Occlusal veneer

咬合贴面
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:作者评估了使用咬合贴面治疗的隐裂牙齿(CT)患者与牙髓状态相关的预后因素。
    方法:对80例CT(71例)进行了分析,其中有1条或更多的裂纹线(CLs)和正常的牙髓活力或可逆性牙髓炎。所有患者均接受咬合贴面,并记录其人口统计学和临床数据。在治疗后1周和1、2、3、6、12、18和24个月记录纸浆状态和临床特征。
    结果:上颌第一磨牙通常受累(30[38%])。终点线上的CL数量从1到7不等,大多数有3个CL(24[30%])。在终点线上通过准备的CL的数量从0到4不等,其中2个CL(42[53%])是最普遍的。随访期间,80例CT中有5例进展为牙髓病,成功率为93.8%。Cox模型和Kaplan-Meier分析的结果表明,探测深度大于6mm,根尖区牙周膜增宽,超过4个CLS在终点线上,通过终点线准备超过2个CLs是与纸浆状态相关的危险因素(P<0.05)。
    结论:咬合贴面可以保护CT,而无需预防性根管治疗。
    结论:报道了咬合贴面CT修复牙髓病的成功率和危险因素。
    BACKGROUND: The authors evaluated the prognostic factors associated with pulp status in patients with cracked teeth (CT) treated with occlusal veneer.
    METHODS: An analysis of 80 CT (71 patients) with 1 or more crack lines (CLs) and normal pulp vitality or reversible pulpitis was performed. All patients received occlusal veneer and their demographic and clinical data were recorded. Pulp status and clinical features were recorded at 1 week and posttreatment at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months.
    RESULTS: Maxillary first molars were commonly involved (30 [38%]). The number of CLs on the finish line ranged from 1 through 7 and most had 3 CLs (24 [30%]). The number of CLs through preparation on the finish line ranged from 0 through 4, and 2 CLs (42 [53%]) were the most prevalent. During follow-up, 5 of 80 CT progressed to pulp disease, resulting in a success rate of 93.8%. Results of the Cox model and Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that probing depth greater than 6 mm, widening periodontal ligament of apical area, more than 4 CLs on finish line, and more than 2 CLs through preparation on the finish line were risk factors associated with pulp status (P < .05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Occlusal veneer can protect CT without preventive root canal therapy.
    CONCLUSIONS: The success rate and risk factors of pulp disease in CT restored with occlusal veneer are reported.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本系统评价旨在比较临床结果,内部间隙,真实,精度,与研磨(SM)氧化锆修复体相比,3D打印(AM)的生物相容性。
    方法:对互联网数据库进行了彻底搜索,直到2023年9月。搜索检索到的研究比较了AM氧化锆与SM氧化锆修复体的临床结果,fit,真实,精度,和生物相容性。
    方法:在1736条记录中,只有59人被筛选为合格,和22条记录纳入本审查.使用修订后的Cochrane偏差风险工具(ROB2)评估研究质量,纽卡斯尔渥太华量表(NOS),和ModifiedConsort语句。一项临床研究显示偏倚风险中等,而偏倚风险较低。所有实验室研究都显示出一些偏见。短期观察显示100%生存率,没有牙周并发症的迹象。3D打印的氧化锆牙冠显示出统计学上显着的较低的ΔE和与相邻牙齿的更好匹配(p≤0.5)。适合,真实,和精度随印刷技术和牙齿表面而变化。
    结论:与铣削牙冠相比,3D打印的氧化锆牙冠与相邻的天然牙齿提供了更好的美学颜色和轮廓匹配。3D打印和铣削都导致在临床上可接受的内部和边缘配合内的牙冠。除了纳米粒子喷射,SM冠的边缘间隙小于AM冠,然而,两者在临床上都是可以接受的.层压单板可能更准确地通过3D打印生产。3D打印的轴向表面精度优于铣削的轴向表面。建议进行长期RCT以确认3D打印修复体的临床适用性。
    结论:内部配合和间隙,精度,和真实性是成功的牙科修复的基本要求。两种技术都可以产生具有临床上可接受的边缘和内部配合的修复体。轴向表面和狭窄或收缩区域比传统研磨氧化锆更有利于3D打印。
    This systematic review aimed to compare the clinical outcome, internal gap, trueness, precision, and biocompatibility of 3D-printed (AM) compared to milled (SM) zirconia restorations.
