BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether the sequential administration of programmed death (PD)-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors and epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) is associated with the development of severe interstitial pneumonitis (IP).
METHODS: We identified 69,107 eligible patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from a Japanese national inpatient database, who initiated EGFR-TKI therapy. The study population was divided into the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor and non-prior PD-1/PD-L1 groups based on PD-1/PD-L1 administration before EGFR-TKI therapy. We conducted 1:4 matched-pair cohort analyses (n = 9,725) to compare the incidence of IP and in-hospital mortality within 90 days of administration of EGFR-TKI between the two groups after adjusting for the clinical background. Furthermore, we performed subgroup analyses categorized according to the duration of prior PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor use.
RESULTS: IP occurred in 4.4% of patients in the matched-pair cohort. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-use before EGFR-TKI therapy was significantly associated with IP (odds ratio [OR], 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34-2.38) and in-hospital mortality (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.72-2.55). Prior PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor use in an interval of <6 months before EGFR-TKI administration was associated with a higher risk of IP than EGFR-TKI administration without prior PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor. In-hospital mortality was higher in patients with prior PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor use than that in those without prior PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor use, irrespective of the treatment duration.
CONCLUSIONS: Sequential use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and EGFR-TKIs in patients with non-small cell lung cancer was significantly associated with IP compared to EGFR-TKIs without prior PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor administration.

BACKGROUND: Numerous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have investigated PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-based combination therapies. The debate surrounding the potential additive clinical benefits of combination of two immune-oncology (IO) therapies for cancer patients persists.
METHODS: Both published and grey sources of randomized clinical trials that compared anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based immunotherapy combinations with monotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors were encompassed. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).
RESULTS: Our analysis encompassed 31 studies comprising 10,341 patients, which covered 12 distinct immune-oncology combination regimens. Across all patients, the immunotherapy combinations exhibited the capability to enhance the ORR (OR = 1.23 [95% CI 1.13-1.34]) and extend PFS (HR = 0.91 [95% CI 0.87-0.95]). However, the observed enhancement in OS (HR = 0.96 [95% CI 0.91-1.01]) was of no significance. Greater benefits in terms of PFS (HR = 0.82 [95% CI 0.72 to 0.93]) and OS (HR = 0.85 [95% CI 0.73 to 0.99]) may be particularly pronounced in cases where PD-L1 expression is negative. Notably, despite a heightened risk of any-grade TRAEs (OR = 1.72 [95% CI 1.40-2.11]) and grade greater than or equal to 3 TRAEs (OR = 2.01 [95% CI 1.67-2.43]), toxicity was generally manageable.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that incorporating an additional immunotherapy agent with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors can elevate the response rate and reduce the risk of disease progression, all while maintaining manageable toxicity. However, there remains a challenge in translating these primary clinical benefits into extended overall survival.

UNASSIGNED: Various immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1), have been approved for use, but they have side effects on the endocrine glands.
UNASSIGNED: Adverse event reports related to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from the first quarter of 2019 to the first quarter of 2023 were extracted, and the reported Odds ratio methods (ROR method) and comprehensive standard methods (MHRA methods) were used for data mining and analysis.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 5,322 reports (accounts for 6.68% of the total reports)of AEs in endocrine system were collected, including 1852 of pabolizumab (34.80%), 2,326 of navuliumab (43.71%), 54 of cimipriliumab (1.01%), 800 of atilizumab (15.03%), 222 of duvariumab (4.17%) and 68 of averumab (1.28%). Endocrine system-related AEs were mainly present in men (excluding those treated with pembrolizumab) aged ≥65 years. The ratio of AEs components in the endocrine system for the six drugs was approximately 3-8%. The main endocrine glands involved in AEs were the thyroid (pembrolizumab), pituitary and adrenal (nivolumab), adrenal (cemiplimab, atezolizumab, and avelumab), and thyroid (durvalumab). Most patients experienced AEs between 30 and 365 (mean, 117) days,the median time was 61d. AEs resulted in prolonged hospitalization in >40% and death in >10% of cases after administration of pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or durvalumab.
UNASSIGNED: Men aged ≥65 years should be concerned about endocrine-related AEs. There was a lengthy interval between the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and endocrine system-related AEs, but the outcome was serious. Special attention should be given to endocrine system-related AEs when using pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or durvalumab.

