背景:以开放的科学方法为不同的利益相关者共享研究成果可以更好地获取不同的研究,以解决不同领域的问题,这导致研究资源的平等获取条件,以及更大的科学生产力。因此,这项研究的目的是了解伊朗卫生研究人员在研究中的开放性概念.
方法:从8月初到2021年11月中旬,对来自不同领域的伊朗卫生研究人员进行了20次半结构化访谈,滚雪球,和方便采样。访谈一直持续到数据饱和。使用MAXQDA20进行主题分析进行数据分析。最后,确定了与开放科学有关的七个主要问题。
结果:通过对访谈的分析,在22个子类中提取了235个主码和173个主码。在仔细评估和整合子类和类之后,他们最终被分为九类和三个主要主题。分析表明,研究的开放性与三个主要主题有关:研究人员对开放科学的理解,开放科学对出版和共享研究的影响,关注和不愿开放研究。
结论:考虑到在健康领域进行的研究的多样性,应规定获得研究结果的条件;诸如隐私之类的问题也应规定为在卫生系统中获得数据和信息的重要主题。我们的分析表明,应根据卫生领域的不同范围来说明研究过程的发布和共享条件。开放科学的概念与获取研究结果和其他研究项目有关,无论成本如何,政治,社会,或者种族障碍,可以在知识发展中创造集体智慧。与开放获取有关的研究的发布和共享过程适用于所有类型的产出,准入条件,增加对研究的信任,创建不同的发布路径,以及公民更广泛地参与研究。应促进开放的科学实践,以增加知识的流通和利用率,同时调整和尊重隐私的限制,国家的知识产权和国家安全权。
BACKGROUND: Sharing research outputs with open science methods for different stakeholders causes better access to different studies to solve problems in diverse fields, which leads to equal access conditions to research resources, as well as greater scientific productivity. Therefore, the aim of this study was to perceive the concept of openness in research among Iranian health researchers.
METHODS: From the beginning of August to the middle of November 2021, twenty semi-structured interviews were held with Iranian health researchers from different fields using purposeful, snowball, and convenience sampling. The interviews continued until data saturation. Data analysis was performed with thematic analysis using MAXQDA 20. Finally, seven main issues related to open science were identified.
RESULTS: Through analysis of the interviews, 235 primary codes and 173 main codes were extracted in 22 subclasses. After careful evaluation and integration of subclasses and classes, they were finally classified into nine categories and three main themes. Analysis showed that openness in research was related to three main themes: researchers\' understanding of open science, the impact of open science on publication and sharing of research, concerns and reluctance to open research.
CONCLUSIONS: The conditions of access to research output should be specified given the diversity of studies conducted in the field of health; issues like privacy as an important topic of access to data and information in the health system should also be specified. Our analysis indicated that the conditions of publication and sharing of research processes should be stated according to different scopes of health fields. The concept of open science was related to access to findings and other research items regardless of cost, political, social, or racial barriers, which could create collective wisdom in the development of knowledge. The process of publication and sharing of research related to open access applies to all types of outputs, conditions of access, increasing trust in research, creation of diverse publication paths, and broader participation of citizens in research. Open science practices should be promoted to increase the circulation and exploitation rates of knowledge while adjusting and respecting the limits of privacy, intellectual property and national security rights of countries.