UNASSIGNED: An increase in opioid-related overdoses, notably from potent synthetic opioids like fentanyl, prompted this consideration of characteristics of emergency department (ED) patients with evidence for illicit fentanyl use or exposure, the correlation with intentional opioid misuse, and subsequent ED management.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective review was performed of patients presenting to an urban academic medical center ED with evidence for illicit fentanyl use, determined by positive urine drug screens (UDS), from 6/2021 through 11/2021. Participant demographics, comorbidities, ED chief complaint and disposition, and evidence of intentional opioid misuse were considered. Secondary outcomes included provision of buprenorphine/naloxone and/or naloxone kits at discharge, ED recidivism, and six-month mortality. Bivariate comparisons and logistic regression models were performed.
UNASSIGNED: Among 409 unique patients, most were white and male with a mean age of 39.4. Approximately half presented with opioid-related complaints. Evidence of intentional opioid misuse was identified in 72.6 % of patients. Black patients had 79 % lower odds of intentional opioid misuse compared to white patients. Regarding ED management, 28.8 % were discharged with buprenorphine/naloxone and 14.0 % with a naloxone kit. Black patients had 63 % lower odds of receiving buprenorphine/naloxone compared to white patients after controlling for covariates. Nearly 6 % of the study population died within six months of the initial ED visit.
UNASSIGNED: This fentanyl-focused review describes patient characteristics which largely mirror the epidemiology of the current opioid epidemic; however, despite evidence of objective exposure, it also suggests that Black patients may be less likely to use fentanyl intentionally. It also highlights potential disparities related to ED-based opioid misuse patient management.

BACKGROUND: Injecting, smoking, and snorting heroin/synthetic opioids is each associated with unique health risks. It is unclear how route of administration (ROA) preferences have shifted during the opioid epidemic.
METHODS: Using 2000-2021 admissions data from SAMHSA TEDS-A, we analyzed trends in heroin/synthetic opioid ROA preferences and factors associated with these preferences.
RESULTS: 7,881,318 heroin/synthetic opioid admissions reported injection, smoking, or snorting preference. Nationally, injection peaked in 2014 (69.9 %) and nadired in 2021(52.2 %), snorting nadired in 2014 (24.9 %) and peaked in 2021 (36.4 %), and smoking rose steadily from 2.5 % in 2005 to a peak of 11.4 % in 2021. From 2000-2021, the number of states with ≥10 % smoking rates grew from 2 to 27 (highest: 57.0 % in Arizona in 2021). In 2021, increased adjusted prevalence ratios (APR) of non-injection versus injection use were associated with older age at first opioid use (APR 1.52 [95 % CI: 1.51, 1.54] for those 30+ relative to ≤20), and all race/ethnicities relative to non-Latino White individuals (highest: Black individuals, APR 1.77 [1.75, 1.78]). Geography strongly predicted smoking versus snorting (Mountain APR 6.91 [6.64, 7.19], Pacific APR 6.61 [6.35, 6.88], reference: New England).
CONCLUSIONS: ROA preferences of heroin/synthetic opioids have changed substantially since 2000, with: 1) recent decreases in injection nationally; 2) increased smoking, particularly in the western US; and, 3) recent increased snorting in the eastern US. Smoking is now prevalent and growing. Public health implications include an increasing number of smoking-related fatal overdoses and the probable reduction of injection-specific morbidity and increase in smoking-specific morbidity.