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have been demonstrated to induce itch in both humans and experimental animals. However, whether the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway is involved in the regulation of chronic psoriatic itch remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the role of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in imiquimod-induced chronic psoriatic itch. The intradermal injection of PD-L1 in the nape of neck significantly alleviated chronic psoriatic itch in imiquimod-treated skin. Additionally, we observed that spontaneous scratching behavior induced by imiquimod disappeared on day 21. Still, intradermal injection of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors could induce more spontaneous scratching for over a month, indicating that imiquimod-treated skin remained in an itch sensitization state after the spontaneous scratching behavior disappeared. During this period, there was a significant increase in PD-1 receptor expression in both the imiquimod-treated skin and the spinal dorsal horn in mice, accompanied by significant activation of microglia in the spinal dorsal horn. These findings suggest the potential involvement of the peripheral and central PD-1/PD-L1 pathways in regulating chronic itch and itch sensitization induced by imiquimod.

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy with multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors (multi-TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been increasingly tested in clinical studies. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the addition of ICI to multi-TKIs on the profile of treatment-related adverse events.
METHODS: An electronic database search was performed using PubMed and Web of Science to identify published clinical studies on multi-TKI monotherapy and multi-TKI plus ICI combination therapy from July 20, 2005 to July 1, 2023. The incidence rate of common adverse events caused by multi-TKI monotherapy and multi-TKI plus ICI combination therapy was obtained and compared from the viewpoints of (1) relative risk for the combination therapy vs sunitinib, (2) adverse event incidence rate by clinical trial, and (3) pooled incidence rate. The quality of the evidence was assessed with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Meta-analysis used random effects models.
RESULTS: This systematic review identified 83 clinical studies involving 7951 patients. The combination therapy of multi-TKI and ICI was associated with an increased risk of diarrhea (relative risk [RR]: 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-1.33, P < .001), hypothyroidism (RR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.11-1.87, P = .0064) and rash (RR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.18-2.47, P = .0045) compared with multi-TKI monotherapy. The addition of ICI was suggested to decrease the risk of adverse events related to performance status.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study identified an increased risk of treatment-related adverse events associated with multi-TKI plus ICI combination therapy. This would help optimize the management of toxicities caused by multi-TKI plus ICI combination therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy for early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients with different clinical characteristics.
METHODS: Randomized clinical trials for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and chemotherapy combination were included. Pooled analysis of odds ratio (OR) for pathological complete response (pCR) and hazard ratio (HR) for event-free survival (EFS) was conducted overall and for predefined subgroups.
RESULTS: The combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy significantly improved pCR rate in early TNBC patients (OR, 1.77), and the incidence of events was significantly reduced by 37%. Lymph node metastasis was associated with more benefits on pCR (OR[N0], 1.29; OR[N+], 2.57; P = 0.01), while earlier T stage was related to more benefits on EFS (HR[T1-T2], 0.48; HR[T3-T4], 0.85; P = 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors to chemotherapy offers improved pCR and EFS in early TNBC patients. T and N stages may have implications for the efficacy.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), either as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy, have improved the therapeutic outcome for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the efficacy of combination therapies, such as programmed cell death 1(PD-1)/its ligand (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors, in targeting different pathways remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to determine whether the addition of a CTLA-4 inhibitor to PD-1/PD-L1 therapy improves the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy in NSCLC. Methods: We systematically searched various electronic databases for suitable trials. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the clinical efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 with and without CTLA-4 were included in the analyses. The meta-analysis software RevMan 5.3 was used for statistical analyses. Results: A total of seven RCTs were retrieved. The results suggested that the combination of CTLA-4 and PD-1/PDL-1 inhibitors did not show enhanced efficacy over PD1/PDL-1 inhibitor monotherapy as determined by overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.84-1.14, p = 0.79), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.81-1.06, p = 0.25), and objective response rate (ORR) (HR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.96-1.21, p = 0.19). Furthermore, the combination immunotherapy was associated increased toxicity as evidenced by increased incidence of any type adverse events (AEs) (RR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.00-1.13, p = 0.03), grade ≥3 immune-mediated AEs (RR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.36-1.82, p < 0.05), and treatment discontinuation (RR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.46-2.28, p < 0.05). Conclusion: Combining anti-CTLA-4 with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy did not improve the therapeutic efficacy, and was associated with greater toxicity than anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. Further investigation of the combination immunotherapy in specific subsets of patients is warranted to identify and define the patient-specific benefits of this combination. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023435399.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy has demonstrated efficacy in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet the optimal period of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy is undetermined. In a phase II study (neoSCORE, NCT04459611), more neoadjuvant therapy cycles appeared to provide greater pathological remission, and patients with squamous NSCLC had a better major pathological response rate than those with nonsquamous NSCLC. Sintilimab, a monoclonal anti-PD-1 antibody, has shown encouraging antitumor activity and safety in multiple cancers, including NSCLC. Here, we describe the study design of neoSCORE II (NCT05429463), a randomized, open-label, multicenter phase III trial comparing the efficacy and safety of three cycles with four cycles of neoadjuvant sintilimab plus platinum-based chemotherapy in resectable stage IIA-IIIB squamous NSCLC. Trial registration number: NCT05429463 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed death-1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors for the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). Methods: A literature search was conducted of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library and was limited to the English literature. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to July 2022 were considered for inclusion. The outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs (TRAE). Subgroup analysis was performed based on the PD-L1 expression status, and the differences between first- and second-line PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors were estimated. Results: We included five RCTs comprising 3584 patients in the analysis. Compared with chemotherapy alone, the use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as monotherapy did not significantly prolong OS [hazard ratios (HR), 0.90; 95% CI, 0.81-1.00] or PFS (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.95-1.32). However, the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy significantly improved both OS (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.96) and PFS (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.90). Additionally, subgroup analysis showed that in mUC with PD-L1 expression ≥ 5%, treatment with the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor alone did not reduce the risk of death. Safety analysis showed that the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor alone did not significantly increase the incidence rates of grade ≥ 3 TRAEs. Conclusions: The results show that use of the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor alone as first-line treatment is similar to chemotherapy in terms of both survival and response rates. However, the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy has a significant benefit in terms of PFS or OS. Nonetheless, more RCTs are warranted to evaluate efficiency and safety in the combination regimen of chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

