Pelvic abscess

盆腔脓肿
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    常染色体显性显性高免疫球蛋白E(IgE)综合征是一种罕见的先天性免疫错误,影响全世界大约百万分之一的个体。由于多系统参与(免疫和非免疫),它表现出各种症状。反复感染(主要在皮肤和肺部)是常见的表现。一名5岁的中东男孩出现症状,提示继发于多发性大骨盆腹部脓肿和急性肾损伤伴高钾血症的阻塞性尿路病,因此需要进入重症监护病房。经进一步调查,患者的基因检测(全外显子组测序)显示STAT3基因存在杂合错义变异.患者完全康复,开始预防性抗生素后不需要进一步入院。尽管深部感染在STAT3高IgE综合征中并不常见,最常见的是皮肤和肺部感染。可能发生多个深度收集,需要及时干预和积极治疗。
    Autosomal dominant hyper immunoglobulin E (IgE) syndrome is a rare inborn error of immunity that affects approximately one in a million individuals worldwide. It presents with various symptoms owing to multisystem involvement (immunological and non-immunological). Recurrent infections (mainly in the skin and lungs) are common presentations. A 5-year-old Middle Eastern boy presented with symptoms suggestive of obstructive uropathy secondary to multiple large pelviabdominal abscesses and acute kidney injury with hyperkalemia that necessitated admission to the intensive care unit. Upon further investigation, the patient\'s genetic test (whole exome sequencing) demonstrated a heterozygous missense variant in the STAT3 gene. The patient completely recovered and did not require further admission after initiating prophylactic antibiotics. Although deep-seated infections are uncommon in STAT3 hyper IgE syndrome, skin and lung infections are most commonly observed. Multiple deep collections can occur and require prompt intervention and aggressive treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项工作的目的是研究左结肠憩室炎患者术后早期吻合口漏或盆腔脓肿(AL/PA)与症状性吻合口狭窄(SAS)之间的关系。
    方法:这是一项由FrançaisedeChirurgie协会进行的全国性憩室炎手术患者队列研究的回顾性研究。使用路径分析进行评估。该数据库包括7053名接受结肠憩室炎手术的患者,选择性或在紧急情况下进行手术,通过开放式或腹腔镜检查。从研究分析中排除存在(i)右侧憩室炎的患者(初始数据库包括所有连续接受结肠憩室炎手术的患者),(ii)在第一次手术期间未进行吻合或(iii)缺少有关狭窄的信息,术后脓肿或吻合口漏。
    结果:在纳入最终分析的4441例患者中,327例(4.6%)发生AL/PA,82例(1.8%)发生SAS。AL/PA是与SAS发生风险相关的独立因素(OR=3.41,95%CI=1.75-6.66)。与分流造口≥100天的情况一样(OR=2.77,95%CI=1.32-5.82),而肠系膜下动脉近端中心血管结扎与风险降低相关(OR=0.41;95%CI=0.19~0.88).造口分流<100天或≥100天也是与AL/PA风险相关的因素(OR=3.08,95%CI=2-4.75,OR=12.95,95%CI=9.11-18.50)。有趣的是,AL/PA和SAS的放射引流或手术治疗之间没有显著关联.
    结论:AL/PA是与SAS风险相关的独立因素。AL/PA的治疗与吻合口狭窄的发生无关。分流造口与AL/PA和SAS的风险增加相关。特别是如果它被放置≥100天。医生必须了解这些信息,以便在择期或紧急手术期间创建造口时决定最佳行动方案。
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to investigate the association between early postoperative anastomotic leakage or pelvic abscess (AL/PA) and symptomatic anastomotic stenosis (SAS) in patients after surgery for left colonic diverticulitis.
    METHODS: This is a retrospective study based on a national cohort of diverticulitis surgery patients carried out by the Association Française de Chirurgie. The assessment was performed using path analyses. The database included 7053 patients operated on for colonic diverticulitis, with surgery performed electively or in an emergency, by open access or laparoscopically. Patients were excluded from the study analysis where there was (i) right-sided diverticulitis (the initial database included all consecutive patients operated on for colonic diverticulitis), (ii) no anastomosis was performed during the first procedure or (iii) missing information about stenosis, postoperative abscess or anastomotic leakage.
