PD-1 inhibitors

PD - 1 抑制剂
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) is a potentially fatal disease that can occur at any duration of treatment. Patients may present with vague respiratory symptoms such as progressive cough, dyspnea, and decreased activity tolerance. Among checkpoint inhibitors, CIP is higher in programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors. An 82-year-old Latina woman with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2-negative lobular carcinoma of the right breast had been treated by partial mastectomy followed by adjuvant hormonal treatment and radiation in 2014. Then CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil) was followed by letrozole and abemaciclib, PD-1, therapy in 2022. In 2023, the patient presented with a dry cough and worsening dyspnea with a new oxygen requirement. She was admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of multifocal pneumonia and sepsis. She unfortunately developed rapidly higher oxygen requirements and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and was ultimately presumed to have CIP. She was intubated on hospital day 6 and extubated on day 12 with no plans for reintubation and do-not-resuscitate status. She subsequently had demise after a period of respiratory arrest. CIP is rare but associated with fatal outcomes, especially with the development of ARDS. It is important, along the course of cancer treatment and goals of care discussion, to educate patients and their families on possible side effects of chemotherapy and involve specialists early with the goal of lowering mortality rates. Most patients do not survive this unfortunate progression of disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    肝细胞癌(HCC)是最常见的原发性肝脏恶性肿瘤。肝切除术是主要的治愈性治疗选择,但相当比例的患者在初始评估时不是手术候选人.随着新型治疗策略的发展,包括靶向治疗和免疫疗法,一些HCC可以实现肿瘤的降期和治疗性切除。一名52岁的男性被诊断为肝癌,门静脉浸润,广泛的肺和淋巴结转移。给予经肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)联合多纳非尼和辛替利玛。治疗后,肝脏中的原发性肿瘤大部分缩小,几乎完全消除了肺转移。患者随后接受了肝癌的治愈性手术,病理检查显示肿瘤完全坏死。术后继续进行靶向免疫治疗,在最新的随访中没有发现疾病进展。具有远处转移的晚期HCC可能对TACE与酪氨酸激酶靶向抑制剂和PD-1受体阻滞剂的联合治疗有良好的反应。并获得治愈性手术的机会。这种功效可能与免疫微环境的重塑和血管生成有关。HCC是非常异质的,对治疗的反应因患者而异。缺乏有用的生物标志物来预测治疗效果,这需要进一步研究。
    Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver malignancy. Hepatic resection constitutes the major curative treatment option, but a significant proportion of patients are not surgical candidates on initial evaluation. Along with the development of novel therapeutic strategies including targeted therapies and immunotherapies, a few HCCs can achieve tumor downstaging and be curatively resected. A 52-year-old man was diagnosed with HCC with portal vein invasion and extensive pulmonary and lymph node metastasis. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in conjunction with donafenib and sintilimab was given. Primary tumors in the liver largely shrank with almost complete elimination of the lung metastases following treatment. The patient subsequently underwent curative surgery for HCC, and the pathological examination revealed complete necrosis of the tumor. Targeted immunotherapy was continued after surgery and no disease progression was found on the latest follow-up. Advanced HCC with distant metastasis might have an excellent response to combination therapy of TACE with tyrosine kinase-targeted inhibitors and PD-1 blocker, and achieve opportunity for curative surgery. This efficacy may be associated with the remodeling of immune microenvironment and angiogenesis. HCC is extremely heterogeneous, and the response to therapeutics varies among patients. There is a lack of useful biomarkers to predict therapeutic efficacy, which needs further studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)是全球疾病负担的原因。诸如手术切除和化学疗法的常规治疗提供有限的长期存活率。最近,针对PD-1的免疫疗法在其他癌症中显示出希望,但其在ESCC中的疗效尚不清楚.
    符合这项研究条件的31项研究包括总共10,681名接受免疫治疗的患者。单独或与传统化疗联合使用。2023年9月1日,在包括CENTRAL在内的数据库中进行了全面搜索,PubMed,MEDLINE,WebofScience,Embase,还有Scopus.
