Bullous pemphigoid affects people who are usually very frail, because they are very old and frequently have neurological co-morbidities. Over the past twenty years, therapeutic management has improved thanks to the application of highly potent corticosteroid-based creams, following a well-established regimen, for several months. Well-conducted nursing care is therefore essential not only to cover wounds, but also to treat the disease. Dedicated nursing time is also an opportunity to provide support to patients, who are often very uncomfortable.

Bullous pemphigoid is an autoimmune bullous cutaneous disease. We report the case of a 60 year-old male patient whose kidney allograft failed and was on hemodialysis for the previous 16 months. After tapering immunosuppressive medication, he presented simultaneous bullous eruption and kidney allograft intolerance syndrome. Investigation showed a positive BP180 anti-basement membrane zone antibody and skin biopsy was consistent with bullous pemphigoid. The patient was treated with corticotherapy and bullous pemphigoid resolved. The development of new onset diabetes and concerns over long term immunosuppression, halted the decision to continue corticotherapy and the patient underwent graft nephrectomy, with resolution of the kidney allograft intolerance syndrome without recurrence of the bullous disease. The occurrence of bullous pemphigoid in patients with failed renal allograft is rare, with only eleven cases reported in literature. This case illustrates how graft nephrectomy can provide a definitive cure to bullous pemphigoid in this setting.

BACKGROUND: Radiation therapy may cause a range of side effects of the skin within the irradiated area. Not of all the reactive effects of the skin induced by radiation therapy have to be related to some forms of radiodermatitis, and when non-standard clinical presentations overcome, it may be necessary to undertake appropriate diagnostic tools to not be in trap of wrong diagnosis.
UNASSIGNED: A 76 years-old man undertook resection surgery after a neoadjuvant radiation therapy for a soft tissue sarcoma of his groin region. After surgery, he developed an acute skin reaction comparable with a severe form of radiodermatitis. Despite cares, his clinical status got worse. Only skin biopsies guided us to the right diagnosis: it was a form of a bullous pemphigoid induced by radiation therapy. The consequent appropriate treatment was finally resolute.
CONCLUSIONS: These forms have to be recognized in time, to undertake skin biopsies as soon as an evocative clinical presentation appears. The appropriate treatment, which consists in local or systemic corticotherapy, is resolute in most cases.

The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (monoclonal antibodies targeting PD-1/PD-L1 or CTLA-4) represents a significant advance in the treatment of multiple cancers. Given their particular mechanism of action, which involves triggering CD4+/CD8+ T-cell activation and proliferation, they are associated with a specific safety profile. Their adverse events are primarily immune-related, and can affect practically all organs. In this context, dermatological toxicity is the most common, though it mostly remains mild to moderate and does not require discontinuation of treatment. More than a third of patients are faced with cutaneous adverse events, usually in the form of a maculopapular rash, pruritus or vitiligo (only in patients treated for melanoma). Much more specific dermatologic disorders, however, may occur such as lichenoid reactions, induced psoriasis, sarcoidosis, auto-immune diseases (bullous pemphigoid, dermatomyositis, alopecia areata), acne-like rash, xerostomia, etc. Rigorous dermatological evaluation is thus mandatory in the case of atypical, persistent/recurrent or severe lesions. In this article, we review the incidence and spectrum of dermatologic adverse events reported with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Finally, a management algorithm is proposed.

On a therapeutic point of view, 2017 in dermatology could be summarized in one disease, one pathway and in one number : atopic dermatitis, JAK inhibitors and 23. 2017 will be the year of the first registration of a biologic treatment in atopic dermatitis, dupilumab, with numerous other drugs currently in development. JAK inhibitors show promising results in several difficult-to-treat conditions, such as alopecia areata, vitiligo or atopic dermatitis, but still warrant confirmation in upcoming controlled trials. Monoclonal antibodies targeting IL-23 have confirmed in phase III studies their great efficacy in controlling psoriasis and will be soon available in practice, illustrating well the optimal link between bench side and bed in this emblematic inflammatory dermatological condition.

BACKGROUND: The inflammatory myopathies are a heterogeneous group of muscle diseases and comprise polymyositis, dermatomyositis (DM), myopathies associated with cancers, necrotising myositis and inclusion body myositis. DM occasionally exhibits few or no muscular signs: i.e. hypomyopathic/amyopathic DM. Anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis (DM) is a rare form of dermatomyositis that is frequently amyopathic; the prognosis is linked mainly to pulmonary involvement.
METHODS: A 69-year-old woman treated for mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) gastric lymphoma was referred for a bullous eruption. Based on the investigations performed, a diagnosis was made of bullous pemphigoid. At the same time, amyopathic dermatomyositis was discovered together with interstitial lung disease. Systemic steroids were introduced in combination with rituximab. A favourable outcome was achieved.
CONCLUSIONS: Anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis must be considered systematically in all cases of pulmonary involvement associated with cutaneous signs of dermatomyositis, in which no muscular involvement is generally seen. This condition accounts for up to 7% of DM and carries a severe prognosis due to pulmonary involvement.

