Patient Dropouts

患者辍学
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估密集期戒烟治疗退出的相对风险。
    方法:根据2015年至2019年在圣保罗市中心的一家专业诊所开始戒烟治疗的个人的电子病历,进行了一项回顾性和定量的队列研究。巴西。使用泊松回归模型计算退出治疗的相对风险。
    结果:观察到,在开始治疗的396名(100.0%)人中,109(27.5%)在密集阶段结束之前放弃了它。年龄每增加一年,退出戒烟治疗的风险平均降低了2%.
    结论:年轻人退出戒烟治疗的风险更高。有必要重新考虑为年轻人提供的护理,以促进治疗的连续性。
    OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the relative risk of smoking cessation treatment dropout during its intensive phase.
    METHODS: a retrospective and quantitative cohort study was developed from the electronic medical records of individuals who started smoking cessation treatment between 2015 and 2019 at a specialty clinic in a city in the interior of São Paulo, Brazil. The relative risk of dropping out of treatment was calculated using the Poisson regression model.
    RESULTS: it was observed that out of the 396 (100.0%) individuals who started the treatment, 109 (27.5%) abandoned it before the end of the intensive phase. For each one-year increase in age, the risk of dropping out of smoking cessation treatment decreased by an average of 2%.
    CONCLUSIONS: the risk of dropping out of smoking cessation treatment is higher among younger individuals. It is necessary to rethink the care offered to younger adults to promote the continuity of treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    根据国际主要准则,对于不能接受手术治疗的肥胖和精神/心理障碍患者,建议采取营养方法和心理治疗.共有94名患者(T0)完成了一系列自我报告措施:症状清单-90-修订版(SCL-90-R),Barratt冲动性量表-11(BIS-11),暴饮暴食量表(BES),肥胖相关幸福感问卷-97(ORWELL-97),和明尼苏达州多相人格量表-2(MMPI-2)。然后,进行了12次简短的心理动力学心理治疗,随后参与者完成随访评估(T1).确定了两组患者:第1组(n=65),谁在T0和T1完全完成了评估;和第2组辍学(n=29),仅在T0而不是T1完成评估。实施机器学习模型以调查哪些变量与治疗失败最相关。通过考虑两个变量:MMPI-2校正(K)量表和SCL-90-R恐惧症(PHOB)量表,分类树模型识别出退出治疗的患者,准确率约为80%。鉴于关于这一主题的研究数量有限,本研究结果突出了考虑患者适应水平和社会背景的重要性,将他们纳入治疗计划。警告说明,含义,并讨论了未来的方向。
    According to the main international guidelines, patients with obesity and psychiatric/psychological disorders who cannot be addressed to surgery are recommended to follow a nutritional approach and a psychological treatment. A total of 94 patients (T0) completed a battery of self-report measures: Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11 (BIS-11), Binge-Eating Scale (BES), Obesity-Related Well-Being Questionnaire-97 (ORWELL-97), and Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). Then, twelve sessions of a brief psychodynamic psychotherapy were delivered, which was followed by the participants completing the follow-up evaluation (T1). Two groups of patients were identified: Group 1 (n = 65), who fully completed the assessment in both T0 and T1; and Group 2-dropout (n = 29), who fulfilled the assessment only at T0 and not at T1. Machine learning models were implemented to investigate which variables were most associated with treatment failure. The classification tree model identified patients who were dropping out of treatment with an accuracy of about 80% by considering two variables: the MMPI-2 Correction (K) scale and the SCL-90-R Phobic Anxiety (PHOB) scale. Given the limited number of studies on this topic, the present results highlight the importance of considering the patient\'s level of adaptation and the social context in which they are integrated in treatment planning. Cautionary notes, implications, and future directions are discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:饮食行为显著影响不同人群的健康结果。不健康的饮食与严重的疾病和巨大的经济负担有关,每年导致约1100万人死亡和重大的残疾调整生命年。数字饮食干预为改善饮食行为提供了可访问的解决方案。然而,自然减员,定义为参与者在干预完成前退出,是一个重大挑战,率高达75%-99%。高减员损害了干预的有效性和可靠性,并加剧了健康差异,强调需要理解和解决其原因。
