Paracentesis

穿刺术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    高达90%的CF(pwCF)患者将有某种形式的肝胆受累。本手稿旨在探索不同的血管内,内窥镜,放射学和外科手术可用于诊断和治疗最严重形式的CF肝胆受累(CFHBI),称为晚期囊性纤维化肝病(aCFLD),在10%的pwCF中看到。这些程序和干预措施包括肝活检,肝静脉压力梯度测量,胃造口管放置以优化营养,穿刺术,肝移植前内镜下静脉曲张控制出血和门体分流。通过利用先进的诊断或手术技术,pwCF的医疗保健专业人员可以更有效地管理CFHBI和aCFLD患者,并有可能改善患者预后.
    Up to 90% of people with CF (pwCF) will have some form of hepatobiliary involvement. This manuscript aims to explore the different endovascular, endoscopic, radiological and surgical procedures available to diagnose and manage the most severe form of CF hepatobiliary involvement (CFHBI) known as advanced cystic fibrosis liver disease (aCFLD), seen in 10% of pwCF. These procedures and interventions include liver biopsy, hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement, gastrostomy tube placement to optimize nutrition, paracentesis, endoscopic variceal control of bleeding and portosystemic shunting before liver transplantation. By utilizing advanced diagnostic or surgical techniques, healthcare professionals of pwCF can more effectively manage patients with CFHBI and aCFLD and potentially improve patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:腹水是剖宫产(C/S)的罕见并发症。这里,我们报告了一例急症C/S后出现细菌腹水的患者。
    方法:一名41岁女性在接受C/S治疗后一周出现弥漫性腹部紧绷和疼痛,由于叠加先兆子痫和分娩时间延长,在384/7周接受C/S。
    方法:诊断为C/S后由沙门氏菌引起的腹水。
    方法:初始治疗包括头孢美唑和甲硝唑。在第2天,进行穿刺术,然后是白蛋白和羟乙基淀粉给药。到第3天,患者出现肺水肿,需要Lasix管理。在第6天,腹水培养显示沙门氏菌对第三代头孢菌素具有抗性,导致美罗培南治疗调整。这导致症状改善。美罗培南持续14天以完成治疗方案。
    结果:随访超声显示腹水减少。随着患者临床状况的改善,她在第20天出院,并安排门诊随访。在随后的3个月随访期间,未观察到腹水复发。出院后8天未发现腹水。
    结论:术后诊断为沙门菌腹水。抗生素治疗和治疗性穿刺对这种情况有效。
    BACKGROUND: Bacterascites are a rare complication of cesarean sections (C/S). Here, we report the case of a patient with bacterascites after an emergent C/S.
    METHODS: A 41-year-old female reported diffuse abdominal tightness and pain for a week after C/S, who received C/S at 38 4/7 weeks due to superimposed preeclampsia and prolonged labor.
    METHODS: Bacterascites caused by Salmonella species after C/S was diagnosed.
    METHODS: Initial treatment included cefmetazole and metronidazole. On day 2, paracentesis was performed, followed by albumin and hydroxyethyl starch administration. By day 3, the patient developed pulmonary edema, necessitating Lasix administration. On day 6, ascites culture revealed Salmonella species resistant to third-generation cephalosporins, leading to meropenem therapy adjustment. This resulted in improved symptoms. Meropenem was continued for 14 days to complete the treatment regimen.
    RESULTS: Follow-up ultrasonography revealed a decrease in ascites. As the patient clinical condition improved, she was discharged on day 20 and scheduled for outpatient department follow-up. No recurrence of ascites was observed during the subsequent follow-up period of 3 months. No ascites were noted 8 days after discharge.
    CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative bacterascites with Salmonella were diagnosed. Antibiotic treatment and therapeutic paracentesis were effective for this condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    姑息治疗对于终末期肝病(ESLD)患者通常是次优的。腹水仍然是ESLD中最常见的并发症。尽管长期腹腔引流(LTAD)通常用于难治性恶性腹水,ESLD的标准治疗是医院引流(大体积穿刺(LVP)).正在进行的美国国立卫生与护理研究所(NIHR)资助的试验(REDUCe2研究)(ISRCTN269936824)将姑息性LTAD与ESLD中的LVP进行比较。这个35个地点的试验是在英国进行的,苏格兰和威尔士。
    了解医疗保健专业人员(HCP)对在ESLD中使用姑息性LTAD的看法和经验。
    在2019年8月至12月之间使用了一项电子调查,该调查包括七个带有固定定量选项的问题和三个探索性问题。该调查通过英国肝脏研究协会通讯以电子方式分发,并分发到英格兰东南部和伦敦东北部的相关医院部门。在初次邀请调查后的4周和8周发送了电子邮件提醒。
    有211名受访者(肝病专家(36.5%),专科护士(24.6%),胃肠病学家(16.6%),学员(17%)和其他人(5.2%))。所有受访者都可以使用LVP,86%的患者接受经颈静脉肝内门体分流术,67%到LTAD,10%到其他选项,如自动低流量腹水(ALFA)泵。调查的大多数受访者(68%)报告了他们使用LTAD的经验。几乎所有受访者(91%)都愿意在ESLD中考虑LTAD。然而,这方面的主要威慑因素是感知到的感染风险(90%),其次是社区的LTAD管理(57%)。有使用LTAD经验的患者中约有51%报告了患者的临床并发症(包括出血,感染和肾功能损害),41%的人报告了技术问题,35%的人报告了社区支持不足。
    由于ESLD,几乎所有的HCP都愿意在难治性腹水中考虑姑息性LTAD,但主要的威慑因素是感知到的感染风险和缺乏指导社区管理的公开数据。REDUCe2审判将澄清这些担忧是否真实,并提供关于角色的确凿证据,如果有的话,在这个脆弱的和正在研究的ELD队列中,姑息性LTAD。
    UNASSIGNED: Palliative care is often suboptimal for patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Ascites remains the most common complication in ESLD. Though long-term abdominal drains (LTAD) are commonly used in refractory malignant ascites, the standard care for ESLD is hospital drainage (large volume paracentesis (LVP)). There is an ongoing National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) funded trial (REDUCe 2 Study) (ISRCTN269936824) comparing palliative LTAD to LVP in ESLD. This 35-site trial is being conducted in England, Scotland and Wales.
    UNASSIGNED: To understand the views and experience of healthcare professionals (HCP) on the use of palliative LTAD in ESLD.
    UNASSIGNED: An electronic survey comprised of seven questions with fixed quantitative options and three exploratory questions was used between August-December 2019. The survey was distributed electronically via the British Association for Study of Liver newsletter and to relevant hospital departments in Southeast England and Northeast London. An email reminder was sent at 4 and 8 weeks after the initial invitation to the survey.
    UNASSIGNED: There were 211 respondents (hepatologists (36.5%), specialist nurses (24.6%), gastroenterologists (16.6%), trainees (17%) and others (5.2%)). All respondents had access to LVP, 86% to a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure for patients, 67% to LTADs and 10% to other options, such as the automated low-flow ascites (ALFA) pump. The majority of respondents to the survey (68%) reported their experience of using LTAD. Almost all respondents (91%) were willing to consider LTAD in ESLD. However, the main deterrents of this were the perceived risk of infection (90%), followed by LTAD management in community (57%). Some 51% of those with prior experience of using LTAD reported clinical complications for patients (including bleeding, infection and renal impairment), 41% reported technical issues and 35% inadequate community support.
    UNASSIGNED: Almost all HCPs are willing to consider palliative LTAD in refractory ascites due to ESLD, but the main deterrents are the perceived infection risk and lack of published data to guide community management. The REDUCe 2 trial will clarify if these concerns are real and provide conclusive evidence on role, if any, of palliative LTADs in this vulnerable and under researched cohort with ESLD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的二十年中,在照顾危重病人的同时使用超声波呈指数增长,现在已成为重症监护实践的重要组成部分。腹部超声是其他专业的既定技术,但是它在重症监护中的使用落后于其他超声模式。然而,它在患者诊断和管理中的潜在作用将使其成为重症医师的宝贵工具。床边腹部超声的主要用途是用于创伤患者的自由液体检测。但是腹部超声也可以帮助我们诊断腹痛的患者,低血容量或无尿,它可以在穿刺术或膀胱导管和胃管放置等过程中指导我们。
    The use of ultrasound while caring for critically ill patients has been increasing exponentially in the last two decades and now is an essential component of intensive care practice. Abdominal ultrasound is an established technique in other specialties, but its use in intensive care has lagged behind other ultrasound modalities. However, its potential role in the diagnosis and management of patients will make it an invaluable tool for intensivists. The main use of abdominal ultrasound at the bedside is for free fluid detection in trauma patients. But abdominal ultrasound can also help us diagnose patients with abdominal pain, hypovolemia or anuria, and it can guide us during procedures such as paracentesis or bladder catheter and gastric tube placement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抗生素给药前早期穿刺可降低失代偿期肝硬化患者的发病率和死亡率。我们研究了在进行穿刺之前或之后变量与抗生素施用的关联。
    这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是纽约市一家社区医院收治的137例肝硬化继发腹水患者。预测变量是人口统计,疾病相关,入场时间,和血清测量。
    我们发现夜间入院患者在服用抗生素后进行穿刺的相对风险显著增加(相对风险比[RRR]=3.01,95%CI:1.02-8.85,p=0.046)。人口统计,疾病相关,和血清测量变量与穿刺术或抗生素给药顺序没有显着相关。此外,体重指数增加与未进行穿刺的相对风险降低显著相关(RRR=0.84,95%CI:0.74-0.96,p=0.01).
