Percutaneous techniques

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:强直性脊柱炎(AS)患者的脊柱骨折主要表现为不稳定,涉及脊柱的所有三列,手术干预通常被认为是必要的。然而,在AS患者中,骨结构和解剖结构的显著改变导致缺乏可识别的地标,增加了椎弓根螺钉植入的难度。因此,我们介绍了机器人辅助经皮内固定治疗AS患者胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效.
    方法:对12例确诊为AS的患者进行了回顾性分析。所有患者在2018年10月至2022年10月期间均患有胸腰椎骨折,并接受了后路机器人辅助经皮内固定手术。感兴趣的结果包括手术时间,术中失血,并发症,住院时间和骨折愈合。使用视觉模拟评分(VAS)和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评估临床结果。为了调查已实现的手术矫正,通过测量Cobb角分析术前和术后侧面的X光片。
    结果:12例患者的平均年龄为62.8±13.0岁,平均随访时间为32.7±18.9个月。平均住院时间为15±8.0天。平均手术时间119.6±32.2min,中位失血量为50(50,250)ml。VAS值从术前的6.8±0.9提高到末次随访时的1.3±1.0(P<0.05)。ODI值从术前的83.6±6.1%提高到最新随访的11.8±6.6%(P<0.05)。平均Cobb角由术前的15.2±11.0变为末次随访的8.3±7.1(P<0.05)。骨愈合始终如一,平均愈合时间为6(5.3,7.0)个月。在植入的108颗螺钉中,2(1.9%)定位不当。一名患者术后出现迟发性神经损伤,但出院后神经功能恢复正常.
    结论:后路机器人辅助经皮内固定可作为治疗AS患者胸腰椎骨折的理想手术方法。然而,而机器人辅助椎弓根螺钉的放置可以提高椎弓根螺钉插入的准确性,不应该仅仅依靠它。
    BACKGROUND: Spinal fractures in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) mainly present as instability, involving all three columns of the spine, and surgical intervention is often considered necessary. However, in AS patients, the significant alterations in bony structure and anatomy result in a lack of identifiable landmarks, which increases the difficulty of pedicle screw implantation. Therefore, we present the clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted percutaneous fixation for thoracolumbar fractures in patients with AS.
    METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted on a series of 12 patients diagnosed with AS. All patients sustained thoracolumbar fractures between October 2018 and October 2022 and underwent posterior robotic-assisted percutaneous fixation procedures. Outcomes of interest included operative time, intra-operative blood loss, complications, duration of hospital stay and fracture union. The clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). To investigate the achieved operative correction, pre- and postoperative radiographs in the lateral plane were analyzed by measuring the Cobb angle.
    RESULTS: The 12 patients had a mean age of 62.8 ± 13.0 years and a mean follow-up duration of 32.7 ± 18.9 months. Mean hospital stay duration was 15 ± 8.0 days. The mean operative time was 119.6 ± 32.2 min, and the median blood loss was 50 (50, 250) ml. The VAS value improved from 6.8 ± 0.9 preoperatively to 1.3 ± 1.0 at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). The ODI value improved from 83.6 ± 6.1% preoperatively to 11.8 ± 6.6% at the latest follow-up (P < 0.05). The average Cobb angle changed from 15.2 ± 11.0 pre-operatively to 8.3 ± 7.1 at final follow-up (P < 0.05). Bone healing was consistently achieved, with an average healing time of 6 (5.3, 7.0) months. Of the 108 screws implanted, 2 (1.9%) were improperly positioned. One patient experienced delayed nerve injury after the operation, but the nerve function returned to normal upon discharge.