    A thorough search of Internet databases was conducted up to September 2023. The search retrieved studies compared AM zirconia to SM zirconia restorations regarding clinical outcome, fit, trueness, precision, and biocompatibility.
    Of 1736 records, only 59 were screened for eligibility, and 22 records were included in this review. The quality of studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (ROB2), and the Modified Consort Statement. One clinical study exhibited a low risk of bias. All laboratory studies revealed some bias concerns. Short-term observation showed 100 % survival with no signs of periodontal complications. 3D-printed zirconia crowns showed statistically significant lower ΔE and a better match to adjacent teeth (p ≤ 0.5). The fit, trueness, and precision vary with the printing technique and the tooth surface.
    3D-printed zirconia crowns provide better aesthetic color and contour match to adjacent natural teeth than milled crowns. Both 3D printing and milling result in crowns within the clinically acceptable internal and marginal fit. Except for nanoparticle jetting, the marginal gap of SM crowns was smaller than AM crowns, however, both were clinically acceptable. Laminate veneers might be more accurately produced by 3D printing. 3D-printed axial surface trueness was better than milled axial surfaces. Long-term RCTs are recommended to confirm the clinical applicability of 3D-printed restorations.
    Internal fit and gap, precision, and trueness are fundamental requirements for successful dental restorations. Both techniques produce restorations with clinically acceptable marginal and internal fit. Axial surfaces and narrow or constricted areas favored 3D-printed than conventionally milled zirconia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: English Abstract
    目的:回顾性研究高嵌体和咬合体修复体的存活率和临床失败原因。为临床适应证的选择提出有价值的建议。
    方法:2016年至2019年,由其中一位作者治疗的102例患者和124颗牙齿接受了CAD/CAM硅酸锂增强的玻璃陶瓷嵌体或前磨牙和磨牙的贴面修复,包括43颗具有牙髓活力的牙齿,81颗牙髓治疗的牙齿,修复体咬合厚度为1.5mm。经过四年的恢复,进行了回顾性调查,以记录修复体的存活率,修复失败的原因,和患者满意度,用卡方检验对活生牙与牙髓治疗牙之间以及修复牙之间的修复体存活率进行统计分析。
    结果:活生牙和牙髓治疗牙修复体的成活率分别为95.5%和90.0%,分别,平均生存率为90.2%。活生牙的存活率高于经牙髓治疗的牙齿,无统计学差异。牙齿位置之间也没有统计学上的显着差异。失败的原因包括修复体的破裂,修复的损失,基牙的骨折,相邻接触点以下的继发性龋齿,和相邻接触点松动引起的食物嵌塞。患者总满意率为91.5%。
    结论:玻璃陶瓷嵌体和咬合贴面的4年生存率低于全冠修复,与单冠修复相比,并发症更多。应根据基牙的生命力和牙齿组织的剩余量仔细选择修复体的设计。当剩下的牙齿结构太少时,应选择桩和冠进行修复。应确保修复体足够的强度和厚度,以防止食物嵌塞。由于基牙预备量少,它具有对牙髓和牙周组织刺激小的优点,并可以推荐作为试验恢复。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the survival rate and clinical failure reasons of onlay and occlusal veneer restorations retrospectively, and to put forward valuable suggestions for the selection of clinical indications.
    METHODS: A total of 102 patients and 124 teeth treated by one of the authors from 2016 to 2019 were subjected to CAD/CAM lithium silicate reinforced glass-ceramic onlay or veneer restorations of premolars and molars, including 43 teeth with pulp vitality, 81 endodontic treated teeth, and occlusal thickness of restoration was 1.5 mm. After four years of restoration, retrospective surveys were conducted to record the survival rate of restorations, the causes of restoration failure, and patient satisfaction rates, and the survival rate of restorations between vital teeth and endodontic treated teeth and among restored teeth was statistically analyzed by Chi-square test.
