We queried the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) to evaluate the presentation, management, and outcomes of renal trauma in children from birth to 18 years from 2007-2018.
Patients were categorized as infants (0-1 year), toddlers (2-4 years), children (5-9 years), preteen (10-14 years), and teens (15-18 years), and patient demographics, grade of injury, and mechanism of injury including sports-related trauma (SRT) were collected. Each group was then evaluated for the level of management and patient outcome.
We identified 3720 patients with renal trauma. Our cohort was predominantly White (68.5%), male (68.6%), and required public insurance (38.5%). Most injuries were low grade (86.7%) and managed non-operatively (94.7%). The overall mortality was 51 (1.4%). Younger patients (infants, toddlers, children) were more likely to present with complex injuries and they were more likely to have been involved in a motor vehicle accident. They had higher blood transfusion rates, longer inpatient courses, higher levels of admission acuity, and higher mortality. Patients in the older age groups presented most after SRT. Across all age groups, the most common source of SRT was limited contact sports; however, when considering only teens, full contact sports were the primary offending activity. This review of the PHIS database provides insight to the rates and patterns of pediatric renal trauma in the United States.
Our data suggest an age-related differences in the presentation, management, and outcomes of pediatric renal trauma patients.

OBJECTIVE: To report pediatric renal trauma experiences at the National Center for Child Health and Development in Japan according to the Japanese Association for the Surgery of Trauma (JAST) classification 2008.
METHODS: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for 45 children younger than 18 years old diagnosed with renal trauma from February 2004 to December 2021, regarding details of external causes, treatments, complications, and injury scales according to the JAST classification 2008. The cases who cannot be classified into the JAST classification 2008 will be categorized into our original type 0.
RESULTS: There were 24 males and 21 females with a mean age of 8.5 years. Left kidneys were the predominantly affected side. Blunt injury was involved in every case (mainly falls and traffic accidents). Concomitant organ injuries were found in 13 cases. The injury scales were type Ia (13.3%), II (11.1%), IIIa (13.3%), IIIb (24.4%). Type 0 accounted for 37.8%, which were type 0c (congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract without hematoma and/or laceration of kidney parenchyma) at 11.1% and type 0h (only hematuria and normal radiologic finding) at 26.7%. Treatments were blood transfusion, ureteral stenting, nephrostomy, and no nephrectomy. Complications were pseudoaneurysm, hypertension, and infection.
CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 38% of cases cannot be classified into the JAST classification 2008, comprising at least two irrelevant types (type 0c and type 0h ). Accordingly, a pediatric renal injury scale should be established to achieve the precise diagnosis and treatments. However, further studies are still needed.

Unintentional injury is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in children. There is no consensus on the ideal, discrete management of pediatric renal trauma (PRT). Therefore, management protocols tend to be institution-specific.
This study aimed to characterize PRT at a rural level-1 trauma center and subsequently develop a standardized protocol.
A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of PRT at a rural level 1 trauma center between 2009 and 2019 was conducted. Injuries were characterized regarding renal trauma grade, associated multi-organ involvement and the need for intervention. The benefit of patient transfer from regional hospitals and length and cost of stay were evaluated.
Of 250 patients admitted with renal trauma diagnosis 50 patients <18 years were analyzed. Of those, the majority (32/50, 64%) had low-grade (grade I-III) injuries. Conservative management was successful in all low-grade injuries. Of 18 high-grade PRT, 10 (55.6%) required intervention, one prior to transfer. Among patients with low-grade trauma, 23/32 (72%) were transferred from an outside facility. A total of 13 (26%) patients with isolated low-grade renal trauma were transferred from regional hospitals. All isolated, transferred low-grade renal trauma had diagnostic imaging before transfer and none required invasive intervention. Interventional management of renal injury was associated with a longer median LOS [7 (IQR = 4-16.5) vs 4 (IQR = 2-6) days for conservative management, p = 0.019)] and an increased median total cost of $57,986 vs. $18,042 for conservative management (p = 0.002).
The majority of PRT, particularly low-grade, can be managed conservatively. A significant proportion of children with low-grade trauma are unnecessarily transferred to higher level centers. Review of pediatric renal trauma at our institution over a decade has allowed us to develop an institutional protocol which we believe allows for safe and effective patient monitoring.
Isolated, low-grade PRT can be managed conservatively at regional hospitals without needing transfer to a level 1 trauma center. Children with high-grade injuries should be closely monitored and are more likely to need invasive intervention. Development of a PRT protocol will help to safely triage this population and identify those who may benefit from transfer to a tertiary care center.