    对于OSR,结果表明,在不同时间点(6、12和24个月)的生存率显着提高,比值比为0.636(95%CI0.595-0.680;Z=-13.292;p<0.00001)。就PFS而言,PD-1抑制剂在不同时间点表现出改善;合并比值比为0.568(95%CI0.511-0.633;Z=-10.357;p<0.00001)。关于ORR,汇总分析显示总比值比为1.724(95%CI1.554-1.913;Z=10.289;p<0.00001),表明治疗反应改善。DCR并不表明PD-1抑制剂比化疗有显著优势,比值比为0.904(95%CI0.784-1.043;Z=-1.381;p=0.167)。
    有令人信服的证据加强了PD-1抑制剂的有效性和安全性,作为单一疗法或与化疗联合,用于ESCC的治疗。PD-1抑制剂在OSR方面表现出显著优势,PFS,ORR。
    UNASSIGNED: Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC) contributes to the global burden of disease. Conventional treatments such as surgical resection and chemotherapy offer limited long-term survival rates. Recently, immunotherapies targeting PD-1 have shown promise in other cancers, but their efficacy in ESCC remains unclear.
    UNASSIGNED: The 31 studies eligible for this study included a total of 10,681 patients who were subjected to immunotherapy, either alone or in combination with traditional chemotherapy. A comprehensive search was conducted on September 1, 2023, across databases including CENTRAL, PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus.
    UNASSIGNED: For OSR, results indicate a significantly improved survival at different time points (6, 12, and 24 months), with an odds ratio of 0.636 (95 % CI 0.595-0.680; Z = -13.292; p < 0.00001). In terms of PFS, PD-1 inhibitors demonstrated improvements at different time points; pooled odds ratio was 0.568 (95 % CI 0.511-0.633; Z = -10.357; p < 0.00001). Regarding ORR, the pooled analysis showed an overall odds ratio of 1.724 (95 % CI 1.554-1.913; Z = 10.289; p < 0.00001), indicating improved treatment response. DCR did not suggest a significant advantage for PD-1 inhibitors over chemotherapy, with an odds ratio of 0.904 (95 % CI 0.784-1.043; Z = -1.381; p = 0.167).
    UNASSIGNED: There is compelling evidence reinforcing the efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors, as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy, for the treatment of ESCC. PD-1 inhibitors demonstrate a significant advantage in terms of OSR, PFS, and ORR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    黑色素瘤是美国第五大最常见的癌症,占所有皮肤癌相关死亡的大多数。使其成为最致命的皮肤恶性肿瘤.IIB-IV期黑色素瘤的系统辅助治疗现已批准用于接受手术切除的患者,考虑到该患者人群中复发和死亡的明显风险。尽管阶段较低,与IIIA/IIIB期相比,高危II期黑色素瘤(IIB/IIC期)通常表现出更积极的病程,因此有理由考虑对这些患者进行辅助治疗。在这次审查中,我们强调目前治疗IIB/C期黑色素瘤的实践标准,重点是由已发表的具有里程碑意义的临床试验支持的辅助疗法,包括抗PD-1治疗。值得注意的是,到目前为止,在该患者人群中批准的辅助疗法已显示出无复发生存率的改善,虽然它们对总体生存率的影响尚未确定。最后,这篇综述重点介绍了目前正在进行的高危临床II期黑色素瘤的研究和治疗可能性的试验和未来方向.
    Melanoma is the fifth most common cancer in the United States and accounts for the majority of all skin cancer-related deaths, making it the most lethal cutaneous malignancy. Systemic adjuvant therapy for stage IIB-IV melanoma is now approved for patients who have undergone surgical resection, given the appreciable risk of recurrence and mortality in this patient population. Despite the lower stage, high-risk stage II melanoma (stage IIB/IIC) can often exhibit an even more aggressive course when compared to stage IIIA/IIIB disease, thus justifying consideration of adjuvant therapy in these patients. In this review, we highlight the current standard of practice for the treatment of stage IIB/C melanoma, with a focus on adjuvant therapies supported by published landmark clinical trials, including anti-PD-1 therapy. Notably, adjuvant therapies approved thus far in this patient population have demonstrated an improvement in recurrence-free survival, while their impact on overall survival is pending. Finally, this review highlights currently ongoing trials and future directions for research and treatment possibilities for high-risk clinical stage II melanoma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近,一系列程序性细胞死亡-1(PD-1)抑制剂联合化疗的试验显示,在以前未经治疗的患者中,与单独化疗相比,疗效极佳。晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)。然而,对于哪种免疫治疗方案可导致更好的生存结局,目前尚无正面比较和共识.本研究旨在评估各种基于PD-1抑制剂的疗法在晚期ESCC患者的一线治疗中的生存疗效。
    在PubMed中搜索了2023年7月31日之前收集的数据,科克伦图书馆,Embase,Medline,和WebofScience数据库。使用MetaSurv软件包合并总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期曲线。通过重建的个体患者数据比较生存数据。
    共纳入4,162例患者和7项随机对照试验。合成后,PD-1抑制剂将中位OS从11.3个月(95%CI(置信区间)10.7-11.7)延长至15.6个月(95%CI14.7-16.3)。根据重建的患者水平数据,托里帕利玛,tislelizumab,和sintilimab组实现了最长的操作系统,而sintilimab和tislelizumab组的复发风险低于其他治疗.在合并阳性评分≥10分的患者中,辛替利玛比pembrolizumab具有更好的OS疗效(HR:0.71,95%CI:0.52-0.96)。肿瘤比例评分≥1%,camrelizumab,Nivolumab,和toripalimab在OS和无进展生存期中均显示了近期生存获益.