    RESULTS: The survival rates of restorations on vital teeth and endodontic treated teeth were 95.5% and 90.0%, respectively, the average survival rate was 90.2%. The survival rates of vital teeth were higher than those of endodontic treated teeth without statistical difference. There was also no statistically significant difference among the tooth locations. The causes of failure included the cracking of the restoration, the loss of the restoration, the fracture of the abutment teeth, secondary caries below the adjacent contact point, and food impaction caused by the loosening of the adjacent contact point. The overall patient satisfaction rate was 91.5%.
    CONCLUSIONS: The 4-year survival rate of glass-ceramic onlays and occlusal veneers is lower than that of the full crown restoration, and there are more complications than that of the single-crown restorations. The design of the restoration should be carefully selected based on the vitality of the abutment tooth and the remaining amount of tooth tissue. When there is too little tooth structure left, a post and crown should be selected for restoration. Adequate strength and thickness of the restoration should be ensured to prevent food impaction. Due to the small amount of abutment tooth preparation, it has the advantages of less stimulation of the pulp and periodontal tissue, and can be recommended as a trial restoration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to remove occlusal veneers of varied thicknesses and compositions by Er:Yag laser in vitro and analyze the interfacial microstructure between veneers and tooth that irradiated by laser, by which experimental evidence could be provided to support the non-invasive removal of occlusal veneerby laser.
    METHODS: Fresh mandibular premolars extracted for orthodontic requirements were collected for tooth preparation. Three kinds of ceramic materials (Vita Suprinity, Vita Mark Ⅱ, and Upcera Hyramic) were selected to fabricate occlusal veneer with different thicknesses (1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mm). One week later, Er:Yag laser (2.5 W and 3.5 W) was used to irradiate and remove the occlusal veneer and recorded the timespan. After the removal operation, the micro-morphologies of samples were examined by scanning electron microscope.
    RESULTS: Upcera Hyramic veneer failed to be removed (>20 min); the operation span at 2.5 W, Vita Suprinity (96.0 s±16.0 s) was longer than Vita MarkⅡ(84.5 s±19.5 s) in the 1.0 mm group (P<0.05), and Vita Suprinity (246.5 s±13.5 s) was longer than Vita MarkⅡ(170.0 s±14.0 s) in the 1.5 mm group (P<0.05). At 3.5 W, Vita Suprinity (381.0 s±24.0 s) was longer than Vita MarkⅡ(341.5 s±26.5 s) in the 2.0 mm group.
    CONCLUSIONS: Increasing laser power could shorten the operation span and facilitate the removal of occlusal veneers with the same thickness and composition. The occlusal veneer was sustained when insufficient laser power was applied. With the same laser power and ceramic thickness, laser penetration could interfere with the integral of the ceramic structure when the laser interacted with the bonding layer. With the same ceramic composition and laser power, the operation span and laser power increased with the thickness of the occlusal veneer. However, the laser was incapable of removing occlusal resin veneer directly.