    CONCLUSIONS: Posterior robotic-assisted percutaneous internal fixation can be used as an ideal surgical treatment for thoracolumbar fractures in AS patients. However, while robot-assisted pedicle screw placement can enhance the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion, it should not be relied upon solely.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评价后路长节段稳定术治疗无前路融合或截骨的强直性脊柱疾病(ASD)相关胸腰椎假关节的手术效果。
    方法:纳入12例ASD的胸腰椎假关节患者。所有患者均接受了后路长段稳定手术。在一些患者中,经皮技术或机器人或O形臂导航的辅助被用于椎弓根螺钉植入.通过视觉模拟评分(VAS)和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评估临床结果。评估骨融合的放射学结果,前柱缺损,局部后凸矫正(LK)和椎弓根螺钉的位置。
    结果:所有患者在假关节部位均经历了有效的骨融合。平均手术时间161.7±57.1分钟,平均失血量为305.8±293.2ml。对于六名在机器人或O形臂导航的帮助下接受手术的患者,与使用徒手技术的患者相比,手术时间和平均失血量无统计学意义(P>0.05)。VAS评分,ODI值,末次随访时,平均LK角有明显改善(P<0.05)。椎弓根螺钉置入的准确率为96%。
    结论:长节段固定的后路手术,没有前路融合或截骨术,ASD合并胸腰椎假关节的患者可以取得满意的疗效。经皮技术的应用,以及机器人或导航技术的辅助可能是治疗ASD患者假关节的好选择。
    The objective of this study was to evaluate the surgical effectiveness of posterior procedure with long segment stabilization for treating thoracolumbar pseudarthrosis associated with ankylosing spinal disorders (ASDs) without anterior fusion or osteotomy.
    Twelve patients with thoracolumbar pseudarthrosis in ASD were enrolled. All patients underwent posterior long-segment stabilization procedures. In some patients, the percutaneous technique or the aid of a robot or O-arm navigation was utilized for pedicle screw implantation. The clinical results were evaluated by means of the visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index. Radiological outcomes were evaluated for bone fusion, anterior column defect, local kyphotic correction, and position of the pedicle screws.
    All patients experienced effective bone fusion at the sites of pseudarthrosis. The mean operative time was 161.7 ± 57.1 minutes, and the average amount of blood loss was 305.8 ± 293.2 mL. For 6 patients who underwent surgery with the assistance of a robot or O-arm navigation, there was no statistically significant difference observed in terms of operative time and mean blood loss compared to those who used the freehand technique (P > 0.05). The visual analog scale score, Oswestry Disability Index value, and mean local kyphotic angle showed significant improvements at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was 96%.
    Posterior surgery with long-segment fixation, without anterior fusion or osteotomy, can achieve satisfactory outcomes in ASD patients with thoracolumbar pseudarthrosis. The application of percutaneous techniques, as well as the assistance of robots or navigation technique may be a good choice for the treatment of pseudarthrosis in ASD patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:化疗的广泛使用增加了对完全植入式静脉接入端口(TIVAP)的需求。以前,使用标志性技术的锁骨下穿刺入路是最常用的植入方法;然而,它与早期并发症有关,如气胸,血胸,动脉穿刺.因此,需要一种更安全的植入方法。这项研究旨在评估我们机构中使用的头静脉切开方法的安全性和有效性。
    方法:本研究包括在2018年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间使用头静脉切开方法进行TIVAP植入的患者。我们回顾性评估了技术成功率,操作次数,早期并发症。
    结果:这项研究包括221名成年患者(男性,129;妇女,92),平均年龄68±11岁。平均体重指数(BMI)为21±4kg/m2。共有213例(96.4%)患有需要化疗的恶性肿瘤。术后平均随访时间为659±442天(范围,5-1698天)。共有127例患者(57.5%)在随访期间死亡。技术成功率为86.4%(191/221)。有30次失败,其中24例改行锁骨下静脉穿刺入路。平均手术时间为53±21分钟。4例(1.8%)患者出现早期并发症,对应于0.028并发症/1,000导管天的发生率。一名患者意外动脉穿刺;然而,这不是头静脉切开法的结果,而是锁骨下静脉穿刺的次要结果.无气胸并发症,血胸,或采用头静脉切开法观察动脉穿刺。
    结论:这项研究表明,与常规穿刺技术相比,TIVAP的头静脉切开方法具有可接受的成功率和较少的早期并发症。
    BACKGROUND: The widespread use of chemotherapies has increased the need for totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAPs). Previously, the subclavian puncture approach with the landmark technique was the most used implantation method; however, it has been related to early complications such as pneumothorax, hemothorax, and arterial puncture. Therefore, a safer implantation method is required. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the cephalic vein cut-down method used in our institution.
    METHODS: Patients who underwent TIVAPs implantation using the cephalic vein cut-down method as the first choice between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020, were included in this study. We retrospectively evaluated the technical success rates, operation times, and early complications.