    目的:本研究系统回顾了数字饮食干预中减员的文献,以确定根本原因,提出潜在的解决方案,并将这些发现与行为理论概念相结合,形成一个全面的理论框架。该框架旨在阐明减员背后的行为机制,并指导更有效的数字饮食干预措施的设计和实施。最终降低流失率,减轻健康不平等。
    方法:我们进行了系统评价,荟萃分析,和专题综合。跨7个电子数据库的全面搜索(PubMed,MEDLINE,Embase,中部,WebofScience,CINAHLPlus,和学术搜索完成)是针对2013年至2023年之间发表的研究进行的。资格标准包括探索数字饮食干预中的减员的原始研究。数据提取侧重于研究特征,示例人口统计,流失率,减员的原因,和潜在的解决方案。我们遵循了ENTREQ(增强定性研究综合报告的透明度)和PRISMA(系统评论和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南,并使用RStudio(Posit)进行荟萃分析和NVivo进行主题综合。
    结果:在442项确定的研究中,21符合纳入标准。荟萃分析显示,对照组的平均流失率为35%,38%为干预组,40%用于观察性研究,具有高度异质性(I²=94%-99%),表明影响因素不同。主题综合确定了15个相互关联的主题,这些主题与行为理论概念保持一致。基于这些主题,力-资源模型的开发是为了探索流失的根本原因,并从行为理论的角度指导未来干预措施的设计和实施。
    结论:高流失率是数字饮食干预的一个重要问题。开发的框架通过驱动力系统和支持资源系统之间的相互作用概念化了减员,提供对参与者流失的细微差别的理解,概括为动力不足、资源不足或匹配不良。它强调了数字饮食干预的关键必要性,以动态地平衡动机成分与可用资源。主要建议包括用户友好的设计,行为因素激活,识字训练,力量-资源匹配,社会支持,个性化适应,和动态跟进。将这些策略扩展到人口水平可以增强数字健康公平性。有必要对该框架进行进一步的实证验证,同时制定了行为理论指导的数字饮食干预指南。
    背景:PROSPEROCRD42024512902;https://tinyurl.com/3rjt2df9。
    BACKGROUND: Dietary behaviors significantly influence health outcomes across populations. Unhealthy diets are linked to serious diseases and substantial economic burdens, contributing to approximately 11 million deaths and significant disability-adjusted life years annually. Digital dietary interventions offer accessible solutions to improve dietary behaviors. However, attrition, defined as participant dropout before intervention completion, is a major challenge, with rates as high as 75%-99%. High attrition compromises intervention validity and reliability and exacerbates health disparities, highlighting the need to understand and address its causes.
    OBJECTIVE: This study systematically reviews the literature on attrition in digital dietary interventions to identify the underlying causes, propose potential solutions, and integrate these findings with behavior theory concepts to develop a comprehensive theoretical framework. This framework aims to elucidate the behavioral mechanisms behind attrition and guide the design and implementation of more effective digital dietary interventions, ultimately reducing attrition rates and mitigating health inequalities.
    METHODS: We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis, and thematic synthesis. A comprehensive search across 7 electronic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, CINAHL Plus, and Academic Search Complete) was performed for studies published between 2013 and 2023. Eligibility criteria included original research exploring attrition in digital dietary interventions. Data extraction focused on study characteristics, sample demographics, attrition rates, reasons for attrition, and potential solutions. We followed ENTREQ (Enhancing the Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research) and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and used RStudio (Posit) for meta-analysis and NVivo for thematic synthesis.
    RESULTS: Out of the 442 identified studies, 21 met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed mean attrition rates of 35% for control groups, 38% for intervention groups, and 40% for observational studies, with high heterogeneity (I²=94%-99%) indicating diverse influencing factors. Thematic synthesis identified 15 interconnected themes that align with behavior theory concepts. Based on these themes, the force-resource model was developed to explore the underlying causes of attrition and guide the design and implementation of future interventions from a behavior theory perspective.
