The treatment landscape of gynecologic cancers has expanded in recent years to include targeted and immune-based therapies. These therapies often have ocular side effects not seen with conventional chemotherapies, some of which can cause significant visual impairment if not recognized in a timely fashion. Clinicians must know how to appropriately identify, mitigate, and treat these ocular adverse events. Management often involves working with an interdisciplinary team of eye specialists, and it is important to know when to refer patients for specialized care. Proactive identification of eye specialists, especially in rural and community settings where access to care can be limited, may be necessary. Here, we discuss the management of common ocular toxicities seen with novel anticancer agents used to treat gynecologic cancers.

We experienced a case of bilateral corneal thinning during the oral taking of S-1, a combination anti-cancer drug of tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil-potassium. A 69-year-old man was prescribed oral S-1 for the treatment of duodenal papilla adenocarcinoma and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. However, he developed a decrease in visual acuity in both eyes after three cycles of S-1 oral taking, and ophthalmic examination revealed corneal thinning exceeding 100 µm and an increase in high-order irregularity of cornea in both eyes. After one month after discontinuation of S-1, his visual acuity and corneal thickness returned to its previous levels. Besides corneal ulcers and perforations, corneal thinning can be recognized as a potential corneal side effect necessitating monitoring during S-1 treatment.

BACKGROUND: Acne vulgaris is a chronic inflammatory disease of the pilosebaceous unit, which includes the hair follicle, hair shaft and sebaceous gland. The only treatment that has an effect on all the main aetiological causes of acne is isotretinoin. However, it may have a variety of negative side effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge and attitudes of dermatologists regarding ocular effects following isotretinoin prescribing in the Aseer region, Saudi Arabia.
METHODS: An anonymous online cross-sectional survey was conducted in August 2022 to investigate dermatologists\' knowledge and attitude regarding isotretinoin-related ocular side effects in Aseer, Saudi Arabia. Participants were recruited using convenience and snowball sampling methods.
RESULTS: A total of 48 dermatologists were included in this survey. The age distribution ranged from 25 to over 60 years. Sixteen (37.5%) were aged 31-40 years, 29 (60.4%) were male and 20 (41.7%) were specialists. All dermatologists reported that it can cause dry eye, 32 (66.7%) reported that it can cause contact lens intolerance, 10 (20.8%) reported that it can cause a decrease in dark adaptation and two (4.2%) thought that it can cause ectopia lentis and retinoblastoma. Regarding attitude, 43 (87.5%) thought that a course of isotretinoin is not recommended if the patient has recently undergone refractive surgery, 30 (62.5%) always inform patients about ocular side effects, 31 (72.9%) do not consider referring patients for ophthalmic examinations before initiating isotretinoin, 12 (25.0%) always prescribe lubricant eye drops, 15 (31.3%) always ask patients about recent refractive surgery, 17 (35.4%) always warn patients about avoiding refractive surgery during isotretinoin use and 19 (39.6%) always inform patients concerning discomfort with contact lenses.
CONCLUSIONS: The survey reveals that dermatologists in Aseer, Saudi Arabia, generally have good knowledge of isotretinoin related to some ocular side effects, especially dry eye and contact lens intolerance. However, there is some variation in their practices with regard to patient education, referrals for ophthalmic examinations, the use of lubricant eye drops and refractive surgery during isotretinoin treatment. Thus, dermatologists should receive educational training on the safety profile of isotretinoin while managing acne vulgaris.

The association between vaccines and ocular disorders has attracted significant attention in scientific research. Numerous mainstream vaccines are associated with a range of uveitis types, including anterior, intermediate, and posterior uveitis. Additionally, they are associated with distinct ocular diseases such as multifocal choroiditis, Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease, acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy (APMPPE), and multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS). These ocular conditions are often transient, with a vast majority of patients experiencing improvement after steroid intervention. To date, numerous cases of vaccine-induced uveitis have been reported. This study analyzed the correlation between antiviral vaccines, including the hepatitis B virus (HBV), human papillomavirus (HPV), measles-mumps-rubella (MMR), varicella zoster virus (VZV), and influenza vaccines, and different manifestations of uveitis. This is the first comprehensive study to offer a detailed analysis of uveitis types induced by antiviral vaccines. Through an extensive database search, we found a particularly strong link between influenza vaccines, followed by VZV and HPV vaccines. While anterior uveitis is common, conditions such as APMPPE, MEWDS, and VKH are particularly notable and merit careful consideration in clinical practice. Corticosteroid treatment was effective; however, half of the observed patients did not achieve full recovery, indicating potentially prolonged effects of the vaccine.