BACKGROUND: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) mainly affects elderly patients. It is often associated with neurological disorders, which constitute a major risk factor of the disease. The aim of our study was to determine whether neurological disorders, particularly dementia, influence outcome and mortality in BP patients.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of all patients with BP seen in our dermatology department consecutively between 1997 and 2011. Clinical, immunological and therapeutic data, number of relapses and survival status were compared according to the presence at diagnosis of neurological disorders, particularly dementia.
RESULTS: Among the 178 patients included, an associated neurological disease was present in 84 (47.2%) and dementia in 43 (24.2%) at the time of diagnosis of BP. Patients with associated dementia were older and had a lower Karnofsky index. Sixty-four patients (37.8%) had had at least one clinical relapse of BP, chiefly within the first 18 months after starting therapy. Coexistent neurological disease was not associated with BP relapse (P=0.55) contrary to an extensive BP phenotype at diagnosis (P=0.008). Coexistent neurological disease and/or dementia were associated with higher mortality (P=0.03 and P<0.001, respectively), but did not modify the type or the total duration of BP treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: A coexistent neurological disease or dementia at the time of diagnosis of BP significantly increase the risk of mortality and shortens the duration of clinical follow-up of patients with BP, thus limiting the analysis of their influence on the outcome of BP itself.

The broncho-pulmonary small cell carcinoma is the most common cancer provider paraneoplastic syndrome especially neurological and endocrine but also cutaneous syndrome. Paraneoplastic dermatosis do not result from a direct extension of cancer and are not metastases, but their presence is suggestive of an underlying tumor. The evolution of the dermatosis is parallel to that of cancer: treating cancer results in the regression of cutaneous manifestations. We report an observation of a 44-year-old smoker, who was hospitalized for a tissue excavated process associated with bullous dermatosis. The transmural puncture biopsy finds small cell carcinoma. The skin biopsy objective bullous pemphigoid. The evolution under chemotherapy was marked regression of bullous lesions and the patient died later after metastatic extension. Cutaneous paraneoplastic syndrome appears only in a minority of cancer patients, but its recognition is very important for early diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Anti-p200 pemphigoid is a recently described autoimmune subepidermal bullous dermatosis characterized by its target antigen and the associated anatomoclinical picture. The treatment is not as yet well defined.
METHODS: A 73-year-old man consulted for a pruritic bullous eruption with buccal involvement. Direct immunofluorescence revealed linear deposits of IgG and C3 at the dermal-epidermal junction. Elisa screening for circulating anti-BP180 and anti-BP230 antibodies was negative. A diagnosis of bullous pemphigoid was suspected. After an unfavourable clinical outcome under clobetasol and then prednisolone and methotrexate, other immunological tests were performed. Indirect immunofluorescence on NaCl-cleaved skin revealed a deposit of IgG4 antibodies on the dermal side. Immunoblotting showed antibodies directed against a 200-kDa antigen on a dermal extract. A diagnosis of anti-p200 pemphigoid was made. The patient was treated with dapsone combined with prednisolone. Seventy-two hours later, treatment was stopped due to hepatic cytolysis related to immunoallergic hepatitis. Treatment with mycophenolate mofetil was then initiated and resulted in complete remission, which persisted at seven months.
CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of anti-p200 pemphigoid was made on the basis of a set of clinical and immunological factors. Anti-p200 pemphigoid differs from standard bullous pemphigoid in terms of more frequent cephalic, acral and mucous membrane involvement, as well as a greater degree of miliary scarring. There was no eosinophilia. Elisa screening for anti-BP180 and anti-BP230 antibodies was negative. Immunoblotting showed antibodies directed against a 200kDa protein on dermal extract. The treatment is not well defined, even if dapsone appears to be the most effective therapy. To our knowledge, our patient is the first to be successfully treated with mycophenolate mofetil.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of anti-p200 pemphigoid is difficult. In our case, treatment by mycophenolate mofetil was effective and could offer an alternative to dapsone.

Autoimmune blistering diseases are characterized by the production of pathogenic autoantibodies that are responsible for the formation of epidermal blisters. Major advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of these disorders have allowed the development of new therapeutic agents. Recent epidemiologic data showed that bullous pemphigoid mainly affects elderly patients. Bullous pemphigoid is often associated with degenerative neurologic disorders. A major increase in the incidence of bullous pemphigoid has been observed in France. Treatment of bullous pemphigoid is mainly based on superpotent topical corticosteroids. The role of desmosomal proteins has been demonstrated in the initiation, propagation and persistence of the autoimmune response in pemphigus. Several studies have shown a correlation between anti-desmoglein antibody titers and disease activity. Pemphigus susceptibility genes have been identified. Oral corticosteroids remain the mainstay of pemphigus treatment. Dramatic and long-lasting improvement has been recently obtained with rituximab in recalcitrant types of pemphigus. Other autoimmune junctional blistering diseases are rare entities, whose prognosis can be severe. Their diagnosis has been improved by the use of new immunological assays and immunoelectronic microscopy. Immunosupressants are widely used in severe types in order to prevent mucosal sequelae.