    RESULTS: Of the 4441 patients who were included in the final analysis, AL/PA occurred in 327 (4.6%) and SAS occurred in 82 (1.8%). AL/PA was a significant independent factor associated with a risk for occurrence of SAS (OR = 3.41, 95% CI = 1.75-6.66), as was the case for diverting stoma for ≥100 days (OR = 2.77, 95% CI = 1.32-5.82), while central vessel ligation proximal to the inferior mesenteric artery was associated with a reduced risk (OR = 0.41; 95% CI = 0.19-0.88). Diverting stoma created for <100 days or ≥100 days was also a factor associated with a risk for AL/PA (OR = 3.08, 95% CI = 2-4.75 and OR = 12.95, 95% CI = 9.11-18.50). Interestingly, no significant association between radiological drainage or surgical management of AL/PA and SAS could be highlighted.
    CONCLUSIONS: AL/PA was an independent factor associated with the risk for SAS. The treatment of AL/PA was not associated with the occurrence of anastomotic stenosis. Diverting stoma was associated with an increased risk of both AL/PA and SAS, especially if it was left for ≥100 days. Physicians must be aware of this information in order to decide on the best course of action when creating a stoma during elective or emergency surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在比较低Hartmann手术(LHP)和腹部手术切除(APR)对直肠癌(RC)术后并发症的影响。
    方法:回顾性纳入2015年至2019年在本中心接受根治性LHP或APR的RC患者。收集并分析患者的人口统计学和手术信息。使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来平衡基线信息。主要结果是主要并发症的发生率。所有统计分析均通过SPSS22.0和R进行。
    结果:主要包括342名个体,PSM后保留134名,比例为1:2(LHP为50,APR为84)。LHP组患者肿瘤高度较高(P<0.001)。两组的主要并发症发生率无显著差异(6.0%vs.1.2%,P=0.290),和严重的盆腔脓肿(2%vs.0%,P=0.373)。然而,LHP组轻微并发症的发生率明显高于对照组(52%vs.21.4%,P<0.001),差异主要在于腹部伤口感染(10%vs.0%,P=0.006)和肠梗阻(16%vs.4.8%,P=0.028)。在多因素分析中,LHP不是盆腔脓肿的独立危险因素。
    结论:我们的数据表明,LHP和APR之间的主要并发症发生率相当。当不建议进行初次吻合时,LHP仍然是选定的RC患者的可靠替代方法。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare low Hartmann\'s procedure (LHP) with abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer (RC) regarding postoperative complications.
    METHODS: RC patients receiving radical LHP or APR from 2015 to 2019 in our center were retrospectively enrolled. Patients\' demographic and surgical information was collected and analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline information. The primary outcome was the incidence of major complications. All the statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 22.0 and R.
    RESULTS: 342 individuals were primarily included and 134 remained after PSM with a 1:2 ratio (50 in LHP and 84 in APR). Patients in the LHP group were associated with higher tumor height (P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between the two groups for the incidence of major complications (6.0% vs. 1.2%, P = 0.290), and severe pelvic abscess (2% vs. 0%, P = 0.373). However, the occurrence rate of minor complications was significantly higher in the LHP group (52% vs. 21.4%, P < 0.001), and the difference mainly lay in abdominal wound infection (10% vs. 0%, P = 0.006) and bowel obstruction (16% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.028). LHP was not the independent risk factor of pelvic abscess in the multivariate analysis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrated a comparable incidence of major complications between LHP and APR. LHP was still a reliable alternative in selected RC patients when primary anastomosis was not recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    在急性感染的情况下,阴道袖口裂开(VCD)是一种罕见但严重的全子宫切除术并发症,没有明确的治疗指南。有必要进一步记录有关治疗的最佳做法,特别是当它涉及到外科引流利用和放置。
    我们介绍了一例68岁的原发性腹膜癌患者,该患者接受了机器人辅助的全腹腔镜子宫切除术,作为间隔切除手术的一部分,并进行了VCD。在手术室中阴道修复了袖带,并放置了Malecot导管进行骨盆脓肿引流。
    关于VCD管理的明确指南,文献很少。手术和预期管理方法取决于患者的稳定性,手术经验,当地实践规范,以及腹内损伤的证据.介入放射学已成为治疗VCD和阴道袖带脓肿的主要引流源。Malecot排水管成本低,以及对此类管理的有效干预,是妇科医生的重要资源。
    UNASSIGNED: Vaginal cuff dehiscence (VCD) in the setting of acute infection is an uncommon but serious complication of total hysterectomy without clear guidelines for management. There is a need for further documentation of best practices around treatment, particularly when it comes to surgical drain utilization and placement.
