UNASSIGNED: Flaps and grafts are used for filling dead space, ureteral substitution, and as mesh alternatives. The surgical robot is invaluable in urologic reconstructive surgery due to the ability of the robot to reach the deep pelvis, its minimally invasive access, the ability to use indocyanine green to identify structures and assess tissue perfusion and viability, and ergonomics for the surgeon. Robotic reconstruction can involve tissue transfer in the form of flaps and grafts to provide form and function to organs that have been damaged by iatrogenic injuries, trauma, infections, cancer, radiation injury, or congenital abnormalities. Common flaps and grafts can be readily adapted to the robotic approach. In this literature review, we examine the robotic use of flaps and grafts in reconstructive urology.
UNASSIGNED: A thorough literature review was conducted via a PubMed search for predefined terms.
UNASSIGNED: Flaps and grafts in reconstructive urology are used for interposition, ureteral substitution, and as mesh alternatives. Omental flaps are used for tissue interposition, or to provide structure and nutrients, and are easily employed with the robot. Various robotic applications of peritoneal flaps have been described. Vascular rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps are well-vascularized flaps that occupy dead space and provide structural support, which can be harvested readily with the robot. Sigmoid epiploica are an excellent flap for pelvic reconstruction. Gracilis flaps and fascia lata grafts are well-tolerated and provide space occupying tissue. Boari flaps aid in robotic ureteral reconstruction, especially in the setting of long defects. Oral mucosa is excellent for ureteral or bladder neck reconstruction. Rectal mucosa is well-tolerated and easy to harvest robotically for a variety of urinary tract reconstructive applications. The appendix or ileum can be interposed for repair of damaged ureters.
UNASSIGNED: Various flaps and grafts have been adapted for robotic reconstructive urology. As the field develops, refinement of techniques and innovation in flaps and employment of the robot will propel this field forward. More studies, especially comparative studies, are needed to elucidate the flaps and grafts that are most likely to be successful with the least morbidity for each use case.

OBJECTIVE: Surgery for primary tumors of the mobile spine and sacrum often requires complex reconstruction techniques to cover soft-tissue defects and to treat wound and CSF-related complications. The anatomical, vascular, and immunoregulatory characteristics of the omentum make it an excellent local substrate for the management of radiation soft-tissue injury, infection, and extensive wound defects. This study describes the authors\' experience in complex wound reconstruction using pedicled omental flaps to cover defects in surgery for mobile spine and sacral primary tumors.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on 34 patients who underwent pedicled omental flap reconstruction after en bloc resection of primary sacral and mobile spine tumors between 2010 and 2020. The study focused on assessing the indications for omental flap usage, including soft-tissue coverage, protection against postoperative radiation therapy, infection management, vascular supply for bone grafts, and dural defect and CSF leak repair. Patient demographic characteristics, tumor characteristics, surgical outcomes, and follow-up data were analyzed to determine the procedure\'s efficacy and complication rates.
RESULTS: From 2010 to 2020, 34 patients underwent pedicled omental flap reconstruction after en bloc resection of sacral (24 of 34 [71%]) and mobile spine (10 of 34 [29%]) primary tumors, mostly chordomas. The patient cohort included 21 men and 13 women with a median (range) age of 60 (32-89) years. The most common indication for omental flap was soft-tissue coverage (20 of 34 [59%]). Other indications included protecting abdominopelvic organs for postoperative radiation therapy (6 of 34 [18%]), treating infections (5 of 34 [15%]), providing vascular supply for free fibular bone graft (1 of 34 [3%]), and repairing large dural defects and CSF leak (2 of 34 [6%]). The median (range) follow-up was 24 (0-132) months, during which 71% (24 of 34) of patients did not require additional surgery for wound-related complications. At last follow-up, 59% (20 of 34) had stable disease and 32% (11 of 34) had recurrence, had progression of disease, or had been discharged to hospice after treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: The pedicled omentum is an effective local tissue graft that can be used for complex wound reconstruction and management of high-risk closures in primary spine tumors. This technique may have a lower rate of complications than other approaches and may influence surgical planning and flap selection in challenging cases.

