Osmotherapy

渗透疗法
  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    急性创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是全球范围内死亡和残疾的主要原因。颅内压(ICP)降低是中度至重度急性TBI患者的关键管理重点。我们旨在评估高渗盐水(HTS)与其他降低ICP的药物在TBI患者中的临床疗效和安全性。从2000年开始,我们进行了一项比较HTS与HTS的随机对照试验(RCTs)的系统搜索。所有年龄段的TBI患者的其他ICP降低药物。主要结果是6个月时的格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)评分(PROSPEROCRD42022324370)。包括10个RCT(760例患者)。6个RCT纳入定量分析。没有证据表明HTS对GOS评分有影响(有利vs.不利)与其他药物相比(风险比[RR]0.82,95%置信区间[CI]0.48-1.40;n=406;2个随机对照试验)。没有证据表明HTS对全因死亡率(RR0.96,95%CI0.60-1.55;n=486;5个随机对照试验)或总住院时间(RR2.36,95%CI-0.53-5.25;n=89;3个随机对照试验)有影响。与其他药物相比,HTS与不良高钠血症相关(RR2.13,95%CI1.09-4.17;n=386;2个RCT)。点估计有利于用HTS减少不受控制的ICP,但这并无统计学意义(RR0.52,95%CI0.26-1.04;n=423;3项随机对照试验).大多数纳入的RCT由于缺乏盲法而处于不明确或偏倚的高风险,不完整的结果数据,选择性报告。我们没有发现HTS对临床重要结局有影响的证据,也没有发现HTS与不良高钠血症相关。所包含的证据的确定性很低到很低,但正在进行的RCT可能有助于减少这种不确定性。此外,GOS评分报告的异质性反映了对标准化TBI核心结局集的需求.
    Acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of mortality and disability worldwide. Intracranial pressure (ICP)-lowering is a critical management priority in patients with moderate to severe acute TBI. We aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of hypertonic saline (HTS) versus other ICP-lowering agents in patients with TBI. We conducted a systematic search from 2000 onward for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HTS vs. other ICP-lowering agents in patients with TBI of all ages. The primary outcome was the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score at 6 months (PROSPERO CRD42022324370). Ten RCTs (760 patients) were included. Six RCTs were included in the quantitative analysis. There was no evidence of an effect of HTS on the GOS score (favorable vs. unfavorable) compared with other agents (risk ratio [RR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-1.40; n = 406; 2 RCTs). There was no evidence of an effect of HTS on all-cause mortality (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.60-1.55; n = 486; 5 RCTs) or total length of stay (RR 2.36, 95% CI - 0.53 to 5.25; n = 89; 3 RCTs). HTS was associated with adverse hypernatremia compared with other agents (RR 2.13, 95% CI 1.09-4.17; n = 386; 2 RCTs). The point estimate favored a reduction in uncontrolled ICP with HTS, but this was not statistically significant (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.26-1.04; n = 423; 3 RCTs). Most included RCTs were at unclear or high risk of bias because of lack of blinding, incomplete outcome data, and selective reporting. We found no evidence of an effect of HTS on clinically important outcomes and that HTS is associated with adverse hypernatremia. The included evidence was of low to very low certainty, but ongoing RCTs may help to the reduce this uncertainty. In addition, heterogeneity in GOS score reporting reflects the need for a standardized TBI core outcome set.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是一个重要的健康和社会问题。该实体的损伤机制可分为两个阶段:(1)由于创伤事件引起的原发性急性损伤;(2)由于先前病变产生的低血压和缺氧引起的继发性损伤,导致神经细胞缺血和坏死。脑水肿是TBI中观察到的最重要的预后标志物之一。在TBI的早期阶段,脑脊液补偿脑水肿。然而,如果水肿增加,这个机制失败了,颅内压升高.为了避免这种连锁效应,在临床实践中应用了几种治疗方法,包括床头的高度,维持正常体温,疼痛和镇静药物,机械通气,神经肌肉阻滞,控制过度换气,和液体治疗(FT)。FT的目标是改善循环系统,避免器官缺氧。因此,在临床实践中,快速和早期输注大量晶体液以恢复血容量和血压。尽管FT在TBI的早期管理中具有重要意义,关于哪种解决方案更适合应用的临床试验很少。本研究的目的是对日常临床实践中使用的不同类型的FT在TBI管理中的作用进行叙述性综述。为了实现这一目标,还将对该实体进行病理生理学方法,总结为什么使用不同类型的FT。
    Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an important health and social problem. The mechanism of damage of this entity could be divided into two phases: (1) a primary acute injury because of the traumatic event; and (2) a secondary injury due to the hypotension and hypoxia generated by the previous lesion, which leads to ischemia and necrosis of neural cells. Cerebral edema is one of the most important prognosis markers observed in TBI. In the early stages of TBI, the cerebrospinal fluid compensates the cerebral edema. However, if edema increases, this mechanism fails, increasing intracranial pressure. To avoid this chain effect, several treatments are applied in the clinical practice, including elevation of the head of the bed, maintenance of normothermia, pain and sedation drugs, mechanical ventilation, neuromuscular blockade, controlled hyperventilation, and fluid therapy (FT). The goal of FT is to improve the circulatory system to avoid the lack of oxygen to organs. Therefore, rapid and early infusion of large volumes of crystalloids is performed in clinical practice to restore blood volume and blood pressure. Despite the relevance of FT in the early management of TBI, there are few clinical trials regarding which solution is better to apply. The aim of this study is to provide a narrative review about the role of the different types of FT used in the daily clinical practice on the management of TBI. To achieve this objective, a physiopathological approach to this entity will be also performed, summarizing why the different types of FT are used.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目标:预期,随机化,双盲研究旨在评估中线移位患者择期幕上脑肿瘤手术期间20%甘露醇和3%高渗盐水(HS)脑松弛的差异.
    方法:60例接受幕上开颅手术切除肿瘤的患者在皮肤切口接受5mL/kg20%甘露醇(n=30)或3%HS(n=30)。动脉血中的PCO2维持在35-40mmHg内,并且动脉血压控制在基线值±20%内。主要结果是令人满意的大脑松弛的比例。外科医生以四点量表评估大脑松弛(1=极好,没有肿胀,2=最小肿胀,3=严重肿胀不需要治疗,4=需要治疗的严重肿胀)。通过成像技术确定的手术后颅内变化,术后并发症,PACU和住院时间,和30天的死亡率也被记录。使用适当的统计学检验进行比较;P<0.05被认为是显著的。该试验已在Eudract中注册。EMA.欧罗巴。欧盟(#2021-006290-40)。
    结果:甘露醇组和HS组患者在脑松弛方面没有差异:2.00[1.00-2.00]和2.00[1.75-3.00],分别为(P=0.804)。肿瘤大小(OR:0.99,95%CI:0.99-1.01;P=0.371),瘤周水肿分类(OR:0.57,95%CI:0.11-2.84;P=0.493),质量效应(OR:0.86,95%CI:0.16-4.87;P=0.864),麻醉(OR:4.88,95%CI:0.82-28.96;P=0.081)和中线移位(OR:5.00,95%CI:0.84-29.70;P=0.077)对甘露醇或HS治疗患者的脑肿胀没有显着影响。围手术期结局无显著差异,观察死亡率和PACU长度以及住院时间.
    结论:5mL/kg的20%甘露醇或3%HS可导致对幕上脑肿瘤中线移位进行开颅手术的患者的脑松弛评分相似。
    A prospective, randomized, double-blind study was designed to assess differences in brain relaxation between 20% mannitol and 3% hypertonic saline (HS) during elective supratentorial brain tumour surgery in patients with midline shift.
    Sixty patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy for tumour resection were enrolled to receive either 5mL/kg of 20% mannitol (n=30) or 3% HS (n=30) administered at skin incision. PCO2 in arterial blood was maintained within 35-40mmHg and arterial blood pressure was controlled within baseline values ±20%. The primary outcome was the proportion of satisfactory brain relaxation. The surgeon assessed brain relaxation on a four-point scale (1=excellent with no swelling, 2=minimal swelling, 3=serious swelling not requiring treatment, 4=severe swelling requiring treatment). Postsurgical intracranial changes determined by imaging techniques, postoperative complications, PACU and hospital stay, and mortality at 30 days were also recorded. Appropriate statistical tests were used for comparison; P<0.05 was considered as significant. This trial was registered in Eudract.ema.europa.eu (#2021-006290-40).
