Child physical abuse is a common cause of pediatric morbidity and mortality. Up to half of all children presenting with abusive injuries have a history of a prior suspicious injury, suggesting a pattern of repeated physical abuse. Medical providers are responsible for identifying children with suspicious injuries, completing mandated reporting to child protective services for investigation, and screening for occult injuries and underlying medical conditions that can predispose to injuries. Early identification of inflicted injuries appropriate evaluations may serve as an opportunity for life-saving intervention and prevent further escalation of abuse. However, identification of abuse can be challenging. This article will review both physical exam findings and injuries that suggest abuse as well as the evaluation and management of physical abuse.

Transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcMEPs) play an integral role in assessing motor tract function in surgical procedures where motor function is at risk. However, transcranial stimulation creates a risk for oral trauma. Several studies have reported on distinct factors that can influence the rate of TcMEP-induced oral trauma, but little is known about how an anesthetic regimen can influence this rate. In this retrospective review, we investigated the incidence of oral injury under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and balanced anesthesia in 66,166 cases from 2019 to 2021. There were 295 oral injuries in our sample, yielding an incidence of 0.45%, which is in line with ranges reported in the literature. A total of 222 of the injured patients were sedated with balanced anesthesia, while the remaining 73 were under TIVA anesthetics. This difference in distribution was statistically significant (p < 0.0002). Our findings suggest TIVA is associated with lower risk of oral trauma when TcMEPs are monitored, thereby improving patient safety.

BACKGROUND: An impalement-related injury to the oral cavity is common in pediatric patients at emergency department. A computed tomography evaluation is not always suitable in these cases. Herein, we aimed to present oral sonography findings from six pediatric patients presenting with impalement-related injury to the oral cavity.
METHODS: All included patients were younger than 4 years and sustained injuries with a toothbrush, chopstick, water gun, and fork to the tonsils, submandibular gland area, uvula, and under the tongue.
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound imaging appeared useful in helping diagnose impalement-related injuries lateral to the midline.

Vaping has become an increasingly popular alternative to smoking in recent years. We present a rare and unusual case of upper airway bleeding caused by inhalation of a cannabidiol (CBD) oil-based vape due to a chemical burn. There are no case reports of this injury in the literature, and we discuss the clinical presentation, diagnosis and our management of this potentially life-threatening injury. A 27-year-old man presented to the accident and emergency department after using a CBD oil vape. After one inhalation of the CBD oil vape, the patient experienced immediate onset pain in the oropharynx, dyspnoea, expectoration of blood and hoarseness. The patient had used a CBD oil vape four hours earlier that evening for the first time, which was procured from an unregulated online source. The patient was referred to the Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) team where the examination of oropharynx identified a posterior pharyngeal bleeding point. Flexible nasal endoscopy was undertaken showing profound erythema and inflammation throughout the oropharynx and posterior pharyngeal wall. The mucous membranes had been detached leaving an exposed bleeding submucosa. The patient was commenced on three cycles of back-to-back adrenaline nebulisers (1:1000 adrenaline in 5ml of 0.9% NaCl), 6.6mg dexamethasone intravenously and hydrogen peroxide gargles (5ml of 3% hydrogen peroxide in 10ml of water) three times a day. There were early involvement and review of the airway by the anaesthetic and intensive care teams, which was deemed safe at the time. A plan was made for a definitive airway if bleeding reoccurred. Upper airway bleeding can present as a rare form of vape-induced injury and should be considered part of the differential diagnosis particularly in those using CBD oil vapes. History taking is pertinent and patients should be questioned on the specific vape liquids used. Airway stabilisation is the priority with early involvement of the multi-disciplinary team including anaesthetists, intensive care specialists and ENT surgeons.

Oral injuries in young children may indicate physical abuse. The prevalence of oral injuries in young children presenting to the emergency department is unknown. These data would assist providers in making decisions about the need for further abuse evaluation.
To determine the prevalence of oral injuries, associated chief complaints and characteristics, and frequency of abuse evaluations in children younger than 24 months presenting to a pediatric emergency department (PED).
Twelve pediatric emergency medicine physicians consecutively enrolled children younger than 24 months in a tertiary care PED.
We performed a prospective observational study. Enrolled patients underwent a complete oral examination. Providers recorded patient demographics, type of chief complaint, oral injury details, developmental ability, and the presence of an abuse evaluation.
Oral injuries occurred in 36/1303 (2.8%, 95% CI 1.9-3.8%) and were more common in patients with traumatic (26/200, 13%) versus medical chief complaints (10/1,103, 0.9%) (p < .001). Of patients with oral injuries (36), 78% were mobile and 72% had traumatic chief complaints. Nine (25%) children with oral injuries were evaluated for abuse. Oral injuries in children 0-11 months old were more likely to be evaluated for abuse than children 12-24 months old (70.0% vs. 7.7%, p < .001).
The prevalence of oral injuries in children <24 months old presenting to a PED was low. Most occurred in mobile children and in children with traumatic chief complaints. Younger, non-mobile children with oral injuries had a higher likelihood of having an abuse evaluation.

暂无摘要。

Motocross is a high-risk sport that can cause serious injuries including oral injuries. However, mouthguard use is not mandatory in motocross. This report describes a case of an oral laceration with exposure of bilateral inferior alveolar nerves as a result of a motocross accident in which the patient was not wearing a mouthguard.

BACKGROUND: Oral injuries are common among children, but studies on oral injury according to the presence of foreign objects in the mouth are limited. The aim of this study was to compare injury patterns and their effects in children presenting to a Japanese pediatric emergency room (ER) with and without foreign objects in the mouth.
METHODS: Children who were brought to the ER at Tokyo Metropolitan Children\'s Medical Center with oral injuries between 1 January 2011 and 31 December 2012, were included. Information regarding mechanism of injury, object related to injury, required procedure, and disposition (i.e. placement after ER evaluation: hospitalization or discharge) was collected. Injured subjects with and without foreign objects in the mouth were compared.
RESULTS: Three hundred and nineteen subjects were included in analysis. Median age was 26 months. Labial mucosa, tongue, buccal mucosa, and teeth were major locations of injury. Tumble (i.e. fall from standing) was the leading mechanism of injury (50%). Seventy-one subjects (22%) were holding foreign objects in the mouth when injury occurred. A toothbrush was the most common object (31%). Subjects with foreign objects in the mouth were more likely to injure the posterior parts of the mouth, and to require imaging (P = 0.04) and hospital admission (P < 0.001). This was also the case for children with injury due to tumble.
CONCLUSIONS: Tumble (i.e. fall from standing) was the most common mechanism of injury. Furthermore, requirement for medical resources increased if children had foreign objects in their mouth. Preventive measures should focus on educating parents about the dangers associated with children moving around while holding objects in the mouth.