    PD-1抑制剂联合化疗可显著提高晚期ESCC患者的生存时间。托里帕利马,tislelizumab,sindilimab联合化疗显示出最佳的OS获益。将tislelizumab和sintilimab添加到化疗中可能会产生更长的无进展益处。Sintilimab被强烈推荐用于高程序性细胞死亡-配体1丰度的患者。
    [https://www.crd.约克。AC.uk/PROSPERO/],标识符[CRD42024501086]。
    UNASSIGNED: Recently, a sum of trials of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors combined with chemotherapy have shown excellent efficacy compared to chemotherapy alone in patients with previously untreated, advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, there is no head-to-head comparison and consensus on which immunotherapy regimen results in better survival outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the survival efficacy of various PD-1 inhibitor-based therapies in the first-line treatments for patients with advanced ESCC.
    UNASSIGNED: Data collected prior to 31 July 2023 were searched in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, and Web of Science databases. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival curves were pooled using the MetaSurv package. Survival data were compared by reconstructed individual patient data.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 4,162 patients and seven randomized controlled trials were included. After synthesizing, PD-1 inhibitors prolonged median OS from 11.3 months (95% CI (confidence interval) 10.7-11.7) to 15.6 months (95% CI 14.7-16.3). Based on reconstructed patient-level data, the toripalimab, tislelizumab, and sintilimab group achieved the longest OS, whereas the sintilimab and tislelizumab group had the lowest risk of recurrence than other treatments. In patients with a combined positive score of ≥10, sintilimab had better OS efficacy than pembrolizumab (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52-0.96). In terms of tumor proportion score of ≥1%, camrelizumab, nivolumab, and toripalimab showed proximate survival benefits in both OS and progression-free survival.
    UNASSIGNED: PD-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy significantly improved the survival time of patients with advanced ESCC. Toripalimab, tislelizumab, and sintilimab plus chemotherapy showed the best OS benefit. Longer progression-free benefits might be generated from adding tislelizumab and sintilimab to chemotherapy. Sintilimab was strongly recommended for patients with high programmed cell death-ligand 1 abundance.
    UNASSIGNED: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/], identifier [CRD42024501086].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    免疫疗法,由程序性细胞死亡蛋白-1(PD-1)抑制剂领导,已经成为一种突出的抗肿瘤疗法,然而,胰腺癌(PC)的预后挑战仍然存在。这次回顾,单中心研究评估2015-2022年在解放军总医院肿瘤科接受PD-1抑制剂治疗的晚期PC患者的预后因素。经解放军总医院伦理委员会伦理批准(S2021-228-03),我们使用Kaplan-Meier和Cox模型分析了126例患者.p<0.05被认为是统计学上显著的差异。中位总生存期(mOS)和无进展生存期(mPFS)分别为12.1和4.6个月,分别。重要的mOS预测因素是手术史(44.2个月vs.10个月,*p=.022),无肝转移(44.2个月vs.6.4个月,*p=.034),基线CA19-9≤216.15U/ml(18.5个月vs.9.2个月,*p=.049)。对于mPFS,组织学分化(5.5个月vs.3.2个月,*p=.022)和一线PD-1抑制剂使用(5.1个月与1.5个月,***p=.001)是关键。亚组分析强调了低组织学分化的早期进展和未经手术的早期死亡。手术史,没有肝转移,基线CA19-9水平,组织学中/高分化可以预测PD-1抑制剂在晚期PC中的疗效,在前瞻性试验中等待验证。
    Immunotherapy, led by programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors, has emerged as a prominent antitumor therapy, yet prognostic challenges persist in pancreatic cancer (PC). This retrospective, single-center study evaluated prognostic factors in advanced PC patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors at the PLA General Hospital\'s Oncology Department from 2015-2022. With ethics approval by the Ethics Committee of the General Hospital of the People\'s Liberation Army (S2021-228-03), we analyzed 126 patients using Kaplan-Meier and Cox models. p < .05 was considered a statistically significant difference. Median overall survival (mOS) and progression-free survival (mPFS) were 12.1 and 4.6 months, respectively. Significant mOS predictors were surgery history (44.2 months vs. 10 months, *p = .022), absence of liver metastases (44.2 months vs. 6.4 months, *p = .034), and baseline CA19-9 ≤ 216.15 U/ml (18.5 months vs. 9.2 months, *p = .049). For mPFS, histologic differentiation (5.5 months vs. 3.2 months, *p = .022) and first-line PD-1 inhibitor use (5.1 months vs. 1.5 months, ***p = .001) were key. Subgroup analyses highlighted early progression in low histologic differentiation and earlier death without surgery. History of surgery, absence of liver metastases, baseline CA19-9 level, and histologic intermediate/high differentiation may predict PD-1 inhibitor efficacy in advanced PC, pending validation in prospective trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:观察卡莫瑞珠单抗对初治耐药的晚期宫颈癌患者的临床疗效。
