Actinic keratosis (AK) is a common precancerous skin condition predominantly affecting older males with fair skin and significant UV exposure. The clinical significance of AK is related to its potential for malignant transformation and progression to squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Accurate diagnosis of AK is essential for adequate treatment, evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, and mitigating the risk of developing SCC. However, clinician variability due to the subjective nature of current diagnostic tools presents significant challenges to achieving consistent and reliable AK diagnoses. Thus, there is no universally accepted standard for measuring AK.This review evaluates current methods for evaluating and diagnosing AK, focusing on clinician variability through inter- and intraobserver agreement. Eight peer-reviewed studies investigating the reliability of various approaches for AK evaluation show substantial variability in interobserver or intraobserver agreement, with most methods demonstrating only slight to moderate reliability. Some suggest that consensus discussions and simplified rating scales can modestly improve diagnostic reliability. However, remaining variability and the lack of a universally accepted standard for measuring AK underscore the need for more robust and standardized diagnostic and evaluation methods.The review emphasizes the need for improved diagnostic tools and standardized methods to enhance the accuracy and reliability of AK assessments. It also proposes applying a novel examination approach using 1,3-dihydroxyacetone (DHA) staining which may improve the visualization and identification of AK lesions. Advancements in these areas have significant potential, promising better clinical practices and patient outcomes in AK management.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the test-retest and inter-rater reliability of goniometry and fleximetry in measuring cervical range of motion in individuals with chronic neck pain.
METHODS: A reliability study. Thirty individuals with chronic neck pain were selected. Cervical range of motion was measured by goniometry and fleximetry at two time points 7 days apart. To characterize the sample, we used the numerical pain rating scale, Pain-Related Catastrophizing Thoughts Scale, and Neck Disability Index. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC) were calculated. Correlations between goniometry and fleximetry measurements were performed using Spearman\'s correlation coefficient (rho).
RESULTS: For goniometry, we found excellent test-retest reliability (ICC ≥ 0.986, SEM ≤ 1.89%, MDC ≤ 5.23%) and inter-rater reliability (ICC ≥ 0.947, SEM ≤ 3.91%, MDC ≤ 10.84%). Similarly, we found excellent test-retest reliability (ICC ≥ 0.969, SEM ≤ 2.71%, MDC ≤ 7.52%) and inter-rater reliability (ICC ≥ 0.981, SEM ≤ 1.88%, MDC ≤ 5.20%) for fleximetry. Finally, we observed a strong correlation between the goniometry and the fleximetry for all cervical movements (rho ≥ 0.993).
CONCLUSIONS: Goniometry and fleximetry measurements are reliable for assessing cervical range of motion in individuals with chronic neck pain.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the inter-rater agreements of both the Glans-Urethral Meatus-Shaft (GMS) hypospadias score and Hypospadias Objective Penile Evaluation (HOPE) score, aiming to standardize disease classification for consistent agreement in clinically relevant characteristics of hypospadias.
METHODS: Photos of hypospadias in children were collected from two separate institutions. Three raters scored the photos using GMS and HOPE, excluding penile torsion and curvature assessment in HOPE due to photo limitations.
RESULTS: A total of 528 photos were included. With GMS, Fleiss\' multi-rater kappa showed an agreement of 0.745 for glans-urethral plate, 0.869 for meatus, and 0.745 for shaft. For HOPE scores, the agreements were 0.888 for position of meatus, 0.669 for shape of meatus, 0.730 for shape of glans, and 0.708 for the shape of the skin. The lower agreement in the shape of the meatus evaluation may be attributed to the lack of a quantitative classification method in HOPE. Experts rely on their subjective judgment based on the provided example photos and their index patient.
CONCLUSIONS: While there is high agreement among experts when evaluating hypospadias using the GMS and HOPE scoring criteria, only the position of the meatus achieved nearly perfect agreement highlighting that the current scoring systems entail a subjective element in disease classification.