    CONCLUSIONS: High attrition rates are a significant issue in digital dietary interventions. The developed framework conceptualizes attrition through the interaction between the driving force system and the supporting resource system, providing a nuanced understanding of participant attrition, summarized as insufficient motivation and inadequate or poorly matched resources. It underscores the critical necessity for digital dietary interventions to balance motivational components with available resources dynamically. Key recommendations include user-friendly design, behavior-factor activation, literacy training, force-resource matching, social support, personalized adaptation, and dynamic follow-up. Expanding these strategies to a population level can enhance digital health equity. Further empirical validation of the framework is necessary, alongside the development of behavior theory-guided guidelines for digital dietary interventions.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO CRD42024512902; https://tinyurl.com/3rjt2df9.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在检查阿尔茨海默病治疗效果的研究中,磨耗是一个特别关注的问题。分析阿尔茨海默氏症研究中退出的原因对于排除自然减员偏见至关重要,这会破坏研究的有效性。相比之下,在使用重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)的研究中,磨损受到的关注要少得多。我们的目标是确定出于相同原因退出的参与者之间的任何共同点。三名独立编码人员对每个关于退出原因的回应进行了评级,并生成频率表来表征每个类别中的参与者。这项研究是针对一项为期7个月的研究中的28例撤回病例进行的,该研究调查了rTMS对阿尔茨海默病的短期和长期治疗效果,该研究涉及3个研究地点的156名参与者。确定了退出的七个原因,健康和医疗变化是最常见的报告原因(7名参与者)。涉及家庭或照顾者的个人问题是下一个最常见的(5名参与者),其余5个类别分别由3名参与者组成.尽管有限的样本量阻止了推理统计的使用,我们的研究结果强调,rTMS研究人员需要更透明地报告流失率和退出原因.
    Attrition is a particular concern in studies examining the efficacy of a treatment for Alzheimer disease. Analyzing reasons for withdrawal in Alzheimer studies is crucial to ruling out attrition bias, which can undermine a study\'s validity. In contrast, attrition in studies using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has received much less attention. Our goal was to identify any commonalities between participants who withdrew for the same reasons. Three independent coders rated each response concerning the reasons for withdrawal, and frequency tables were generated to characterize the participants within each category. This study was conducted on the 28 withdrawn cases from a 7-month study investigating the short-term and long-term therapeutic effects of rTMS for Alzheimer disease among 156 participants across 3 sites of the study. Seven reasons for withdrawal were identified, with health and medical changes being the most commonly reported reason (7 participants). Personal issues involving family or caregivers were the next most common (5 participants), and the remaining 5 categories consisted of 3 participants each. Although the limited sample size prevented the use of inferential statistics, our findings highlight the need for more transparent reporting of attrition rates and withdrawal reasons by rTMS researchers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该研究的目的是调查辍学率,并辨别导致阿雷格里港医院(PROTIG)的跨学科性别认同计划停止向跨性别者提供治疗的潜在因素。
    这项研究采用了描述性的,横截面,回顾性设计分析从2000年至2018年在PROTIG接受治疗的患者的病历中获得的社会人口统计学和临床数据.一种结构化的形式,由PROTIG的专业团队设计,用于提取和评估几个变量,包括:年龄,性别,教育水平,根据国际疾病分类(ICD-10:版本:2010)诊断F64,临床合并症(由ICD-10编码),性传播感染的实验室诊断,病人的住所和医院之间的距离,以及进入PROTIG的年份。根据患者的出勤时间将患者队列分为两类:辍学(定义为出勤长达365天)和非辍学(出勤超过365天)。使用Pearson卡方检验比较退出组和非退出组之间的分类变量。此外,采用泊松回归分析,采用95%置信区间(CI),并将显著性水平设定为0.05。
    该研究共纳入888名接受PROTIG治疗的患者,其中275人(31%)被归类为辍学组。在患者群体中,65.5%(n=582)自我鉴定为变性女性,而34.5%(n=306)被确定为变性男性。在退出组和非退出组之间注意到显著差异。具体来说,跨性别女性之间存在差异(p<0.001),受教育程度较低的个人(p<0.001),ICD-10分类为F64的诊断较少(p<0.001),ICD-10中记录的临床合并症较少的个体(p<0.001),以及2010年后开始纳入PROTIG的人(p<0.001)。
    在PROTIG接受护理的个体中,治疗中断的比率显着,观察到组间差异有统计学意义。我们为这种中止假设了潜在的理由,了解护理经验和小组参与者的反馈:增加我们辖区内跨性别护理门诊服务的可及性,同时提高了社会对性别认同的认识,促进了多样化的性别表达途径,而无需依赖确认性别的外科干预措施。
    UNASSIGNED: The objective of the study was to investigate dropout rates and discern potential factors contributing to the discontinuation of treatment provided to transgender individuals by the Transdisciplinary Gender Identity Program at the Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (PROTIG).
