Pancreatic trauma

胰腺创伤
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:胰腺创伤(PT)在创伤性损伤中很少见,发病率低,但它仍然会导致严重的感染并发症,导致高死亡率。急性胰腺炎(AP)是PT后常见的并发症,当合并器官功能障碍和败血症时,这将导致预后较差。
    方法:我们报告了一名25岁的多器官损伤患者,包括胰腺,由于腹部创伤,继发于紧急剖腹产的坏死性胰腺炎,合并腹腔感染(IAI)。患者接受了经皮引流,胰腺坏死组织清创术,对患者进行腹腔感染病灶清创。
    结论:我们报告一例严重AP和继发于创伤的IAI。该患者通过保守治疗如抗生素治疗和液体支持与手术相结合来管理。并获得了更好的结果。
    BACKGROUND: Pancreatic trauma (PT) is rare among traumatic injuries and has a low incidence, but it can still lead to severe infectious complications, resulting in a high mortality rate. Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common complication after PT, and when combined with organ dysfunction and sepsis, it will result in a poorer prognosis.
    METHODS: We report a 25-year-old patient with multiple organ injuries, including the pancreas, due to abdominal trauma, who developed necrotising pancreatitis secondary to emergency caesarean section, combined with intra-abdominal infection (IAI). The patient underwent performed percutaneous drainage, pancreatic necrotic tissue debridement, and abdominal infection foci debridement on the patient.
    CONCLUSIONS: We report a case of severe AP and IAI secondary to trauma. This patient was managed by a combination of conservative treatment such as antibiotic therapy and fluid support with surgery, and a better outcome was obtained.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:结肠和胰腺损伤长期以来都与创伤患者的腹腔感染并发症独立相关。这项研究的目的是评估伴随胰腺损伤对创伤性结肠损伤患者预后的影响。
    方法:确定连续3年接受结肠损伤手术治疗的患者。患者特征,损伤和休克的严重程度,胰腺损伤的存在和程度,记录术中充血红细胞(PRBC)输血情况。收集并比较结果,包括腹内脓肿形成和缝合线失败。然后进行多变量逻辑回归分析以确定伴随胰腺损伤对腹腔脓肿形成的影响。
    结果:确定了243例创伤性结肠损伤患者。其中17人也有胰腺损伤。合并结肠和胰腺损伤的患者在年龄方面与孤立结肠损伤的患者在临床上相似,性别,穿透损伤机制,入院乳酸,ISS,缝合线故障,和入院收缩压。两种腹内脓肿率(88.2%vs29.6%,P<.001)和术中PRBC输血(8vs1个单位,P=.004)在胰腺和结肠联合损伤组中较高。多变量逻辑回归确定了两种术中PRBC输血(比值比,1.09;95%置信区间,1.04-1.15;P<.001)和伴随胰腺损伤(比值比,14.8;95%置信区间,3.92-96.87;P<.001)作为腹内脓肿形成的独立预测因子。
    结论:术中PRBC输注和同时存在胰腺损伤是外伤性结肠损伤患者腹腔脓肿形成的独立预测因素。
    BACKGROUND: Colon and pancreatic injuries have both long been independently associated with intraabdominal infectious complications in trauma patients. The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of concomitant pancreatic injury on outcomes in patients with traumatic colon injuries.
    METHODS: Consecutive patients over a 3-year period who underwent operative management of colon injuries were identified. Patient characteristics, severity of injury and shock, presence and grade of pancreatic injury, and intraoperative packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions were recorded. Outcomes including intraabdominal abscess formation and suture line failure were collected and compared. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was then performed to determine the impact of concomitant pancreatic injury on intraabdominal abscess formation.
