Optic canal fracture

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的探讨经翼点和眶上入路视神经减压术(OND)治疗严重外伤性视神经病变(TON)的疗效,并确定OND术后视力(VA)的预后因素。本研究回顾性分析了2019年9月至2022年6月在我们研究所通过翼点或眶上入路治疗的重度TON患者。人口统计信息,创伤因素,创伤和完全失明之间的间隔,创伤和手术之间的间隔,并记录了相关的颅面创伤。比较两组患者的住院天数和术后VA。本研究包括54例严重的TONNLP患者;21例患者通过翼点入路进行了OND,另外33人接受了眶上入路。分别,在翼点和眶上方法组中,平均住院天数为9.8±3.2和10.7±2.9天(p=0.58),平均随访时间为18.9±4.3和20.8±3.7个月(p=0.09),OND的平均周长分别为53.14±15.89○(范围220○-278○)和181.70±6.56○(范围173○-193○)(p<0.001)。翼点和眶上入路的总体改善率分别为57.1%和45.5%(p=0.40),分别。视管骨折(OCF)显示与眶上入路术后VA显着相关(二进制:p=0.014,CI:1.573-57.087;序数:p=0.003,CI:1.517-5.503),但不是在翼方法中。在眶上入路组中,OFC患者的预后较好(78.6%)高于无OFC患者(21.4%).患有严重创伤性TON的患者可以通过翼点或眶上入路从OND中受益。OCF是通过眶上入路OND术后VA的潜在预后因素。
    To investigate the effectiveness of optic nerve decompression (OND) in the treatment of severe traumatic optic neuropathy (TON) through pterional and supraorbital approaches, and to identify the prognostic factor for postoperative visual acuity (VA) following OND. Patients with severe TON treated with OND through either pterional or supraorbital approach in our institute from September 2019 to June 2022 were retrospectively reviewed in this study. Demographic information, trauma factors, the interval between trauma and complete blindness, the interval between trauma and surgery, and the associated craniofacial traumas were recorded. Hospitalization days and the postoperative VA of patients in two groups were compared. There were 54 severe TON patients with NLP included in this study; 21 patients underwent OND through the pterional approach, and the other 33 underwent the supraorbital approach. Respectively, in groups of pterional and supraorbital approaches, the average hospitalization days were 9.8 ± 3.2 and 10.7 ± 2.9 days (p = 0.58), the mean durations of follow-up were 18.9 ± 4.3 and 20.8 ± 3.7 months (p = 0.09), and the average circumference of OND were 53.14 ± 15.89 ◦ (range 220 ◦ -278◦) and 181.70 ± 6.56◦ (range 173 ◦ -193◦) (p<0.001). The overall improvement rates of pterional and supraorbital approaches are 57.1% and 45.5% (p = 0.40), respectively. Optic canal fracture (OCF) was revealed to be significantly associated with postoperative VA in the supraorbital approach (Binary: p = 0.014, CI: 1.573-57.087; Ordinal: p = 0.003, CI: 1.517-5.503), but not in the pterional approach. In the group of supraorbital approach, patients with OFC had a higher rate of a better outcome (78.6%) than those without (21.4%). Patients with severe traumatic TON may benefit from OND through either the pterional or supraorbital approach. OCF is a potential prognostic factor for postoperative VA following OND through the supraorbital approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    创伤性视神经病变(TON)是钝性或穿透性头部外伤后视力丧失的罕见原因,但是后果可能是毁灭性的,尤其是双侧视神经受累的病例。尽管大多数患者是年轻的成年男性,大约20%的病例发生在儿童时期。TON的诊断通常基于临床病史和指示视神经病变的检查结果而直接。然而,当患者的精神状态因严重创伤而受损时,评估可能很困难。TON经常导致中央视力的严重丧失,最终的视觉结果在很大程度上取决于患者的基线视力。其他不良预后因素包括意识丧失,48小时后视力没有改善,没有视觉诱发的反应,和神经影像学上的视神经管骨折的证据。TON的管理仍然存在争议。一些临床医生喜欢单独观察,而其他人选择用全身性类固醇干预,视神经管手术减压术,或者两者兼而有之。这些不同治疗方案的证据基础薄弱,并且在TON中常规使用大剂量类固醇或手术并非没有任何伴随风险。保守治疗的患者的自发视力恢复率相对较高,因此,需要在平衡中更仔细地考虑干预措施可能产生的不利影响。
    Traumatic optic neuropathy (TON) is an uncommon cause of visual loss following blunt or penetrating head trauma, but the consequences can be devastating, especially in cases with bilateral optic nerve involvement. Although the majority of patients are young adult males, about 20% of cases occur during childhood. A diagnosis of TON is usually straightforward based on the clinical history and examination findings indicative of an optic neuropathy. However, the assessment can be difficult when the patient\'s mental status is impaired owing to severe trauma. TON frequently results in profound loss of central vision, and the final visual outcome is largely dictated by the patient\'s baseline visual acuities. Other poor prognostic factors include loss of consciousness, no improvement in vision after 48 hours, the absence of visual evoked responses, and evidence of optic canal fractures on neuroimaging. The management of TON remains controversial. Some clinicians favor observation alone, whereas others opt to intervene with systemic steroids, surgical decompression of the optic canal, or both. The evidence base for these various treatment options is weak, and the routine use of high-dose steroids or surgery in TON is not without any attendant risks. There is a relatively high rate of spontaneous visual recovery among patients managed conservatively, and the possible adverse effects of intervention therefore need to be even more carefully considered in the balance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号