    方法:我们检索了25例晚期(IIA2-IV期)宫颈癌患者的数据,这些患者由于对初始化疗的反应不佳而接受了卡姆瑞珠单抗的联合挽救治疗。主要结果是客观缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)。次要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)和不良事件的发生.为了评估其对PFS的长期影响,我们纳入了研究期间诊断为IIA2-IV期的64例患者,对初始放疗或化疗有反应,并接受常规治疗作为对照。
    结果:Camrelizumab具有很高的挽救性治疗效果,卡利珠单抗抢救组(CS组)的ORR为80.0%(20/25),DCR为88.0%(22/25)。CS组PFS明显长于对照组。CS组和对照组的中位随访时间分别为18.1和18.3个月。分别,均未达到PFS中位数。CS组和对照组的不良事件发生率分别为52.0%(13/25)和51.6%(33/64),其中最常见的不良事件是骨髓抑制,皮肤毛细血管内皮增生(CCEP),和升高的肝酶,所有患者的AE等级均低于3级。
    结论:卡利珠单抗作为晚期宫颈癌患者的早期挽救性治疗显示出了有希望的疗效和安全性。
    OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical efficacy of Camrelizumab in patients with advanced cervical cancer who presented with resistance to initial therapy.
    METHODS: We retrieved data from 25 patients with advanced (stage IIA2-IV) cervical cancer who were administered a combination salvage therapy with Camrelizumab due to the poor response to initial chemotherapy. The primary outcome was objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR), the secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and the occurrence of adverse events. To evaluate its long-term effect on PFS, we included 64 patients diagnosed with stage IIA2-IV during the study period, who were responsive to initial radiotherapy or chemotherapy and received conventional therapy as control.
    RESULTS: Camrelizumab exhibits a high salvage treatment efficacy, with ORR of 80.0% (20/25) and DCR of 88.0% (22/25) in Camrelizumab salvage group (CS group). The PFS in CS group was significantly longer than that in control group. The median follow-up time were 18.1 and 18.3 months in the CS group and the control group, respectively, and neither achieved median PFS. The adverse event (AEs) rates in the CS and control groups were 52.0% (13/25) and 51.6% (33/64), in which the most common adverse events were myelosuppression, cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (CCEP), and elevated liver enzymes, and the grade of AEs was less than grade 3 in all patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: Camrelizumab demonstrated promising efficacy and safety as the early salvage treatment for patients with advanced cervical cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺癌是癌症相关死亡的主要原因,非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)是主要亚型。程序性死亡1(PD-1)和程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)抑制剂广泛用于治疗IV期NSCLC。本研究系统回顾文献,阐明PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂治疗对III期NSCLC患者生存的影响。
    对III期NSCLC患者给予PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂的随机III期临床试验以英文撰写,并在2012年11月至2022年11月之间发表,符合审查条件。信息来源是MEDLINE数据库(最后一次咨询于2022年12月26日),ScienceDirect网站(最后一次咨询于2022年12月26日),和中央登记册(最后一次咨询于2022年12月27日)。感兴趣的结果是总生存期(OS),无进展生存期(PFS),无病生存率(DFS),和无事件生存(EFS)。根据Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册5.1.0版进行偏倚风险评估。根据建议分级,对调查结果进行了确定性评估,评估,发展,和评估(等级)指南。
    14项符合条件的研究和2788名参与者被纳入审查。用于对参与者进行分组的关键特征是疾病组织学,癌细胞中PD-L1表达的百分比,和治疗的时间表。根据放化疗后使用PD-L1抑制剂,OS和PFS得到改善(风险比[RR]:0.85;95%置信区间[CI]:0.75-0.96和RR:0.75;95%CI:0.70-0.86),并且在非鳞状NSCLC中使用一线PD-1抑制剂加化疗后OS得到改善(RR:0.40;95%CI:0.17-0.95),等级结果表明证据质量中等。
    本综述重点介绍了III期NSCLC中PD-L1抑制剂在放化疗后使用时的OS和PFS益处,以及非鳞状III期疾病化疗中添加一线PD-1抑制剂的OS益处。
    UNASSIGNED: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death, and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the predominant subtype. Programmed death 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors are widely used to treat stage IV NSCLC. This study systematically reviewed the literature to clarify the impact of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment on the survival of patients with stage III NSCLC.