    目的: 本实验采用Er: Yag激光对不同厚度、不同材质牙合贴面进行体外照射去粘接,通过分析比较Er:Yag激光对于牙合贴面、牙体组织微观结构的影响,为激光无创拆除牙合贴面提供理论依据。方法: 选取新鲜拔除正畸下颌前磨牙,标准化牙体预备后制作3种不同厚度(1.0、1.5、2.0 mm)和不同材质(Vita琥珀瓷、Vita MarkⅡ、润瓷)牙合贴面进行粘接,1周后使用Er: Yag激光(2.5、3.5 W)照射牙合贴面并记录时间。扫描电镜(SEM)观察去除后的微观形态。结果: 润瓷牙合贴面经2.5或3.5 W Er: Yag激光长时间(>20 min)照射后仍无法取下;2.5 W Er: Yag激光去除粘接时间:1.0 mm Vita琥珀瓷组(96.0 s±16.0 s)大于1.0 mm Vita MarkⅡ组(84.5 s±19.5 s)(P<0.05);1.5 mm Vita琥珀瓷组(246.5 s±13.5 s)大于1.5 mm Vita MarkⅡ组(170.0 s±14.0 s)(P<0.05);3.5 W Er: Yag激光去除粘接时间:2.0 mm Vita琥珀瓷组(381.0 s±24.0 s)大于2.0 mm Vita MarkⅡ组(341.5 s±26.5 s)。结论: 同种材质、相同厚度情况下:激光功率越大,拆除时间越短,当功率较小时,可能导致牙合贴面无法拆除。相同厚度、相同功率情况下:激光穿透瓷块到达粘接层可能对瓷块结构产生影响。同种材料、相同功率情况下:瓷块厚度越厚,拆除所需时间越长,所需功率越高。激光无法直接拆除树脂类牙合贴面。.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:分析咬合贴面修复隐裂牙(CT)的咬合/热敏感性缓解时间和危险因素。
    方法:对63例CT进行分析,收集他们的人口统计学和临床数据以及病史。对患者进行随访以检查热/咬伤敏感性的缓解。
    结果:上颌第一磨牙最普遍(N=25,40%)。终点线上的裂纹线的数量范围为1至6,而终点线上的裂纹线的数量范围为0至4。疼痛缓解在1周时稳定地达到52%,在1周时达到62%,在3个月时达到90%以上,并且在12个月时完全解决(无痛)。侧向敲击的痛苦与咬合贴面修复后的长期热敏感性(≥1个月)有关。通过在终点线>2上准备的裂纹线数量与治疗后的咬合敏感性(≥1个月)相关。
    结论:大多数患者(>90%)在通过咬合贴面恢复CT后3个月内没有咬伤和热敏感症状。侧向敲击和通过终点线准备的裂纹线数量可能是影响术后症状的重要因素。
    结论:咬合贴面是一种超薄修复体,不需要限制临床牙冠高度,可以保护和缓解CT的咬伤/热敏感性,而无需预防性根管治疗。
    To analyze the relief time and risk factors of biting/thermal sensitivity in cracked tooth (CT) restored using occlusal veneer.
    63 CT were analyzed, and their demographic and clinical data and medical history were collected. Patients were followed-up to examine the relief of thermal/biting sensitivity.
    The maxillary first molar was the most prevalent (N = 25, 40%). The number of crack lines on the finish line ranged from 1 to 6 while the number of crack lines through preparation on the finish line from 0 to 4. Pain relief achieved steadily to 52% for thermal and 62% for biting at 1 week to over 90% for each by 3 months and was completely resolved (no pain) for each by 12 months. Painful of lateral percussion was related to a long period of thermal sensitivity (≥1 month) after restoration with occlusal veneer. The number of crack lines through preparation on the finish line >2 was correlated with biting sensitivity (≥1 month) post-treatment.
    Most patients (>90%) became asymptomatic of biting and thermal sensitivity within 3 months of CT restored by occlusal veneer. Lateral percussion and the number of crack lines through preparation on the finish line could be significant factors affecting postoperative symptoms.