    There was no difference in brain relaxation: 2.00 [1.00-2.00] and 2.00 [1.75-3.00] for patients in mannitol and HS groups, respectively (P=0.804). Tumour size (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.99-1.01; P=0.371), peritumoral oedema classification (OR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.11-2.84; P=0.493), mass effect (OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.16-4.87; P=0.864), anaesthesia (OR: 4.88, 95% CI: 0.82-28.96; P=0.081) and midline shift (OR: 5.00, 95% CI: 0.84-29.70; P=0.077) did not have a significant influence on brain swelling in patients treated with either mannitol or HS. No significant differences in perioperative outcomes, mortality and length of PACU and hospital stay were observed.
    5mL/kg of 20% mannitol or 3% HS result in similar brain relaxation scores in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial brain tumour with midline shift.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    结论:为了加快文章的发表,AJHP在接受后尽快在线发布手稿。接受的手稿经过同行评审和复制编辑,但在技术格式化和作者打样之前在线发布。这些手稿不是记录的最终版本,将在以后替换为最终文章(按照AJHP样式格式化并由作者证明)。
    目的:当前神经危重症护理协会关于脑水肿管理的指南在某些情况下推荐高渗盐水(HTS)而不是甘露醇,但是关于适当的管理方法仍然存在实际问题,浓度/剂量,监测以确保安全使用,和存储。本文的目的是根据现有证据解决这些实际问题。
    结论:已经研究了许多不同的高渗解决方案,以确定缓解急性缺血性中风患者急性脑水肿的最佳高渗性物质,脑出血,蛛网膜下腔出血,和创伤性脑损伤。甘露醇和HTS是当代神经重症监护实践中使用的主要高渗疗法。在剂量和配方的实际方面,HTS的当代使用遵循了迂回的道路,证据主要包括回顾性或观察性数据。推注剂量的HTS降低急性颅内压升高的有效性是公认的。如果对血清钠和氯化物浓度进行适当的监测,使用HTS的不良事件通常是轻微的且无临床意义。现有证据表明,在某些情况下,HTS的外周给药可能是安全的。由于安全存储的监管要求,HTS的及时利用变得复杂,但在适当的保护措施下,HTS可以存储在患者护理区域。
    结论:HTS配方,管理方法,输注速率,存储因机构而异,也不存在实践标准。对于HTS,中心静脉内给药可能是优选的,但只要采取检测和预防静脉炎和外渗的措施,外周静脉给药是安全的.通过适当的协议可以安全使用HTS,教育,和机构保障措施到位。
    Current Neurocritical Care Society guidelines on the management of cerebral edema recommend hypertonic saline (HTS) over mannitol in some scenarios, but practical questions remain regarding the appropriate administration method, concentration/dose, monitoring to ensure safe use, and storage. The aim of this article is to address these practical concerns based on the evidence currently available.
    Many different hypertonic solutions have been studied to define the optimal hyperosmolar substance to relieve acute cerebral edema in patients with conditions such as acute ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and traumatic brain injury. Mannitol and HTS are the main hyperosmolar therapies in use in contemporary neurocritical care practice. Contemporary use of HTS has followed a circuitous path in regards to the practical aspects of dosing and formulation, with evidence mainly consisting of retrospective or observational data. The effectiveness of bolus doses of HTS to lower acutely elevated intracranial pressure is well accepted. Adverse events with use of HTS are often mild and non-clinically significant if appropriate monitoring of serum sodium and chloride concentrations is performed. Available evidence shows that peripheral administration of HTS is likely safe in certain circumstances. Timely utilization of HTS is complicated by regulatory requirements for safe storage, but with appropriate safeguards HTS can be stored in patient care areas.
