OBJECTIVE: There is an incomplete understanding regarding the extent of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in managing chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and its effect on outcomes. This study aimed to assess and compare limited sinus surgery, full-house, extended and radical ESS for optimizing CRS outcomes.
RESULTS: An online search in adherence with PRISMA guidelines was performed. Data were pooled for meta-analysis. Forty-six articles met inclusion criteria. Full-house ESS yielded greater improvements in SNOT-22 and endoscopy scores over limited ESS. Radical ESS improved nasal symptoms and reduced disease recurrence more than full house ESS, while extended ESS decreased revision ESS rates when compared to full-house ESS. Total ethmoidectomy reduced SNOT-22 scores more than limited ethmoidectomy. There was no difference in perioperative complications for all extents of ESS. When compared to limited ESS, full-house ESS yielded better patient symptom outcomes. Radical ESS demonstrated even greater reductions in nasal symptoms, while extended ESS additionally decreased revision surgery rates. Thus, in general, greater extent of ESS leads to better outcomes, while all extents of ESS are relatively safe.

Background: This review explores the potential benefits of combining totally endoscopic and robotic-assisted cardiac surgery with minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC). Robotic techniques herald a new era of surgical precision, leveraging advanced instrumentation and enhanced visualization to navigate cardiac anatomy with unprecedented accuracy. Purpose: Concurrently, MiECC systems provide tailored physiological support during cardiopulmonary bypass, meticulously managing perfusion parameters to safeguard vital organs\' function. Results: The convergence of these cutting-edge technologies marks a paradigmatic shift in cardiac surgical practice, with potential mitigation of invasiveness, attenuation of perioperative complications, and expedite postoperative recovery. Conclusions: This review also addresses prevailing challenges and limitations, including technological complexities and procedural intricacies, while elucidating the strategic imperatives for optimizing their collaborative utilization.

BACKGROUND: Effective medication adherence is vital for managing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and enhancing patient well-being. This study aimed to evaluate medication adherence levels and associated factors among AMI patients using standardized assessment tools.
METHODS: Employing a cross-sectional descriptive design, the study involved 210 patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction. Participants completed the General Medication Adherence Scale (GMAS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and provided socio-demographic details.
RESULTS: The study revealed partial adherence to medications among AMI patients, with mean scores of 24.89 (± 3.64) out of 33. Notably, good adherence was observed in non-adherence due to patient behavior (mean ± SD = 11.8 ± 2.3 out of 15) and additional disease burden (mean ± SD = 8.65 ± 2.21 out of 12), while partial adherence was noted in non-adherence due to financial constraints (mean ± SD = 4.44 ± 1.34 out of 6). Patients reported mild anxiety (mean ± SD = 8.38 ± 2.81) and no depressive symptoms (mean ± SD = 7.43 ± 2.42). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that employed status, younger age, shorter duration of MI, lower anxiety, and depression levels were associated with higher medication adherence. However, factors such as monthly income, gender, educational level, and marital status did not predict medication adherence.
CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the significance of addressing anxiety and depression levels and considering socio-demographic factors when designing interventions to enhance medication adherence among AMI patients. Further research is needed to explore additional determinants of medication adherence and develop tailored interventions to improve patient outcomes post-AMI.

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), necessitating adaptations across pre-transplant, transplantation, and post-transplant phases. HSCT recipients with compromised immune systems face heightened risks of severe COVID-19 outcomes, including increased mortality. The pandemic prompted significant changes in treatment strategies, with many patients experiencing delays or deferrals in autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), alongside adjustments to chemotherapy regimens to prevent disease recurrence. Clinical practices have evolved to address pandemic-related challenges, including a decrease in allo-HSCT procedures, a shift towards using domestic donors and peripheral blood stem cells over bone marrow grafts, and integration of telemedicine to reduce patient burden. These adaptations aim to balance COVID-19 exposure risks with the need for lifesaving HSCT. Innovations in response to the pandemic include stringent infection control measures, modified conditioning regimens, and revised post-transplant care protocols to mitigate infection risks. The importance of optimizing antiviral treatments, exploring new immunomodulatory interventions, and researching broadly neutralizing antibodies for HSCT recipients has been underscored. Despite the difficulties, the pandemic has catalyzed significant learning and innovation in HSCT practices, emphasizing the need for ongoing adaptation and research to protect this vulnerable patient population.

Spine surgery is essential for restoring alignment, stability, and function in patients with cervical spine injuries, especially when instability, pain, deformity, or progressive nerve damage is present. Effective wound closure is vital in these procedures, aiming to promote rapid healing, reduce infection risks, enable early mobilization, and ensure satisfactory cosmetic results. However, there is limited evidence on the optimal wound closure technique for posterior spine surgery, highlighting the need for innovative approaches. A study by Glener et al. evaluated the effectiveness of STRATAFIX™ Symmetric barbed sutures compared to traditional braided absorbable sutures in spinal surgery. In a randomized trial involving 20 patients, the STRATAFIX™ group demonstrated a shorter mean closure time and significantly fewer sutures used, though without a statistically significant reduction in closure time. No significant differences were observed in postoperative complications between the groups during a six-month follow-up. While the findings suggest potential cost savings and efficiency improvements with STRATAFIX™, the study\'s small sample size and short follow-up period limit its generalizability. Furthermore, AI-based models, such as the Xception deep learning model, show promise in improving suture training accuracy for medical students, which could enhance surgical outcomes and reduce complications. Despite the promising results, further research with larger sample sizes, extended follow-up periods, and multi-center trials is necessary to validate the effectiveness of barbed sutures like STRATAFIX™ in neurosurgery. The integration of AI in surgical training and continued exploration of innovative techniques are essential to advancing the field and optimizing patient care in spinal surgery.