    UNASSIGNED: This study employs a descriptive, cross-sectional, retrospective design to analyze socio-demographic and clinical data obtained from medical records of patients treated at PROTIG between 2000 and 2018. A structured form, devised by PROTIG\'s professional team, was utilized to extract and evaluate several variables including: age, gender, education level, diagnosis of F64 according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10: Version: 2010), clinical comorbidities (coded by ICD-10), laboratory diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, distance between patients\' residence and the hospital, and year of entry into PROTIG. The patient cohort was stratified into two categories based on their duration of attendance: dropout (defined as attendance for up to 365 days) and non-dropout (attendance exceeding 365 days). Categorical variables between dropout and non-dropout groups were compared using Pearson\'s chi-square test. Additionally, Poisson regression analysis was utilized, employing a 95% confidence interval (CI) and setting the significance level at 0.05.
    UNASSIGNED: The study included a total of 888 patients accessing PROTIG, with 275 (31%) classified in the dropout group. Of the patient population, 65.5% (n = 582) self-identified as transgender women, while 34.5% (n = 306) identified as transgender men. Significant differences were noted between the dropout and non-dropout groups. Specifically, differences were noted among transgender women (p < 0.001), individuals with lower levels of education (p < 0.001), those with fewer diagnoses classified under ICD-10 as F64 (p < 0.001), individuals exhibiting fewer clinical comorbidities recorded in ICD-10 (p < 0.001), and those who commenced inclusion in PROTIG after 2010 (p < 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: There exists a notable rate of treatment discontinuation among individuals receiving care at PROTIG, with statistically significant variances observed between groups. We posit potential rationales for this discontinuation, informed by care experiences and feedback from group attendees: Increased accessibility to outpatient services in our jurisdiction for Transgender Care, along with heightened societal awareness of gender identity fostering diverse gender expression avenues devoid of reliance on gender-affirming surgical interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:癌症带来了越来越大的全球负担,尤其是在像加纳这样的非洲国家,由于许多社会因素,已经确定了高癌症治疗辍学率。文化和经济原因。关于治疗访问行为的模式知之甚少,尤其是在加纳北部,这项研究旨在探索。
    方法:通过跨部门合作,我们提取了Tamale教学医院提供的癌症患者记录并进行了临床验证.通过多变量逻辑回归进行描述性分析。还应用了治疗映射过程来突出数据收集中的挑战。对于高水平的缺失数据,使用链式方程进行了多次估算。敏感性分析用于评估缺失数据的影响。
    结果:即使考虑到由于数据缺失而导致的不确定性,治疗脱落率也很高,只有27%的患者完全接受治疗。发现所有癌症的高辍学率,包括加纳国家健康保险计划涵盖的癌症。多元逻辑回归显示,社会,健康状况和系统因素影响治疗参与,直到完成。观察到肝脏的高缺失数据,卵巢,结直肠,胃,膀胱,食道癌、头颈癌和皮肤癌,软组织肉瘤,其中限制了模型拟合。
    结论:治疗退出在加纳北部是一个关键问题。由于动态的原因,有大量的数据缺失,复杂且分散的治疗途径。需要未来的研究来了解数据记录中的复杂挑战。
    治疗退学是政策制定者应该寻求解决的一个相关问题。需要与参与癌症治疗和数据收集的利益相关者进行进一步讨论,以更好地了解当地常规数据收集面临的挑战。这将允许制定政策,以适应多种交叉的健康和社会因素对完成治疗的影响。
    BACKGROUND: Cancer presents a growing global burden, not least in African countries such as Ghana where high cancer treatment dropouts has been identified due to numerous social, cultural and financial reasons. There is little understanding regarding patterns of treatment access behaviour, especially in Northern Ghana, which this study was designed to explore.