    UNASSIGNED: We present a case of a 68-year-old with primary peritoneal carcinoma who underwent a robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy as part of an interval debulking surgery and had a VCD. The cuff was repaired vaginally in the operating room with placement of a Malecot catheter for pelvic abscess drainage.
    UNASSIGNED: The literature is sparse in regard to clear guidelines for management of VCD. Surgical and expectant management approaches are dependent on patient stability, surgical experience, local practice norms, and evidence of intra-abdominal injury. Interventional radiology has become a primary source of drain placement in management of VCD and vaginal cuff abscess. Malecot drains are a low cost, and effective intervention for such management and an important resource for the gynecologic surgeon.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    深骨盆脓肿被骨盆骨包围,膀胱,妇科器官,肠道,神经和血管系统,并通过各种途径进行排水。通常在计算机断层扫描指导下进行经臀入路;但是,如果超声检查可用于确认入路,它被认为更有效,因为它减少了辐射暴露,并允许在超声和透视引导下实时穿刺。
    这项回顾性研究是在TobataKyoritsu医院(福冈,日本)2021年4月1日至2022年12月31日。使用3D图像分析系统(SYNAPSEVINCENT)对5例连续的深骨盆脓肿进行了超声引导下经臀位引流和透视检查,以研究安全穿刺的解剖结构。
    三名患者因结直肠癌术后脓肿,一个是由阑尾炎穿孔引起的,还有一个是乙状结肠憩室炎引起的.平均引流时间为11天(SD=6.7)。无并发症,比如出血或神经损伤,被观察到。
    我们使用SYNAPSEVINCENT构建了跨坐骨大孔穿刺路线的3D图像,以客观地理解解剖结构和穿刺路线。理想的经臀围方法是将导管插入尽可能靠近the骨的水平。使用超声引导和透视检查,可以安全,轻松地进行the骨副骨旁方法。
    UNASSIGNED: Deep pelvic abscesses are surrounded by the pelvic bones, bladder, gynecological organs, intestinal tract, and nerve and vascular systems, and are approached by various routes for drainage. The transgluteal approach is often performed under computed tomography guidance; however, if ultrasonography can be used to confirm the approach, it is considered more effective because it reduces radiation exposure and allows for real-time puncture under sonographic and fluoroscopic guidance.
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study was conducted at Tobata Kyoritsu Hospital (Fukuoka, Japan) between April 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022. Sonographically guided transgluteal drainage with fluoroscopy was performed in five consecutive cases of deep pelvic abscesses using a 3D image analysis system (SYNAPSE VINCENT) to study the anatomy for safe puncture.
    UNASSIGNED: Three patients had postoperative abscesses from colorectal cancer, one caused by perforation of the appendicitis, and one caused by sigmoid diverticulitis. The average drainage duration was 11 days (SD = 6.7). No complications, such as bleeding or nerve damage, were observed.