    Occlusal veneer is an ultrathin restoration and had no need for restricting clinical crown height, which could protect and relief the biting/thermal sensitivity of CT without preventive root canal therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究陶瓷厚度和牙科基材的影响(牙釉质与牙本质/牙釉质)对非保留咬合贴面的存活率和失效负荷。
    方法:将人上颌磨牙(n=60)分为五个测试组(n=12)。组(命名为DE-1.5,DE-1.0,DE-0.5,E-1.0,E-0.5)的牙科基材(E=牙釉质,DE=牙本质/牙釉质)和修复厚度(标准:1.5毫米,薄:1.0毫米,超薄:0.5毫米)。所有牙齿均为非保持性整体式二硅酸锂咬合贴面(IPSe.max压力机,Ivoclar)。修复被粘合(SyntacClassic/VariolinkII,Ivoclar)并暴露于热机械疲劳(120万次循环,1.6Hz,49N/5-55°C)。使用通用试验机进行单一负载失效。应用了线性回归模型,成对比较使用Student-Newman-Keuls方法(p<0.05)。
    结果:三个基于牙本质的咬合贴面(一个DE-1.0,两个DE-0.5)在疲劳暴露后显示出裂纹,这相当于95%的总生存率。失效负荷导致以下排序:2142N(DE-0.5)>2105N(E-1.0)>2075N(E-0.5)>1440N(DE-1.5)>1430N(DE-1.0)。薄(E-1.0)和超薄的牙釉质咬合贴面(E-0.5)显示出较高的失效载荷,并且显着超过了标准厚度的牙本质牙质贴面(DE-1.5)(p=0.044,p=0.022)。
    结论:所有测试的整体式二硅酸锂咬合贴面获得高于生理咀嚼力的失效载荷。薄而超薄的牙釉质咬合贴面优于标准的厚牙本质咬合贴面。
    结论:基于牙釉质的微创咬合贴面修复与非保留准备设计可以作为保守治疗选择。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of ceramic thickness and dental substrate (enamel vs. dentin/enamel) on the survival rate and failure load of non-retentive occlusal veneers.
    METHODS: Human maxillary molars (n = 60) were divided into five test-groups (n = 12). The groups (named DE-1.5, DE-1.0, DE-0.5, E-1.0, E-0.5) differed in their dental substrate (E = enamel, DE = dentin/enamel) and restoration thickness (standard: 1.5 mm, thin: 1.0 mm, ultrathin: 0.5 mm). All teeth were prepared for non-retentive monolithic lithium-disilicate occlusal veneers (IPS e.max Press, Ivoclar). Restorations were adhesively cemented (Syntac Classic/Variolink II, Ivoclar) and exposed to thermomechanical fatigue (1.2 million cycles, 1.6 Hz, 49 N/ 5-55°C). Single load to failure was performed using a universal testing-machine. A linear-regression model was applied, pairwise comparisons used the Student-Newman-Keuls method (p < 0.05).
    RESULTS: Three dentin-based occlusal veneers (one DE-1.0, two DE-0.5) revealed cracks after fatigue exposure, which corresponds to an overall-survival rate of 95%. Load to failure resulted in the following ranking: 2142 N(DE-0.5) > 2105 N(E-1.0) > 2075 N(E-0.5) > 1440 N(DE-1.5) > 1430 N(DE-1.0). Thin (E-1.0) and ultrathin enamel-based occlusal veneers (E-0.5) revealed high failure loads and surpassed the standard thickness dentin-based veneers (DE-1.5) significantly (p = 0.044, p = 0.022).
    CONCLUSIONS: All tested monolithic lithium disilicate occlusal veneers obtained failure loads above physiological chewing forces. Thin and ultrathin enamel-based occlusal veneers outperformed the standard thick dentin-based occlusal veneers.
    CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive enamel-based occlusal veneer restorations with non-retentive preparation design may serve as a conservative treatment option.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    咬合贴面是一种超薄修复方法,是一种微创方法,可以保留更多的牙齿组织并提供更好的美学效果,提高患者满意度。
    咬合贴面是一种超薄修复方法和微创方法,可以保留更多的牙齿组织并提供更好的美学效果,从而提高患者满意度;然而,以前没有研究报道使用咬合贴面治疗牙齿破裂。因此,我们描述了单例使用咬合贴面的牙齿破裂的诊断和治疗过程。一名29岁的男性出现在我们的牙科诊所,抱怨右侧的下颌磨牙咬痛。进行常规口腔检查并进行X线照相,以评估口腔状况和治疗计划。#16牙齿具有从咬合面围绕整个远端舌尖的裂纹线。在与患者讨论了各种治疗方案后,进行了咬合贴面。用咬合贴面治疗后一周,病人没有抱怨。14个月的随访显示有希望的临床和影像学结果。咬合贴面是牙齿破裂的替代治疗选择,因为它可以保存更多的牙齿组织,并有可能挽救牙髓活力。
    UNASSIGNED: An occlusal veneer is an ultrathin restoration method and a minimally invasive approach that can preserve more dental tissue and provide better aesthetic outcomes, thus increasing patient satisfaction.