    METHODS: Through cross-sector collaboration, we extracted and clinically validated cancer patient records available in the Tamale Teaching Hospital. These were analysed descriptively and through multi-variate logistic regression. A treatment mapping process was also applied to highlight challenges in data collection. Multiple imputation with chained equations was conducted for high levels of missing data. Sensitivity analysis was applied to assess the impact of missing data.
    RESULTS: Treatment drop-out was high even when uncertainty due to missing data was accounted for, and only 27 % of patients completely engaged with treatment. High drop-out was found for all cancers including those covered by the Ghana National Health Insurance scheme. Multi-variate logistic regression revealed that social, health condition and systemic factors influence treatment engagement until completion. High missing data was observed for liver, ovarian, colorectal, gastric, bladder, oesophageal and head and neck and skin cancers, and soft tissue sarcomas, which limited model fitting.
    CONCLUSIONS: Treatment drop-out is a critical issue in Northern Ghana. There was high missing data due to the dynamic, complex and decentralised treatment pathway. Future studies are needed to understand the complex challenges in data recording.
    UNASSIGNED: Treatment drop out is a pertinent issue that policy makers should look to address. Further discussion with stakeholders involved in cancer treatment and data collection is required to better understand challenges to routine data collection in the local setting. This will allow policy to be designed to cater for the impact of multiple intersecting health and social factors on treatment completion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:参与者在临床试验中停止研究治疗可能会导致试验效力不足,在统计分析中产生偏差,和限制研究结果的可解释性。因此,在整个研究持续时间内将参与者保留在临床试验中与参与者招募一样重要。
    目的:本分析旨在确定在无症状AD(A4)研究中抗淀粉样蛋白治疗的盲期,参与者的随机化前特征与过早停药的相关性。
    方法:所有A4试验的随机参与者都被归类为在研究的盲期由于任何原因而过早停止研究(退出)或完成治疗研究的盲期(完成者)。
    方法:该试验在美国67个研究中心进行,加拿大,日本和澳大利亚通过全球COVID-19大流行。
    方法:样本由所有1169名A4试验随机参与者组成。
    方法:预随机化人口统计,临床,使用单变量广义线性混合模型(GLMM)评估淀粉样蛋白PET和研究中止的遗传预测因子,以中止状态为二元结果,每个预测因子作为固定效应,和站点作为随机效应,以解释试验中研究站点之间的差异。然后将在p<0.10时显著的特征包括在多变量GLMM中。
    结果:在随机参与者中,339(29%)在盲期终止研究(试验中的中位随访时间:759天)。从多变量分析来看,研究中止的两个主要预测因素是筛查状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)评分(OR=1.07[95CI=1.02;1.12];p=0.002)和年龄(OR=1.06[95CI=1.03;1.09];p<0.001).有痴呆家族史(OR=0.75[95CI=0.55;1.01];p=0.063)和APOEε4携带者(OR=0.79[95CI=0.6;1.04];p=0.094)的参与者不太可能退出研究。与协会是微不足道的。在这些分析中,性别,种族和民族,认知评分和淀粉样蛋白/tauPET评分与研究退出无关.
    结论:在A4试验中,年龄较大的参与者和通过STAI测量的基线焦虑水平较高的参与者更有可能中止,而有痴呆家族史或APOEε4携带者退出的可能性较小.这些发现对未来的临床前试验设计和选择过程有直接的影响,以确定那些有最大脱落风险的个体,并为研究团队提供信息,以制定AD预防研究中的有效选择和保留策略。
    BACKGROUND: Participant discontinuation from study treatment in a clinical trial can leave a trial underpowered, produce bias in statistical analysis, and limit interpretability of study results. Retaining participants in clinical trials for the full study duration is therefore as important as participant recruitment.