    HTS formulations, methods of administration, infusion rate, and storage vary by institution, and no practice standards exist. Central intravenous administration may be preferred for HTS, but peripheral intravenous administration is safe provided measures are undertaken to detect and prevent phlebitis and extravasation. The safe use of HTS is possible with proper protocols, education, and institutional safeguards in place.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在缺血性中风中,再灌注治疗后,血液供应的大量减少会导致血脑屏障的破坏和脑水肿。脑水肿的特征是颅内压(ICP)升高,组织疝和脑灌注压降低。在临床环境中,渗透疗法一直是降低ICP的常见做法。然而,没有关于选择给药方案参数的指南,例如注射剂量,输注时间和保留时间。最重要的是,渗透疗法的效果已被证明是有争议的,因为渗透剂的输注会导致一系列的副作用。这里,因此,提出了一种新的脑水肿和渗透治疗的有限元模型来预测治疗结果。该模型由模拟血液灌注的三个组件组成,水肿,和渗透疗法,分别。在灌注模型(包括小动脉,静脉,和毛细血管血液隔室),解剖学上准确的大脑几何形状用于识别在中风中灌注减少和潜在水肿发生的区域。然后使用具有四个流体隔室的多孔循环模型(小动脉血液,静脉血,毛细血管血,和间质液)。在渗透疗法模型中,渗透压是变化的,并且在不同渗透治疗期间ICP的变化被量化。该模型的模拟结果与可用的临床数据显示出极好的一致性,并且该模型用于研究各种参数下的渗透治疗。因此,通过模拟,证明了如何为具有不同病理参数的患者提出治疗策略.
    In ischaemic stroke, a large reduction in blood supply can lead to the breakdown of the blood brain barrier and to cerebral oedema after reperfusion therapy. Cerebral oedema is marked by elevated intracranial pressure (ICP), tissue herniation and reduced cerebral perfusion pressure. In clinical settings, osmotherapy has been a common practice to decrease ICP. However, there are no guidelines on the choice of administration protocol parameters such as injection doses, infusion time and retention time. Most importantly, the effects of osmotherapy have been proven controversial since the infusion of osmotic agents can lead to a range of side effects. Here, a new Finite Element model of brain oedema and osmotherapy is thus proposed to predict treatment outcome. The model consists of three components that simulate blood perfusion, oedema, and osmotherapy, respectively. In the perfusion model (comprising arteriolar, venous, and capillary blood compartments), an anatomically accurate brain geometry is used to identify regions with a perfusion reduction and potential oedema occurrence in stroke. The oedema model is then used to predict ICP using a porous circulation model with four fluid compartments (arteriolar blood, venular blood, capillary blood, and interstitial fluid). In the osmotherapy model, the osmotic pressure is varied and the changes in ICP during different osmotherapy episodes are quantified. The simulation results of the model show excellent agreement with available clinical data and the model is employed to study osmotherapy under various parameters. Consequently, it is demonstrated how therapeutic strategies can be proposed for patients with different pathological parameters based on simulations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脑水肿,在各种情况下,可能伴有低钠血症。低渗应激诱导的星形胶质细胞脱髓鞘的脑损伤威胁在终末期肝病的低钠血症患者中更为常见,创伤性脑损伤,心力衰竭,或其他条件经历过快速纠正低钠血症。这些场景,在CKD和/或AKI排尿量下降的情况下,相对于血浆钠浓度的增加,可能需要控制血浆张力的升高。我们通过常规连续RRT模式应用的钠渗透疗法为该问题提供了战略解决方案:预稀释连续静脉静脉血液滤过。
    Cerebral edema, in a variety of circumstances, may be accompanied by states of hyponatremia. The threat of brain injury from hypotonic stress-induced astrocyte demyelination is more common when vulnerable patients with hyponatremia who have end stage liver disease, traumatic brain injury, heart failure, or other conditions undergo overly rapid correction of hyponatremia. These scenarios, in the context of declining urinary output from CKD and/or AKI, may require controlled elevations of plasma tonicity vis-à-vis increases of the plasma sodium concentration. We offer a strategic solution to this problem via sodium-based osmotherapy applied through a conventional continuous RRT modality: predilution continuous venovenous hemofiltration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)每年住院人数超过100万,并与高发病率和死亡率相关。治疗的目标是消除充血并去除增加的体内总钠和体内总水。急性肾损伤(AKI)或慢性肾病(CKD)存在于三分之二的ADHF患者中。ADHF和AKI的病理生理学是双向和协同的。AKI和CKD通过降低利尿效率和钠和水的排泄使ADHF的管理复杂化。在ADHF住院的患者中,低钠血症是最常见的电解质异常,通常是容量超负荷。ADHF代表额外的治疗挑战,特别是当存在少尿时。使用基于钠的渗透疗法进行预稀释连续静脉血液滤过可以安全地增加血浆钠浓度,而不会有害地增加总钠。我们提出了一种详细的方法来解决ADHF和AKI患者的高容量低钠血症问题。
    Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) accounts for more than 1 million hospital admissions annually and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Decongestion with removal of increased total body sodium and total body water are goals of treatment. Acute kidney injury (AKI) or chronic kidney disease (CKD) is present in two-thirds of patients with ADHF. The pathophysiology of ADHF and AKI is bidirectional and synergistic. AKI and CKD complicate the management of ADHF by decreasing diuretic efficiency and excretion of sodium and water. Among patients hospitalized with ADHF, hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte abnormality and is classically encountered with volume overload. ADHF represents an additional therapeutic challenge particularly when oligoanuria is present. Predilution continuous venovenous hemofiltration with sodium-based osmotherapy can safely increase plasma sodium concentration without deleteriously increasing total body sodium. We present a detailed methodology that addresses the issue of hypervolemic hyponatremia in patients with ADHF and AKI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估输注500毫升乳酸钠对重症监护病房患者不同生化变量和颅内压的影响。
    方法:进行了一项前瞻性实验单队列研究。
    方法:大学医院的多价重症监护病房。
    方法:休克和颅内高压的危重患者。
    方法:在15min内注入500ml乳酸钠推注。血浆钠水平,钾,镁,钙,氯化物,乳酸,碳酸氢盐,PaCO2,pH,在3个时间点记录磷酸盐和白蛋白:T0预输注;T1在30min,和T2在输注后60min。在T0和T2测量平均动脉压和颅内压。
    结果:41例患者接受乳酸钠治疗:19例作为渗透压活性剂,22例作为体积膨胀剂。观察到代谢性碱中毒:T0与T1(p=0.007);T1与T2(p=0.003)。钠在3个时间点增加(T0vs.T1,p<0.0001;T1与T2,p=0.0001)。此外,乳酸钠降低颅内压(T0:24.83±5.4vs.T2:15.06±5.8;p<0.001)。同样,血浆乳酸表现出双相作用,在T2处快速下降(p<0.0001),包括先前患有高乳酸盐血症的患者(p=0.002)。
    结论:输注乳酸钠与代谢性碱中毒有关,高钠血症,减少了氯血症,和血浆乳酸水平的双相变化。此外,急性脑损伤患者颅内压下降.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the infusion of sodium lactate 500ml upon different biochemical variables and intracranial pressure in patients admitted to the intensive care unit.
    METHODS: A prospective experimental single cohort study was carried out.
    METHODS: Polyvalent intensive care unit of a university hospital.
    METHODS: Critical patients with shock and intracranial hypertension.
    METHODS: A 500ml sodium lactate bolus was infused in 15min. Plasma levels of sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, chloride, lactate, bicarbonate, PaCO2, pH, phosphate and albumin were recorded at 3 timepoints: T0 pre-infusion; T1 at 30min, and T2 at 60min post-infusion. Mean arterial pressure and intracranial pressure were measured at T0 and T2.
    RESULTS: Forty-one patients received sodium lactate: 19 as an osmotically active agent and 22 as a volume expander. Metabolic alkalosis was observed: T0 vs. T1 (p=0.007); T1 vs. T2 (p=0.003). Sodium increased at the 3 timepoints (T0 vs. T1, p<0.0001; T1 vs. T2, p=0.0001). In addition, sodium lactate decreased intracranial pressure (T0: 24.83±5.4 vs. T2: 15.06±5.8; p<0.001). Likewise, plasma lactate showed a biphasic effect, with a rapid decrease at T2 (p<0.0001), including in those with previous hyperlactatemia (p=0.002).
    CONCLUSIONS: The infusion of sodium lactate is associated to metabolic alkalosis, hypernatremia, reduced chloremia, and a biphasic change in plasma lactate levels. Moreover, a decrease in intracranial pressure was observed in patients with acute brain injury.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本手稿将回顾创伤性脑损伤的静脉输液治疗。将包括人类和动物文献。还将讨论基本治疗建议。
    This manuscript will review intravenous fluid therapy in traumatic brain injury. Both human and animal literature will be included. Basic treatment recommendations will also be discussed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号