    UNASSIGNED: An occlusal veneer is an ultrathin restoration method and a minimally invasive approach that can preserve more dental tissue and provide better aesthetic outcomes, thus increasing patient satisfaction; however, no previous studies reported on treating cracked teeth using occlusal veneer. Accordingly, we described the diagnosis and treatment process of a cracked tooth using occlusal veneer in a single case. A 29-year-old male presented at our dental clinic complaining of biting pain in the mandibular molar on the right-hand side. A routine oral examination with radiography was performed to evaluate the oral condition and treatment planning. The #16 tooth had a crack line surrounding the whole distal-lingual cusp from the occlusal surface. After discussing various therapeutic options with the patient, an occlusal veneer was performed. One week after treatment with occlusal veneer, the patient had no complaints. A 14-month follow-up showed promising clinical and radiographic outcomes. Occlusal veneer is an alternative treatment option for a cracked tooth, as it can preserve more dental tissue and potentially save pulp vitality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估假体预备咬合面的牙尖倾斜和修复材料的类型对疲劳行为的影响,故障模式,和咬合贴面的应力分布。
    方法:玻璃纤维增强环氧树脂修复剂,用于具有三种不同咬合面牙尖倾角(0°,15°,和30°)被产生并根据尖端倾斜度(0°,15°,或30°)和修复材料的类型(焦硅酸锂-LD或树脂复合材料-RC)。尽管基材制备尖点倾角不同,修复体被设计为在咬合面的尖端之间保持30°的倾斜度,并且在要在CAD/CAM系统中加工的修复体的中心凹槽区域的厚度为0.7mm。胶结后,样品储存约7天(在37°C的水中),然后进行破坏载荷试验(n=2)和间歇循环疲劳试验(n=9)(初始载荷:100N;步长:50N;循环/步长:10,000;加载频率:20Hz;加载活塞:6mm直径不锈钢),直到观察到裂纹。数据采用双向方差分析,Kaplan-Meier,和Mantel-Cox事后测试。进行了有限元分析(FEA)和分形分析。
    结果:根据不同的假体预备牙尖倾角评估了LD和RC咬合贴面的疲劳性能。0°倾角显示出两种材料的最佳疲劳性能(LD:944N,RC:861N),而15°和30°倾角的值较低(LD:800N和533N,RC:739N和717N,分别)。研究还发现,对于0°的倾斜度,LD咬合贴面的性能优于RC咬合贴面(LD:944N>RC:861N),而对于30°的倾斜度,RC咬合贴面比LD咬合贴面具有更好的疲劳性能(LD:533N结论:仅考虑机械角度,当假体预备牙尖倾角为30°时,应指示RC咬合贴面。当观察到0°假体预备尖点倾斜时,LD咬合贴面的机械性能更好。当保持15°尖端倾斜时,两种修复材料的行为相似。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of cusp inclination of the prosthetic preparation\'s occlusal surface and type of restorative material on the fatigue behavior, failure mode, and stress distribution of occlusal veneers.
    METHODS: Glass fiber-reinforced epoxy resin prosthetic preparations for occlusal veneers with three different occlusal surface cusp inclination degrees (0°, 15°, and 30°) were produced and assigned into six testing groups (n = 11) according to the cusp inclination (0°, 15°, or 30°) and type of restorative material (lithium disilicate-LD or resin composite-RC). Despite different substrate preparation cusp inclination degrees, the restorations were designed maintaining 30° inclination between the cusps at the occlusal surface and a thickness of 0.7 mm at the central groove region of the restorations to be machined in a CAD/CAM system. After cementation, the specimens were stored for about 7 days (under water at 37 °C), and subsequently submitted to a load to failure test (n = 2) and an intermittent cyclic fatigue test (n = 9) (initial load: 100 N; step size: 50 N; cycles/step: 10,000; loading frequency: 20 Hz; loading piston: 6-mm-diameter stainless steel) until observing cracks. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA, Kaplan-Meier, and Mantel-Cox post hoc tests. Finite element analysis (FEA) and fractographic analyses were performed.