    OBJECTIVE: This analysis aims to identify associations of pre-randomization characteristics of participants with premature discontinuation during the blinded phase of the Anti-Amyloid treatment in Asymptomatic AD (A4) Study.
    METHODS: All A4 trial randomized participants were classified as having prematurely discontinued study during the blinded period of the study for any reason (dropouts) or completed the blinded phase of the study on treatment (completers).
    METHODS: The trial was conducted across 67 study sites in the United States, Canada, Japan and Australia through the global COVID-19 pandemic.
    METHODS: The sample consisted of all 1169 A4 trial randomized participants.
    METHODS: Pre-randomization demographic, clinical, amyloid PET and genetic predictors of study discontinuation were evaluated using a univariate generalized linear mixed model (GLMM), with discontinuation status as the binary outcome, each predictor as a fixed effect, and site as a random effect to account for differences among study sites in the trial. Characteristics significant at p<0.10 were then included in a multivariable GLMM.
    RESULTS: Among randomized participants, 339 (29%) discontinued the study during the blinded period (median follow-up time in trial: 759 days). From the multivariable analysis, the two main predictors of study discontinuation were screening State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores (OR = 1.07 [95%CI = 1.02; 1.12]; p=0.002) and age (OR = 1.06 [95%CI = 1.03; 1.09]; p<0.001). Participants with a family history of dementia (OR = 0.75 [95%CI = 0.55; 1.01]; p=0.063) and APOE ε4 carriers (OR = 0.79 [95%CI = 0.6; 1.04]; p=0.094) were less likely to discontinue from the study, with the association being marginally significant. In these analyses, sex, race and ethnicity, cognitive scores and amyloid/tau PET scores were not associated with study dropout.
    CONCLUSIONS: In the A4 trial, older participants and those with higher levels of anxiety at baseline as measured by the STAI were more likely to discontinue while those who had a family history of dementia or were APOE ε4 carriers were less likely to drop out. These findings have direct implications for future preclinical trial design and selection processes to identify those individuals at greatest risk of dropout and provide information to the study team to develop effective selection and retention strategies in AD prevention studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:基于网络的口译认知偏差修正(CBM-I)可以改善口译偏差和焦虑症状,但面临高辍学率。这项研究测试了基于网络的CBM-I相对于积极的心理教育状况的有效性,以及为CBM-I参与者的子集增加了低强度的远程教学。
    方法:1,234名焦虑的社区成年人(Mage=35.09岁,81.2%女性,72.1%白色,82.6%不是西班牙裔)在序贯的第一阶段随机分配,在我们团队的公共研究网站上进行多重分配随机试验,以完成每周五次的CBM-I或心理教育。在第一次会议之后,对于第二阶段,一种算法试图将CBM-I参与者分类为更高(与较低)退学的风险;然后随机分配那些被归类为较高风险的人完成四次简短的每周远程教学检查(与没有教练)。
    结果:根据假设(https://doi.org/j2xr;Daniel,Eberle,&Teachman,2020),CBM-I在改善正面和负面解释偏见方面显著优于心理教育(认可评级,简短的身体感觉解释问卷)和焦虑症状(总体焦虑严重程度和损害量表,来自抑郁焦虑压力量表的焦虑量表-简表),在2个月的随访中,较小的治疗收益仍然显着。出乎意料的是,CBM-I的治疗退出结果明显比心理教育差,并添加教练(vs.没有教练)没有显著提高疗效或退出结果(特别是,许多参与者选择不与他们的教练互动)。
    结论:基于Web的CBM-I似乎有效,但是补充教练可能无法减轻辍学的挑战。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2024APA,保留所有权利)。
    OBJECTIVE: Web-based cognitive bias modification for interpretation (CBM-I) can improve interpretation biases and anxiety symptoms but faces high rates of dropout. This study tested the effectiveness of web-based CBM-I relative to an active psychoeducation condition and the addition of low-intensity telecoaching for a subset of CBM-I participants.