Programmed cell death receptor/ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) blockade therapy for various cancers induces itch. However, few studies have evaluated the mechanism underlying PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-induced itch. This study aimed to establish and evaluate a mouse model of acute itch induced by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and to explore the role of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in chronic itch. The intradermal injection of the PD-1/PD-L1 small molecule inhibitors, or anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies in the nape of the neck in the mice elicited intense spontaneous scratches. The model was evaluated using pharmacological methods. The number of scratches was reduced by naloxone but not by antihistamines or the transient receptor potential (TRP) channel inhibitor. Moreover, the PD-1 receptor was detected in the spinal cord of the mouse models of chronic itch that exhibited acetone, diethyl ether, and water (AEW)-induced dry skin, imiquimod-induced psoriasis, and 1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (DNFB)-induced allergic contact dermatitis. Intrathecal PD-L1 (1 μg, 4 times a week for 1 week) suppressed the activation of the microglia in the spinal dorsal horn to relieve the chronic itch that was elicited by imiquimod-induced psoriasis and DNFB-induced allergic contact dermatitis. Although the activation of the microglia in the spinal dorsal horn was not detected in the AEW-treated mice, intrathecal PD-L1 still reduced the number of scratches that were elicited by AEW. Our findings suggest that histamine receptor inhibitors or TRP channel inhibitors have limited effects on PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-induced itch and that spinal PD-1 is important for the spinal activation of the microglia, which may underlie chronic itch.