    UNASSIGNED: We constructed a 3D image of the puncture route of the trans greater sciatic foramen using SYNAPSE VINCENT to objectively comprehend the anatomy and puncture route. The ideal transgluteal approach is to insert the catheter as close to the sacrum as possible at the level of the infrapiriformis. The parasacrum infrapiriformis approach can be performed safely and easily using ultrasound guidance and fluoroscopy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    一名52岁的男性患者出现腹部和背部疼痛的抱怨。CT显示深骨盆脓肿延伸到the前腔。由于通过传统的经臀入路穿刺无法到达深部脓肿,在CT透视下使用颅尾穿刺技术进行经皮盆腔脓肿引流。颅尾穿刺需要垂直于CT横截面插入针。该方法将CT台架推进到比针尖更深的位置,并跟随针尖的CT横截面。这一系列的图像和运动继续直到针到达目标。手术成功,没有并发症,脓肿缩小了,血液检测数据有所改善。颅尾穿刺技术为深骨盆脓肿的引流提供了一种替代方法,可以避免与臀肌穿刺相关的并发症。CT透视引导下颅尾穿刺经皮盆腔脓肿引流为深盆腔脓肿的穿刺途径提供了一种安全的选择。
    A 52-year-old male patient presented with complaints of abdominal and back pain. CT revealed a deep pelvic abscess extending into the anterior sacral space. Since puncture via the conventional transgluteal approach cannot reach a deep abscess, percutaneous pelvic abscess drainage was performed under CT fluoroscopy using the cranio-caudal puncture technique. The cranio-caudal puncture requires needle insertion perpendicular to the CT cross-section. This method advances the CT gantry deeper than the needle tip and follows the CT cross-section with the needle tip. This series of images and movements continues until the needle reaches the target. The procedure was successful without complications, the abscess was reduced in size, and blood test data improved. The cranio-caudal puncture technique provides an alternative for the drainage of deep pelvic abscesses that avoids the complications associated with gluteal muscle puncture. Percutaneous drainage of pelvic abscesses under CT fluoroscopy-guided cranio-caudal puncture offers a safe option as a puncture route for deep pelvic abscesses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    盆腔脓肿是腹部手术或肠道或妇科疾病的常见并发症。在过去的几十年里,内镜超声(EUS)引导引流术已成为经皮或手术治疗盆腔脓肿的一种微创替代方法.
    评估单中心EUS引导下经直肠盆腔脓肿引流的安全性和有效性。
    从2017年2月到2023年4月,在单中心通过EUS引导引流治疗盆腔脓肿的患者的所有数据,进行回顾性分析。
    共有17例患者通过EUS引导引流治疗盆腔脓肿。在所有17名患者(100%)中,该程序在技术上是成功且顺利的。脓肿的病因是术后(n=5,29%),继发于内科疾病(n=10,59%)或胃肠道穿孔(n=2,12%)。5例(29%)患者出现多房性脓肿,平均最大直径为76mm(范围40-146mm)。使用2个双纤尾支架进行引流,在1例患者中,额外部署了10Fr引流导管。两名患者(12%)需要第二次内窥镜干预。治疗成功,通过随访CT扫描的完全脓肿分辨率以及症状缓解来定义,是100%。没有必要进行手术干预。术后住院时间中位数为5天。在39个月的中位随访时间内未报告复发。
    使用双猪尾支架的EUS引导经直肠引流盆腔脓肿是安全且高效的。这个案例系列有助于累积证据,在专家手中,EUS引导的引流应被视为治疗盆腔脓肿的一线方法。
    UNASSIGNED: Pelvic abscess is a common complication of abdominal surgery or intestinal or gynecological diseases. Over the last decades, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to percutaneous or surgical treatment of pelvic abscesses.
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate safety and efficacy of EUS-guided transrectal pelvic abscess drainage in a single center.
    UNASSIGNED: From February 2017 to April 2023, all data on patients who were treated for pelvic abscesses by EUS-guided drainage in a single center, were retrospectively analyzed.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 17 patients were treated for pelvic abscesses by EUS-guided drainage. The procedure was technically successful and uneventful in all 17 patients (100%). Etiology of the abscess was postsurgical (n=5, 29%), secondary to medical illness (n=10, 59%) or gastrointestinal perforation (n=2, 12%). The abscess was multilocular in 5 patients (29%), the mean largest diameter was 76 mm (range 40-146 mm). Drainage was performed using 2 double pigtail stents, and in 1 patient an additional 10 Fr drainage catheter was deployed. Two patients (12%) required a second endoscopic intervention. Treatment success, defined by complete abscess resolution on follow-up CT scan along with symptom relief, was 100%. There was no need for surgical intervention. The median post-procedural hospital stay was 5 days. No recurrence was reported within a median time of follow-up of 39 months.
