Performance status

性能状态
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)在食管癌(EC)的治疗中起着重要作用。然而,很少有患者能长期生存,一些患者出现严重的免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)。需要建立疗效和安全性的可靠预测生物标志物以提高疗效。我们回顾性分析了昭和大学纳武单抗单药治疗EC的结果,医学部,确定受益于ICI单药治疗的患者的生物标志物和特征。
    方法:本研究纳入了86例接受纳武单抗单药治疗的EC患者。患者特征,功效,并对安全性进行了分析。多变量分析评估了总生存期(OS)之间的相关性,无进展生存期(PFS),最佳总体反应(BOR),irAE,和以下变量:性别,年龄,性能状态(PS),中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR),C反应蛋白(CRP)水平,白蛋白水平,治疗前的体重指数。
    结果:PFS中位数为3.1个月,中位OS为9.0个月。在多变量分析中,预处理PS,NLR,性别与OS和PFS显著相关。NLR<3.3预测生存期更长(中位OS17.5vs.6.4个月,NLR≥3.3;p<0.001)。PS0-1的中位OS为10.6个月,PS2-3的中位OS为1.3个月(p<0.001)。NLR在PS0-1组中保持显著的预测。irAE的发展与OS和PFS的增加显著相关。
    结论:治疗前NLR低和PS良好的患者可以最大限度地提高ICIs的益处。低NLR可能是抗肿瘤免疫的较高免疫活性的指标,表明NLR在日常实践中可能是一种方便的预测生物标志物。
    OBJECTIVE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) play an important role in the treatment of esophageal cancer (EC). However, few patients achieve long-term survival, and some patients develop serious immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Reliable predictive biomarkers of efficacy and safety need to be established in order to improve efficacy. We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of nivolumab monotherapy on EC at Showa University, Department of Medicine, to identify biomarkers and characteristics of patients who benefit from ICI monotherapy.
    METHODS: Eighty-six patients with EC who received nivolumab monotherapy were included in the present study. Patient characteristics, efficacy, and safety were analyzed. A multivariable analysis evaluated the correlation among overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), best overall response (BOR), irAEs, and the following variables: sex, age, performance status (PS), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein (CRP) level, albumin level, and body-mass index before treatment.
    RESULTS: Median PFS was 3.1 months, and median OS was 9.0 months. In multivariable analysis, pretreatment PS, NLR, and sex were significantly correlated with OS and PFS. NLR <3.3 predicted longer survival (median OS 17.5 vs. 6.4 months for NLR ≥3.3; p<0.001). Median OS was 10.6 months for PS 0-1 and 1.3 months for PS 2-3 (p<0.001). NLR remained significantly predictive in the PS 0-1 group. The development of irAEs was significantly associated with increased OS and PFS.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low NLR and good PS before treatment may maximize the benefits of ICIs. A low NLR may be an indicator of higher immunocompetence for anti-tumor immunity, suggesting that NLR may be a convenient predictive biomarker in daily practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在KEYNOTE-024随机试验中证明了pembrolizumab在未治疗的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中的疗效。本系统文献综述的目的是确定和总结接受pembrolizumab单药治疗的先前未治疗的NSCLC患者的总生存期(OS)的真实世界证据(RWE)。在PubMed(MEDLINE®)和EMBASE数据库中进行系统搜索。分析的重点是生存数据(在特定时间点的中位OS和生存率)。为了探索与KEYNOTE-024研究相当的人群,我们专注于纳入至少50%的癌症IV期和ECOG表现状态0~2的患者的研究.总共确定了41项RWE研究,涵盖了7600多名未接受全身治疗的晚期NSCLC患者。总的来说,这些研究报告的生存结局差异很大(中位OS范围:3.0~34.6个月).大多数RWE研究报告的中位OS短于KEYNOTE-024(26.3个月),但如KEYNOTE-024试验(18.3-40.4个月)所报道,约一半的OS中位数在OS的95%置信区间范围内.具有与KEYNOTE-024试验相似的阶段和性能状态特征的患者在pembrolizumab单药治疗中受益相同,因为其生存结果(18.9-22.8个月)与临床试验中报告的结果一致。RWE数据显示,与ECOG-PS0-1患者相比,ECOG-PS2+患者的预后明显更差。
