Workers can be injured by animals such as mammals and insects. Previous studies found that most animal-related occupational fatalities were caused by horses and cattle. We analyzed characteristics of recent nonfatal severe animal-related injuries in US workers.
The severe injury reports (SIR) database, collected by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, contains employer self-reports of inpatient hospitalizations and amputations. We used 2015-2021 SIR data to assess properties of animal-related injuries, including the type of animal involved, the nature of the injury, and the industry of the employer. Industry-specific incidence rates were calculated.
We identified 788 severe animal-related injuries during the 7-year study period. Mammals caused over half of these injuries (476; 60.4%), followed by insects, arachnids, and mites (183; 23.2%) and reptiles (127; 16.1%). Two-thirds (529; 67.1%) of animal-related injuries were traumatic, while 211 (28.0%) injuries were due to poisoning or allergic reaction. The highest observed incidence was in livestock merchant wholesalers (59.6 severe injuries per 100,000 workers per year); injuries in this industry were often due to cattle. Mail delivery and landscape architecture, two industries in which animal contact is atypical, were also among the 10 industries with the highest incidence.
Workers in many industries experienced severe injuries due to animals. Among workers whose job involves animal contact, cattle workers appear to be at highest risk. Outdoor workers in some industries require protection from bites of dogs, snakes, and insects.

Occupational exposure to ototoxicants, substances that can cause hearing loss alone or exacerbate hearing loss when exposure occurs in combination with noise, is a workplace hazard that is poorly understood. A review of existing research indicates that some solvents and heavy metals may be ototoxic, but few studies have attempted to estimate the impact of ototoxicant exposure on the United States worker population. Researchers examined trends in workplace exposure to ototoxicants among workers in the United States by comparing exposure data collected by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration against worker hearing loss data provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) for 2012-2019. The study found that the noise exposure data was strongly correlated to the hearing loss data using Pearson\'s correlation (p < .001), confirming that the exposure data collected by OSHA is predictive of the risk of occupational illness as reported by BLS. Chi-square analysis indicates that reported hearing loss was more common among industry subsectors with exposure to ototoxicants than those without exposure to ototoxicants. These findings suggest that workers with coexposure to ototoxicants and noise may be at a higher risk of experiencing hearing loss than those exposed to noise alone, and action should be taken to minimize this risk.

Blood-borne pathogens (BBPs) are infectious microorganisms that are found in human blood and can cause diseases in humans. Health care workers such as physicians, surgeons, nurses, dentists, dental students, dental assistants, laboratory technicians, personnel handling infectious waste, and other health care employees are at increased risk of exposure to these pathogens. Percutaneous injuries from needles or other sharp objects are the major sources of BBPs in the workplace. Needlestick injuries (NSIs) have the most potential to transmit and have the easiest mode of transmission of BBPs.
The authors searched electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Scopus, Embase, MEDLINE-Ovid) for studies and articles focused on the various aspects of NSIs, their possible causes, prevention, and management protocols.
There is a lack of literature on the global prevalence of NSIs among dental practitioners and underreporting of NSIs by clinicians. The authors also found that dental students and inexperienced practitioners were the most vulnerable. They found apparent inconsistencies in guidelines and recommendations from various regulatory and statutory agencies in charge of limiting and managing NSIs.
The most significant occupational risks for health care workers globally are NSIs. Dentists are recognized as one of the high-risk groups for exposure to NSIs. Although the reporting rate was noticeably low, the frequency of NSIs among dental students was alarmingly high.
Appropriate and succinct training of dental health care workers is crucial for prevention and management of NSIs. It is recommended that dentists familiarize themselves with recommendations from such agencies and organizations as the Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and American Dental Association.

The modern food supply chain presents unique hazards to employees that result in higher morbidity and mortality rates versus other industries. Employees in food manufacturing, wholesaling, and even retailing experience relatively high numbers of occupational injuries and fatalities. One reason for the high hazard rates may be the reliance on a synergistic packaging system designed to load and transport food products within and between manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers. Packaged food products are often aggregated using palletizers before they can be transported by forklifts and pallet jacks. Materials handling within facilities is critical to the efficient functioning of all members of the food-related supply chain, but product movement can be a source of occupational injuries. No previous research has examined the cause and result of such hazards.
This paper aims to examine severe injuries related to the packaging and movement of food products in segments of the food and beverage supply chain from manufacturing to retailing. An OSHA database was used to investigate all severe injuries in the six years from 2015 to 2020. The focus was on the food supply chain for the period since OSHA began mandating new reporting procedures for severe injuries.
Results show there were 1,084 severe injuries and 47 fatalities during the six-year period. Fractures of the lower extremities were most prevalent, with the most frequent event type being transportation-related such as pedestrian-vehicle incidents. Significant differences were seen in the three parts of the food supply chain.
Implications are drawn for key sectors of the food-related supply chain to reduce packaging- and product movement-related hazards.