Background: Isotretinoin is frequently used for treatment of severe nodulocystic and papulopustular acne, however use is limited by mucocutaneous, ocular, and systemic side effects.Objective: (1) provide a systematic meta-analysis of ocular side effects during isotretinoin use and their corresponding incidences; (2) provide a narrative summary of ocular side effects during isotretinoin use reported in case reports.Methods: A systematic database search using predefined search terms was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus from inception to 5 March, 2021. Predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria were used to select included studies. In total, 53 original studies qualified for meta-analysis, and 41 case reports/series qualified for narrative results.Results: The studies included in the meta-analysis reported incidences of various ocular side effects including dry eye, eye sensitivity, vision changes, and ocular inflammatory conditions. Incidences across studies did vary, leading to considerable heterogeneity. The narrative results summarize more uncommon, but equally important, ocular side effects.Conclusions: Dry eye is the most commonly reported ocular side effect. Other less common, but more serious, ocular side effects including vision changes can occur. We recommend that isotretinoin prescribers monitor for dry eye. Limitations include the heterogeneity of reported incidences of ocular side effects between studies.

This study evaluated the functional outcome and ocular side effects of patients receiving proton beam radiotherapy (PBR) for the treatment of iris melanoma (IM).
This retrospective study analyzed prospectively collected data.
Patients with IM who underwent PBR as a primary treatment.
Treatment was given in the form of whole PBR (wPBR: n = 51) or segmental PBR (sPBR: n = 98).
Visual acuity (VA) and side effects were divided into ocular surface disease (OSD), secondary glaucoma, or cataract development.
A total of 149 eyes of 149 patients with a mean age of 53.9 ± 16.0 years were included. Tumor recurrence developed in 3 patients (wPBR: 1/51; sPBR: 2/98). Ocular surface disease was observed in 78.4% of the wPBR group (40/51) and 25.5% of the sPBR group (25/98) (P < 0.001) after 0.7 ± 1.2 years and 1.1 ± 0.9 years, respectively. The main side effect was dry eye syndrome in both groups, but severe side effects such as limbal stem cell failure were found only in the wPBR group (4/51; 7.8%). Secondary glaucoma developed in 31.4% of the wPBR group (16/51) compared with 1.0% in the sPBR group (1/98; P < 0.001). Glaucoma control was generally achieved with eye drops, whereas surgery was necessary in 5 patients (wPBR: 4/51, 7.8%; sPBR: 1/98, 1%). Cataract surgery was performed in 47.9% of the wPBR group (23/48) and 19.8% of the sPBR group (19/96) (P < 0.001). Before treatment, VA was 0.14 ± 0.27 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in the wPBR group and 0.04 ± 0.19 logMAR in the sPBR group. A worsening was seen in the wPBR group (0.55 ± 0.16 logMAR; P < 0.001) 6 months after radiotherapy, which normalized after 12 months (0.15 ± 0.30 logMAR; P = 0.17). In the sPBR group, no such decrease in VA was observed (6 months: 0.03 ± 0.22 logMAR, P = 0.54; 12 months: 0.04 ± 0.21 logMAR, P = 0.98).
Our results demonstrate that PBR is a very successful treatment option for patients with IM, showing a high tumor control rate and relatively low complication profile. Tumor recurrence was a rare event, and secondary enucleation was not necessary in any patient. Side effects are commonly seen, but severe side effects such as limbal stem cell failure or secondary glaucoma mainly developed after wPBR. These results are important for clinical decision making and discussion with the patient regarding this form of radiotherapy.
The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