    METHODS: 1,234 anxious community adults (Mage = 35.09 years, 81.2% female, 72.1% white, 82.6% not Hispanic) were randomly assigned at Stage 1 of a sequential, multiple-assignment randomized trial to complete five weekly sessions of CBM-I or psychoeducation on our team\'s public research website. After the first session, for Stage 2, an algorithm attempted to classify CBM-I participants as higher (vs. lower) risk for dropping out; those classified as higher risk were then randomly assigned to complete four brief weekly telecoaching check-ins (vs. no coaching).
    RESULTS: As hypothesized (https://doi.org/j2xr; Daniel, Eberle, & Teachman, 2020), CBM-I significantly outperformed psychoeducation at improving positive and negative interpretation biases (Recognition Ratings, Brief Body Sensations Interpretation Questionnaire) and anxiety symptoms (Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale, Anxiety Scale from Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-Short Form), with smaller treatment gains remaining significant at 2-month follow-up. Unexpectedly, CBM-I had significantly worse treatment dropout outcomes than psychoeducation, and adding coaching (vs. no coaching) did not significantly improve efficacy or dropout outcomes (notably, many participants chose not to interact with their coach).
    CONCLUSIONS: Web-based CBM-I appears effective, but supplemental coaching may not mitigate the challenge of dropout. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    疫苗接种是一项具有成本效益的公共卫生计划,有助于降低五岁以下儿童的发病率和死亡率。全球,自扩大免疫计划(EPI)出台以来,疫苗可预防的儿童死亡原因数量显著减少.然而,出于各种原因,2020年,2300万儿童无法获得足够的疫苗。因此,本研究旨在评估埃塞俄比亚12~23个月儿童肺炎结合疫苗(PCV)脱落的决定因素.
    该研究分析了从2019年小型埃塞俄比亚人口和健康调查中获得的横截面数据。采用多水平二元逻辑回归分析,并使用Akaike信息标准选择最佳拟合模型。该研究包括989名12至23个月的儿童的加权样本。该研究提出了调整后的赔率比(AOR)以及95%的置信区间(CI),以确定影响PCV脱落的重要因素。
    本研究中PCV脱落率为20.2%。在多层次分析中,持有健康卡(AOR=0.076,95%CI:0.019,0.04),PCV2疫苗接种(AOR=0.002,95%CI:0.023,0.263),和第7区(AOR=6.98,95%CI:10.1,48.31)与儿童的PCV退出显着相关。
    拥有健康卡,接受了PCV2疫苗接种后,和地区是PCV脱落的重要预测因子。因此,针对所有母亲和特定地区的免疫接种健康教育,需要定制的公共卫生干预措施来降低疫苗接种率。
    UNASSIGNED: Vaccination is a cost-effective public health program that helps reduce significant morbidity and mortality in children under the age of five. Worldwide, the number of vaccine-preventable causes of child death has significantly decreased since the Expanded Program of Immunization (EPI) was introduced. However, for a variety of reasons, 23 million children did not have adequate access to vaccines in 2020. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the determinants of pneumonia conjugate vaccine (PCV) dropout among children aged 12-23 months in Ethiopia.
    UNASSIGNED: The study analyzed cross-sectional data obtained from the 2019 mini Ethiopian demographic and health survey. Multilevel binary logistic regression analysis was utilized, and the best fit model was chosen using the Akaike Information Criteria. The study comprised a weighted sample of 989 children aged 12 to 23 months. The study presented the Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) along with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) to identify the significant factors influencing PCV dropout.
    UNASSIGNED: The PCV dropout rate was reported at 20.2% in this study. In the multilevel analysis, possession of a health card (AOR = 0.076, 95% CI: 0.019, 0.04), vaccination for PCV 2 (AOR =0.002, 95% CI: 0.023, 0.263), and region 7 (AOR = 6.98, 95% CI: 10.1, 48.31) were significantly associated with children\'s PCV dropout.