As one of the most commonly injured organs in the genitourinary system during trauma, a thorough understanding of pediatric renal trauma\'s diagnosis and management is essential for physicians. The improvement of imaging modalities in recent years has shifted most treatments to a conservative approach. Non-operative management could reduce the risk of nephrectomy while increasing renal salvage rate. However, high-grade pediatric renal injury management remains controversial. We aimed to report two children with high-grade renal trauma, diagnosed using computed tomography and retrograde pyelography studies, undergoing different approaches. The first patient underwent a nephrectomy, whereas the second patient underwent non-operative management.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines advocating the conservative management of renal injuries in children are primarily extrapolated from adult series due to a dearth of evidence in the pediatric population.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review our experience in the management of pediatric high-grade renal trauma and to clarify the role of conservative management in this cohort of patients.
METHODS: The Alberta Trauma Registry (ATR) is a comprehensive web-based registry which functions to prospectively collect data on all trauma patients in the province who sustain a severe injury (i.e. Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥12). The ATR was used to identify all pediatric patients who attended hospitals within the Edmonton region with high grade renal injuries (grade III-V) between January 2006 and December 2018. Hospital records and imaging were reviewed to identify patient demographics, mechanism of injury, AAST grade, haemodynamic stability, associated injuries, management, length of hospital stay (LOS), complications, and follow-up outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 53 children (38 boys, 15 girls) were identified with a mean age of 13 years (1-16). The mechanism of injury was blunt trauma in 92.5% (49/53) of cases (Supplementary Table). AAST grade distribution was 37.8% Grade III (20/53), 49% Grade IV (26/53) and 13.2% Grade V (7/53). All Grade III injuries were successfully managed conservatively. Overall 11 patients with Grade IV/V injuries required urological intervention (ureteral stenting (5 patients), angioembolization (4 patients), bladder washout with clot evacuation (1 patient), emergency nephrectomy (3 patients)). The overall renal salvage rate was 92.4% (49/53).
CONCLUSIONS: Our series confirms the safety of expectant management in high grade pediatric renal trauma. All grade III injuries in our study were managed conservatively without the need for intervention. This suggests that these injuries may be managed safely outside of designated trauma centres. One third of children with grade IV/V injuries required intervention. Therefore we recommend that patients with these injuries are transferred to specialized units with the capacity to provide such procedures if required.
CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the conservative management of pediatric renal trauma in the setting of high-grade injury. Expectant management was associated with acceptable rates of intervention and excellent renal salvage rates.

BACKGROUND: To report our initial experience using intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in pediatric renal trauma with the potential for substantial radiation reduction.
METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent intravenous CEUS at our institution between May 2015 and January 2018 for the suspicion of blunt renal trauma. CEUS was obtained either as an immediate or short-term comparison to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT), or in outpatient follow-up.
RESULTS: CEUS was performed on 7 patients (9 kidneys) with age range 2 months to 16 years old. CEUS was utilized as a comparison to CECT in 4 of 7 patients for initial evaluation, clinical change, or short-term follow-up. CEUS alone was used in one patient with low suspicion for renal injury. In the remaining two patients, CEUS was obtained as a follow-up study weeks after the initial CECT, following conservative management. All patients with confirmed renal injury by CECT (n = 5) underwent a follow-up CEUS at 1-2 months.
CONCLUSIONS: In an era of conservative management for renal trauma in which operative intervention is dictated more often by the clinical course than radiographic findings, it is reasonable to consider alternative imaging methods such as CEUS in stable patients to decrease radiation exposure.
UNASSIGNED: IV.

BACKGROUND: Renal trauma is a relevant cause of morbidity in children older than 1 year. Most patients are currently managed conservatively, even in case of high-grade traumas; nevertheless, harmful complications may occur even in hemodynamically stable patients. We present a case of grade IV blunt renal trauma complicated by post-traumatic pseudoaneurysm.
METHODS: A 10-year-old girl was referred to our institution for grade IV trauma of the right kidney. During observation she had persistent hematuria that caused anemia. A second contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan revealed a posttraumatic pseudoaneurysm that was successfully treated by angiographic embolization.
CONCLUSIONS: Although extremely rare after blunt renal trauma, post-traumatic renal pseudoaneurysm may cause severe blood loss and anemia, and angioembolization is therefore indicated. This condition should be suspected and move physicians to investigate further.