    RESULTS: This study included 221 adult patients (men, 129; women, 92), with a mean age of 68 ± 11 years. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 21 ± 4 kg/m2. A total of 213 patients (96.4%) had malignant tumors that required chemotherapy. The mean postoperative follow-up period was 659 ± 442 days (range, 5-1,698 days). A total of 127 patients (57.5%) died during the follow-up period. The technical success rate was 86.4% (191/221). There were 30 failures, 24 of which were converted to the subclavian vein puncture approach. The mean operation time was 53 ± 21 min. Early complications were observed in 4 (1.8%) patients, corresponding to an incidence of 0.028 complications/1,000 catheter days. One patient had an unintended arterial puncture; however, it was not a result of the cephalic vein cut-down method but a secondary result of the subclavian vein puncture. No complications of pneumothorax, hemothorax, or arterial puncture were observed with the cephalic vein cut-down method.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the cephalic vein cut-down method for TIVAPs had an acceptable success rate and fewer early complications than the conventional puncture techniques.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:根据世界卫生组织分类,研究1型和3a型囊性包虫病(CE)巨大囊肿(至少一个直径>10cm)的经皮治疗的有效性和安全性,并评估并发症的处理方法。尤其是胆管瘘(CBFs)。
    方法:这项回顾性研究包括2016年1月至2021年12月间接受经皮导管插入术治疗的66例CE1和CE3a巨大囊肿患者。囊肿的特点,主要和次要并发症,拔除导管的时间,并记录住院时间。
    结果:在68个囊肿中,CBF发生在35(51.5%),11例(16.1%),五个人的回忆(7.4%),和三个(4.5%)的过敏反应。没有死亡。术中观察到胆管引流的35个CBF囊肿中有20个(29.4%),仅在术后观察到15个(22.1%)。在35个CBF囊肿中的18个(51.5%)中放置了塑料胆道支架。与没有瘘管的患者相比,有CBFs的患者住院时间和导管拔除时间更长(15.3±10.9vs.6.1±2.6天和32.7±51.8天vs.6.2±3.1天,分别;P<0.001)。在回忆的病人中,三人接受二次导管插入术治疗,两人接受了手术。总的来说,三名患者接受了手术。临床成功率为95.4%。所有囊肿均随访平均19.1(范围,12-60)个月,与初始评估相比,囊肿体积平均减少88.8%。
    结论:CE1和CE3a巨大囊肿使用导尿技术可以有效和安全地治疗,具有很高的临床成功率。与以前报道的这些患者相反,CBF的比率很高,但是这些患者可以通过经皮引流和/或内镜逆行胰胆管造影术成功治疗,而无需手术。
    To investigate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous treatment in cystic echinococcosis (CE) type 1 and 3a giant cysts (with at least one diameter>10 cm) according to the World Health Organization classification and to evaluate the management of complications, especially cystobiliary fistulas (CBFs).
    This retrospective study included 66 patients with 68 CE1 and CE3a giant cysts treated with percutaneous catheterization between January 2016 and December 2021. The characteristics of the cysts, major and minor complications, time to catheter removal, and length of hospital stay were recorded.
    Among the 68 cysts, CBFs occurred in 35 (51.5%), cavity infections in 11 (16.1%), recollection in five (7.4%), and anaphylaxis in three (4.5%). There was no mortality. Biliary drainage was observed intraoperatively in 20 (29.4%) and only postoperatively in 15 (22.1%) of the 35 cysts with CBFs. A plastic biliary stent was placed in 18 (51.5%) of the 35 cysts with CBFs. The patients with CBFs had a longer hospital stay and time to catheter removal than those without fistulas (15.3 ± 10.9 vs. 6.1 ± 2.6 days and 32.7 ± 51.8 vs. 6.2 ± 3.1 days, respectively; P < 0.001). Of the patients who developed recollection, three were treated with secondary catheterization, and two underwent surgery. In total, three patients underwent surgery. The rate of clinical success was 95.4%. All cysts were followed up for an average of 19.1 (range, 12-60) months, and there was an average 88.8% reduction in cyst volume compared to the initial evaluation.