Formaldehyde has carcinogenic properties. It is associated with nasopharyngeal cancer and causes irritation of the eyes, nose, throat, and respiratory system. Formaldehyde exposure is a significant health concern for those participating in the gross anatomy laboratory, but no learning method can substitute cadaver dissection. We performed a formaldehyde level study in 2018, which found that most of the breathing zone (S-level) and environment (R-level) formaldehyde levels during laboratory sessions at the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital exceeded international ceiling standards. In the academic year 2019, we adapted the engineering rationale of the NIOSH hierarchy of controls to facilitate formaldehyde clearance by opening the dissection table covers and increasing the area per dissection table, then measured formaldehyde ceiling levels by formaldehyde detector tube with a gas-piston hand pump during (1) body wall, (2) upper limb, (3) head-neck, (4) thorax, (5) spinal cord removal, (6) lower limb, (7) abdomen, and (8) organs of special senses dissection sessions and comparing the results with the 2018 study. The perineum region data were excluded from analyses due to the laboratory closure in 2019 from the COVID-19 outbreak. There were statistically significant differences between the 2018 and 2019 S-levels (p < 0.001) and R-levels (p < 0.001). The mean S-level decreased by 64.18% from 1.34 ± 0.71 to 0.48 ± 0.26 ppm, and the mean R-level decreased by 70.18% from 0.57 ± 0.27 to 0.17 ± 0.09 ppm. The highest formaldehyde level in 2019 was the S-level in the body wall region (1.04 ± 0.3 ppm), followed by the S-level in the abdomen region (0.56 ± 0.08 ppm) and the spinal cord removal region (0.51 ± 0.29 ppm). All 2019 formaldehyde levels passed the OSHA 15-min STEL standard (2 ppm). The R-level in the special sense region (0.06 ± 0.02 ppm) passed the NIOSH 15-min ceiling limit (0.1 ppm). Three levels for 2019 were very close: the R-level in the head-neck region (0.11 ± 0.08 ppm), the abdomen region (0.11 ± 0.08), the body wall region (0.14 ± 0.12 ppm), and the S-level in the special sense region (0.12 ± 0.04 ppm). In summary, extensive analysis and removal of factors impeding formaldehyde clearance can improve the general ventilation system and achieve the OSHA 15-min STEL standard.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) issued an emergency temporary standard (ETS) for COVID-19 applicable to private sector employers with 100 or more employees. Among other things, the ETS required employers either to mandate employee vaccination or weekly testing and wearing masks.

This article discusses current available resources with respect to regulatory agencies including the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) for determining the requirements placed upon laboratories for handling of hazardous materials. The focus is specific to the histology laboratory and xylene use, and includes a literature review, admixed with historical reference points. Procedures and tasks in the histology laboratory are highlighted in relation to their connection to the quality of the work environment with an emphasis on air quality. Recommendations are provided for maintaining an appropriate work environment for the prevention of potential adverse health effects. The gap within the OSHA Laboratory Standard, i.e. a lack of explanatory language, leaves much open to interpretation regarding fume hood usage with volatile hazardous chemicals. As a result, both the level of safety training and the awareness of good laboratory practices (GLP) for handling volatile hazardous reagents such as xylene can become compromised.

In the face of a global pandemic posing unprecedented risks to worker health, the Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA), the agency charged with protecting workers from occupational illness, has floundered. Its efforts to protect workers have been too little, too late, poorly designed, and entangled in legal controversy. Two years into a pandemic that has posed the greatest threat to worker health in our lifetimes, OSHA has adopted no effective, COVID-19-specific protections for workers. This article chronicles OSHA\'s efforts and the response of the courts.

During 2001-2002, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), at the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, collaborated with the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) at the United States Department of Labor to conduct a voluntary survey of U.S. employers regarding the use of respiratory protective devices. In 2003, the survey results were jointly published by NIOSH and BLS. This study highlights and evaluates the scientific impact of the 2001-2002 survey by using the Science Impact Framework which provides a historical tracking method with five domains of influence. The authors conducted interviews with original project management as well as a thorough document review and qualitative content analysis of published papers, books, presentations, and other relevant print media. A semi-structured and cross-vetted coding was applied across the five domains: Disseminating Science, Creating Awareness, Catalyzing Action, Effecting Change, and Shaping the Future. The 2001-2002 survey findings greatly enhanced understanding and awareness of respirator use in occupational settings within the United States. It also led to similar surveys in other countries, regulatory initiatives by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and Mine Safety and Health Administration, and ultimately to a renewed partnership between NIOSH and BLS to collect contemporary estimates of respirator use in the workplace within the United States.

BACKGROUND: The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulates exposures to hazardous chemicals in workplace air. When contemporaneous exposure measurements are unavailable, retrospective analysis of biomarkers could provide valuable information about workers\' exposures.
METHODS: Single-compartment pharmacokinetic (PK) models were created to relate the concentration of a chemical in the air to the concentration of the chemical or its metabolite in workers\' blood or urine. OSHA utilized the PK models in investigations of three fatal incidents in which workers were exposed to nickel carbonyl, methyl bromide, or styrene. To obtain the minimum plausible estimate of each exposure, OSHA used conservative assumptions about parameters such as workers\' inhalation rates, baseline levels of biomarker, and chemicals\' volumes of distribution.
RESULTS: OSHA analyzed a worker\'s urinary nickel concentration and concluded that his 8-h time-weighted average exposure to nickel carbonyl was at least 0.06 mg/m3 . Analysis of a worker\'s postexposure, premortem blood bromide level revealed that his exposure to methyl bromide was at least 181 mg/m3 . Post-mortem blood styrene measurements suggested that a third worker\'s exposure to styrene was at least 625 mg/m3 . These exposures exceeded OSHA\'s permissible exposure limits of 0.007 mg/m3 for nickel carbonyl, 80 mg/m3 for methyl bromide, and 426 mg/m3 for styrene. OSHA successfully cited the three employers for violations of chemical exposure limits.
CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of biomarkers via PK modeling enables retrospective evaluations of workers\' acute exposures to hazardous chemicals. These techniques are useful to occupational regulators who assess employer compliance with mandatory exposure limits.