    RESULTS: The fatigue performance of LD and RC occlusal veneers was evaluated based on different prosthetic preparation cusp inclinations. The 0° inclination showed the best fatigue performance for both materials (LD: 944N, RC: 861N), while the 15° and 30° inclinations had lower values (LD: 800N and 533N, RC: 739N and 717N, respectively). The study also found that for a 0° inclination, LD occlusal veneers performed better than RC ones (LD: 944 N > RC: 861N), while for a 30° inclination, RC occlusal veneers had better fatigue performance than LD ones (LD: 533N < RC: 717N). No significant difference was observed between the materials for a 15° inclination (LD: 800N = RC: 739N). The FEA results showed a higher tensile stress concentration on lithium disilicate than on resin composite occlusal veneers. All lithium disilicate occlusal veneers showed radial crack failures, while resin composite occlusal veneers showed Hertzian cone cracks and radial cracks combined.
    CONCLUSIONS: Considering mechanical perspective only, RC occlusal veneers should be indicated when prosthetic preparation cusps inclinations are 30°. When 0° prosthetic preparation cusps inclinations are observed, LD occlusal veneers will behave mechanically better. When a 15° cusp inclination is preserved, both restorative materials behave similarly.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项体外研究计划分析不同厚度的陶瓷咬合贴面和不同表面处理对骨折抵抗力的影响。
    方法:从两种不同厚度(1.0和0.5mm)的咬合表面在解剖学上准备了总共48颗声音下颌磨牙。CAD/CAM氧化锆增强的玻璃陶瓷块(VitaSuprinity)用于制造咬合贴面。根据咬合面厚度将牙齿随机分为A和B两个主要组(n=24)。根据表面调节将每组细分为三个相等的子组(n=8)-HF子组:使用氢氟酸和陶瓷底漆进行蚀刻;APF子组:使用酸化的磷酸盐氟化物和陶瓷底漆进行蚀刻;EP子组:仅使用蚀刻和底漆进行调节。双重固化粘合剂树脂水泥(MultilinkAutomix)用于粘合单板。在抗断裂性测试之前,对所有试样进行240,000次动态载荷老化循环。抗断裂性以牛顿(N)测量。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对故障模式模式进行分析和分类。结果使用双向方差分析和Bonferroni的事后检验进行分析,其次是每个因素的单向方差分析。除了每个厚度下的表面处理的单向方差分析之外,每个人都跟着Bonferroni的事后测试。然后,T检验用于比较每种表面处理下的两种厚度。所有测试均设定在0.05显著性水平。
    结果:双向ANOVA检验表明,修复厚度和表面处理均显着影响断裂阻力值(p<0.05)。从1.0mm厚度的HF获得最高的抗断裂平均值(2672±216N),而最低的平均值(2104±299N)是从0.5mm厚度的APF获得的。
    结论:所有测试组,不管厚度,证明了断裂阻力值超过了正常和超功能咬合力。氢氟酸蚀刻后再施加陶瓷底漆后粘结的单板显示出更有利的断裂模式。
    This in-vitro study is planned to analyze the effect of different thicknesses of ceramic occlusal veneers and different surface treatments on fracture resistance.
    A total of 48 sound mandibular molars are anatomically prepared from the occlusal surface with two different thicknesses (1.0 and 0.5 mm). CAD/CAM zirconia-reinforced glass ceramic blocks (Vita Suprinity) are used for fabricating occlusal veneers. The teeth are randomly divided into two primary groups A and B (n=24) according to occlusal veneer thickness. Each group is subdivided according to surface conditioning into three equal subgroups (n=8)-subgroup HF: etching with hydrofluoric acid and ceramic primer application; subgroup APF: etching with acidulated phosphate fluoride and ceramic primer application; subgroup EP: conditioning with etch and prime only. Dual-cure adhesive resin cement (Multilink Automix) is utilized to adhesively bond the veneers. All specimens are subjected to 240,000 cycles of dynamic load aging prior to the fracture resistance test. The fracture resistance is measured in Newton (N). The Failure mode patterns are analyzed and categorized using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The results are analyzed using a two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni\'s Post-Hoc test, followed by a one-way ANOVA for each factor. That is in addition to one-way ANOVA for surface treatment under each thickness, each followed by Bonferroni\'s Post-Hoc test. Then, a T-test is used to compare the two thicknesses under each surface treatment. All tests are set at 0.05 significance level.