    The efficacy of pembrolizumab in the treatment-naïve non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was proved in the KEYNOTE-024 randomized trial. The aim of this systematic literature review was to identify and summarize the real world evidence (RWE) of overall survival (OS) in previously untreated patients with NSCLC receiving pembrolizumab monotherapy. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed (MEDLINE®) and EMBASE databases. Analyses were focused on survival data (median OS and survival rates at specific time points). To explore the population comparable with the KEYNOTE-024 study, we focused on studies enrolling at least 50% of patients at stage IV of cancer and ECOG performance status 0-2. A total of 41 RWE studies covering over 7600 advanced NSCLC patients naïve to systemic treatment were identified. Overall, survival outcomes reported in those studies vary considerably (median OS range: 3.0-34.6 months). Most RWE studies reported median OS shorter to that reported in KEYNOTE-024 (26.3 months), but about half of reported OS medians were in range of 95% confidence interval for OS as reported in KEYNOTE-024 trial (18.3-40.4 months). Patients with similar characteristics of stage and performance status to those of KEYNOTE-024 trial benefited the same with pembrolizumab monotherapy as their survival outcomes (18.9-22.8 months) were consistent with those reported in the clinical trial. RWE data showed substantially worse outcomes in patients with ECOG-PS 2+ compared to ECOG-PS 0-1 patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于食欲和蛋白质合成的增加,预计Anamorelin通过增加瘦体重(LBM)来改善癌症恶病质。然而,在现实世界的实践中,阿纳瑞林对癌症恶病质的影响尚不清楚.这项研究的目的是评估anamorelin的疗效和安全性,并确定anamorelin治疗疗效的预测因子。
    方法:我们回顾性分析了2021年5月至2022年8月期间接受化疗的癌症恶病质患者的数据。使用LBM评估anamorelin的疗效,对Anamorelin治疗的“12周持续有效反应”定义为LBM维持或增加12周。我们使用多变量逻辑模型,包括控制营养状况(CONUT)评分,研究了与Anamorelin治疗的“12周持续有效反应”相关的因素,对营养障碍的客观评估,和改良的格拉斯哥预后评分(mGPS),对癌症患者的恶病质状况进行评分。评估患者在开始阿纳瑞林治疗后与进食相关的主观生活质量(QOL)变化,我们使用问卷(QOL-ACD食欲相关项目:Q8,9,11)。根据不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)5.0版评价不良事件。
    结果:对40例患者的数据进行分析,23例患者对anamorelin表现出12周的持续有效反应(57.5%)。12周时,LBM显著增加1.63±3.73kg(平均值±SD)。多变量逻辑分析显示,CONUT得分较低与anamorelin治疗的“12周持续有效反应”显着相关(调整比值比:13.5,95%置信区间:2.2-84.2,P=0.004)。QOL评估显示,开始服用anamorelin后,食欲和进餐的趋势增加。5名患者(12.5%)在开始使用anamorelin后的12周内HbA1c升高超过1.0%。没有患者出现QT间期延长或3级或更高的肝转氨酶升高。
    结论:Anamorelin在接受化疗的癌性恶病质患者中可以维持或增加LBM,安全性可耐受。CONUT得分低,尽管符合癌症恶病质的标准,被建议作为阿纳瑞林疗效的预测因子,这表明CONUT评分较低的患者可能会从早期引入阿纳瑞林中获益。
    BACKGROUND: Anamorelin is expected to improve cancer cachexia by increasing lean body mass (LBM) due to increased appetite and protein synthesis. However, the effect of anamorelin on cancer cachexia in real-world practice is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anamorelin and to identify predictors of efficacy on treatment with anamorelin.
    METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with cancer cachexia treated with chemotherapy between May 2021 and August 2022. Efficacy of anamorelin was evaluated using LBM, with \"12-week sustained effective response\" to anamorelin treatment defined as maintenance or an increase in LBM for 12 weeks. We examined factors associated with \"12-week sustained effective response\" to anamorelin treatment using a multivariable logistic model that included controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, an objective assessment of nutritional disorders, and the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), which scores the cachexia status of cancer patients. To assess patient subjective quality of life (QOL) changes related to eating after starting anamorelin treatment, we used a questionnaire (QOL-ACD appetite-related items: Q8, 9, 11). Adverse events were evaluated in accordance with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0.
    RESULTS: On analysis of data from 40 patients, 23 patients showed a 12-week sustained effective response to anamorelin (57.5%). At 12 weeks, LBM significantly increased by 1.63 ± 3.73 kg (mean ± SD). Multivariable logistic analysis revealed that a low CONUT score was significantly associated with \"12-week sustained effective response\" to anamorelin treatment (adjusted odds ratio: 13.5, 95% confidence intervals: 2.2-84.2, P = 0.004). QOL assessment showed a trend toward increased appetite and enjoyment of meals after anamorelin initiation. Five patients (12.5%) had an increase in HbA1c of more than 1.0% during the 12 weeks after the start of anamorelin. No patient had QT interval prolongation or grade 3 or higher hepatic transaminase elevation.
    CONCLUSIONS: Anamorelin may maintain or increase LBM with tolerable safety in patients with cancer cachexia undergoing chemotherapy. A low CONUT score, despite meeting criteria for cancer cachexia, is suggested as a predictor for the efficacy of anamorelin, indicating that patients with a low CONUT score may benefit from early introduction of anamorelin.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在比较<75岁患者和≥75岁患者因胰头和壶腹周围区肿瘤行胰十二指肠切除术(PD)的术后结局。
    方法:评估了2019年2月至2023年12月在我院接受PD的患者。人口统计,东部肿瘤协作组绩效状态(ECOG-PS)得分,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分,合并症,住院,并发症,并对临床病理特征进行分析。将患者分为<75岁组(A组)和≥75岁组(B组)并进行比较。
    结果:整个队列(n=155)的中位年龄为66岁(IQR=16)。在ECOG-PS和ASA评分方面,A组(n=128)和B组(n=27)之间存在显着差异。两组之间在术后并发症方面没有显着差异。B组的30天死亡率更高(p=0.017)。B组的累积中位生存期为10个月,而A组的中位生存期为28个月,具有统计学上的显著差异(p<0.001)。当根据ECOG-PS对年龄组进行分层时,对于ECOG-PS2-3A组,生存期为15个月;对于ECOG-PS2-3B组,存活了八个月,差异无统计学意义(p=0.628)。
    结论:随着人口老龄化,PD患者的选择不应仅仅基于年龄.这项研究表明,PD对75岁以上的患者是安全的。在老年患者中,在决定候选人是否适合手术时,应考虑表现状况和合并症的优化。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes of < 75-year-old patients and ≥ 75-year-old patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic head and periampullary region tumors.
    METHODS: Patients who underwent PD in our hospital between February 2019 and December 2023 were evaluated. Demographics, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) scores, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, comorbidities, hospital stays, complications, and clinicopathological features were analyzed. Patients were divided into < 75 years (Group A) and ≥ 75 years (Group B) groups and compared.
    RESULTS: The median age of the entire cohort (n = 155) was 66 years (IQR = 16). There was a significant difference between Group A (n = 128) and Group B (n = 27) regarding the ECOG-PS and ASA scores. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding postoperative complications. The 30-day mortality rate was greater in Group B (p = 0.017). Group B had a cumulative median survival of 10 months, whereas Group A had a median survival of 28 months, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). When age groups were stratified according to ECOG-PS, for ECOG-PS 2-3 Group A, survival was 15 months; for ECOG-PS 2-3 Group B, survival was eight months, and the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.628).
