UNASSIGNED: Ulcerative colitis is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease, affecting the colorectal mucosae, with a relapsing-remitting course, characterized by the trafficking and gathering of lymphocytes in the inflammatory intestinal mucosa. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators preventing lymphocytes egress from lymphoid tissues to the active inflammation site is an alternative therapeutic option in this condition.
UNASSIGNED: We carried out a comprehensive review of the literature available on Medline, Scopus and Embase regarding the pharmacokinetics of S1P receptor modulators. For each compound, we reviewed the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic data and efficacy and safety data from phase 3 studies and real-life studies when available.
UNASSIGNED: S1P receptor modulators, including ozanimod and etrasimod (both currently on the market) as well as VTX002 (under development), are a new class of drugs for the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis, inducing and maintaining the remission. Due to its pharmacokinetic features, this class of drugs has certain advantages such as an oral administration, a short half-life, a high volume of distribution, and no immunogenicity. On the other hand, there are risks of cardiological and ophthalmological side-effects, as well as drug-drug interactions risk, that require special attention from the healthcare providers.

Aim: Diroximel fumarate (DRF), ozanimod (OZA) and interferon beta-1a (IFN) are disease-modifying therapies approved for the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis. No randomized trials have compared DRF versus OZA and IFN. We compared DRF versus OZA and DRF versus IFN using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons for efficacy outcomes, including annualized relapse rate (ARR), 12- and 24-week confirmed disability progression (CDP) and absence of gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) T1 lesions and new/newly enlarging T2 lesions. Patients & methods: We used individual patient data from EVOLVE-MS-1 (NCT02634307), a 2-year, open-label, single-arm, phase III study of DRF (n = 1057) and aggregate data from RADIANCE (NCT02047734), a 2-year, double-blind, phase III study that compared OZA 1 mg once daily (n = 433) and intramuscular IFN 30 μg once weekly (n = 441). To account for cross-trial differences, the EVOLVE-MS-1 population was restricted to those who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria for RADIANCE, then weighted to match the average baseline characteristics of RADIANCE. Results: After weighting, DRF and OZA had similar ARRs (0.18 and 0.17, respectively), with a rate difference (DRF vs OZA) of 0.01 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.04 to 0.06). DRF had a lower ARR than IFN (0.18 and 0.28, respectively), with a rate difference (DRF vs IFN) of -0.10 (95% CI: -0.16 to -0.04) after weighting. Outcomes for 12- and 24-week CDP favored DRF versus OZA; 12-week CDP favored DRF versus IFN, but there was not strong evidence favoring DRF over IFN for 24-week CDP. Compared with OZA and IFN, DRF had higher proportions of patients without Gd+ T1 lesions and patients without new/newly enlarging T2 lesions. Conclusion: Disability progression and radiological outcomes were favorable for DRF versus OZA, although no differences were observed in ARR. Clinical and radiological outcomes generally favored DRF versus IFN. These findings may be informative for patients and clinicians considering different treatment options for MS.

