高。基于eccDNA相关基因的预后模型显示了预测胆管癌患者生存和免疫微环境的潜力。
    Extrachromosomal DNAs (eccDNAs) frequently carry amplified oncogenes. This investigation aimed to examine the occurrence and role of eccDNAs in individuals diagnosed with advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) who exhibited distinct prognostic outcomes. Five patients with poor survival outcomes and five with better outcomes were selected among patients who received first-line hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy from June 2021 to June 2022. The extracted eccDNAs were amplified for high-throughput sequencing. Genes associated with the differentially expressed eccDNAs were analyzed using Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses. The differentially expressed bile eccDNA-related genes were used to construct a prognostic model. Across all 10 patients, a total of 19,024 and 3,048 eccDNAs were identified in bile and plasma, respectively. The concentration of eccDNA detected in the bile was 9-fold higher than that in plasma. The chromosome distribution of the eccDNAs were similar between bile and matched plasma. GO and KEGG pathway analyses showed enrichment in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and Wnt/β-catenin pathways in patients with poor survival outcomes. According to the prognostic model constructed by eccDNA-related genes, the high-risk group of cholangiocarcinoma patients displayed significantly shorter overall survival (p < 0.001). Moreover, the degree of infiltration of immunosuppressive cells was higher in patients in the high-risk group. In conclusion, EccDNA could be detected in bile and plasma of pCCA patients, with a higher concentration. A prognostic model based on eccDNA-related genes showed the potential to predict the survival and immune microenvironment of patients with cholangiocarcinoma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    术中冰冻切片(FS)分析评估胆管边缘状态通常用于评估肝门部胆管癌(pCCA)切除手术期间切除的完整性。然而,在获得初始正差值后,额外重新剖腹产对长期结局的影响尚不清楚.包括在术前影像学诊断为pCCA的患者,并从2013年5月至2021年6月接受根治性意向手术,最少随访2年。对所有患者进行了近端胆管边缘的术中FS分析。阳性切缘由浸润性癌的存在定义。在62例术前诊断为pCCA的患者中,在最终组织病理学报告中排除患有不可手术疾病(分期腹腔镜检查或局部探查)和其他/良性病理的患者后,将35例患者纳入最终分析。在35名患者中,术后90天死亡率的患者被排除在最终生存分析之外.FS分析显示10例(28.5%)患者的初始切缘为阳性。在10例接受再次切除以获得阴性近端切缘的患者中,只有5例患者获得阴性切缘(继发性R0)。最初的正边际与不良的长期结果相关。初始切缘阳性患者的中位无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS)分别为16和19.6个月,但对于初始切缘阴性的患者,则为36个月和58.2个月,分别(p=0.012)。与主要R0相比,次要R0患者的中位DFS和OS显着降低(16vs.DFS为36个月,p=0.117和19.6vs.操作系统58.2个月,分别为p=0.027)。术中FS阳性的近端肝导管边缘表明可切除pCCA患者的长期预后较差。额外切除对生存有可疑的益处,当达到次要的负裕度时。
    Intraoperative frozen section (FS) analysis to assess the bile duct margin status is commonly used to assess the completeness of resection during surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) resection. However, the impact of additional re-section on the long-term outcome after obtaining an initial positive margin remains unclear. Patients diagnosed as pCCA on preoperative imaging and subjected to curative intent surgery from May 2013 to June 2021 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included. Intraoperative FS analysis of the proximal bile duct margin was performed in all patients. A positive margin was defined by the presence of invasive cancer. Out of the 62 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of pCCA on imaging, 35 patients were included for final analyses after excluding patients with inoperable disease (on staging laparoscopy or local exploration) and other/benign pathology on the final histopathology report. Out of the 35 patients, patients with postoperative 90-day mortality were excluded from the final survival analysis. FS analysis revealed an initial positive margin in 10 (28.5%) patients. Among 10 patients who underwent re-resection to achieve negative proximal margins, only 5 patients achieved a negative margin (secondary R0). An initial positive margin was associated with poor long-term outcomes. Median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 16 and 19.6 months for patients with an initial positive margin, but 36 and 58.2 months for patients with an initial negative margin, respectively (p = 0.012). The median DFS and OS were significantly lower for those with secondary R0 as compared to primary R0 (16 vs. 36 months for DFS, p = 0.117 and 19.6 vs. 58.2 months for OS, p = 0.027, respectively). An intraoperative FS positive proximal hepatic duct margin dictates poor long-term outcomes for patients with resectable pCCA. Additional resection has a questionable benefit on survival, when a secondary negative margin is achieved.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号