    CONCLUSIONS: With the increasing aging population, patient selection for PD should not be based solely on age. This study demonstrated that PD is safe for patients older than 75 years. In older patients, performance status and the optimization of comorbidities should be considered when deciding on a candidate\'s suitability for surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于70岁以上患者活体肝移植(LDLT)的可行性的证据有限。这项研究的目的是评估老年受者的术后结局,并确定LDLT的潜在可行性和可接受性。
    数据来自762个收件人,其中老年组(≥70岁)26人,年轻组(<70岁)736人,甚至通过倾向得分匹配(PSM)进行审查。
    两组术后并发症的发生频率没有显着差异。此外,两组在LDLT后的30天死亡率相当(两者均为3.9%)和相似的住院时间(36天vs.40天)。1-,3-,老年组的5年移植物存活率为92.0%,这与年轻群体相当(p=0.517),由PSM确认。值得注意的是,所有老年患者的捐赠者都是接受者的孩子,平均年龄为41.6岁,未使用年龄≥50岁的供体移植物,表示使用高质量的移植物。我们对老年受者的纳入标准严格定义为ECOG-PS评分为0-2,这在实现良好的术后结局中起着关键作用。
    LDLT可以安全地用于70岁或以上的老年患者,只要他们有保存好的PS,并从年轻的捐赠者那里获得高质量的移植物,不可避免地所有老年接受者的孩子。这种方法产生可接受的长期结果。因此,仅年龄不应作为LDLT的绝对禁忌症。
    UNASSIGNED: There is limited evidence regarding the feasibility of living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for patients aged over 70. The aims of this study were to assess postoperative outcomes in elderly recipients and to ascertain the potential feasibility and acceptability of LDLT.
    UNASSIGNED: Data were collected from 762 recipients, including 26 in the elderly group (aged ≥70) and 736 in the younger group (aged <70), and reviewed even by propensity score matching (PSM).
    UNASSIGNED: No significant differences were observed in the frequency of postoperative complications between the two groups. Additionally, both groups exhibited a comparable 30-day mortality rate after LDLT (3.9% in both) and similar hospital stays (36 days vs. 40 days). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year graft survival rates in the elderly group were 92.0%, which was comparable to those in the younger group (p = 0.517), as confirmed by PSM. Notably, all donors for elderly patients were the children of the recipients, with an average age of 41.6 years, and grafts from donors aged ≥50 years were not utilized, signifying the use of high-quality grafts. Our inclusion criterion for elderly recipients was strictly defined as an ECOG-PS score of 0-2, which played a pivotal role in achieving favorable postoperative outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: LDLT can be performed safely for elderly patients aged 70 years or older, provided they have a preserved PS and receive high-quality grafts from younger donors, inevitably all children of elderly recipients. This approach yields acceptable long-term outcomes. Consequently, age alone should not serve as an absolute contraindication for LDLT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:在晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中,免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)单药治疗对于体弱患者和表现状态差(PS)的患者通常优于强化ICI治疗.在那些PS差的人中,虚弱对治疗选择和死亡率的额外影响尚不清楚.