    RESULTS: 243 patients with traumatic colon injuries were identified. 17 of these also had pancreatic injuries. Patients with combined colon and pancreatic injuries were clinically similar to those with isolated colon injuries with respect to age, gender, penetrating mechanism of injury, admission lactate, ISS, suture line failure, and admission systolic blood pressure. Both intraabdominal abscess rates (88.2% vs 29.6%, P < .001) and intraoperative PRBC transfusions (8 vs 1 units, P = .004) were higher in the combined pancreatic and colon injury group. Multivariable logistic regression identified both intraoperative PRBC transfusions (odds ratio, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.15; P < .001) and concomitant pancreatic injury (odds ratio, 14.8; 95% confidence interval, 3.92-96.87; P < .001) as independent predictors of intraabdominal abscess formation.
    CONCLUSIONS: Both intraoperative PRBC transfusions and presence of concomitant pancreatic injury are independent predictors of intraabdominal abscess formation in patients with traumatic colon injuries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    胰腺创伤是急诊室中观察最少的诊断之一,少得多的儿科紧急情况。任何直接腹部钝器伤的原因都可能导致它。文献中只有少数案例,马匹事故与这种并发症有关,但是在文献中从来没有见过骑马鞍是导致胰腺损伤的原因,直到现在.强调早期诊断的重要性是关键,但更重要的是,为了强调正确的诊断方法将为识别主胰管病变提供机会,这将允许及时的手术方法,提高这些患者的总体生存率和降低发病率。这不仅在于利用特定研究的重要性,例如计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描来评估腹部创伤,但也使用其他更适合儿科患者的图像研究,如磁共振成像(MRI)与胰胆管造影(MRCP)。
    Pancreatic trauma is one of the least observed diagnoses in the emergency room, much less in pediatric emergencies. Any cause of direct abdominal blunt trauma can cause it. With only a few cases presented in the literature, horse accidents have been associated with this complication, but it has been never seen in literature as a case where the horse-riding saddle is the one causing the pancreatic trauma, until now. Emphasizing the importance of an early diagnosis is the key point, but more importantly, to highlight that the correct diagnostic approach will grant the opportunity for a lesion in the main pancreatic duct to be identified, which will allow a timely surgical approach, increasing overall survival rates and decreasing morbidity in these patients. Here lies the importance of not only utilizing a specific study, such as a computerized tomography (CT) scan to evaluate abdominal trauma but also using other image studies that are better suited for pediatric patients, such as magnetic resonance image (MRI) with cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    钝性胰腺损伤(BPI)在儿童中相对罕见,并且与相对较高的发病率和死亡率有关,特别是如果诊断延迟。本报告的目的是回顾有关小儿BPI早期诊断和治疗中存在争议的问题的文献。描述了一名6岁女孩的钝性胰腺损伤的代表性病例,该病例具有延迟诊断和术中和术后并发症。使用相关关键字对Scopus和WebofScience中的数据库和灰色文献进行了系统搜索。在PubMed上共发现了过去5年中发表的26篇相关文章。尽管早期CT表现被认为是最初胰腺外伤检查的一部分,CT检测儿童主胰管损伤的敏感性较低。MRCP和ERCP(如果有)可用于评估导管损伤,应在CT上不清楚胰管状态时进行。大多数低级别胰腺损伤患者可保守治疗。尽管涉及远端胰腺切除术的手术仍然是大多数患有严重胰腺损伤的儿童的首选方法,越来越多的证据表明非手术治疗(NOM)是安全有效的.NOM后大多数胰腺假性囊肿的并发症相对较轻,大多数自发解决。对于那些需要手术的孩子,提倡风险最小的保守手术方法。总之,小儿胰腺损伤的最佳治疗方法存在争议.需要进一步的临床试验来制定儿童胰腺损伤的临床实践指南。
