This is an overview of relation between acute and chronic pancreatitis and between acute pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Acute pancreatitis and recurrent acute pancreatitis are an etiological factor of chronic pancreatitis. Population-based studies have calculated the risk of acute recurrent pancreatitis after the first attack of acute pancreatitis to be 20% and development of chronic pancreatitis after first attack of acute pancreatitis is 10%. An important risk factor is tobacco smoking. Acute and chronic pancreatitis are risk factors for pancreatic cancer. The risk of acute pancreatitis is related to the number of recurrences of acute pancreatitis, but not the etiology of acute pancreatitis. Acute pancreatitis, as well as chronic pancreatitis, are risk factors for pancreatic cancer. After an attack of acute pancreatitis or recurrent acute pancreatitis a patient should be regarded as a high risk.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has limited treatment options, emphasizing the urgent need for effective therapies. The predominant driver in PDAC is mutated KRAS proto-oncogene, KRA, present in 90% of patients. The emergence of direct KRAS inhibitors presents a promising avenue for treatment, particularly those targeting the KRASG12C mutated allele, which show encouraging results in clinical trials. However, the development of resistance necessitates exploring potent combination therapies. Our objective was to identify effective KRASG12C-inhibitor combination therapies through unbiased drug screening. Results revealed synergistic effects with son of sevenless homolog 1 (SOS1) inhibitors, tyrosine-protein phosphatase non-receptor type 11 (PTPN11)/Src homology region 2 domain-containing phosphatase-2 (SHP2) inhibitors, and broad-spectrum multi-kinase inhibitors. Validation in a novel and unique KRASG12C-mutated patient-derived organoid model confirmed the described hits from the screening experiment. Our findings propose strategies to enhance KRASG12C-inhibitor efficacy, guiding clinical trial design and molecular tumor boards.

Pancreatic cancer, a highly fatal malignancy, is predicted to rank as the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the next decade. This highlights the urgent need for new insights into personalized diagnosis and treatment. Although molecular subtypes of pancreatic cancer were well established in genomics and transcriptomics, few known molecular classifications are translated to guide clinical strategies and require a paradigm shift. Notably, chronically developing and continuously improving high-throughput technologies and systems serve as an important driving force to further portray the molecular landscape of pancreatic cancer in terms of epigenomics, proteomics, metabonomics, and metagenomics. Therefore, a more comprehensive understanding of molecular classifications at multiple levels using an integrated multi-omics approach holds great promise to exploit more potential therapeutic options. In this review, we recapitulated the molecular spectrum from different omics levels, discussed various subtypes on multi-omics means to move one step forward towards bench-to-beside translation of pancreatic cancer with clinical impact, and proposed some methodological and scientific challenges in store.

UNASSIGNED: Pancreatic cancer (PC), characterized by its aggressive nature and low patient survival rate, remains a challenging malignancy. Anoikis, a process inhibiting the spread of metastatic cancer cells, is closely linked to cancer progression and metastasis through anoikis-related genes. Nonetheless, the precise mechanism of action of these genes in PC remains unclear.
UNASSIGNED: Study data were acquired from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, with validation data accessed at the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Differential expression analysis and univariate Cox analysis were performed to determine prognostically relevant differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with anoikis. Unsupervised cluster analysis was then employed to categorize cancer samples. Subsequently, a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis was conducted on the identified DEGs to establish a clinical prognostic gene signature. Using risk scores derived from this signature, patients with cancer were stratified into high-risk and low-risk groups, with further assessment conducted via survival analysis, immune infiltration analysis, and mutation analysis. External validation data were employed to confirm the findings, and Western blot and immunohistochemistry were utilized to validate risk genes for the clinical prognostic gene signature.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 20 prognostic-related DEGs associated with anoikis were obtained. The TCGA dataset revealed two distinct subgroups: cluster 1 and cluster 2. Utilizing the 20 DEGs, a clinical prognostic gene signature comprising two risk genes (CDKN3 and LAMA3) was constructed. Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) were classified into high-risk and low-risk groups per their risk scores, with the latter exhibiting a superior survival rate. Statistically significant variation was noted across immune infiltration and mutation levels between the two groups. Validation cohort results were consistent with the initial findings. Additionally, experimental verification confirmed the high expression of CDKN3 and LAMA3 in tumor samples.
UNASSIGNED: Our study addresses the gap in understanding the involvement of genes linked to anoikis in PAAD. The clinical prognostic gene signature developed herein accurately stratifies patients with PAAD, contributing to the advancement of precision medicine for these patients.