UNASSIGNED: The reliability of interpretation of coronary angiography as a diagnostic tool was investigated. Furthermore, the impact of interobserver variability of coronary lesions on clinical decision-making was assessed. One of our motivations to do this research was the research gaps and our aim to have up-to-date information regarding interobserver variability among different cardiologists.
UNASSIGNED: Our objective was to quantify interobserver variability among cardiologists who have seen angiograms independently. Disagreement among cardiologists in the visual assessment of invasive coronary angiography of coronary artery stenosis is not uncommon in previous studies. Three cardiologists with extensive experience in coronary angiography, including the primary cardiologist of each patient, read the angiograms of 200 patients from Toronto General Hospital independently.
UNASSIGNED: Our research showed the mean agreement among all participating observers was 77.4%; therefore, the interobserver variability of coronary angiography interpretation was 22.6%.
UNASSIGNED: Coronary angiography is still the gold-standard technique for guidance regarding coronary lesions. Sometimes, coronary angiography results in underestimation or overestimation of a lesion\'s functional severity. Interobserver variability should also be considered when interpreting the severity of coronary stenoses via invasive coronary angiography. This research shows that interobserver variability regarding coronary angiograms is still present (22.6%).
Plain language summary: The gold-standard method for diagnosing coronary stenosis, invasive coronary angiography has some challenges too. One of these challenges has been the difference among various cardiologists regarding determination of severity of each coronary stenosis. In this study, we focused on differences in interobserver variability in coronary angiography interpretation. Three cardiologists who were experienced in coronary angiography read each patient’s coronary angiogram separately. Overall, 200 patients with a history of angiography at Toronto General Hospital were selected randomly. The research showed that overall agreement among all participating cardiologists with regard to the reading of coronary angiograms was 77.4%. In other words, interobserver variability of 22.6% was seen among the readers.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the intra- and inter-observer consistency of the Visually Accessible Rembrandt Images (VASARI) feature set before and after dichotomization, and the association between dichotomous VASARI features and the overall survival (OS) in glioblastoma (GBM) patients.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 351 patients with pathologically confirmed IDH1 wild-type GBM between January 2016 and June 2022. Firstly, VASARI features were assessed by four radiologists with varying levels of experience before and after dichotomization. Cohen\'s kappa coefficient (κ) was calculated to measure the intra- and inter-observer consistency. Then, after adjustment for confounders using propensity score matching, Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare OS differences for each dichotomous VASARI feature. Next, patients were randomly stratified into a training set (n = 211) and a test set (n = 140) in a 3:2 ratio. Based on the training set, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was adopted to develop combined and clinical models to predict OS, and the performance of the models was evaluated with the test set.
RESULTS: Eleven VASARI features with κ value of 0.61-0.8 demonstrated almost perfect agreement after dichotomization, with the range of κ values across all readers being 0.874-1.000. Seven VASARI features were correlated with GBM patient OS. For OS prediction, the combined model outperformed the clinical model in both training set (C-index, 0.762 vs. 0.723) and test set (C-index, 0.812 vs. 0.702).
CONCLUSIONS: The dichotomous VASARI features exhibited excellent inter- and intra-observer consistency. The combined model outperformed the clinical model for OS prediction.

OBJECTIVE: The calliper function is used for manual measurements of full thickness macular holes (FTMHs). We aimed to investigate whether a reproducible difference could be detected beyond interobserver variability between two commonly used manufacturers in their manual calliper facility in spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) for metrics related to FTMH.
METHODS: This is a non-interventional, retrospective, observational study. Two independent observers examined 8 eyes (16 OCT) scans and 128 measurements (minimal linear diameter (MLD), basal diameter and hole height on both sides) of FTMHs, taken on Heidelberg Spectralis and Topcon Triton (OCT machines). The interobserver agreement and OCT machine agreement of measurements were analysed by Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis. Spectralis and Triton had 125 µm and 50 µm horizontal b-scan spacing, respectively.
RESULTS: Overall, we report high absolute agreement in interobserver (ICC 0.991 (95% CI 0.985 to 0.995, p<0.001)) and OCT machine (ICC 0.993 (95% CI 0.987 to 0.996, p<0.001)) variability. Lower horizontal resolution in Triton compared with Spectralis leads to interobserver variability, in smaller horizontal measurements. Lower horizontal scanning density in Spectralis lead to relatively large interobserver variation if different reference scans were chosen, and consistently smaller MLD measurements than Triton. Vertical measurements without 1:1 scaling lead to inaccurate exaggerated oblique vertical measurements. Calliper function appears otherwise identically calibrated.
CONCLUSIONS: We report excellent interobserver and OCT machine agreement in measurements. However, the paper shows several factors that could influence the reliability of measurements acquired in eyes with FTMHs, such as the dimension of the hole as well as different image resolution, density scanning protocols or vertical scaling of the OCT machines viewing platform.