    The two-way ANOVA test revealed that restoration thickness and surface treatment both significantly affect the fracture resistance values (p<0.05). The highest fracture resistance mean (2672±216N) is obtained from HF at 1.0 mm thickness, while the lowest mean (2104±299N) is obtained from APF at 0.5 mm thickness.
    All test groups, regardless of thickness, demonstrated fracture resistance values that exceeded both normal and parafunctional bite forces. The veneers that bonded after hydrofluoric acid etching followed by ceramic primer application showed more favourable fracture patterns.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究的目的是调查生存率,脱粘电阻,以及用作后悬臂保持器时不同咬合贴面设计的失效模式,树脂粘合固定假牙(RBFDP)在两个牙齿磨损水平。
    方法:分配了四个测试组:两组进行咬合-近端准备(PT1和PT2用于1级和2级磨损),两组进行咬合近端和舌侧准备(PLT1和PLT2用于1级和2级磨损)。用粘合剂粘合系统(PanaviaV5)粘合整体氧化锆陶瓷(3Y-TZP)RBFDP。样品在5°C至55°C之间进行了1.200.000个循环的咀嚼模拟,负载为5kg,热循环为7500个循环。幸存的修复体在准静态条件下脱粘。用ANOVA分析结果。
    结果:样品在热机械疲劳载荷后表现出100%的存活率。PLT1组的脱粘阻力高于PT1组(P=0.004),PT2组高于PT1组(P≤0.001)。然而,PT2组和PLT2组之间的脱粘阻力差异无统计学意义(P=0.343),PLT1和PLT2组(P=0.222)。PT1和PT2组在62.5%和0.00%的试样中表现出良好的失效模式,分别。而PLT1和PLT2组表现出25%的有利故障模式。
    结论:咬合贴面作为悬臂RBFDP的保持器显示出有希望的结果。舌延伸可能会增加抗脱粘能力。然而,建议采用具有舌面和近端斜面的保守设计,无论牙齿磨损的程度。
    The purpose of this study was to investigate the survival rate, the debonding resistance, and the failure modes of different occlusal veneer designs when used as a retainer for posterior cantilever, resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) at two tooth wear levels.
    Four test groups were assigned: two groups with occlusal-proximal preparation (PT1 and PT2 for grade 2 and 3 wear), and two groups for occlusal-proximal and lingual preparation (PLT1 and PLT2 for grade 2 and 3 wear) Monolithic zirconia ceramic (3Y-TZP) RBFDPs were luted with an adhesive bonding system (Panavia V5). The specimens underwent a chewing simulation for 1.200.000 cycles with a load of 5 kg and thermocycling for 7500 cycles between 5 °C and 55 °C. The surviving restorations were debonded under quasi-static conditions. The results were analyzed with ANOVA.
    The specimens exhibited a 100 % survival rate after thermomechanical fatigue loading. The debonding resistance was statistically significant higher for group PLT1 than for group PT1 (P = 0.004), and higher for group PT2 than group PT1 (P ≤ 0.001). However, the debonding resistance showed no statistically significant difference between groups PT2 and PLT2 (P = 0.343), and groups PLT1 and PLT2 (P = 0.222). Groups PT1 and PT2 showed favorable failure modes in 62.5 % and 0.00 % of the specimens, respectively. While groups PLT1 and PLT2 presented 25 % favorable failure modes.
    Occlusal veneers showed promising results as a retainer for cantilever RBFDPs. The lingual extension might increase debonding resistance. Nevertheless, conservative designs with lingual and proximal bevels are to be recommended, irrespective of the level of tooth wear.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号