    UNASSIGNED: Having a health card, having received the PCV 2 vaccinations, and region were significant predictors of PCV dropout. Consequently, health education on immunization for all mothers and region-specific, customized public health interventions are needed to reduce the vaccination dropout rate.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:每年,疫苗可预防的疾病夺去了880万五岁以下儿童的生命。尽管接种疫苗可防止全球1-2百万儿童死亡,在发展中国家,麻疹疫苗接种退出没有得到很好的研究,特别是在埃塞俄比亚。因此,本研究旨在评估埃塞俄比亚5岁以下儿童麻疹疫苗退出的空间分布及其决定因素.
    方法:使用2019年埃塞俄比亚人口与健康调查的数据进行数据分析。该研究共使用了5,753名儿童。使用空间自相关来确定麻疹疫苗接种退出的空间依赖性。采用普通插值法预测麻疹疫苗接种率下降。与麻疹疫苗接种退出相关的因素在p值<0.05时被宣布为显著的。数据使用置信区间和调整后的比值比进行解释。选择偏差最小和对数比最高的模型作为最佳拟合模型。
    结果:在埃塞俄比亚,三分之一的五岁以下儿童有麻疹疫苗退出。出生间隔等因素(AOR=1.87,95%CI:1.30,2.70),未婚妇女的婚姻状况(AOR=3.98,95%CI:1.08,8.45),≤1名5岁以下儿童(AOR=3.86,95%CI:2.56,5.81),农村居住地(AOR=2.43,95%CI:2.29,3.11),社区水平低的ANC利用率(AOR=3.20,95%CI:2.53,3.56),居住在BenishangulGumuz(AOR=1.80,95%CI:1.061,3.06)的麻疹疫苗退出的几率更高。
    结论:埃塞俄比亚5岁以下儿童的麻疹疫苗接种率与世界卫生组织10%的最大可耐受疫苗接种率下降相比较高。个人和社区水平的变量都是麻疹疫苗接种退出的决定因素。埃塞俄比亚卫生部应关注那些报告未充分利用非国大服务和农村住宅的五岁以下儿童的母亲,同时在埃塞俄比亚疫苗辍学率高的地区设计政策和战略。
    BACKGROUND: Each year, vaccine-preventable diseases cost the lives of 8.8 million under-five children. Although vaccination prevents 1-2 million childhood deaths worldwide, measles vaccination dropouts are not well studied in developing countries, particularly in Ethiopia. Therefore, this study aims to assess the spatial distribution of the measles vaccination dropout and its determinants among under-five children in Ethiopia.
    METHODS: Data from Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey 2019 was used for data analysis. The study used a total of 5,753 children. Spatial autocorrelations was used to determine the spatial dependency of measles vaccination dropout. Ordinary interpolation was employed to forecast measles vaccination dropout. Factors associated with measles vaccination dropout were declared significant at p-values <0.05. The data were interpreted using the confidence interval and adjusted odds ratio. A model with the lowest deviance and highest logliklihood ratio was selected as the best-fit model.
    RESULTS: In Ethiopia, one in three under-five children had measles vaccination dropouts. Factors such as birth interval (AOR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.30, 2.70), unmarried marital status women (AOR = 3.98, 95% CI: 1.08, 8.45), ≤1 number of under-five children (AOR = 3.86, 95% CI: 2.56, 5.81), rural place of residence (AOR = 2.43, 95% CI: 2.29, 3.11), low community-level ANC utilization (AOR = 3.20, 95% CI: 2.53, 3.56), and residing in Benishangul Gumuz (AOR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.061, 3.06) had higher odds of measles vaccination dropout.
    CONCLUSIONS: Measles vaccination dropout rates in Ethiopia among under-five children were high compared to the maximum tolerable vaccination dropout level of 10% by the WHO. Both individual and community-level variables were determinants of measles vaccination dropout. The ministry of health in Ethiopia should give attention to those mothers of under-five children who reported underutilization of ANC services and rural residences while designing policies and strategies in areas of high spatial clustering of vaccine dropout in Ethiopia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号