    总而言之,夜间入院的患者在给予抗生素后进行穿刺的相对风险增加.我们建议持续进行住院医师和住院医师培训,以保持肝硬化患者在床旁手术中的能力,例如穿刺。此外,在夜班期间增加人员配备或由住院医师/住院医师领导的介入团队的存在也可能有助于优化及时穿刺的发生率。
    UNASSIGNED: Early paracentesis before antibiotic administration reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. We studied the association of variables with antibiotic administration before or after performing paracentesis.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective study of 137 patients with ascites secondary to cirrhosis admitted to a community hospital in New York City. Predictor variables were demographic, disease-related, admission timing, and serum measurement.
    UNASSIGNED: We found a significantly increased relative risk for performing paracentesis after antibiotic administration for those admitted at night (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 3.01, 95% CI: 1.02-8.85, p = 0.046). Demographic, disease-related, and serum measurement variables were not significantly associated with performing paracentesis or order of antibiotic administration. Also, increased body mass index was significantly associated with decreased relative risk for paracentesis not done (RRR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.74-0.96, p = 0.01).
    UNASSIGNED: In conclusion, there was increased relative risk for performing paracentesis after antibiotic administration for patients admitted at night. We recommend ongoing resident and hospitalist training to maintain competency in bedside procedures such as paracentesis for patients with cirrhosis. Also, increased staffing or the presence of a resident/hospitalist led interventional team during night shifts may also help optimize the rates of timely paracentesis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:提供视频教程,详细介绍如何进行“盲”和超声引导下的腹部穿刺术,以进行诊断和治疗指导,并提供腹内压测量(IAP)的简要演示。
    方法:任何怀疑有游离腹腔积液的猫或狗或需要测量IAP的患者。
    方法:当根据体格检查和/或诊断影像学高度怀疑腹膜积液时,应进行腹腔穿刺术。4象限水龙头使用20号或更大的针头,盲目地放置在腹部4个象限中的≥1个中,以收集腹液。相比之下,在经皮插入针头和注射器以收集液体之前,超声可以使腹部中的液体可视化。不管收集技术如何,液体应立即进行细胞学分析,然后可以提交生化参数,由病理学家进行额外的细胞分析,和文化和敏感性(在极少数情况下,如果指示)。当担心器官灌注不足和室综合征时,使用压力计-导尿管系统测量的膀胱内膀胱压力接近IAP。
    结果:腹部穿刺术可以在使用和不使用超声引导的情况下进行。在进行治疗之前和之后,膀胱内压力测量用于诊断和趋势IAP值。
    结论:腹腔穿刺术是一种简单而安全的技术,所有小动物临床医生都应该舒适地进行。积液取样可以指导进一步的诊断和治疗。IAP的测量是简单的并且不需要专门的设备。
    OBJECTIVE: To provide a video tutorial detailing how to perform \"blind\" and ultrasound-guided abdominocentesis for diagnostic and therapeutic guidance, and to provide a brief demonstration of intra-abdominal pressure measurement (IAP).
    METHODS: Any cat or dog with suspicion of free abdominal effusion or patients requiring measurement of IAP.