BACKGROUND: Ozanimod, approved for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) and relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS), is a weak in vitro monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitor. MAO-B inhibitors can cause serotonin accumulation with concomitant use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). We evaluated the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) potentially associated with serotonin accumulation during ozanimod and concomitant SSRI/SNRI use in this post hoc analysis of pooled UC studies and the open-label extension RMS DAYBREAK.
METHODS: Data for ozanimod 0.92 mg from pooled UC studies (n = 1158; cutoff: January 10, 2022) and RMS DAYBREAK (n = 2257; cutoff: February 1, 2022) were analyzed. Concomitant SSRI/SNRI use was allowed in the UC (n = 67) and RMS (n = 274) studies. A narrow Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities search (\"serotonin syndrome,\" \"neuroleptic malignant syndrome,\" and \"malignant hyperthermia\") and a broad search including terms potentially associated with serotonin accumulation were conducted. The percentages of patients with TEAEs in both searches were analyzed by concomitant SSRI/SNRI use when the TEAE occurred.
RESULTS: No patients had TEAEs matching the narrow search criteria. No differences were observed in the percentages of patients with ≥1 TEAE matching the broad search regardless of SSRI/SNRI use in UC (with: 25.4% [n = 17 of 67]; without: 15.0% [n = 164 of 1091]) and RMS (with: 12.4% [n = 34 of 274]; without: 15.6% [n = 310 of 1982]) studies.
CONCLUSIONS: No evidence of increased TEAEs potentially associated with serotonin accumulation was observed with concurrent use of ozanimod and SSRIs/SNRIs.
BACKGROUND: NCT01647516, NCT02531126, NCT02435992, NCT02576717.
No evidence of increased treatment-emergent adverse effects potentially associated with serotonin accumulation was observed with concurrent use of ozanimod and serotonergic antidepressants. Our findings support the absence of clinically meaningful ozanimod monoamine oxidase B inhibition in vivo.

The gut microbiota is a complex ecosystem, home to hundreds of bacterial species and a vast repository of enzymes capable of metabolising a wide range of pharmaceuticals. Several drugs have been shown to affect negatively the composition and function of the gut microbial ecosystem. Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors and Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators are drugs recently approved for inflammatory bowel disease through an immediate release formulation and would potentially benefit from colonic targeted delivery to enhance the local drug concentration at the diseased site. However, their impact on the human gut microbiota and susceptibility to bacterial metabolism remain unexplored. With the use of calorimetric, optical density measurements, and metagenomics next-generation sequencing, we show that JAK inhibitors (tofacitinib citrate, baricitinib, filgotinib) have a minor impact on the composition of the human gut microbiota, while ozanimod exerts a significant antimicrobial effect, leading to a prevalence of the Enterococcus genus and a markedly different metabolic landscape when compared to the untreated microbiota. Moreover, ozanimod, unlike the JAK inhibitors, is the only drug subject to enzymatic degradation by the human gut microbiota sourced from six healthy donors. Overall, given the crucial role of the gut microbiome in health, screening assays to investigate the interaction of drugs with the microbiota should be encouraged for the pharmaceutical industry as a standard in the drug discovery and development process.

UNASSIGNED: Several oral disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). In the absence of head-to-head randomized data, matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) can evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of ozanimod versus other oral DMTs in RRMS.
UNASSIGNED: To synthesize results from the published MAICs of ozanimod and other oral DMTs for 2-year outcomes in RRMS.
UNASSIGNED: Published MAICs involving ozanimod for the treatment of RRMS were identified. Extracted data elements included efficacy [annualized relapse rate (ARR), confirmed disability progression (CDP), and brain volume loss] and safety [adverse events (AEs), serious AEs (SAEs), AEs leading to discontinuation, and infection] outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: The four MAIC studies identified compared ozanimod with fingolimod, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate (DMF), and ponesimod. All comparisons were adjusted for differences in age, sex, relapses within the previous year, Expanded Disability Status Scale score, and percentage of patients with prior DMTs. Outcomes at 2 years were analyzed based on comparisons that lacked a common comparator arm. Ozanimod was associated with significantly lower ARR versus teriflunomide [ARR ratio (95% CI) 0.73 (0.62, 0.84) and DMF 0.80 (0.67, 0.97)], with no significant difference versus fingolimod or ponesimod. The proportions of patients treated with ozanimod or fingolimod had similar 3- and 6-month CDP. Compared with teriflunomide and DMF, ozanimod was associated with a significantly lower risk of 3-month CDP; 6-month CDP was comparable. Ozanimod was associated with significantly lower rates of any AE and AEs leading to discontinuation compared with the other oral DMTs evaluated. Ozanimod also had significantly lower rates of SAEs versus teriflunomide and DMF and lower rates of reported infection outcomes versus fingolimod and ponesimod.
UNASSIGNED: Compared with the other oral DMTs evaluated in MAICs, ozanimod was associated with a favorable safety profile and improved or comparable efficacy outcomes.
An indirect comparison of ozanimod vs other oral treatments in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis The many treatment options available for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) make treatment decisions difficult. While direct head-to-head treatment comparisons provide useful information, these studies are not available for every pair of treatments. Indirect comparisons of published study results can help fill that evidence gap. A technique called matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) offers a statistically robust way to compare safety/efficacy outcomes from different studies by accounting for important differences across the studies. We collected data from four MAIC studies that compared 2-year treatment outcomes in patients treated with ozanimod versus those treated with fingolimod, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate (DMF), or ponesimod. Each study accounted for differences in age, sex, relapses within the previous year, disability status, and previous therapy use. We found ozanimod was either better than or similar to other treatments based on the outcomes measured. The annual rate of RRMS relapse was lower for patients treated with ozanimod than for patients treated with teriflunomide or DMF and similar for patients treated with ponesimod or fingolimod. Ozanimod-treated patients saw their RRMS progress at rates similar to those treated with fingolimod at 3 and 6 months and teriflunomide and DMF at 6 months; RRMS was more likely to progress at 3 months in patients treated with teriflunomide and DMF versus those treated with ozanimod. Our analyses also found that patients treated with ozanimod had lower rates of side effects, including those serious enough to cause treatment discontinuation, compared with patients receiving other treatments. By comparing findings from existing MAIC studies, we found that patients with RRMS treated with ozanimod had fewer side effects and better or similar efficacy outcomes compared with patients who received other treatments for RRMS. These findings can potentially inform treatment decisions for patients with RRMS.