    Blunt pancreatic injury (BPI) is relatively uncommon in children, and is associated with relatively high morbidity and mortality, especially if diagnosis is delayed. The aim of this report is to review the literature regarding controversial questions in the early diagnosis and management of pediatric BPI. A representative case of blunt pancreatic trauma in a six-year-old girl with delayed diagnosis and intraoperative and postoperative complications was described. A systematic search of databases and the grey literature in Scopus and Web of Science using relevant keywords was conducted. A total of 26 relevant articles published in last 5 years were found in PubMed. Although early CT performance is considered part of initial pancreatic trauma workup, the sensitivity of CT for detecting main pancreatic duct injuries in children is relatively low. MRCP and ERCP (if available) are useful for assessing ductal injury and should be performed when the status of the pancreatic duct is unclear on the CT. Most patients with low-grade pancreatic damage may be treated conservatively. Although surgery involving distal pancreatectomy remains the preferred approach for most children with high-grade pancreatic injury, there is growing evidence to suggest that non-operative management (NOM) is safe and effective. Most pancreatic pseudo cysts following NOM had relatively mild complications, and most resolved spontaneously. For those children who do require surgery, a conservative operative approach with the least risk is advocated. In conclusion, the optimal management for pediatric pancreatic trauma is controversial. Further clinical trials are required to generate clinical practice guidelines on pancreatic trauma in a child population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:儿科胰腺病理学及其管理很少被描述。我们介绍我们的经验。
    方法:完成了1995年至2021年所有胰腺疾病患者的回顾性病例-记录回顾。数据引用为中值(范围)。
    结果:两百十二名患者中75.9%的患者出现胰腺炎。在研究期间,胰腺炎的转诊率增加,并且影响了广泛的年龄范围(2个月-15.6岁)。急性胰腺炎(n=118)(年龄10.6(0.18-16.3)岁)。最常见的原因是特发性(n=60,50.8%)和胆道(n=28,23.8%)。约有10%的并发症或潜在的胆道原因需要治疗。复发性胰腺炎(n=14)(11.6(0.3-14.3)年)。最常见的原因是遗传性胰腺炎(n=6,42.9%)。一名患者需要内镜下引流假性囊肿。慢性胰腺炎(n=29)(16(0.38-15.5)年)。潜在诊断为特发性(n=14,48.4%)或遗传性胰腺炎(n=10,34.5%)。13名患者需要积极管理,包括胰肠吻合术(n=5)。24例(70.5%)保守治疗钝性创伤(n=34)。6名患者需要开放手术,但4例通过内窥镜或介入放射学进行治疗.胰腺肿瘤(n=13)在11.2(2.3-16)年出现。病理包括胰母细胞瘤(n=3),实性假乳头状瘤(n=3),神经内分泌肿瘤(n=2),腺泡细胞囊腺瘤(n=1),导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(n=1),胰腺胰岛素瘤(n=1),胰腺导管腺癌(n=1),和胚胎性横纹肌肉瘤(n=1)。其他(N=4):胰腺囊肿(n=3)和环状胰腺(n=1)。
    结论:儿科胰腺疾病涵盖了广泛的良性和恶性疾病,并受益于获得专科医疗,外科,内窥镜,和介入放射学专业知识。儿科胰腺炎的转诊人数正在增加,但是病因与成人不同。
    方法:IV.
    BACKGROUND: Paediatric pancreatic pathology and its management is rarely described. We present our experience.
    METHODS: A retrospective case-note review of all patients with pancreatic disease from 1995 to 2021 was completed. Data are quoted as median (range).