    METHODS: Abdominocentesis should be performed when there is high suspicion for peritoneal effusion based on physical exam and/or diagnostic imaging. The 4-quadrant tap uses 20-gauge or larger needles placed blindly in ≥ 1 of the 4 quadrants of the abdomen to collect abdominal fluid. In contrast, ultrasound allows visualization of fluid in the abdomen prior to percutaneous insertion of a needle and syringe to collect fluid. Regardless of collection technique, fluid should have immediate cytologic analysis and later can be submitted for biochemical parameters, additional cellular analysis by a pathologist, and culture and sensitivity (in rare cases if indicated). Intravesicular bladder pressure measurement using a manometer-urinary catheter system approximates the IAP when there is concern for organ hypoperfusion and compartment syndrome.
    RESULTS: Abdominocentesis can be performed with and without the use of ultrasound guidance. Intravesicular bladder pressure measurement is used to diagnose and trend IAP values before and after treatments are performed.
    CONCLUSIONS: Abdominocentesis is a simple and safe technique that all small animal clinicians should be comfortable performing. Effusion sampling can guide further diagnostics and treatments. Measurement of IAP is simple and requires no specialized equipment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:反复进行腹水穿刺会对急诊科(ED)提出重大要求。为减轻这种需求,新的由普通内科医生领导的门诊手术诊所需要ED工作人员和患者接受这种护理过渡。
    目的:这项定性研究评估了在安全网医院实施FLuidASPiration(FLASP)诊所的障碍和促进因素。
    方法:FLASP诊所在2021年3月COVID-19大流行期间开业。从2022年2月至4月,对以下人员进行了半结构化访谈:10名ED医师和护士;5名FLASP临床患者;和4名在ED接受穿刺的患者。采访被记录下来,转录,并使用扎根理论方法对按计划行为理论(TPB)领域分类的主题进行分析,包括:态度/知识;社会规范;和物流。
    结果:主题分析发现,ED工作人员赞赏对穿刺的需求减少,但障碍包括:缺乏知识;对不稳定患者和患者期望(规范)的担忧;和调度后勤.FLASP临床患者只有有利的主题:对临床安全的信念;与员工的积极关系;和临床效率。使用ED进行穿刺的患者仅表示担忧:可能需要进行测试或住院;通常在ED中进行护理;并且不清楚临床安排。
    结论:本研究揭示了改变穿刺术护理地点所面临的挑战,包括需要更多的ED工作人员教育和标准化方法来将患者分诊到适当的护理地点。对ED患者进行有关门诊手术诊所的益处的更多支持和教育也可以减轻穿刺的ED负担。
    BACKGROUND: Repeated paracentesis for ascites can place significant demands on the emergency department (ED). A new general internist-led outpatient procedure clinic to alleviate this demand required ED staff and patients to accept this transition of care.
    OBJECTIVE: This qualitative study evaluates barriers and facilitators to implementing the FLuid ASPiration (FLASP) clinic in a safety net hospital.
    METHODS: The FLASP clinic opened during the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2021. From February to April 2022, semi-structured interviews were conducted with: 10 ED physicians and nurses; 5 FLASP clinic patients; and 4 patients receiving paracentesis in the ED. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a Grounded Theory approach for themes categorized by Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) domains including: attitudes/knowledge; social norms; and logistics.
    RESULTS: Thematic analysis found that ED staff appreciated reduced demand for paracentesis, but barriers included: lack of knowledge; concerns about unstable patients and patient expectations (norms); and scheduling logistics. FLASP clinic patients had only favorable themes: belief in clinic safety; positive relationship with staff; and clinic efficiency. Patients using the ED for paracentesis expressed only concerns: possible need for testing or hospitalization; care usually in the ED; and unclear clinic scheduling.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals challenges to transitioning sites of care for paracentesis including the need for greater ED staff education and standardizing methods to triage patients to appropriate site of care. Greater support and education of ED patients about the benefits of an outpatient procedure clinic may also reduce ED burden for paracentesis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    肝硬化患者很少发生由腹腔穿刺术引起的腹壁血肿。本文介绍一例67岁女性肝硬化患者因腹腔穿刺术引起腹壁血肿的病例,并复习相关文献。前两天,该患者在当地诊所接受了腹腔穿刺术,以缓解顽固性腹水的症状。一被录取,体格检查显示紫癜性斑块,腹壁左下象限有肿胀和轻度压痛。腹部计算机断层扫描显示晚期肝硬化伴脾肿大,脐静脉旁的曲折扩张,大量的腹水,腹壁左下象限有大量急性血肿。髂外动脉造影显示左旋髂深动脉造影剂外渗。然后使用N-丁基-2-氰基丙烯酸酯对目标动脉分支进行栓塞,止血.最终诊断为肝硬化患者腹腔穿刺术后左旋深髂动脉腹壁血肿。