UNASSIGNED: Due to resistance to gemcitabine (GEM), patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) usually have poor prognosis and low survival rate. The purpose of our research was to explore the impact of exosome PPP3CB on GEM resistance in PC, and concurrently analyze the regulatory role of the miR-298/STAT3 signaling pathway.
UNASSIGNED: Exosomes isolated from PC cells were verified by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) and western blotting (WB). The interaction between PPP3CB and miR-298 was verified using dual-luciferase reporter gene assay, followed by evaluation of cell growth and death using CCK8 assay, EdU staining, and flow cytometry.
UNASSIGNED: Increased PPP3CB expression was observed in GEM-resistant PC cells. Exosomes from PC cells and GEM-resistant PC cells were successfully extracted by ultra-high speed centrifugation. Confocal microscopy showed internalization of fluorescein amide (FAM)-labeled GEM-resistant exosomes by PC cells. PPP3CB enhanced the proliferation of GEM-resistant PC cells and inhibited their apoptosis, whereas down-regulation of PPP3CB promoted the death of PC cells and inhibited the proliferation of GEM-resistant PC cells, and enhance the susceptibility of PC cells to GEM. Additionally, PPP3CB positively regulated STAT3 expression in PC cells by down-regulating miR-298, thus promoting the growth and inhibiting the death of PC cells.
UNASSIGNED: PC cell-derived exosome PPP3CB enhances STAT3 expression by downregulating miR-298, stimulating cell growth, and suppressing cell death, thereby increasing the resistance of PC cells to GEM.

BACKGROUND: Despite calls for regionalizing pancreatic cancer (PC) care to high-volume centers (HVCs), many patients with PC elect to receive therapy closer to their home or at multiple institutions. In the context of cross-institutional PC care, the challenges associated with coordinating care are poorly understood.
METHODS: In this qualitative study we conducted semi-structured interviews with oncology clinicians from a HVC (n = 9) and community-based hospitals (n = 11) to assess their perspectives related to coordinating the care of and treating PC patients across their respective institutions. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using deductive and inductive approaches to identify themes related to cross-institutional coordination challenges and to note improvement opportunities.
RESULTS: Clinicians identified challenges associated with closed-loop communication due, in part, to not having access to a shared electronic health record. Challenges with patient co-management were attributed to patients receiving inconsistent recommendations from different clinicians. To address these challenges, participants suggested several improvement opportunities such as building rapport with clinicians across institutions and updating tumor board processes. The opportunity to update tumor board processes was reportedly multi-dimensional and could involve: (1) designating a tumor board coordinator; (2) documenting and disseminating tumor board recommendations; and (3) using teleconferencing to facilitate community-based clinician engagement during tumor board meetings.
CONCLUSIONS: In light of communication barriers and challenges associated with patient co-management, enabling the development of relationships among PC clinicians and improving the practices of multidisciplinary tumor boards could potentially foster cross-institutional coordination. Research examining how multidisciplinary tumor board coordinators and teleconferencing platforms could enhance cross-institutional communication and thereby improve patient outcomes is warranted.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are rarely used to treat advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) due to marginal efficacy.
METHODS: This study included 92 consecutive patients diagnosed with advanced or recurrent PDAC who received nivolumab-based treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify prognostic factors. A control group of 301 patients with PDAC who achieved disease control with palliative chemotherapy but without ICIs was selected for comparison using propensity score matching (PSM).
RESULTS: The median overall survival (OS) since nivolumab treatment was 15.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.5-19.0), 2.4 (95% CI 1.2-3.6), and 1.1 (95% CI 1.0-1.2) months in patients who received add-on nivolumab after achieving disease control with chemotherapy, in those who received concomitant nivolumab and chemotherapy without prerequisite confirmation of disease control, and in those who received nivolumab without concomitant chemotherapy, respectively (P < 0.001). After PSM, the median overall survival (OS) since initiation of the concomitant chemotherapy that achieved disease control was significantly longer (P = 0.026) in patients who received add-on nivolumab (19.8 months; 95% CI 14.5-25.1) than in those who received chemotherapy alone (13.8 months; 95% CI 10.8-16.9). The immune profiling of the tumors in resected patients revealed higher scores of CD8+ T cells to Tregs in patients with add-on nivolumab comparing to those who received chemotherapy alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Adding-on nivolumab was associated with improved OS in patients with advanced PDAC who achieved disease control following chemotherapy.

