BACKGROUND: Orthotic treatment is a common option for the conservative treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF). However, there is insufficient evidence of its clinical benefit.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of orthotic treatment for OVF.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study with data from two prospective studies.
METHODS: This study included 160 patients with fresh OVF enrolled in 2012 and 2020 prospective cohort studies.
METHODS: The visual analog scale (VAS) score for low back pain was used for clinical outcomes, and radiographic parameters included the percent height of the vertebra and angular change of the vertebral body. Moreover, the occurrence of secondary vertebral fractures was followed-up over time.
METHODS: The patients were divided into brace and no-brace groups and were matched according to propensity score for age, sex, anterior percent height at the initial examination, and presence of old OVFs. Hazard ratio for the cumulative incidence of secondary vertebral fractures with and without bracing were calculated and analyzed using the generalized Wilcoxon test. In addition, the brace group was divided into soft and rigid brace groups and compared with the no-brace group.
RESULTS: Each group had 61 cases after propensity score matching. There were no significant differences in the VAS improvement for low back pain and the change in percent height of the anterior and posterior walls from initial examination to 6 months after injury (p = 0.87, p = 0.39 and p = 0.14, respectively, mixed-effect models). Meanwhile, the mean angular change of fractured vertebrae was 4.3° / 3.2° initially and 1.2° / 2.5° at 6 months (the brace group / no-brace group, respectively; p = 0.007, mixed-effect models). A significant difference was also observed between the rigid brace group and the no-brace group (p = 0.008, mixed effect models). The incidence of secondary vertebral fractures was 1.6% / 11.4% at 1 month, indicating a significant difference (the brace group / no-brace group, respectively; p = 0.028). The hazard ratio for the cumulative incidence of secondary fractures due to orthotic treatment was 0.47 (95% confidence interval 0.20-1.09, p = 0.054).
CONCLUSIONS: Although orthotic treatment for fresh OVF did not relieve pain, it might contribute to the stabilization of the fractured vertebra, especially using a rigid brace. Moreover, it might influence a reduction of the imminent vertebral fracture risk immediately after the onset of OVF.
METHODS: Clinical study.

Osteoporosis is a highly prevalent and multifactorial disease whose main manifestation is the appearance of fragility or low-impact fractures. The most frequent locations of osteoporotic fractures occur at the vertebrae, femoral, distal end of the radius and humerus. Osteoporotic vertebral fracture deserves special mention among them due to its prevalence, importance as it often goes unnoticed and medium-long term consequences are: pain, deformity, disability and deterioration in quality of life. In this review we will focus on the classification and initial evaluation of the patient with osteoporosis, estimation of risk factors, laboratory and imaging studies for an adequate assessment using simple radiography, dual densitometry and magnetic resonance imaging. We will also address the main aspects of the differential diagnosis, treatment and prevention of vertebral fragility fracture, briefly reviewing the main therapeutic agents currently used for its prevention and treatment.

UNASSIGNED: A post-hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study.
UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to identify factors at the time of injury associated with declining activities of daily living (ADLs) in the chronic phase of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) managed conservatively.
UNASSIGNED: Although a conservative approach is the treatment of choice for OVFs, ADLs do not improve or eventually decrease in some cases. However, the risk factors for ADL decline after the occurrence of OVFs, particularly the difference between those with or without initial bed rest, are unknown.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 224 consecutive patients with OVFs aged ≥65 years who received treatment within 2 weeks after the occurrence of injury were enrolled. The patients were followed up for 6 months thereafter. The criteria for evaluating the degree of independence were applied to evaluate ADLs. Multivariable analysis with a logistic regression model was performed to evaluate the risk factors for ADL decline.
UNASSIGNED: In total, 49/224 patients (21.9%) showed a decline in ADLs. Of these, 23/116 patients (19.8%) in the rest group and 26/108 patients (24.1%) in the no-rest group experienced a decline in ADLs. In the logistic regression analyses, a diffuse low signal on T2- weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (odds ratio, 5.78; 95% confidence interval, 2.09-16.0; p=0.0007) and vertebral instability (odds ratio, 3.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-11.4; p=0.0135) were identified as independent factors in the rest and no-rest groups, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: In patients with acute OVFs, a diffuse low signal on T2-weighted MRI and severe vertebral instability were independently associated with ADL decline in patients treated with and without initial bed rest, respectively.