BACKGROUND: The laparoscopically harvested omental flap (LHOF) has been used in partial or total breast reconstruction, but most studies on LHOF were case reports or small case series. However, the clinical feasibility and oncological safety of LHOF in oncoplastic breast surgery remains controversial. This study reported our experience applying LHOF for immediate breast reconstruction.
METHODS: Between June 2018 and March 2022, 300 patients underwent oncoplastic breast surgery using LHOF at our institution. Their clinicopathological data, complications, cosmetic outcomes, and oncologic outcomes were evaluated.
RESULTS: All patients underwent total breast reconstruction using LHOF after nipple-sparing mastectomy. The median operation time was 230 min (ranging from 155 to 375 min). The median operation time for harvesting the omental flap was 55 min (ranging from 40 to 105 min). The success rate of the laparoscopically harvested pedicled omental flap was over 99.0%. Median blood loss was 70 ml, ranging from 40 to 150 ml. The volume of the flap was insufficient in 102 patients (34.0%). The overall complication rate was 12.3%. Subcutaneous fluid in the breast area (7%) was the most common reconstruction-associated complication, but most cases were relieved spontaneously. The incidence rate of omental flap necrosis was 3.3%. LHOF-associated complications occurred in two cases, including one case of incisional hernia and one case of vascular injury. Cosmetic outcomes were satisfactory in 95.1% of patients on a four-point scale by three-panel assessment and 97.2% using the BCCT.core software. Two local and one systemic recurrence were observed during a median follow-up period of 32 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The LHOF for immediate breast reconstruction is a safe and feasible method that involves minimal donor-site morbidity, satisfactory cosmetic outcomes, and promising oncologic safety.

OBJECTIVE: The robotic approach is increasingly popular in reconstructive urology. Reconstructive surgeons have commonly used flaps and grafts for obliterating dead space including tissue interposition or as an alternative to mesh in addressing lower urinary tract dysfunction. Advantages of the robotic approach are less incisional pain, excellent visualization in the deep pelvis, and improved surgeon ergonomics. In this literature review, we describe flaps and grafts used in lower urinary tract robotic reconstructive urology, serving as an almanac for these techniques.
RESULTS: Omental, peritoneal, vertical rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (VRAM), sigmoid epiploica, gracilis flaps, and Alloderm™ have been reported for tissue interposition during fistula repair. Fascia lata has been described as a mesh alternative for robotic sacrocolpopexy. Besides providing interposition, flaps support native tissue healing and blood supply. Grafts are easy to use with low patient morbidity, but rely on the blood supply at the recipient site. Robotic reconstruction is an emerging field, and more studies are needed to define the best uses for each flap and graft as well as strategies to maximize outcomes and minimize morbidity.

Meningoceles refer to the protrusion of meninges filled with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) through a bone defect. There is scarce literature on the management of multiple giant anterior sacral meningoceles (ASMs). We report the case of a patient with Marfan syndrome presenting with gait disturbances and dizziness triggered by posture changes due to multiple giant ASMs. The patient was managed through an anterior approach involving a multidisciplinary team of surgeons. Care was taken to limit the persistence of CSF leak using an omental pedicled flap. This technique has only been mentioned twice in the literature for such cases. A literature review was conducted focusing on the evolution course and surgical strategy of meningoceles.

UNASSIGNED: The repair of extensive tissue defects remains a challenge, although great progress has been made in reconstructive surgery. The transplantation of a single huge flap or several flaps in combination will inevitably result in donor-site morbidity. Here we report our experience in the repair of these wounds with laparoscopically harvested great omentum flaps.
UNASSIGNED: Twelve patients with extensive tissue defects caused by deep burn injury, avulsion injury, and open fracture underwent free omental flap transplantation and split-thickness skin grafting. The patient demographics, wound characteristics, and complications postsurgical operation were recorded. Prior to omentum flap transplantation, these patients underwent debridement, vacuum sealing drainage treatment, and/or fixation of fractures. All omentum flaps harvested using laparoscopic technique were anastomosed to recipient vessels, and split-thickness skin grafting was performed 14 days after omental flap transplantation.
UNASSIGNED: The mean defect size was 471 cm2 and the mean omental flap size was 751.1 cm2. Among all 12 cases, the omental flaps survived well except for distal partial necrosis in one case. Skin grafting was also achieved in all cases, and all patients achieved complete wound coverage. All donor sites achieved primary healing without major complications. The mean follow-up time was 30 months with satisfactory appearance and functional outcome.
UNASSIGNED: For the reconstruction of extensive tissue defects in complex wounds, the free transfer of an omental flap may be an ideal option because of its well-vascularized and pliable tissue with reliable vascular anatomy, as well as minimized donor-site morbidity.