    CE1 and CE3a giant cysts can be treated effectively and safely with high clinical success using the catheterization technique. Contrary to what has previously been reported for these patients, the rate of CBFs is high, but these patients can successfully be treated with percutaneous drainage and/or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography without the requirement of surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于介入心脏病学技术的进步,导管导向治疗已成为近期治疗急性肺栓塞患者早期死亡风险高的可行治疗选择.当前的经导管技术允许局部纤维蛋白溶解或栓子切除术,而并发症的风险最小。因此,当全身溶栓禁忌或无效时,在高危患者中可以考虑将这些手术作为外科肺栓子切除术的替代方法.在尽管抗凝治疗但临床上没有改善或恶化的中度高危肺栓塞患者中也考虑了它们。本文的目的是介绍经导管技术在治疗急性肺栓塞患者中的作用。我们描述了该领域的当前知识和专家意见。在患者护理组织和治疗方式的更广泛背景下描述了介入治疗。我们介绍肺栓塞反应小组的组织和职责,术前成像的作用,围手术期抗凝,患者选择,干预的时机,和重症监护支持。详细讨论了当前可用的导管定向治疗,包括标准化协议以及程序成功和失败的定义。该专家意见是与波兰各科学学会的专家合作制定的,这突出了团队合作在护理急性肺栓塞患者中的作用。
    Thanks to advances in interventional cardiology technologies, catheter-directed treatment has become recently a viable therapeutic option in the treatment of patients with acute pulmonary embolism at high risk of early mortality. Current transcatheter techniques allow for local fibrinolysis or embolectomy with minimal risk of complications. Therefore, these procedures can be considered in high-risk patients as an alternative to surgical pulmonary embolectomy when systemic thrombolysis is contraindicated or ineffective. They are also considered in patients with intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism who do not improve or deteriorate clinically despite anticoagulation. The purpose of this article is to present the role of transcatheter techniques in the treatment of patients with acute pulmonary embolism. We describe current knowledge and expert opinions in this field. Interventional treatment is described in the broader context of patient care organization and therapeutic modalities. We present the organization and responsibilities of pulmonary embolism response team, role of pre-procedural imaging, periprocedural anticoagulation, patient selection, timing of intervention, and intensive care support. Currently available catheter-directed therapies are discussed in detail including standardized protocols and definitions of procedural success and failure. This expert opinion has been developed in collaboration with experts from various Polish scientific societies, which highlights the role of teamwork in caring for patients with acute pulmonary embolism.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于经皮微波消融(MWA)或射频消融(RFA)在极早期或早期(BCLA0或A)肝细胞癌(HCC)中的优越性,文献中提供了对比数据。
    主要结果是比较RFA和MWA在早期和非常早期HCC肝硬化患者中实现完全反应的功效。次要结果是评估总生存率和复发率。
    回顾,观察,进行单中心研究.纳入标准为肝硬化,新诊断为单个结节的HCC,最大直径为50mm或最多三个直径为35mm的结节。用RFA或MWA治疗。在热消融后5-7周,使用多相对比增强计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像评估放射学反应。当治疗后未检测到重要组织时,定义了完全反应。
    总的来说,251例HCC患者纳入本研究;81例患者接受MWA治疗,170例接受RFA治疗。MWA和RFA组的完全缓解率相似(331个结节中,87.5%(91/104)用MWA治疗,84.2%(186/221)用RFA治疗,p=0.504)。有趣的是,一项子分析表明,对于21-35毫米的结节,使用MWA获得完全缓解的概率几乎是RFA的5倍(OR=4.88,95%CI1.37-17.31,p=0.014).此外,关于MWA,RFA在21-35毫米结节中的复发率较高(31.9%对13.5%,p=0.019)。用MWA治疗时的总生存率为80.4%(45/56),用RFA治疗时的总生存率为62.2%(56/90)(p=0.027)。在15-20mm结节组中,MWA和RFA治疗之间没有观察到显着差异。
    这项研究表明,在直径为21至35mm的HCC结节中,MWA比RFA更有效。
    Contrasting data are available in the literature regarding the superiority of percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in very early or early (BCLA 0 or A) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
    The primary outcome was to compare the efficacy of RFA and MWA in achieving complete response in cirrhotic patients with early and very early HCC. The secondary outcomes were to evaluate the overall survival and the recurrence rate.
    A retrospective, observational, single-center study was performed. Inclusion criteria were liver cirrhosis, new diagnosis of a single node of HCC measuring a maximum of 50 mm or up to three nodules with diameter up to 35 mm, treatment with RFA or MWA. Radiological response was evaluated with multiphasic contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 5-7 weeks after thermal ablation. Complete response was defined when no vital tissue was detected after treatment.