The current opioid epidemic is one of the most profound public health crises facing the United States. Despite that it has been under the spotlight for years, available treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD) and overdose are limited to opioid receptor ligands such as the agonist methadone and the overdose reversing drugs such as naloxone. Vaccines are emerging as an alternative strategy to combat OUD and prevent relapse and overdose. Most vaccine candidates consist of a conjugate structure containing the target opioid attached to an immunogenic carrier protein. However, conjugate vaccines have demonstrated some intrinsic shortfalls, such as fast degradation and poor recognition by immune cells. To overcome these challenges, we proposed a lipid-PLGA hybrid nanoparticle (hNP)-based vaccine against oxycodone (OXY), which is one of the most frequently misused opioid analgesics. The hNP-based OXY vaccine exhibited superior immunogenicity and pharmacokinetic efficacy in comparison to its conjugate vaccine counterpart. Specifically, the hNP-based OXY vaccine formulated with subunit keyhole limpet hemocyanin (sKLH) as the carrier protein and aluminum hydroxide (Alum) as the adjuvant (OXY-sKLH-hNP(Alum)) elicited the most potent OXY-specific antibody response in mice. The induced antibodies efficiently bound with OXY molecules in blood and suppressed their entry into the brain. In a following dose-response study, OXY-sKLH-hNP(Alum) equivalent to 60 μg of sKLH was determined to be the most promising OXY vaccine candidate moving forward. This study provides evidence that hybrid nanoparticle-based vaccines may be superior vaccine candidates than conjugate vaccines and will be beneficial in treating those suffering from OUD.

The opioid epidemic has taken the lives of thousands of people across North America and Europe. Moreover, lack of housing, inflation, and a rapidly changing economy have affected millions of people, and many have become homeless. Many governments, researchers, health agencies, and not-for-profits have offered innovative ways to tackle this crisis, including many harm-reduction technologies that rely on Internet. In the age of the first artificial intelligence (AI) revolution, where reliance and accessibility to Internet have become a necessity for finding jobs, housing, affordable food, social services, social connection, and staying alive, the creation of free Wi-Fi zones around inner city neighborhood by towns and municipalities is not only a cost-effective way to reduce death, social costs, but a human rights issue during the initial stage of first A.I. revolution.

BACKGROUND: Over the past 25 years, global opioid consumption has increased. Denmark ranks fifth in opioid use globally, exceeding other Scandinavian countries. Postsurgical pain is a common reason for opioid prescriptions, but opioid use patterns after patient discharge from the hospital are unclear. This study examines trends in opioid prescription among Danish surgical patients over a year.
METHODS: This register-based cohort study will use data from Danish governmental databases related to patients undergoing the 10 most frequent surgical procedures in 2018, excluding cancer-related and minor procedures. The primary outcome will be the dispensed postoperative opioid prescriptions at retail pharmacies over four quarters. Secondary analyses will include associations with sex, age, education attainment, and oral morphine equivalent quotient. Surgical treatments and diagnoses will be identified using NOMESCO procedure codes and ICD-10 codes. Opioids will be identified by ATC codes N02A and R05DA04. Subjects will be classified as preoperative opioid consumers or non-opioid consumers based on opioid prescriptions redeemed in the 6 months before surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The study will use extensive national register-based data, ensuring consistent data collection and enhancing the generalizability of the findings to similar healthcare systems. The study may identify high-risk populations for long-term opioids and provide information to support opioid prescribing guidelines and public health policies.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Federal deregulation of opioid agonist therapies are an attractive policy option to improve access to opioid use disorder care and achieve widespread beneficial impacts on growing opioid-related harms. There have been few evaluations of such policy interventions and understanding effects can help policy planning across jurisdictions.
METHODS: Using health administrative data from eight of ten Canadian provinces, this study evaluated the impacts of Health Canada\'s decision in May 2018 to rescind the requirement for Canadian health professionals to obtain an exemption from the Canadian Drugs and Substance Act to prescribe methadone for opioid use disorder. Over the study period of June 2017 to May 2019, we used descriptive statistics to capture overall trends in the number of agonist therapy prescribers across provinces and we used interrupted time series analysis to determine the effect of this decision on the trajectories of the agonist therapy prescribing workforces.
RESULTS: There were important baseline differences in the numbers of agonist therapy prescribers. The province with the highest concentration of prescribers had 7.5 more prescribers per 100,000 residents compared to the province with the lowest. All provinces showed encouraging growth in the number of prescribers through the study period, though the fastest growing province grew 4.5 times more than the slowest. Interrupted time series analyses demonstrated a range of effects of the federal policy intervention on the provinces, from clearly positive changes to possibly negative effects.
CONCLUSIONS: Federal drug regulation policy change interacted in complex ways with provincial health professional regulation and healthcare delivery, kaleidoscoping the effects of federal policy intervention. For Canada and other health systems such as the US, federal policy must account for significant subnational variation in OUD epidemiology and drug regulation to maximize intended beneficial effects and mitigate the risks of negative effects.