    The occurrence of an abdominal wall hematoma caused by abdominal paracentesis in patients with liver cirrhosis is rare. This paper presents a case of an abdominal wall hematoma caused by abdominal paracentesis in a 67-year-old woman with liver cirrhosis with a review of the relevant literature. Two days prior, the patient underwent abdominal paracentesis for symptom relief for refractory ascites at a local clinic. Upon admission, a physical examination revealed purpuric patches with swelling and mild tenderness in the left lower quadrant of the abdominal wall. Abdominal computed tomography revealed advanced liver cirrhosis with splenomegaly, tortuous dilatation of the para-umbilical vein, a large volume of ascites, and a large acute hematoma at the left lower quadrant of the abdominal wall. An external iliac artery angiogram showed the extravasation of contrast media from the left deep circumflex iliac artery. Embolization of the target arterial branches using N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate was then performed, and the bleeding was stopped. The final diagnosis was an abdominal wall hematoma from the left deep circumflex iliac artery after abdominal paracentesis in a patient with liver cirrhosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:恶性腹水(MA)在晚期癌症患者中很常见,约60%的MA患者出现痛苦症状。此外,MA已被确定为不良预后因素,因此,使硕士的管理成为一个重要的问题。我们旨在回顾描述MA的文献,提供相关研究的叙事综合。
    方法:在PubMed上对1971年至2023年5月之间发表的文章进行了文献检索,和Cochrane图书馆使用单词“腹水/恶性腹水”和每个部分的主题。作者独立选择了所使用的文章并进行了总结。最后,本手稿通过所有作者的讨论获得共识.
    腹水形成的病理生理机制涉及血管通透性增加和通过淋巴系统的液体引流受损,这解释了腹膜癌的发生,肝肿瘤引起的门静脉高压症,肝细胞癌背景下的肝硬化,和肝静脉肿瘤阻塞引起的Budd-Chiari综合征。以前已经研究了各种治疗方法和程序的有效性和安全性;然而,目前尚无治疗指南.通常选择利尿剂和穿刺术作为治疗的第一线。腹膜内给药(catumaxomab,贝伐单抗,aflibercept,腹腔热化疗,曲安奈德),留置腹膜导管,腹膜静脉分流,无细胞和浓缩腹水回输疗法通常用于治疗难治性腹水。用于此目的的新设备是alfapump,将腹水从腹膜转移到膀胱。此外,胸段硬膜外镇痛可有效控制腹水相关症状.
    结论:尽管有这些选择,目前尚未建立MA的标准治疗方法,因为这方面的试验很少.有很多问题需要调查,和未来的研究和治疗发展预期。
    OBJECTIVE: Malignant ascites (MA) is common in patients with advanced cancer, and about 60% of patients with MA experience distressing symptoms. In addition, MA has been identified as a poor prognostic factor, therefore, making the management of MA an important issue. We aimed to review literature describing MA provide a narrative synthesis of relevant studies.
    METHODS: A literature search of articles published between 1971 and May 2023 was performed in PubMed, and Cochrane library using the words \"ascites/malignant ascites\" and the theme of each section. Authors independently selected the articles used and summarized. Finally, this manuscript was obtained consensus through discussed among all authors.
    UNASSIGNED: The pathophysiological mechanism of ascites formation involves increased vascular permeability and impaired fluid drainage through the lymphatic system, which explain the occurrence of peritoneal carcinomatosis, portal hypertension due to liver tumors, liver cirrhosis in the background of hepatocellular carcinoma, and Budd-Chiari syndrome caused by tumor occlusion of the hepatic vein. The efficacy and safety of various treatments and procedures have been investigated previously; however, no treatment guidelines have been established yet. Diuretics and paracentesis are often selected as the first lines of treatment. Intraperitoneal drug administration (catumaxomab, bevacizumab, aflibercept, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, triamcinolone), indwelling peritoneal catheters, peritoneovenous shunting, and cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy are commonly used to manage refractory ascites. A new device for this purpose is alfapump, which transfers ascites fluid from the peritoneum into the urinary bladder. In addition, thoracic epidural analgesia may be effective for managing ascites-related symptoms.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite these options, no standard treatment for MA has been established yet because few trials have been conducted in this area. There are many issues to be investigated, and future research and treatment development are expected.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号