    RESULTS: Two hundred and twelve patients were identified with 75.9% presenting with pancreatitis. Referrals for pancreatitis increased during the study period and affected a wide age range (2 months-15.6 years). Acute pancreatitis (n = 118) (age 10.6 (0.18-16.3) years). The most common causes were idiopathic (n = 60, 50.8%) and biliary (n = 28, 23.8%). About 10% required treatment for complications or underlying biliary causes. Recurrent pancreatitis (n = 14) (11.6 (0.3-14.3) years). The most common cause was hereditary pancreatitis (n = 6, 42.9%). One patient required endoscopic drainage of pseudocyst. Chronic pancreatitis (n = 29) (16 (0.38-15.5) years). The underlying diagnosis was idiopathic (n = 14, 48.4%) or hereditary pancreatitis (n = 10, 34.5%). 13 patients required active management, including pancreaticojejunostomies (n = 5). Blunt Trauma (n = 34) was managed conservatively in 24 (70.5%). 6 patients required open surgery, but 4 were managed by either endoscopy or interventional radiology. Pancreatic tumours (n = 13) presented at 11.2 (2.3-16) years. Pathology included pancreaticoblastomas (n = 3), solid pseudopapillary tumours (n = 3), neuroendocrine tumours (n = 2), acinar cell cystadenoma (n = 1), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (n = 1), pancreatic insulinoma (n = 1), pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (n = 1), and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 1). OTHERS (N = 4): Pancreatic cyst (n = 3) and annular pancreas (n = 1).
    CONCLUSIONS: Paediatric pancreatic disease spans a wide spectrum of both benign and malignant disease and benefits from access to specialist medical, surgical, endoscopic, and interventional radiology expertise. Referrals for paediatric pancreatitis are increasing, but aetiology is different to that seen in adults.
    METHODS: IV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胰腺损伤的最佳治疗策略仍不清楚。我们旨在确定基于经皮引流结合内镜逆行胰胆管造影术引导支架置入术的初始非手术治疗(NOM)策略是否会改善钝性高级别胰腺损伤的预后。
    方法:在高容量中心连续纳入血液动力学稳定且无弥漫性腹膜炎征象的闭合性腹部创伤患者。主要结果是初次剖腹手术(LAP)与NOM的患者发生严重并发症(Clavien-Dindo分类≥Ⅲb)。使用改进的泊松回归对主要结果进行建模。倾向得分匹配和加权模型被纳入基于回归的敏感性分析。
    结果:在119例III/IV级胰腺损伤患者中,29例患者接受了初始NOM,90例接受了初始LAP。LAP组严重并发症发生率高于NOM组(65/90[72.2%]比9/29[31.0%],P<0.001)。在多变量修正泊松回归模型中,NOM组严重并发症的相对风险降低(相对风险,0.52;95%置信区间,0.30-0.90;P=0.020)。敏感性分析的结果与多变量分析的结果一致。NOM组每位患者的平均再干预次数为1.8次,LAP组为2.6次(P=0.067)。
    结论:对于血流动力学稳定且无弥漫性腹膜炎的钝性高级别胰腺损伤患者,NOM策略与较低的严重并发症风险相关(Clavien-Dindo分类≥Ⅲb),并且不需要更多的侵入性再干预程序.在拥有足够专业知识的大批量中心,经皮穿刺引流联合内镜逆行胰胆管造影术引导支架置入术可作为选定患者的初步合理选择。
    The optimal management strategy for pancreatic trauma remains unclear. We aimed to determine whether the initial nonoperative management (NOM) strategy based on percutaneous drainage combined with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography guided stent placement would improve outcomes for blunt high-grade pancreatic trauma.
    Patients with blunt abdominal trauma who were hemodynamically stable without signs of diffuse peritonitis were consecutively enrolled at a high-volume center. The primary outcome was the occurrence of severe complications (Clavien‒Dindo classification ≥ Ⅲb) for patients who underwent initial laparotomy (LAP) versus NOM. Modified Poisson regression was used to model the primary outcome. Propensity score matching and weighting models were included into a regression-based sensitivity analysis.
    Of 119 patients with grade III/IV pancreatic trauma, 29 patients underwent initial NOM, and 90 underwent initial LAP. The incidence of severe complications in the LAP group was higher than that in the NOM group (65/90 [72.2%] versus 9/29 [31.0%], P < 0.001). In the multivariable modified Poisson regression model, the relative risk for severe complications was decreased in the NOM group (relative risk, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.90; P = 0.020). The results of the sensitivity analysis were consistent with those of the multivariable analysis. The mean number of reinterventions per patient was 1.8 in the NOM group and 2.6 in the LAP group (P = 0.067).