This study investigated treatment trends and major adverse events in patients hospitalized for osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF). The frequency of surgical interventions for OVF increased significantly, but this did not decrease major adverse events. The findings underscore the necessity for reevaluating OVF management strategies.
OBJECTIVE: Osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) is a common condition in the aging population, often leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Here, we analyzed treatment trends and incidence of major adverse events in patients hospitalized for OVF.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study, using a large Japanese hospital administrative database. The cohort included hospitalized patients aged 65 years or older, admitted for OVF from January 2015 to December 2021. The primary outcomes were the trend in the proportion of the patients undergoing surgery for OVF and the incidence of major adverse events within 30 days of admission. As a secondary outcome, we evaluated the trend in hospitalization costs.
RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 14,714 patients, with a mean age of 82.4 years. There was a significant increase in surgical interventions for OVF, from 3.7% of patients in 2015 to 9.8% in 2021 (p < 0.001). The incidence of major adverse events remained unchanged, with a risk ratio of 1.09 (95% confidence interval, 0.88 to 1.35) in 2021 compared to 2015. Average hospitalization costs increased significantly, from $7,570.6 (SD 6,047.0) in 2015 to $9,502.9 (SD 7,231.5) in 2021 (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite a significant increase in the proportion of surgical intervention for OVF, no reduction in the risk of major adverse events was observed between 2015 and 2021. Surgeons and policy makers need to interpret these findings and work towards an optimized approach to the management of OVF in the aging population.

Background and Objectives: This study retrospectively examined whether the incidence rates of adjacent vertebral fractures (AVFs) can be reduced through balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) for osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) in the early stages, when there is little vertebral height variation. Materials and Methods: A total of 95 patients (22 males, 73 females, mean age: 80.7 years) who had undergone BKP were divided into two groups: the Early group (underwent BKP within 2 weeks after injury, n = 62), and the Non-early group (underwent BKP > 2 weeks after injury, n = 33). The following data were analyzed: patient characteristics; fracture level; the presence of old vertebral fractures, posterior wall injury, and intravertebral cleft; duration of surgery; duration of hospitalization; cement volume; the occurrence of AVF; the timing of AVF occurrence; Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores at the preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up assessments; posterior vertebral kyphosis angle of the affected vertebra on plain lateral X-ray; vertebral wedge ratio; local kyphotic angle; and changes in posterior vertebral kyphosis angle, vertebral wedge ratio, and local kyphotic angle between preoperative and postoperative assessments. The patients were divided based on the occurrence or non-occurrence of AVF after BKP: the Non-AVF group, in which AVF did not occur, and the AVF group, in which AVF occurred. Results: The incidence of AVF was 15.8% (15/95 patients), with a notably lower incidence rate in the Early group at 6.5% (4/62 patients) compared to the Non-early group at 33.3% (11/33 patients). NRS scores significantly improved in both groups at the postoperative assessment and final follow-up. The changes in posterior vertebral kyphosis angle and vertebral wedge ratio were significantly lower in the Early group. In the Non-AVF group, the time from injury to surgery was significantly shorter. Conclusions: The Early group had a significantly lower incidence of AVF. The time from injury to surgery was a risk factor for AVF occurrence, suggesting that early BKP is recommended.

UNASSIGNED: The most prevalent type of fragility fractures is osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs). However, only a few studies have examined the relationship between anti-osteoporosis treatments and malignancy-related mortality following an OVF. The goal of this study is to determine the effect of anti-osteoporosis therapy on mortality in OVF patients with and without cancer.
UNASSIGNED: Data from older people over the age of 65 who were hospitalised for OVFs between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2018 were analysed retrospectively. A total of 6139 persons getting osteoporosis treatment and 28,950 who did not receive treatment were analysed, together with 2 sets of patients, comprising cancer patients (794) and cancer-free patients (5342), using anti-osteoporosis medication or not, in 1:1 propensity score-matched analyses. The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
UNASSIGNED: In all, 35,089 patients with OVFs were included in the population; 29,931 people (85.3%) were women, and the mean (standard deviation) age was 78.13 (9.27) years. Overall survival was considerably higher in those undergoing osteoporosis therapy. This was true both for those without cancer (adjusted HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.51-0.59; P<.0001) as well as those with cancer (adjusted HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.62-0.84; P<.0001). Even among cancer patients, those who received anti-osteoporotic drugs had a lower mortality rate than those who did not.
UNASSIGNED: Our findings suggest that anti-osteoporosis therapy should be initiated regardless of the presence of cancer in the elderly, as it increases survival following OVFs.