The use of a surgical mesh for abdominal wall reconstruction is well established and has been used for long with minor complications, whereas the omental flap has been used for decades in reconstructive surgery.
To demonstrate the increased angiogenic capacity and the reduced inflammatory markers of a synthetic mesh when used in combination with an omental flap. Furthermore, we compare two independent meshes when used alone or in combination with the omental flap.
Twenty-eight rats were included in the study. To determine the effect of using an omental flap under two different meshes, the animals were separated into four groups, i.e., group A (flap + mesh 1), group B (flap + mesh 1 + silicone), group C (flap + mesh 2), and group D (flap + mesh 2 + silicone). A silicone sheet was placed as a barrier between the mesh and the flap. All groups were sacrificed 8 weeks post-operatively.
The use of a silicone sheet barrier between any of the two synthetic meshes and the omental flap in an abdominal wall defect is accompanied by a markedly reduced angiogenesis in terms of a cluster of differentiation (CD)-34 (p < 0.001) and factor VIII (p = 0.0012) and by increased inflammatory response CD-68 (p = 0.0024) and visual scoring (p < 0.001).
Τhe increased angiogenic capacity and the reduced inflammatory markers of a synthetic surgical mesh when used in combination with an omental flap make it a useful option in the reconstruction of an abdominal wall defect on a large or contaminated wound.

UNASSIGNED: Deep sternal wound infection and dehiscence are two serious complications after open cardiac surgery. Omental flap harvesting is recognized as one of the management options, with traditionally non-favorable outcomes due to laparotomy stress on patients.
UNASSIGNED: Herein, however, we report our experience with two patients who have developed a mediastinal wound infection following coronary artery bypass grafting and were reconstructed with omental flaps harvested laparoscopically.
UNASSIGNED: Two 74-year-old females, who were known to have multiple comorbidities, developed a sternal wound infection after coronary artery bypass graft. Several operative trials and non-operative measures have been attempted to manage the infections and/or reconstruct the wound but failed. Both patients then underwent laparoscopic omental flap harvesting for reconstruction and exhibited significant clinical improvement postoperatively.
UNASSIGNED: Omental flap is considered a feasible option for reconstruction of sternal wound dehiscence developing after open cardiac surgery because it is usually well-vascularized, contains a large number of immunologically active cells and has the ability to absorb wound secretions. The traditional method of harvesting is conventional laparotomy, but it carries high rates of morbidity. Therefore, laparoscopic harvesting can be utilized as an alternative with better outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Laparoscopic omental flap harvesting is considered a feasible and safe procedure to manage sternal wound dehiscence after open cardiac surgery, with satisfactory surgical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of immediate breast reconstruction with free or pedicled laparoscopically harvested omental flaps (LHOFs).
METHODS: Between March 2011 and 2021, 82 patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction with free or pediculated omental flaps were enrolled. Breast total or partial mastectomy, laparoscopic greater omentum harvest, and breast reconstruction were carried out in an orderly manner. Postoperative operative results, cosmetic outcomes, and complications were investigated.
RESULTS: Seventeen cases of free LHOF and 65 cases of pedicled LHOF were performed. Cosmetic results were mostly satisfactory (61% excellent, 35% good), with a soft breast that was natural in appearance. Satisfaction investigation showed that 96.2% of patients were satisfied with the reconstructed breast. Uneventful follow-up showed no abdominal complications at the donor site, and the surface skin displayed no swelling. No major complications were found, except for three cases of necrosis. One patient developed slight hematoma. Two patients were found to have local recurrence, and one had distant metastasis. Twenty-four patients accepted radiotherapy, but no size reduction was noted after radiotherapy. We followed the patients to determine their survival status. All patients were alive, except for 1 in the free LHOF group who died 31.2 months after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Immediate breast reconstruction with LHOF provides a soft reconstructed breast with relatively little donor-site deformity and is useful for breast tumor-specific immediate reconstruction.

UNASSIGNED: Low grade Fibromyxoid sarcoma (LGFMS) is a rare soft tissue sarcoma. LGFMS has an indolent clinical behavior but it is prone for late local recurrence and metastasis. In children it is commonly seen in the subcutaneous tissues relative to adults where it presents in deep soft tissues. These patients are best managed in a specialized unit with a multidisciplinary team. For patients with sarcoma, wide local excision remains the treatment of choice. Large complex abdominal wall defects present a unique reconstructive challenge to the surgeon following tumor removal.
METHODS: Here, we present a case of a 9-year old pediatric male patient with complex abdominal wall defect post excision of a recurrent fibromyxoid sarcoma, reconstructed with a sandwich omental flap, monofilament polypropylene mesh (Bard® Mesh) and split-thickness skin graft (STSG).
UNASSIGNED: Despite the success of covering the defect, the patient still had quite a bit of morbidity with the following:abdominal hernia defect and tumor recurrence. Our case demonstrates the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in management of sarcomas hence the need for these patients to be managed through a multidisciplinary approach.
CONCLUSIONS: The omental flap is quite versatile, and knowing how to raise it does not require sophisticated microsurgical skills. It adds to the reconstructive surgeon\'s armamentarium, especially in resource-limited settings.