    UNASSIGNED: EUS-guided transrectal drainage of pelvic abscesses using double pigtail stents is safe and highly effective. This case series contributes to the cumulative evidence that, in expert hands, EUS-guided drainage should be considered as first-line approach for treatment of pelvic abscesses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    EUS是脓肿引流的潜在替代方法。这项研究的目的是确定EUS引导的盆腔脓肿引流术在技术上是否可行,安全,和脓肿解决的有效选项。
    我们从2002年到2020年在一个单一的第四纪机构进行了回顾性审查。所有有或没有引流/支架放置的患者均通过经直肠途径进行EUS引导的盆腔脓肿引流。分析EUS引导盆腔脓肿引流术的技术和临床成功。进行描述性分析和Fisher精确检验。
    研究中纳入了60例连续患者(53.5%男性;平均年龄,53.8±17.9年)。盆腔脓肿主要发生于术后(33例;60.0%)和复杂性憩室炎(14例;23.3%)。平均直径为6.5±2.4cm(80%单眼)。74.5%的病例采用EUS引导的支架放置(双尾纤维塑料或内腔贴壁金属)进行引流,其余病例仅进行抽吸。58例(97%)技术成功。在EUS引导盆腔脓肿引流术后长期随访的患者中(n=55;91.7%),所有病例的72.7%出现脓肿完全消退.复发8例(14.5%),持续7例(12.5%),其中7例采用EUS引导盆腔脓肿引流术治疗成功。考虑到这些成功的再干预,脓肿总消退率为85.5%.脓肿分辨率随引流管放置而提高(83%)。占7次重复EUS引导盆腔脓肿引流,整体脓肿分辨率改善。发生2例死亡(3.4%),原因是先前医疗失败的患者因感染源控制失败而导致败血症,放射学,和手术治疗。
    EUS引导盆腔脓肿引流术在技术上是可行的,安全,以及放射或开放式手术引流的有效替代方法。它还在不同的临床情况下提供有利的临床结果。
    UNASSIGNED: EUS is a potential alternative for the drainage of abscesses. The aim of this study was to determine if EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage is technically feasible, safe, and a valid option for abscess resolution.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a retrospective review from 2002 to 2020 at a single quaternary institution. EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage via the transrectal route was performed in all patients with or without drain/stent placement. Technical and clinical success of EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage was analyzed. Descriptive analyses and Fisher exact test were performed.
    UNASSIGNED: Sixty consecutive patients were included in the study (53.5% male; mean age, 53.8 ± 17.9 years). Pelvic abscesses occurred mainly postoperatively (33 cases; 60.0%) and from complicated diverticulitis (14 cases; 23.3%). Mean diameter was 6.5 ± 2.4 cm (80% unilocular). Drainage was performed with EUS-guided stent placement (double-pigtail plastic or lumen-apposing metal) in 74.5% of cases and with aspiration alone for the remainder. Technical success occurred in 58 cases (97%). Of those with long-term follow-up after EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage (n = 55; 91.7%), complete abscess resolution occurred in 72.7% of all cases. Recurrence occurred in 8 cases (14.5%) and persisted in 7 patients (12.5%), 7 of which were successfully retreated with EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage. Accounting for these successful reinterventions, the overall rate of abscess resolution was 85.5%. Abscess resolution rate improved with drain placement (83%). Accounting for 7 repeat EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainages, overall abscess resolution improved. Two deaths occurred (3.4%) because of sepsis from failed source control in patients who had previously failed medical, radiological, and surgical treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: EUS-guided pelvic abscess drainage is technically feasible, safe, and an effective alternative to radiological or open surgical drainage. It also offers favorable clinical outcomes in different clinical situations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这是一项回顾性研究,旨在评估内镜超声引导盆腔脓肿引流术(EUS-PAD)在单一医院环境中的安全性和有效性。
    方法:EUS-PAD的转诊标准包括适合手术的盆腔脓肿(PA)患者。本研究包括总共14例用EUS-PAD治疗的PA患者。患者平均年龄为57.4岁,男女比例为7:7。总的来说,有6例阑尾穿孔,5例直肠癌和1例憩室穿孔,肛周脓肿,和壁壁坏死。
    结果:总体而言,100%的程序是成功的。在11例患者中取得了临床成功,他们在EUS-PAD后平均在21.4天内出院,并且在移除前放置支架的平均持续时间为27.0天。其中,6例患者达到完全改善状态,原因是阑尾穿孔,而2例和1例患者康复,原因是癌症和壁坏死的治疗后手术,分别。11例阑尾穿孔或接受直肠癌根治术的患者中有8例在EUS-PAD后平均9.4天后出院。尽管两名患者表现出暂时的改善,肛周脓肿和控制直肠癌,随着原发疾病的加剧,PA恶化。PA引流在三名患者中无效,其中两名患有不受控制的直肠癌,一名患有憩室穿孔。
    结论:最后,EUS-PAD不仅是一个可靠的,安全,和有效的替代手术和经皮引流,但对急性感染患者来说也是一个有价值的手术,成功率很高,例如那些有阑尾穿孔或治愈性手术的人。EUS-PAD的不良适应症和禁忌症包括不受控制的胃肠道穿孔和直接肿瘤侵袭。
    OBJECTIVE: This is a retrospective study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pelvic abscess drainage (EUS-PAD) in a single hospital setting.