    For blunt high-grade pancreatic trauma patients with stable hemodynamics and no diffuse peritonitis, the NOM strategy was associated with a lower risk of severe complications (Clavien‒Dindo classification ≥ Ⅲb) and did not require more invasive reintervention procedures. In high-volume centers with sufficient expertise, percutaneous drainage combined with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography guided stent placement may serve as an initial reasonable option for selected patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:很少有研究解决哪种引流类型对胰腺外伤(PT)患者更有益的问题。
    目的:探讨PT患者持续低负压冲洗(NPI)吸引引流是否优于封闭式被动重力(PG)引流。
    方法:接受胰腺手术的PT患者于2009年1月至2021年10月在转诊创伤中心连续入选。主要结局定义为严重并发症的发生(Clavien-Dindo分级≥Ⅲb)。多变量逻辑回归用于对主要结果进行建模,和倾向评分匹配(PSM)纳入基于回归的敏感性分析.
    结果:在这项研究中,146例患者接受了初始PG引流,50例接受了初始NPI吸引引流。在整个队列中,多变量logistic回归模型显示,NPI吸引引流[14/50(28.0%)比66/146(45.2%)降低了严重并发症的调整风险;比值比(OR),0.437;95%置信区间(CI):0.203-0.940]。1:1PSM后,确定了44对匹配的对。在匹配的队列中,对胰腺损伤相关和其他腹内器官损伤相关病例进行的每种手术的比例相当。NPI吸引引流仍显示严重并发症的风险较低[11/44(25.0%)比21/44(47.7%);或,0.365;95CI:0.148-0.901]。森林地块显示,在大多数亚组中,NPI吸力排水与Clavien-Dindo严重程度的风险较低相关。
    结论:这项研究,基于单个高容量中心中最大的PT种群之一,表明,最初的NPI吸引引流可以推荐作为管理复杂PT患者的安全有效的替代方法。
    BACKGROUND: Few studies have addressed the question of which drain types are more beneficial for patients with pancreatic trauma (PT).
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether sustained low negative pressure irrigation (NPI) suction drainage is superior to closed passive gravity (PG) drainage in PT patients.
    METHODS: PT patients who underwent pancreatic surgery were enrolled consecutively at a referral trauma center from January 2009 to October 2021. The primary outcome was defined as the occurrence of severe complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ Ⅲb). Multivariable logistic regression was used to model the primary outcome, and propensity score matching (PSM) was included in the regression-based sensitivity analysis.
    RESULTS: In this study, 146 patients underwent initial PG drainage, and 50 underwent initial NPI suction drainage. In the entire cohort, a multivariable logistic regression model showed that the adjusted risk for severe complications was decreased with NPI suction drainage [14/50 (28.0%) vs 66/146 (45.2%); odds ratio (OR), 0.437; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.203-0.940]. After 1:1 PSM, 44 matched pairs were identified. The proportion of each operative procedure performed for pancreatic injury-related and other intra-abdominal organ injury-related cases was comparable in the matched cohort. NPI suction drainage still showed a lower risk for severe complications [11/44 (25.0%) vs 21/44 (47.7%); OR, 0.365; 95%CI: 0.148-0.901]. A forest plot revealed that NPI suction drainage was associated with a lower risk of Clavien-Dindo severity in most subgroups.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study, based on one of the largest PT populations in a single high-volume center, revealed that initial NPI suction drainage could be recommended as a safe and effective alternative for managing complex PT patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胰腺创伤并不常见,诊断具有挑战性。相反,严重的肾脏损伤,脾,脾和肝脏是常见的,通常很容易用成像方法检测。胰腺损伤可导致大量的发病率和死亡率。回顾该机构在这种罕见伤害方面的经验是本研究的目标。