UNASSIGNED: In healthcare systems prioritizing care of older adults, resource limitations and escalating demand often impede access to outpatient specialized geriatric services.
UNASSIGNED: This study, theoretically guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), aimed to explore barriers and facilitators in implementing a centralized \"Geri-Hub.\" The Geri-Hub is a centralized intake system established within 2 hospital systems to coordinate outpatient and community-based services for older adults, aiming to connect them with the most appropriate care in a timely manner.
UNASSIGNED: Qualitative insights were gathered from healthcare professionals at 2 academic institutions in the process of consolidating services. Through open-ended surveys and semi-structured interviews, we solicited feedback on referral management, waiting times, and overall work experiences.
UNASSIGNED: Thirteen frequently referring providers and a cohort of 9 geriatricians, along with 4 administrators, contributed to the study. Geriatricians emphasized streamlined referrals, flexible scheduling for urgent cases, and a target wait time of 3 months. Administrators stressed standardized referral procedures, defined roles, and accessible referral information.
UNASSIGNED: The findings underscored the need for straightforward referral processes, enhanced communication on referral statuses, and reduced wait times. Optimizing these processes could potentially mitigate resource utilization issues and improve patient outcomes in healthcare systems. This research highlights the critical role of timely access to geriatric services during transformative phases in healthcare delivery.

Despite legal protections guaranteeing care for patients with trauma, disparities exist in patient outcomes. We review disparities in patient management and outcomes related to insurance status, race and ethnicity, and gender for patients with trauma in the preadmission, in-hospital, and postdischarge settings. We highlight groups understudied and either underrepresented or unrepresented in national trauma databases-including American Indians/Alaska Natives, non-English preferred patients, and patients with disabilities. We call for more study of these groups and of upstream factors affecting the reviewed demographics to measure and improve outcomes for these vulnerable populations.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the direct and indirect costs of sickle cell disease (SCD) in Saudi Arabia.
METHODS: Data were collected from 217 participants aged ≥18 years in the eastern region of Saudi Arabia, using a prevalence-based cost-of-illness approach. The Institute for Medical Technology Assessment Medical Consumption Questionnaire and Institute for Medical Technology Assessment Productivity Cost Questionnaire were used to assess costs. A multistage process was used, encompassing patient data collection over 3 months, cost calculation from clinic visits and drug prices, and extrapolation for annual estimates.
RESULTS: The study revealed substantial societal costs of SCD, with an average per-patient cost of SAR181 899 (US$48 506), covering healthcare and productivity losses. Healthcare costs, including hospitalization, informal care, and medication, averaged SAR80 306 (US$21 415). In addition, productivity costs, including unpaid work and presenteeism, averaged SAR101 594 (US$27 092). Obtaining higher levels of education, such as a diploma and BSc degree or higher, has been found to significantly decrease the costs associated with SCD (P = .016, P = .001). Furthermore, when comparing different employment statuses, students (B = -0.301, P = .058) were found to have marginally lower SCD costs, suggesting that their expenses were lower than those of individuals in other employment categories. The predictive model used in this study explained 11.2% of the variation in costs.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights a significant economic burden of SCD in Saudi Arabia and highlights the need for targeted strategies to alleviate financial challenges and improve patient well-being.

BACKGROUND: Late-stage pressure sore (PS) patients are particularly susceptible to osteomyelitis (OM), as bony prominences commonly constitute the focal point of the ulcer. There are lack of data regarding the associated factors and the clinical relevance of this diagnosis in the context of PS treatment.
METHODS: This retrospective analysis investigated the clinical characteristics, blood markers indicative of infection in PS patients, and development of histologically evident OM. A total of 125 patient were included from 2014 to 2019. The patient records were especially scanned for histological diagnosis of OM.
RESULTS: OM was detected in 39% (37/96) of the samples taken during the index procedure. OM prevalence increased to 56% (43/77) at the second and 70% (41/59) at the third debridement. Therefore, the diagnosis of OM was acquired during treatment in 35 cases. Patients diagnosed with initial OM presented significantly higher blood markers, indicative of infection upon admission. Only patients with consistent OM (three positive biopsies) showed higher flap revision rates.
CONCLUSIONS: This study found no compelling evidence linking OM to worse clinical outcomes in PS patients. In the absence of elevated inflammatory markers, reducing bone biopsy frequency and adopting a less aggressive bone debridement approach may help prevent OM in PS patients.

In emergency department (ED) settings, rapid and precise diagnostic evaluations are critical to ensure better patient outcomes and efficient healthcare delivery. This study assesses the accuracy of differential diagnosis lists generated by the third-generation ChatGPT (ChatGPT-3.5) and the fourth-generation ChatGPT (ChatGPT-4) based on electronic health record notes recorded within the first 24 h of ED admission. These models process unstructured text to formulate a ranked list of potential diagnoses. The accuracy of these models was benchmarked against actual discharge diagnoses to evaluate their utility as diagnostic aids. Results indicated that both GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 reasonably accurately predicted diagnoses at the body system level, with GPT-4 slightly outperforming its predecessor. However, their performance at the more granular category level was inconsistent, often showing decreased precision. Notably, GPT-4 demonstrated improved accuracy in several critical categories that underscores its advanced capabilities in managing complex clinical scenarios.