    方法:从1/2019-12/2021接受一线ICI治疗晚期NSCLC的退伍军人事务国家精准肿瘤学计划的患者随访至死亡或研究结束6/2022。使用PS分层的逻辑回归检查了电子虚弱指数与治疗选择的关联。我们还使用PS分层的Cox回归检查了强化治疗的总生存期(OS)。强化治疗被定义为同时使用铂双联化疗和/或双检查点阻断,而非强化治疗为ICI单一疗法。
    结果:在接受任何ICI的1547名患者中,有66.2%的患者虚弱,33.8%的患者PS较差(≥2),和25.8%均。在两个PS亚组中,虚弱患者接受的强化治疗比非虚弱患者少(良好PS:比值比[OR]0.67,95%置信区间[CI]0.51-0.88;差PS:OR0.69,95%CI0.44-1.10)。在接受强化治疗的731名患者中,对于PS良好的人,虚弱与较低的OS相关(危险比[HR]1.53,95%CI1.2-1.96),但未观察到与PS不良相关(HR1.03,95%CI0.67-1.58)。
    结论:PS好和差的虚弱患者接受的强化治疗较少。然而,在PS较差的人群中,虚弱对生存的影响有限。这些发现表明,PS,不脆弱,通过强化治疗推动生存。
    OBJECTIVE: In advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy is often preferred over intensive ICI treatment for frail patients and those with poor performance status (PS). Among those with poor PS, the additional effect of frailty on treatment selection and mortality is unknown.
    METHODS: Patients in the veterans affairs national precision oncology program from 1/2019-12/2021 who received first-line ICI for advanced NSCLC were followed until death or study end 6/2022. Association of an electronic frailty index with treatment selection was examined using logistic regression stratified by PS. We also examined overall survival (OS) on intensive treatment using Cox regression stratified by PS. Intensive treatment was defined as concurrent use of platinum-doublet chemotherapy and/or dual checkpoint blockade and non-intensive as ICI monotherapy.
    RESULTS: Of 1547 patients receiving any ICI, 66.2% were frail, 33.8% had poor PS (≥ 2), and 25.8% were both. Frail patients received less intensive treatment than non-frail patients in both PS subgroups (Good PS: odds ratio [OR] 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51 - 0.88; Poor PS: OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.44 - 1.10). Among 731 patients receiving intensive treatment, frailty was associated with lower OS for those with good PS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.53, 95% CI 1.2 - 1.96), but no association was observed with poor PS (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.67 - 1.58).
    CONCLUSIONS: Frail patients with both good and poor PS received less intensive treatment. However, frailty has a limited effect on survival among those with poor PS. These findings suggest that PS, not frailty, drives survival on intensive treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的对表现状态(PS)较差的胰腺癌(PC)患者应用Anamorelin的疗效不确定,因为之前的试验已经排除了此类患者.这项研究评估了anamorelin在PS较差(2)的PC患者与PS良好(0-1)的患者中的疗效。方法我们回顾性分析了在我们机构接受anamorelin治疗的连续恶病质PC患者。主要结果是反应者的比例,定义为那些在12周内保持或增加体重和食欲的人。次要结果包括anamorelin治疗持续时间,在4周内停用anamorelin(早期停药)的患者比例,和总体生存率。结果45例(35/10)患者纳入本研究。PS差的患者的应答者比例明显低于PS好的患者(0%vs.37%,p=0.042)。中度体重减轻(5%-10%)和胰酶替代疗法的施用与对anamorelin的反应有关。PS差与Anamorelin治疗持续时间较短显著相关(14vs.93天,p<0.001),在4周内停用阿纳瑞林的患者比例更高(70%vs.17%,p=0.003),和存活率降低(62vs.188天,p<0.001)。PS不良与anamorelin的早期停药有关。结论Anamorelin对PS较差的PC患者的疗效极为有限。与PS良好的患者相比,PS较差的PC患者可能不是anamorelin的良好候选人。
    Objective The efficacy of anamorelin in pancreatic cancer (PC) patients with a poor performance status (PS) is uncertain, as previous trials have excluded such patients. This study evaluated the efficacy of anamorelin in PC patients with a poor PS (2) compared with those with a good PS (0-1). Methods We retrospectively reviewed consecutive PC patients with cachexia who received anamorelin at our institution. The primary outcome was the proportion of responders, defined as those who maintained or gained body weight and appetite over 12 weeks. The secondary outcomes included anamorelin treatment duration, proportion of patients who discontinued anamorelin within 4 weeks (early discontinuation), and the overall survival. Results Forty-five patients (35/10) were included in this study. The proportion of responders was significantly lower in patients with a poor PS than in those with a good PS (0% vs. 37%, p=0.042). Moderate weight loss (5%-10%) and administration of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy were associated with a response to