    患者记录是从三级护理中心的胰腺损伤患者的数据记录中收集的,并随访一年。使用放射学和手术发现,将美国创伤胰腺损伤外科协会的评分分配给每位患者。临床检查和CT结果主要用于非手术治疗患者的诊断。数据以描述性统计方式呈现。
    只有2.2%的创伤中心确诊为胰腺损伤。在近一半的病例中,腹部创伤可见。大多数胰腺损伤的受试者处于3级。3级和4级病例的死亡率最高。
    虽然高度胰腺损伤几乎总是需要手术干预,具有完整主胰管的低度胰腺损伤可以非手术有效处理。如果可能,保留脾脏的远端胰腺切除术是远端胰腺转运的理想方法。一名血液动力学稳定的患者,伴有复杂的胰十二指肠损伤,这与高死亡率有关,应进行Whipple切除术。
    UNASSIGNED: Pancreatic trauma is uncommon and challenging to diagnose. Contrarily, severe injuries to the kidney, spleen, and liver are frequent and typically easy to detect with imaging methods. Pancreas injuries can cause a significant amount of morbidity and mortality. Reviewing the institution\'s experience with this rather infrequent injury was the goal of this study.
    UNASSIGNED: The patients\' records were collected from the data records at the tertiary care center for patients who had pancreatic damage and were followed up for a year. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma pancreatic damage grade scores were assigned to each patient using the radiologic and surgical findings. Clinical examination and CT results were predominantly used to make the diagnosis in patients who underwent non-operative treatment. The data are presented as descriptive statistics.
    UNASSIGNED: Only 2.2% of the total cases that presented to the trauma center were finalized as pancreatic injuries. Trauma to the abdomen was seen in nearly half the cases brought. Most of the subjects in pancreatic injuries were in grade 3. Mortality was noted maximum for the grade 3 and 4 cases.
    UNASSIGNED: While high-grade pancreatic injury almost always requires an operational intervention, low-grade pancreatic injury with an intact main pancreatic duct may be effectively handled non-operatively. When possible, distal pancreatectomy with spleen preservation is the ideal procedure for distal pancreatic trans-action. A patient who is hemodynamically stable with complex pancreaticoduodenal damage, which is related to a high death rate, should undergo Whipple resection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    急诊胰十二指肠切除术(EPD)很少进行。了解EPD的适应症和结果对于更好地了解其在临床实践中的应用非常重要。对8例EPD连续病例进行了审查。在2003年1月至2021年12月之间,一个中心的370名患者中有8名(2.2%)接受了紧急胰十二指肠切除术。有6名男性和2名女性,中位年龄为45.5岁。三个病人的适应症是外伤,两名患者的肿瘤出血,每个病人都患有十二指肠肿瘤,术后并发症和内镜下逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)并发症。中位手术时间和出血量分别为427.5分钟和1,825mL,分别。没有手术死亡。7例患者(87.5%)发生术后并发症。3例患者(37.5%)发生术后B级胰瘘。术后中位住院时间为23.5天。5例患者仍然活着,而3例患者在手术后存活了13、31和42个月。死亡原因是两名患者的肿瘤复发,和一名患者的败血症。根据这个案例系列,环保署与发病率上升及胰瘘有关,但在危及生命的情况下仍然是应得的,并且在EPD之后可以长期生存。
    Emergency pancreaticoduodenectomy (EPD) is a rarely performed operation. It is important to know the indications and outcomes of EPD to have a better understanding of its application in clinical practice. A review of eight consecutive cases of EPD was done. Between January 2003 and December 2021, 8 out of 370 patients (2.2%) in a single center received pancreaticoduodenectomy as emergency. There were six males and two females with a median age of 45.5 years. The indications were trauma in three patients, bleeding tumors in two patients, and one patient each in obstructing duodenal tumor, postoperative complication and post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) complication. The median operative time and blood loss were 427.5 minutes and 1,825 mL, respectively. There was no operative mortality. Seven patients (87.5%) had