    Overall, 251 HCC patients were included in this study; 81 patients were treated with MWA and 170 with RFA. The complete response rate was similar in MWA and RFA groups (out of 331 nodules, 87.5% (91/104) were treated with MWA and 84.2% (186/221) were treated with RFA, p = 0.504). Interestingly, a subanalysis demonstrated that for 21-35 mm nodules, the probability to achieve a complete response using MWA was almost 5 times higher than for RFA (OR = 4.88, 95% CI 1.37-17.31, p = 0.014). Moreover, recurrence rate in 21-35 mm nodules was higher with RFA with respect to MWA (31.9% versus 13.5%, p = 0.019). Overall survival was 80.4% (45/56) when treated with MWA and 62.2% (56/90) when treated with RFA (p = 0.027). No significant difference was observed between MWA and RFA treatment in the 15-20 mm nodules group.
    This study showed that MWA is more efficient than RFA in achieving complete response in HCC nodules with 21 to 35 mm diameter.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The seismic impact of transcatheter interventions is rocking the spectrum of structural heart disease (SHD) treatment, with the compelling and attractive appeal of minimally invasive procedures and fast-track discharge. The trend is relentless and continual innovation comes to our doors nearly on a daily basis. Litwinowicz and colleagues describe their trailblazing experience in 223 consecutive patients in whom they performed left atrial appendage occlusion via the percutaneous route. All interventions were performed by surgeons, who had undergone pretraining in a simulation model. Soon thereafter, they were able to achieve outcomes that were comparable with those obtained by experienced interventional cardiologists. The unique surgeons\' training and skills in open-heart surgery make their contribution to perfection and safety of SHD treatment, which are potentially exceptional and distinctive. Extrapolating for the entire field of SHD, which is blossoming ahead, the message to be conveyed is that cardiac surgeons must be trained and embrace every aspect of SHD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and follow-up results of the percutaneous treatment of cystic echinococcosis (CE) patients with giant hepatic cysts (at least one diameter > 10 cm).
    METHODS: Between January 2013 and 2018, 31 CE patients with 34 giant cysts classified as CE1 or CE3a (Gharbi type 1 or 2) according to the World Health Organization criteria and treated with the catheterization technique were analyzed retrospectively.
    RESULTS: Thirty-four giant hepatic cysts were treated using the catheterization technique. Technical success was 100%. One procedure was sufficient for 27 of these cysts, while six patients underwent a second procedure due to recurrence, recollection or complications; one did not accept a repeat procedure and decided to refer to surgery due to pain. Ten (29%) major complications developed. The overall clinical success was 97%. The mean follow-up period was 20 months (5-61 months), and the total reduction in the cyst volume was 92%.
    CONCLUSIONS: The catheterization technique is effective in treating giant CE with acceptable complication rates.
    METHODS: Level 4, Clinical Investigation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Left main percutaneous coronary intervention is an acceptable alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting, and in experienced hands, excellent procedural results can be obtained. A systematic approach to stenting and meticulous attention to detail are required. For most lesions, a single-stent provisional approach is sufficient, but for the more complex lesion, a 2-stent technique is required. Herein, the optimal approach to left main lesion assessment and percutaneous intervention is described.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Evaluation Study
    BACKGROUND: A high percentage of older patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are potential candidates for percutaneous ablation.
    METHODS: We prospectively assessed data from patients older than 70 years with HCC. We determined their demographic and clinical characteristics, the treatment provided and the response, complications and survival among those treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and/or percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI).
    RESULTS: Of 194 patients with HCC, 84 were older than 70 years (43.3%). The mean age was 76.8 ± 4.5 years. Seventy-five percent were male and 91.7% had cirrhosis. Cancer was initially identified by a surveillance program in 61.9%. According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging system, 60.7% were classified as having early stage cancer (0-A), 19% as stage B, 12% as stage C, and 8.3% as stage D. Potentially curative initial treatment was provided in 38.2% (surgical resection in 4.8%, PEI in 22.6%, RFA in 4.8%, PEI+RFA in 6%), transarterial chemoembolization in 20.2%, and sorafenib in 3.6%. Twenty-five percent of patients were not treatment candidates and 13% refused the recommended treatment. The median follow-up after percutaneous ablation was 23 months (IQR 14.2-40.6). The mean number of sessions was 3.5 ± 2.2 for PEI and 1.8 ± 1.6 for RFA. The complications rate per session was 4%. Remission was achieved in 35.7%. The overall median survival was 45.7 months (95% CI 20.8-70.6).
    CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of the patients with HCC in our sample were elderly and more than half were diagnosed at an early stage. Percutaneous ablation was performed in one-third of the sample, achieving remission in 37.5%. There were few complications. Therefore, these patients should be assessed for percutaneous ablation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号