anamorelin. A poor PS was significantly associated with a shorter treatment duration of anamorelin (14 vs. 93 days, p <0.001), a higher proportion of patients who discontinued anamorelin within 4 weeks (70% vs. 17%, p=0.003), and a reduced survival (62 vs. 188 days, p <0.001). A poor PS was associated with early discontinuation of anamorelin. Conclusions The efficacy of anamorelin is extremely limited in PC patients with a poor PS. Patients with PC with a poor PS may not be good candidates for anamorelin compared to those with a good PS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:快速癌症途径旨在加快肺癌的诊断和治疗,是诊断的首选途径。计划外入院(计划外途径)后的诊断与不良结局相关。
    目的:本研究探讨了计划外入院后与肺癌诊断相关的因素,关注老年人口。
    方法:一项回顾性队列研究,使用来自丹麦登记处的基于人群的数据。年龄等因素,合并症,性能状态,吸烟史,分析了社会经济参数和治疗方式与诊断和预后的关系。
    结果:在17,835名患者中,16%为老年人(≥80岁)。计划外路线占诊断路线的28%,老年人比例较高(33%)。不良表现状态和晚期疾病阶段与计划外途径有关。已婚患者不太可能接受计划外的诊断途径。吸烟对诊断途径没有显著影响。治愈性治疗和诊断后12个月死亡的校正比值比,非计划诊断途径为0.68(95%CI,0.61-0.76)和1.48(95%CI,1.36-1.61),分别。
    结论:除了不利的社会经济因素外,虚弱(表现不佳,共病负担较高),这些在老年患者中更为普遍,与接受计划外的诊断途径有关。然而,年龄本身不是。非计划入院后的诊断与治愈性治疗的可能性降低和预后较差相关。扩大筛查计划,将体弱的独居老人包括在内,加上初级保健临床医生的警觉性,有必要改善这些患者的预后。
    BACKGROUND: The fast-track cancer pathway aims to expedite diagnosis of lung cancer and treatment and is the preferred route to diagnosis. Diagnosis following an unplanned admission (unplanned route) has been associated with poor outcomes.
    OBJECTIVE: This study explores factors associated with lung cancer diagnosis following unplanned admissions, focusing on the elderly population.
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using population-based data from Danish registries. Factors such as age, comorbidity, performance status, smoking history, socioeconomic parameters and treatment modality were analyzed in relation to route to diagnosis and prognosis.
    RESULTS: Among 17,835 patients, 16% were elderly (≥ 80 years). The unplanned route constituted 28% of diagnostic routes, with higher proportion among the elderly (33%). Poor performance status and advanced disease stage were associated with the unplanned route. Married patients were less likely to undergo an unplanned route to diagnosis. Smoking did not significantly influence diagnostic route. The adjusted odds ratio for curative treatment and dying 12 months after diagnosis, following unplanned route to diagnosis were 0.68 (95% CI, 0.61-0.76) and 1.48 (95% CI, 1.36-1.61), respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Frailty (poor performance status and high burden of comorbidity) in addition to unfavorable socioeconomic factors, which all were more prevalent among elderly patients, were associated with undergoing an unplanned route to diagnosis. However, age itself was not. Diagnosis following unplanned admission correlated with reduced likelihood of curative treatment and poorer prognosis. Expanding screening initiatives to include frail elderly individuals living alone, along with alertness by primary care clinicians, is warranted to improve outcomes for these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:性能状态是肿瘤学中的一个重要概念,但通常是临床医生报告的。正在努力将患者报告的措施纳入癌症护理中,可以改善病人的症状,生活质量和总体生存率。这项研究的目的是初步了解患者如何根据东部肿瘤协作组绩效状态(ECOG)量表的新患者报告版本确定其身体表现状态。
    方法:我们进行了定性访谈,包括概念启发和认知访谈,作为身体功能研究的患者报告(PROPS)的一部分,以调查参与者如何选择他们对新的患者报告ECOG的答案。参与者接受了患者报告的ECOG,并要求他们描述用于保持日常活动的设备和修改。
    结果:参与者通常理解ECOG的意图。最近状态变化的参与者很难选择答案。大多数参与者在日常生活中使用修改和辅助设备,但并未将其纳入ECOG的理性。
    结论:患者报告的ECOG的潜在益处很多,本研究表明参与者能够按照预期理解和回答患者报告的ECOG。我们建议未来评估最合适的召回期,是否在ECOG指令中包括修改,如果增加患者报告的ECOG的应答选项的数量可能会提高提供答案时的信心。
    OBJECTIVE: Performance status is an important concept in oncology, but is typically clinician-reported. Efforts are underway to include patient-reported measures in cancer care, which may improve patient symptoms, quality of life and overall survival. The purpose of this study was to gain a preliminary understanding of how patients determined their physical performance status based on a novel patient-reported version of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG) scale.