Clear cell sarcoma (CCS) is a type of malignant tumor that can arise from tendons and aponeuroses. This malignant proliferation of cells with melanocytic lineage normally occurs in young patients, and it is normally identified in extremities. However, different sites including gastrointestinal organs are also described. Due difficulties in the molecular and histopathology evaluation, the diagnosis is often confused with malignant melanoma. Most cases are treated with surgical resection, but overall, the prognosis is poor. In this editorial, we will discuss a very interesting case of CCS identified in the pancreas. We will discuss the literature and controversies in the management of this type of cancer. Furthermore, we will address molecular strategies to be incorporated in those cases to better understand the primary location of the tumor. Finally, future perspectives of the field and new strategies of treatment will be described.

UNASSIGNED: To compare the efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and radical surgery for non-metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC).
UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively analyzed 89 stage I/II/III PC patients who underwent HIFU (n = 43) or surgery (n = 46) at the Third Xiangya Hospital from January 2020 to December 2021. Pain relief, Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), overall survival (OS), treatment-related complications and risk factors for OS were assessed.
UNASSIGNED: There was no significant difference in the pain relief rate at 30 days post-treatment between the two groups. However, compared with the surgery group, the HIFU group showed significantly lower post-treatment VAS scores (p = 0.019). In the surgery group, the KPS at 30 days post-treatment was lower than pretreatment KPS (70 vs 80; p = 0.015). This relationship was reversed in the HIFU group (80 vs 70; p = 0.024). Median OS favored surgery over HIFU (23 vs 10 months; p < 0.001), with a higher 1-year OS rate (69.57% vs 32.6%; p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in OS between the two groups for stage III patients (p = 0.177). Complications rated ≥ grade III were 2.33% in the HIFU group and 32.6% in the surgery group. Multivariate analyses showed that age, KPS, and treatment methods were independent prognostic factors for OS.
UNASSIGNED: HIFU demonstrates advantages over surgery in terms of early KPS, VAS improvements, and safety for pancreatic cancer; however, long-term outcomes favor surgery. For III-stage disease, HIFU was noninferior to surgery in overall survival.

In the current medical era, human health is confronted with various challenges, with cancer being a prominent concern. Therefore, enhancing the therapeutic arsenal for cancer with a constant influx of novel molecules that selectively target tumor cells while displaying minimal toxicity toward normal cells is imperative. This study delves into the antiproliferative and EGFR kinase inhibitory activities of newly reported spirooxindole-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine derivatives 8a-h and 10a-h. The inhibitory effects on the growth of human cancer cell lines A-549 (lung carcinoma), Panc-1 (pancreatic carcinoma), and A-431 (skin epidermoid carcinoma) were evaluated, and the SAR has been clarified through analysis. With IC50 values in the single-digit micromolar range, compounds 8b, 8d, 10a-b, and 10d were shown to be the most effective antiproliferative candidates against the studied cancer cell lines. They also exerted negligible cytotoxicity (with selectivity scores between 8.63 and 30.02) against the human lung MRC5 cell line. Additionally, we investigated the potential inhibitory action of compounds 8b, 8d, 10a-b, and 10d on EGFR and VEGFR-2. 10a was this investigation\'s most effective EGFR inhibitor, with an IC50 value of 0.54 μM. Ultimately, the molecular docking analysis of congener 10a highlighted its effective suppression of EGFR by examining its binding mode and docking score compared to Erlotinib. These findings underscore the potential of spirooxindole-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine derivatives as promising anticancer agents targeting EGFR kinase.