Evidence is mixed on whether increased access to insurance, specifically through the ACA\'s Medicaid expansion, exacerbated the opioid public health crisis through increased opioid prescribing. Using survey data on retail prescription drug fills from 2008 to 2019, we did not find a significant relationship between Medicaid expansion and opioid prescribing in the newly eligible Medicaid population. It may be that the dangers of opioids were known well enough by the time of the Medicaid expansion that lack of access to care was no longer a binding constraint on opioid prescription receipt.

BACKGROUND: Opioid dependence represents a public health crisis and can be observed after outpatient urologic procedures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of persistent opioid usage after radical orchiectomy for testicular cancer.
METHODS: The TriNetX Research network database was queried for men between 15 and 45 years undergoing radical orchiectomy for a diagnosis of testicular cancer. All patients with N+ or M+ disease, prior opioid use, and patients who underwent chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or retroperitoneal lymph node dissection were excluded. Patients were stratified whether they were prescribed opioids or not at time of orchiectomy. The incidence of new, persistent opioid use, defined as a prescription for opioids between 3 and 15 months after orchiectomy, was evaluated.
RESULTS: A total of 2,911 men underwent radical orchiectomy for testicular cancer, of which 89.8% were prescribed opioids at time of orchiectomy. After propensity score matching for age, race, and history of psychiatric diagnosis, 592 patients were included (296 received opioids, 296 did not). Overall, 0% of patients who did not receive postoperative opioids developed new persistent opioid use, whereas 10.5% of patients who received postoperative opioids developed new persistent opioid use. Patients prescribed postoperative opioids for orchiectomy had statistically higher risk difference of developing new persistent opioid use (Risk Difference: 10.5%; 95% CI: 7.0-14.0; Z: 5.7; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative opioid prescription following radical orchiectomy is significantly associated with developing new persistent opioid use, with 1 in 10 young men who received postoperative opioids obtaining a new prescription for opioids well beyond the postoperative period. Future efforts should emphasize nonopioid pathways for pain control following this generally minor procedure.

Drug overdose death rates are the highest recorded in New York City (NYC). Substance use disorder (SUD) treatment termination can confer increased risk of drug overdose death. Our objective was to determine the probability of, and factors associated with, drug overdose death following SUD treatment termination. Using a retrospective longitudinal cohort design, we identified those who had NYC-based SUD treatment terminated (01/2016-06/2019) using Chief Medical Examiner and SUD treatment data. Using survival analyses, we examined drug overdose deaths ≤ 14 and ≤ 90 days following SUD treatment termination, respectively. Of 51,171 patients with SUD treatment termination, 140 and 342 had a drug overdose death < 14 and ≤ 90 days, respectively. The crude drug overdose death rate was 26.7 per 1000 person-years at-risk in the ≤ 90-day period and was 71.6 per 1000 person-years at-risk in the ≤ 14-day period. In adjusted Cox proportional hazard model examining death ≤ 14 days, those unemployed (compared to employed) and those terminated from residential treatment (compared to medically supervised withdrawal, opioid treatment programs, and outpatient treatment) were more likely to have had a drug overdose death (all p-values < 0.01). In adjusted Cox proportional hazard model examining death ≤ 90 days, non-Hispanic White people (compared to non-Hispanic Black people), those not stably housed (compared to stably housed), those unemployed and those terminated from residential treatment were more likely to have had a drug overdose death (all p-values < 0.01). Strategies to improve retention including the reassessment of program treatment termination criteria along with strategies to promote ongoing OUD treatment, engagement in harm reduction, and distribution of naloxone are needed.