    METHODS: We conducted qualitative interviews, including concept elicitation and cognitive interviewing as part of the Patient Reports of Physical Functioning Study (PROPS) to investigate how participants selected their answers to a novel patient-reported ECOG. Participants were administered the patient-reported ECOG and asked to describe devices and modifications used to keep up with daily activities.
    RESULTS: Participants generally understood the ECOG as intended. Participants with recent changes in status had some difficulty selecting an answer. Most participants used modifications and assistive devices in their daily lives but did not incorporate these into their rational for the ECOG.
    CONCLUSIONS: The potential benefits of a patient-reported ECOG are numerous and this study demonstrates that participants were able to understand and answer the patient-reported ECOG as intended. We recommend future evaluation for the most-appropriate recall period, whether to include modifications in the ECOG instructions, and if increasing the number of response options to the patient-reported ECOG may improve confidence when providing an answer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    神经系统疾病是全球残疾的主要原因之一。研究强调,康复干预的过程和有效性可能受到情绪因素的影响。本研究的目的是评估神经系统疾病患者中抑郁和焦虑症状的患病率,并检查抑郁和焦虑反应的趋势是否是这些患者残疾的预测因素。该研究包括229名55岁以上的神经系统疾病患者。我们的发现表明,与其他神经系统疾病患者相比,中风患者更容易出现抑郁症状,并且更容易表现出特质焦虑。高龄,女性性别,低教育水平和特质焦虑的存在与抑郁症状的严重程度有关。中风幸存者的ECOG表现得分明显较差,更有可能无法工作。抑郁和特质焦虑都是神经系统患者表现状况的重要预测因子,抑郁症状的存在是这些患者对生活满意度的决定因素。了解神经系统疾病患者表现较差的心理风险因素,将有可能计划预防性干预措施,以最大程度地减少对健康的负面影响并促进获得精神卫生机构。
    Neurological disorders are one of the leading causes of disability globally. Studies emphasise that the course and effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions may be influenced by emotional factors. The aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms in patients with neurological disorders and examine whether depression and tendency to respond with anxiety are predictors of disability in these patients. The study included 229 individuals with neurological disorders aged over 55. Our findings show that stroke patients are more likely to experience depressive symptoms and are more likely to display trait anxiety as compared with patients with other neurological disorders. Advanced age, female sex, low level of education and the presence of trait anxiety are associated with a higher severity of depressive symptoms. Stroke survivors have significantly poorer ECOG performance scores and are more likely to be incapable for work. Both depression and trait anxiety are significant predictors of neurological patients\' performance status, and the presence of depressive symptoms is a determinant of these patients\' level of satisfaction with life. An understanding of psychological risk factors for poorer performance status in individuals with neurological disorders will make it possible to plan prophylactic interventions in order to minimise negative health impacts and facilitate access to mental health facilities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号