暂无摘要。

The Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium (PFDC) is a multidisciplinary organization of colorectal surgeons, urogynecologists, urologists, gynecologists, gastroenterologists, radiologists, physiotherapists, and other advanced care practitioners. Specialists from these fields are all dedicated to the diagnosis and management of patients with pelvic floor conditions, but they approach, evaluate, and treat such patients with their own unique perspectives given the differences in their respective training. The PFDC was formed to bridge gaps and enable collaboration between these specialties. The goal of the PFDC is to develop and evaluate educational programs, create clinical guidelines and algorithms, and promote high quality of care in this unique patient population. The recommendations included in this article represent the work of the PFDC Working Group on Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Pelvic Floor Disorders (members listed alphabetically in Table 1). The objective was to generate inclusive, rather than prescriptive, guidance for all practitioners, irrespective of discipline, involved in the evaluation and treatment of patients with pelvic floor disorders.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of anterior osteotomy in the restoration of normal pelvic floor anatomy in classic bladder exstrophy repair using pelvic floor MRI as an imaging tool for evaluation.
METHODS: This study is a pilot prospective randomized controlled study that included 20 infants with classic bladder exstrophy older than three months with no history of previous surgical operations. All patients underwent complete primary repair and were randomized into two groups, with or without osteotomy. Both groups were assessed preoperatively & postoperatively after three months with pelvic floor MRI and compared to age & gender-matched control group infants with normal pelvic anatomy infants who underwent pelvic MRI for other medical conditions.
RESULTS: There was not any significant statistical difference between osteotomy and non-osteotomy groups in pre-operative demographic data and all pelvic floor MRI measurements, emphasizing that both groups were equal in all characters at the start point of the study before the operation. The mean change difference between pre-operative and post-operative pelvic floor MRI measurements were compared in both groups, and there was not any significant statistical difference in all pelvic floor MRI measurements. Both groups showed the same statistical significance when compared with the control group in all pelvic floor MRI measurements except the posterior bladder neck distance, which was in favor of the osteotomy group, closer to the normal pelvic floor anatomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Anterior osteotomy did not have a significant difference in the restoration of the normal pelvic floor anatomy when combined with complete primary repair of classic bladder exstrophy in newly diagnosed neonates older than three months, except for a single measurement, posterior bladder neck distance. Future studies needed to determine the effect of osteotomy on continence.

暂无摘要。