BACKGROUND: Osteoporosis, as a musculoskeletal disease, is very common, especially in the era of aging society. It is described by a reduction in bone strength and increased risk of fractures, which are linked to considerable morbidity, mortality, and high healthcare burdens. Bisphosphonates are the most commonly used drugs to manage osteoporosis and they consequently reduce fracture risk. However, one of the clinical challenges is fear of side effects in patients who are using bisphosphonates as the administration of these drugs is lengthy. Ocular inflammation has been reporting as one of the potential vision-threatening side effects of bisphosphonates.
OBJECTIVE: To review previously reported ocular inflammation in patients taking bisphosphonates.
METHODS: A literature survey was conducted using databases in order to collect data for a narrative review of published reports regarding ocular side effects of bisphosphonates.
RESULTS: People taking bisphosphonates were at a relatively low risk of ocular inflammation, with the onset from a few hours after exposure up to more than 3 years. The release of inflammatory mediators mainly by activated gamma delta T cells in response to bisphosphonates was the main cause of ocular inflammation.
CONCLUSIONS: Strategies for treating patients with osteoporosis should consider the potential ocular side effects of bisphosphonates. Ocular inflammation, as one of the side effects of bisphosphonates, is a serious sight-threatening sign and should be taken seriously. Greater awareness of the association between bisphosphonate use and ocular inflammation may allow for earlier identification and timely treatment of future cases.

Topiramate (TPM) is a sulfonamide drug with multiple modes of action. It inhibits carbonic anhydrase, blocks sodium channels, enhances potassium channels, and stimulates postsynaptic gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors. Pharmacists Joe Gardocki and Bruce Maryanoff synthesized TPM for the first time in 1979. The FDA did not approve it for medical use in the US until 1996. Around 2004, it was authorized for the prevention of migraine headaches. TPM, like any medication, has several side effects. Common aftermaths include weight loss, diarrhea, dizziness, sleepiness, fatigue, and coordination issues. Some people may experience mental health issues like memory problems, confusion, and speech or language difficulties. The most well-known ocular side effects of TPM are choroidal effusion syndrome, angle-closure glaucoma, and myopic shift. Aside from these, other ophthalmic adverse effects may arise in some people, including retinal problems, uveitis, visual field defects, myokymia, and neuro-ophthalmology complications. If such complications are not identified and treated promptly, they can be severe and vision-threatening, potentially leading to permanent blindness. TPM\'s application as a standalone and adjunctive therapy has increased over time. In 2019, more than 10 million prescriptions of TPM were issued. Due to its extensive use, medical professionals and patients must be aware of its potential repercussions, especially ophthalmic issues. The current review paper likewise makes a step in this direction. This article\'s primary purpose is to educate readers by providing a comprehensive assessment of the research on TPM\'s ocular side effects. All the information has been collected via a thorough search of the Google Search Engine and PubMed.

Targeted cancer therapy agents are the latest development in cancer therapeutics. Although the spectrum of their use continues to expand, ocular side effects are frequently encountered with the use of cancer therapeutics. This review describes the ocular side effects of targeted cancer therapy agents.

UNASSIGNED: With the ageing population, lower urinary tract symptoms are becoming more prevalent with an estimate that by 2025, 52 million adults in the USA will be affected. After lifestyle modifications fail to resolve symptoms, second-line therapy with medications is often recommended by both the European Association of Urology and the American Urological Association. Considering the vulnerability of older patients to co-morbidities, physicians must be more aware of adverse side effects. This study aims to identify a linkage between common overactive bladder and interstitial cystitis medication and adverse ocular symptoms.
UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycInfo, and HealthSTAR alongside a grey literature search in clinicaltrials.gov to include all articles relating to bladder medication and vision-threatening loss. Covidence review software was utilised to conduct the systematic review.
UNASSIGNED: In total, 222 articles were screened, and 23 articles met the inclusion criteria. Comprehensive coverage of 10 available medications was analysed. All medications reported adverse vision effects stratified over 15 categories. The most common adverse effect was reported to be blurred vision (n = 12 studies). Mirabegron had the most number of adverse types of ocular symptoms that covered 6 categories. Cizolirthine Citrate and Elocatitol had the least amount of ocular side effects reported. From the total of 8459 patients that were treated for either overactive bladder syndrome or interstitial cystitis with oral medications, 422 reported adverse vision effects.
UNASSIGNED: This review suggests that ocular safety should be assessed in patients requiring systematic drug therapy in order to guide future research, focussing on long-term tolerability.