暂无摘要。

Osteoporosis is a highly prevalent and multifactorial disease whose main manifestation is the appearance of fragility or low-impact fractures. The most frequent locations of osteoporotic fractures occur at the vertebrae, femoral, distal end of the radius and humerus. Osteoporotic vertebral fracture deserves special mention among them due to its prevalence, importance as it often goes unnoticed and medium-long term consequences are: pain, deformity, disability and deterioration in quality of life. In this review we will focus on the classification and initial evaluation of the patient with osteoporosis, estimation of risk factors, laboratory and imaging studies for an adequate assessment using simple radiography, dual densitometry and magnetic resonance imaging. We will also address the main aspects of the differential diagnosis, treatment and prevention of vertebral fragility fracture, briefly reviewing the main therapeutic agents currently used for its prevention and treatment.

It has been frequently cited that \'the majority of fragility fractures (FF) occur at non-osteoporotic bone mineral density (BMD)\'. For the reports with T-score measured around the time of a hip fracture, we conducted a systematic literature search in December 2022, and resulted in 10 studies with five for Caucasian women and five for East Asian women. Femoral neck (FN) T-score was reported in five Caucasian studies and three East Asian studies, three of five Caucasian studies had a mean T-score ≤-2.5, and one study had the majority of their patients measuring a mean T-score ≤-2.5. All three East Asian studies reported a mean FN T-score ≤-2.7. Total hip T-score was reported in two Caucasian studies and three East Asian studies, the two Caucasian studies both had a mean T-score ≤-2.5, and all three East Asian studies had a mean T-score ≤-2.6. A new literature search conducted in April 2024 results in additional three studies, with results being consistent with the data described above. A trend was noted that \'younger\' patients suffer from hip fractures at a \'higher\' T-score. For the highly cited articles where the notion the majority of FF occur at non-osteoporotic BMD was derived from, authors reported prospective epidemiological studies where BMD was not measured at the timepoint of hip fracture, instead, BMD was measured at the study baseline. These epidemiological studies suggest that >50% of hip fractures likely occur in women with an osteoporotic FN or hip T-score. However, a pattern was seen that older men suffer from hip fracture at a notably higher T-score than older women. For the cases of radiographic vertebral FF, despite varying criteria being used to classify these FFs, the majority of female patients had spine densitometric osteoporosis. Literature shows, compared with the cases of hip fracture, distal forearm fracture occurs at a \'younger\' age and \'higher\' BMD, suggesting distal forearm fracture is more likely associated with a \'higher\' trauma energy level.

Osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) is common in the elderly population. In this report, we describe a case with radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis caused by OVF in a very elderly patient that was treated successfully by full-endoscopic foraminotomy under local anesthesia. The patient was an 89-year-old woman who presented with a chief complaint of left leg pain for 5 years. She visited a couple of hospitals and finally consulted us to determine the exact cause of the pain. Computed tomography scans were obtained and selective nerve root block at L3 was performed. The diagnosis was radiculopathy at L3 due to foraminal stenosis following OVF. The patient had severe heart disease, so we decided to avoid surgery under general anesthesia and planned full-endoscopic spine surgery under local anesthesia. We performed transforaminal full-endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy at L3-L4 to decompress the L3 nerve root. The leg pain disappeared completely immediately after surgery. Postoperative computed tomography confirmed appropriate bone resection. The leg pain did not recur during a year of postoperative follow-up. OVF may cause lumbar radiculopathy as a result of foraminal stenosis, and transforaminal full-endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy under local anesthesia would be the best option in an elderly patient with poor general condition. J. Med. Invest. 71 : 179-183, February, 2024.