    METHODS: The referral criteria for EUS-PAD included patients with a pelvic abscess (PA) that was amenable for the procedure. A total of 14 patients with PA treated with EUS-PAD were included in this study. The mean patient age was 57.4 years, and male-to-female ratio was 7:7. Overall, there were six cases of appendiceal perforation, five of rectal cancer and one case each of the diverticular perforation, perianal abscess, and walled-off necrosis.
    RESULTS: Overall, 100% of procedures were successful. Clinical success was achieved in 11 patients and they were discharged after EUS-PAD within 21.4 days on an average and the average duration of stent placement before removal was 27.0 days. Of all, six patients achieved complete improvement status where the cause was appendiceal perforation while two and one of the patients were recovered where the causes were post-curative operation for carcinoma and walled-off necrosis, respectively. Eight out of eleven patients who exhibited appendiceal perforation or underwent radical rectal cancer surgery were discharged after an average of 9.4 days post EUS-PAD. Although two patients showed temporary improvement, with perianal abscess and controlled rectal carcinoma, the PA worsened as the primary disease intensified. The PA drainage was ineffective in three patients where two of them had uncontrolled rectal cancer and one had diverticular perforation.
    CONCLUSIONS: Conclusively, the EUS-PAD is not only a reliable, safe, and efficient alternative to surgical and percutaneous drainage but also a valuable procedure with a high success rate for patients with acute infections, such as those who have had an appendiceal perforation or curative surgery. Poor indications and contraindications for EUS-PAD include uncontrolled gastrointestinal perforation and direct tumor invasion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    乙状结肠憩室炎可能导致盆腔脓肿的发展。腹内脓肿死亡率高达35%,合并脓肿的憩室炎患者发生复发性憩室炎的风险很高。最近,已使用计算机断层扫描或超声检查进行了图像引导引流,以治疗盆腔脓肿。标准的放射盆腔脓肿图像引导引流方法包括经腹,跨臀肌,或者颅尾穿刺方法。然而,由于骨盆内器官结构,这些标准方法具有技术局限性。因此,我们对2例72岁女性和53岁女性患者进行了图像引导引流术,患者采用更简单的一步穿刺法及侵入性较小的7-Fr引流导管,患者因标准入路困难而复发性盆腔脓肿并发乙状结肠憩室炎.在随访的计算机断层扫描中,两种情况下的脓肿都消失了,显示无盆腔脓肿复发。我们的结果表明,经膀胱图像引导引流是治疗盆腔脓肿的有效替代方法。
    Sigmoid diverticulitis can potentially lead to the development of pelvic abscesses. Mortality rate from intra-abdominal abscesses is as high as 35%, and patients with diverticulitis complicated by an abscess are at a high risk of recurrent diverticulitis. Recently, image-guided drainage has been performed using computed tomography or ultrasonography for the treatment of pelvic abscesses. Standard radiological pelvic abscess image-guided drainage methods consist of transabdominal, transgluteal, or cranio-caudal puncture approaches. However, these standard approaches have technical limitations due to intrapelvic organ structures. Therefore, we performed image-guided drainage using a percutaneous trans-bladder approach with a simpler 1-step puncture method and a less invasive 7-Fr drainage catheter in 2 cases of a 72-year-old female and a 53-year-old female with relapsed pelvic abscesses complicated by sigmoid diverticulitis due to difficulties involving the standard approach. The abscesses in both cases disappeared on follow-up computed tomography scans, demonstrating no pelvic abscess recurrence. Our results showed that trans-bladder image-guided drainage is an effective alternative method for treating pelvic abscesses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号