BACKGROUND: Calculating size-specific dose estimates (SSDEs) requires measurement of the patient\'s anteroposterior (AP) and lateral thickness based on computed tomography (CT) images. However, these measurements can be subject to variation due to inter-observer and intra-observer differences. This study aimed to investigate the impact of these variations on the accuracy of the calculated SSDE.
METHODS: Four radiographers with 1-10 years of experience were invited to measure the AP and lateral thickness on 30 chest, abdomen, and pelvic CT images. The images were sourced from an internet-based database and anonymized for analysis. The observers were trained to perform the measurements using MicroDicom software and asked to repeat the measurements 1 week later. The study was approved by the institutional review board at Taibah University, and written informed consent was obtained from the observers. Statistical analyses were performed using Python libraries Pingouin (version 0.5.3), Seaborn (version 0.12.2), and Matplotlib (version 3.7.1).
RESULTS: The study revealed excellent inter-observer agreement for the calculated effective diameter and AP thickness measurements, with Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) values of 0.95 and 0.96, respectively. The agreement for lateral thickness measurements was lower, with an ICC value of 0.89. The second round of measurements yielded nearly the same levels of inter-observer agreement, with ICC values of 0.97 for the effective diameter, 1.0 for AP thickness, and 0.88 for lateral thickness. When the consistency of the observer was examined, excellent consistency was found for the calculated effective diameter, with ICC values ranging from 0.91 to 1.0 for all observers. This was observed despite the lower consistency in the lateral thickness measurements, which had ICC values ranging from 0.78 to 1.0.
CONCLUSIONS: The study\'s findings suggest that the measurements required for calculating SSDEs are robust to inter-observer and intra-observer differences. This is important for the clinical use of SSDEs to set diagnostic reference levels for CT scans.

Unattended automatic office blood pressure measurement (uAOBP) is starting to become recognised as the preferred method of blood pressure measurement in practice. The body of evidence to support this position is growing. uAOBP decreases intra- and interobserver variability by reducing measurement error. In addition it reduces the white coat effect. Currently three protocols are validated and used the most, with different countries and/or settings preferring different protocols: BpTRU protocol, SPRINT protocol and 30-minute OBP protocol. In this overview all three protocols are discussed extensively based on current available evidence including pro and con\'s, accuracy and prognostic value.

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVF) usually lead to problems of diagnosis and coincide with the age group of metastatic vertebral compression fractures (MVF). Although radiography is the first diagnostic technique, it is generally inaccurate for depicting demineralization and soft tissue lesions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the diagnostic choice. The most relevant signs of OVF are Intravertebral fluid collection or fluid signal, other vertebral deformities without edema and older age. Among the most relevant findings for MVF diagnosis are soft tissue mass and pedicle intensity signal asymmetries. However, reproducibility of these findings in clinical practice is moderate.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a simple, subjective, and reliable grading scale for isotretinoin-induced meibography changes.
METHODS: After analyzing meibography images obtained from systemic isotretinoin users, a grading scale was proposed and named \"meibography health score.\" The score ranged from 1 to 3, with decreasing gland reflectivity and identifiable margins. A total of 11 medical professionals were asked to grade 10 meibography images obtained from isotretinoin users using the proposed scale and were divided into three groups: (A) ophthalmologists with experience with meibography, (B) ophthalmologists with no experience with meibography, and (C) radiologists. The kappa statistic was determined to test interrater reliability.
RESULTS: The overall kappa was approximately 0.64. The kappa scores for Groups A, B, and C were 0.78, 0.59, and 0.90, respectively. Grade 2 had the lowest kappa scores (0.62, 0.35, and 0.82 for A, B, and C, respectively) and grade 3 the highest (0.78, 0.90, and 1.0 for A, B and C, respectively). Furthermore, Group C had the highest kappa scores and Group B the lowest.
CONCLUSIONS: The meibography health score exhibited good interrater reliability, particularly in severe cases.