In the face of infectious disease outbreaks, the collective behavior of a society can has a profound impact on the course of the epidemic. This study investigates the instantaneous social dilemma presented by individuals\' attitudes toward vaccine behavior and its influence on social distancing as a critical component in disease control strategies. The research employs a multifaceted approach, combining modeling techniques and simulation to comprehensively assess the dynamics between social distancing attitudes and vaccine uptake during disease outbreaks. With respect to modeling, we introduce a new vaccination game (VG) where, unlike conventional VG models, a 2-player and 2-strategy payoff structure is aptly embedded in the individual behavior dynamics. Individuals\' willingness to adhere to social distancing measures, such as mask-wearing and physical distancing, is strongly associated with their inclination to receive vaccines. The study reveals that a positive attitude towards social distancing tends to align with a higher likelihood of vaccine acceptance, ultimately contributing to more effective disease control. As the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated, swift and coordinated public health measures are essential to curbing the spread of infectious diseases. This study underscores the urgency of addressing the instantaneous social dilemma posed by individuals\' attitudes. By understanding the intricate relationship between these factors, policymakers, and healthcare professionals can develop tailored strategies to promote both social distancing compliance and vaccine acceptance, thereby enhancing our ability to control and mitigate the impact of disease outbreaks in the future.

The typical framework of replicator dynamics in evolutionary game theory assumes that all mutations are equally likely, meaning that the mutation of an evolving inhabitant only contributes constantly. However, in natural systems in biological and social sciences, mutations can arise due to their repetitive regeneration. The phenomenon of changing strategies (updating), typically prolonged sequences repeated many times, is defined as a volatile mutation that has been overlooked in evolutionary game theory. Implementing a repeated time framework introduces a dynamic mutation aspect incorporated with the pairwise Fermi rule. Network structure, ubiquitous in many natural and artificial systems, has significantly affected the dynamics and outcomes of evolutionary games. We examine the evolution of the pairwise game in terms of dilemma strength. It is revealed that mutation intensity can influence evolutionary dynamics. We also demonstrated that the obtained outcomes run by the deterministic and multi-agent simulation (MAS) process present similar stability regions for both linear and non-linear dynamics, even in various game classes. In particular, the most stimulating effect is detected for the relationship between the fraction of cooperation and the fraction of the mutated individuals, as inclination tends to provide an increasing tendency and supporting defection in the opposite case. In conclusion, we identified a form of volatile mutation as a form of noise that, under certain situations, could be used to enhance cooperation in social systems and design strategies for promoting cooperation in networked environments.