    UNASSIGNED: Randomized phase III clinical trials of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors administered to patients with stage III NSCLC that were written in English and published between November 2012 and November 2022 were eligible for review. The sources of information were the MEDLINE database (last consulted on December 26, 2022), ScienceDirect website (last consulted on December 26, 2022), and CENTRAL register (last consulted on December 27, 2022). The outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and event-free survival (EFS). Risk of bias assessments were performed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.1.0. The findings have been assessed for certainty according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) guidelines.
    UNASSIGNED: Fourteen eligible studies and 2788 participants were included in the review. The key characteristics used to group the participants were disease histology, percentage of PD-L1 expression in cancer cells, and timeline of therapy. OS and PFS were improved (risk ratio [RR]: 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-0.96 and RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.70-0.86, respectively) based on the use of PD-L1 inhibitors after chemoradiation and OS was improved using first-line PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy in non-squamous NSCLC (RR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.17-0.95), with the GRADE results indicating moderate quality of evidence.
    UNASSIGNED: This review highlights the OS and PFS benefits of PD-L1 inhibitors in stage III NSCLC when used after chemoradiation and OS benefits of first-line PD-1 inhibitors added to chemotherapy in non-squamous stage III disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is the cancer with the highest incidence and mortality rates in China, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80%-85% of all malignant lung tumors. Currently, surgical treatment remains the primary treatment modality for lung cancer. In recent years, the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors for NSCLC has become a consensus, and neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) has shown promising efficacy and safety in early to intermediate stage NSCLC. However, there are fewer studies related to nICT for locally advanced NSCLC. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nICT therapy in locally advanced resectable NSCLC.
    METHODS: 85 confirmed resectable stage IIIA and IIIB patients treated in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, from January 2021 to April 2024, were divided into the nICT group (n=32) and the surgery alone group (n=53). Clinical baseline data, perioperative indicators, postoperative complications, imaging response rate, pathological response rate, incidence of adverse events, and quality of life were compared between the two groups.
    RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in clinical baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). Incidence of choosing thoracotomy was higher in the nICT group than in the surgery alone group (P=0.002). There were no significant differences in surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, number of dissected lymph nodes, duration of chest tube placement, postoperative hospital stay, and R0 resection rate between the two groups (P>0.05). The overall incidence of postoperative complications was 31.25% in the nICT group and 22.64% in the surgery alone group, with no statistically significant difference (P=0.380). In the nICT group, the objective response rate (ORR) was 84.38%, with 5 cases of complete response (CR)(15.63%), 22 cases of partial response (PR)(68.75%), 15 cases of pathological response rate (pCR)(46.88%), and 11 cases of major pathological reaponse (MPR) (34.38%). During nICT treatment, 12 cases (37.50%) experienced grade 3 treatment-related adverse events, no death induced by adverse events or immune related adverse events. Moreover, the symptoms of the patients were improved after nICT treatment.
    CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy shows promising efficacy in locally advanced resectable NSCLC, with manageable treatment-related adverse events. It is a safe and feasible neoadjuvant treatment modality for locally advanced resectable NSCLC.