postoperative complications. Three patients (37.5%) developed postoperative grade B pancreatic fistula. The median postoperative hospital stay was 23.5 days. Five patients were still alive while three patients survived for 13, 31, and 42 months after the operation. The causes of death were recurrent tumors in two patients, and sepsis in one patient. According to this case series, EPD is associated with increased morbidity and pancreatic fistula, but is still deserved in life-threatening situations and long-term survival is possible after EPD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胰腺创伤是罕见的,但与显著的发病率相关。目前可用的管理指南基于低质量的证据,缺乏长期结果的数据。本研究旨在评估胰腺损伤的临床特征和患者报告的长期结局。
    进行了一项回顾性队列研究,评估了10年来在5个欧洲国家的11个中心对胰腺损伤的治疗。从医院记录中收集与胰腺损伤和治疗有关的数据。患者报告生活质量(QoL),由于指数伤害而改变就业和新的或正在进行的治疗。
    总之,包括165名患者。大多数是男性(70.9%),中位年龄为27岁(范围:6-93),损伤机制以钝性为主(87.9%).四分之一的病例接受了保守治疗;较高的损伤严重程度评分(ISS)和美国创伤手术协会(AAST)胰腺损伤评分增加了手术的可能性,内窥镜和/或放射学介入。孤立的,钝性胰腺损伤与年龄较小和胰管受累有关;该队列似乎受益于非手术治疗。长期(中位随访93;范围8-214个月),9.3%的受访者报告胰腺外分泌和内分泌功能不全.长期使用镇痛药也影响了9.3%的受访者,许多报告的生活质量问题(QoL)可能归因于阿片类药物治疗的副作用。总的来说,QoL受损与更高的ISS分数相关,手术治疗和阿片类药物出院镇痛。
    胰腺创伤是罕见的,但可以导致大量的短期和长期发病率。尽管有明显损伤,但QoL指标和胰腺功能仍可完全恢复。特别是在孤立的,钝性胰腺损伤保守治疗,并实现早期戒断阿片类药物镇痛。
    UNASSIGNED: Trauma to the pancreas is rare but associated with significant morbidity. Currently available management guidelines are based on low-quality evidence and data on long-term outcomes is lacking. This study aimed to evaluate clinical characteristics and patient-reported long-term outcomes for pancreatic injury.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective cohort study evaluating treatment for pancreatic injury in 11 centers across 5 European nations over >10 years was performed. Data relating to pancreatic injury and treatment were collected from hospital records. Patients reported quality of life (QoL), changes to employment and new or ongoing therapy due to index injury.
    UNASSIGNED: In all, 165 patients were included. The majority were male (70.9%), median age was 27 years (range: 6-93) and mechanism of injury predominantly blunt (87.9%). A quarter of cases were treated conservatively; higher injury severity score (ISS) and American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) pancreatic injury scores increased the likelihood for surgical, endoscopic and/or radiologic intervention. Isolated, blunt pancreatic injury was associated with younger age and pancreatic duct involvement; this cohort appeared to benefit from non-operative management. In the long term (median follow-up 93; range 8-214 months), exocrine and endocrine pancreatic insufficiency were reported by 9.3% of respondents. Long-term analgesic use also affected 9.3% of respondents, with many reported quality of life problems (QoL) potentially attributable to side-effects of opiate therapy. Overall, impaired QoL correlated with higher ISS scores, surgical therapy and opioid analgesia on discharge.
    UNASSIGNED: Pancreatic trauma is rare but can lead to substantial short- and long-term morbidity. Near complete recovery of QoL indicators and pancreatic function can occur despite significant injury, especially in isolated, blunt pancreatic injury managed conservatively and when early weaning off opiate analgesia is achieved.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号