Ulcerative colitis is a chronic, immune-mediated disease characterized by recurring episodes of mucosal inflammation in the colon and rectum. The primary pathogenic mechanism of ulcerative colitis is the dysregulation of the mucosal immune response. The disease follows a relapsing-remitting course, and the goal of management is to successfully induce and then maintain remission. Effectively managing this chronic disease requires addressing all aspects of it. Currently, we have various antitumor necrosis factor agents and novel biologics available for treating ulcerative colitis patients with moderate-to-severe disease. However, none of the existing treatments are considered entirely satisfactory or ideal in these cases. After extensive progressive research, oral small molecule therapies targeting mediators of ongoing inflammation represent an exciting and revolutionary change in the treatment of ulcerative colitis, especially for patients with moderate-to-severe disease. In this review, we aimed to summarize the available experience and ongoing research on oral small molecule agents in the management of ulcerative colitis. The available experience and ongoing research with promising outcomes provide convincing evidence that the value of oral small molecule agents is fact not fancy.

OBJECTIVE: The pivotal phase 3 True North (TN) study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of ozanimod in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. This analysis assessed ozanimod during TN and the ongoing open-label extension (OLE) in patients with active disease who were naive to advanced therapies (ATs).
METHODS: TN was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial consisting of 10-week induction period and 42-week maintenance period. Eligible patients could enter the OLE. Symptomatic efficacy was evaluated from induction through the OLE. Clinical, endoscopic, and mucosal outcomes were evaluated at the end of induction (Week [W] 10) and maintenance (W52) and at predefined OLE timepoints (OLE W46 and W94). Safety during TN was reported.
RESULTS: This analysis included 616 AT-naive patients. Numerically greater proportions of patients receiving ozanimod than placebo achieved symptomatic response (39% vs 29%, 95% confidence interval, -0.1 to 18.8) by W2, with significant differences (56% vs 39%, 95% confidence interval, 6.3-26.3) achieved by W4. Patients receiving ozanimod showed significant improvements across efficacy outcomes versus placebo at W10 and W52 (P < .05, all endpoints). In patients on continuous ozanimod who entered the OLE in clinical response at W52, 91% maintained clinical response through OLE W94, and 74% achieved endoscopic improvement and 57% achieved mucosal healing at OLE W94. In ozanimod-treated patients without clinical response by W10 who received extended induction in the OLE, 62% achieved symptomatic response by OLE W10. Safety outcomes in AT-naive patients were consistent with the total TN population.
CONCLUSIONS: Ozanimod is an effective, durable, and well-tolerated oral therapy for AT-naive ulcerative colitis patients.
RESULTS: gov, numbers NCT02435992 and NCT02531126.

Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of ozanimod, an oral sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator, for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Infrequently does an opportunity present itself to use one drug for two simultaneous disease states, proving especially beneficial in the case of this patient intolerant of numerous established therapies for ulcerative colitis. This case report describes the successful use of ozanimod for both ulcerative colitis and multiple sclerosis, achieving clinical remission in both diseases.

Ozanimod (RPC1063) is an immunomodulator that has been recently approved by the FDA (2020) for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). It is a selective agonist of the sphingosine-1-phophate receptors 1 and 5, expressed on naïve and central memory T and B cells, as well as natural killer (NK) cells, and is involved in lymphocyte trafficking. Oral administration of ozanimod was reported to result in rapid and reversible reduction in circulating lymphocytes in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, however, only minimal effect on NK cells was observed. In this study, we sought to investigate the effect of ozanimod on NK cells and assess whether they play any role in ozanimod-induced remission in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), the animal model of MS.
Active EAE induction was done in C57BL/6 female mice, followed by daily oral treatment with ozanimod (0.6mg/kg) starting at disease onset (score 1). Flow cytometry of blood and CNS was performed 24 hours after the last oral dose of ozanimod treatment in diseased mice. Histological analysis of lumbar spinal cord was performed for evaluating the level of inflammation and demyelination. Depletion of peripheral NK cells was done using anti-NK1.1 mouse antibody (mAb) at day 5 post-EAE induction.
Ozanimod was effective in reducing the clinical severity of EAE and reducing the percentage of autoreactive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells along with significant inhibition of lymphocyte infiltration into the spinal cord, accompanied by reversed demyelination. Furthermore, ozanimod treatment resulted in a significant increase in the frequency of total NK cells in the blood and CNS along with upregulation of the activating receptor NKG2D on CD27low/- NK cell subset in the CNS. The effectiveness of ozanimod treatment in inhibiting the progression of the disease was reduced when NK cells were depleted using anti-NK1.1 mAb.
The current study demonstrated that ozanimod treatment significantly improved clinical symptoms in EAE mice. Ozanimod and anti-NK1.1 mAb appear to function in opposition to one another. Collectively, our data suggest that ozanimod-mediated remission is associated with an increased percentage of total NK cells and CD27low/- NK cells expressing the activating receptor, NKG2D in the CNS.

Small molecule drugs are becoming increasingly used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). However, unlike monoclonal antibody drugs, which have few interactions with other medications, the pharmacokinetics of small molecule drugs are complex and may be influenced by a myriad of drug-drug interactions (DDI) as well as by patient characteristics and food intake. This review aims to provide a concise practical guide to small molecule drug interactions for the use of IBD physicians. It starts with a brief overview of the main metabolizing enzymes and transporters involved in drug interactions and the Food and Drug Administration\'s (FDA) approach to determining drug-interaction hazard thresholds. It is then followed by a more detailed review of the pharmacokinetics of five novel small molecules approved in IBD: Tofacitinib, Upadacitinib, Filgotinib, Ozanimod, and Etrasimod, including their known interactions and specific warnings. This review will also inform readers on challenges in determining the actual magnitude of interactions and their clinical relevance, including the arbitrary nature of some hazard thresholds, the inference of the impact on metabolizing enzymes and transporters from single-drug assays which may not reflect poly-pharmaceutical regimens, and other challenges in this field which the IBD physician needs to be cognizant of. In practice, before administering a small molecule drug, it is advisable to evaluate any potential interactions with other medications the patient is receiving. An increased awareness by health care professionals and patients, may reduce the possible risks associated with DDI of small molecule IBD drugs.