    【中文题目:新辅助免疫治疗联合化疗与手术治疗局部
晚期可切除非小细胞肺癌的短期疗效比较】 【中文摘要:背景与目的 肺癌是中国发生率和死亡率均排名第一的癌症,非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC)占所有肺恶性肿瘤的80%-85%。目前,手术治疗仍是肺癌主要的治疗方式。近年来,免疫检查点抑制剂在NSCLC中的疗效已成为共识,新辅助免疫联合化疗(neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, nICT)在早中期NSCLC中显示出来良好的疗效和安全性。然而,nICT治疗局部晚期NSCLC的相关研究较少。本研究旨在评估程序性死亡受体1(programmed cell death 1, PD-1)抑制剂联合含铂两药新辅助治疗治疗局部晚期可切除NSCLC的有效性和安全性。方法 纳入2021年1月至2024年4月于兰州大学第二医院胸外科就诊的85例确诊可切除IIIA、IIIB期患者,分为nICT组(n=32)和单纯手术组(n=53),比较两组患者的临床基线资料、围手术期相关指标及术后并发症,并评估nICT组的影像学缓解率、病理学缓解率、相关不良反应发生率、生活质量。结果 两组患者临床基线资料差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。nICT组选择开胸方式比单纯手术组发生率高(P=0.002),两组手术时间、术中出血量、清扫淋巴结个数、带管时间、术后住院时间及R0切除率的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。nICT组与单纯手术组术后总并发症发生率分别为31.25%和22.64%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.380)。nICT组中客观缓解率(objective response rate, ORR)为84.38%,完全缓解(complete response, CR)5例(15.63%),部分缓解(partial response, PR)22例(68.75%),病理性完全缓解(pathological complete response, pCR)15例(46.88%),主要病理缓解(major pathological reaponse, MPR)11例(34.38%)。nICT治疗期间,3级治疗相关不良反应共12例(37.50%),无不良反应或免疫相关不良反应导致患者死亡。而且,nICT治疗后患者相关症状有所改善。结论 nICT治疗局部晚期可切除NSCLC显示出良好的疗效,治疗相关不良事件可控,是局部晚期可切除NSCLC安全、可行的新辅助治疗模式。
】 【中文关键词:肺肿瘤;新辅助免疫化疗;PD-1抑制剂;客观缓解率;并发症】.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    阿特珠单抗(PD-L1抑制剂)加贝伐单抗(AB)和辛替单抗(PD-1抑制剂)加贝伐单抗(SB)均被推荐为中国晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)的一线方案。两种方案联合经血管介入治疗不可切除的HCC(uHCC)的疗效差异尚不清楚。我们回顾性分析了在三个中心同时结合AB或SB与经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)和基于FOLFOX的肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)治疗的uHCC患者。客观反应率(ORR),无进展生存期(PFS),比较了总生存期(OS)和治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs).共纳入188例患者,92和96给药A+B+TACE-HAIC(ABTH)和S+B+TACE-HAIC(SBTH),分别。ORR(62.0vs.70.8%,分别为;P=0.257)和疾病控制率(88.0vs.93.8%,P=0.267)根据mRECIST标准,组间相似。ABTH与SBTH相比没有显示出生存优势,中位PFS时间为11.7个月和13.0个月,分别为(HR=0.81,95%CI,0.52-1.26,P=0.35)和相似的OS时间(HR=1.19,95%CI,0.32-4.39,P=0.8)。组间3-4级TRAE没有观察到显著差异。PD-L1或PD-1抑制剂加贝伐单抗联合TACE-HAIC具有同样出色的治疗效果,且不良事件可控。代表uHCC的有希望的治疗选择。
    Both atezolizumab (a PD-L1 inhibitor) plus bevacizumab (A+B) and sintilimab (a PD-1 inhibitor) plus bevacizumab (S+B) are recommended as the first-line regimen for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in China. Different efficacy between the two regimens combined with transvascular intervention for unresectable HCC (uHCC) remain unknown. We retrospectively analyzed uHCC patients treated in three centers by simultaneous combination of A+B or S+B with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and FOLFOX-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were compared. Totally 188 patients were included, with 92 and 96 administered A+B+TACE-HAIC (ABTH) and S+B+TACE-HAIC (SBTH), respectively. ORRs (62.0 vs. 70.8%, respectively; P = 0.257) and disease control rates (88.0 vs. 93.8%, P = 0.267) were similar between groups by the mRECIST criteria. ABTH showed no survival advantage over SBTH, with median PFS times of 11.7 months and 13.0 months, respectively (HR = 0.81, 95% CI, 0.52-1.26, P = 0.35) and similar OS times (HR = 1.19, 95% CI, 0.32-4.39, P = 0.8). No significant differences were observed in grade 3-4 TRAEs between groups. Either PD-L1 or PD-1 inhibitor plus bevacizumab combined with TACE-HAIC have similarly excellent therapeutic efficacy with manageable adverse events, representing promising treatment options for uHCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号