OASIS

绿洲
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    患有糖尿病的老年人存在日常生活活动(ADL)表现受损的风险。家庭健康(HH)服务可帮助患者在住院后恢复执行ADL的能力,但ADL改善可能存在差异。我们的目的是确定与糖尿病年龄≥65岁的HH患者从HH护理开始到出院的ADL表现变化相关的因素。该二次分析使用由HH机构收集的结果和评估信息集-D数据。样本(n=1350)的平均年龄为76.3(SD7.3)。黑人/非裔美国人种族和肠道失禁/造口术与ADL改善较少相关。以下因素与更大的ADL改善相关:有需要培训/支持的护理人员,手术伤口,干扰活动的疼痛,混乱,和更好的分数在先前的功能。总的来说,大多数患者在接受HH护理时改善了他们的ADL表现,但是有一些差距应该解决。
    Older adults with diabetes are at risk for impairments in activities of daily living (ADL) performance. Home health (HH) services help patients regain their ability to perform ADLs following hospitalization, but there may be disparities in ADL improvement. We aimed to identify factors associated with change in ADL performance from the start of HH care to discharge in HH patients with diabetes age ≥65. This secondary analysis used Outcome and Assessment Information Set-D data collected by a HH agency. The sample (n = 1350) had a mean age of 76.3 (SD 7.3). Black/African American race and bowel incontinence/ostomy were associated with less ADL improvement. The following factors were associated with greater ADL improvement: having a caregiver who needed training/support, surgical wounds, pain that interfered with activity, confusion, and better scores in prior functioning. Overall, most patients improved their ADL performance while receiving HH care, but there are disparities that should be addressed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    脓毒症的异质性受到感染部位的显著影响。本研究旨在探讨多重评分系统对评估不同感染部位脓毒症患者预后的预测价值。这项回顾性队列研究的数据来自重症监护IV医学信息集市数据库(MIMIC-IV)(v2.2)。纳入符合脓毒症3.0标准并进入重症监护病房(ICU)的成年患者。感染部位包括肺炎,尿路感染(UTI),蜂窝织炎,腹部感染,和菌血症.评估的主要结果是28天死亡率。序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分,牛津急性疾病严重程度评分(OASIS),比较两组患者的Logistic器官功能障碍系统(LODS)评分。进行二项逻辑回归分析以评估这些变量与死亡率之间的关联。此外,分析了评分系统中受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)的差异.总共4721名患者被纳入分析。平均28天死亡率为9.4%。在LODS中观察到显着差异,绿洲,不同感染部位28天存活组和非存活组之间的SOFA评分(p<0.01)。在肺炎组和腹腔感染组中,LODS和OASIS评分系统均成为脓毒症患者死亡率的独立危险因素(比值比[OR]:1.165,95%置信区间[CI]:1.109-1.224,p<0.001;OR:1.047,95%CI:1.028-1.065,p<0.001)(OR:1.200,95%CI:1.091-1.319,p<0.001;OR:1.060,95%CI:1.025-1.095,p<0.001)对于UTI患者,LODS,绿洲,和SOFA评分系统被确定为死亡率的独立危险因素(OR:1.142,95%CI:1.068-1.220,p<0.001;OR:1.062,95%CI:1.037-1.087,p<0.001;OR:1.146,95%CI:1.046-1.255,p=0.004),LODS评分和OASIS的AUC明显高于SOFA评分(p=0.006)。在蜂窝织炎患者中,OASIS和SOFA评分系统被确定为死亡率的独立危险因素(OR:1.055,95%CI:1.007-1.106,p=0.025;OR:1.187,95%CI:1.005-1.403,p=0.044),在预后预测方面没有显着差异(p=0.243)。在菌血症组,LODS评分系统被确定为死亡率的独立危险因素(OR:1.165,95%CI:1.109-1.224,p<0.001).研究结果表明,LODS评分为预测脓毒症肺炎患者的死亡风险提供了更好的预后准确性。腹部感染,菌血症,和UTI与SOFA分数相比。
    The heterogeneity nature of sepsis is significantly impacted by the site of infection. This study aims to explore the predictive value of multiple scoring systems in assessing the prognosis of septic patients across different infection sites. Data for this retrospective cohort study were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database (MIMIC-IV) (v2.2). Adult patients meeting the criteria for sepsis 3.0 and admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) were enrolled. Infection sites included were pneumonia, urinary tract infection (UTI), cellulitis, abdominal infection, and bacteremia. The primary outcome assessed was 28-day mortality. The sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, Oxford Acute Severity of Illness Score (OASIS), and Logistic Organ Dysfunction System (LODS) score were compared. Binomial logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between these variables and mortality. Additionally, differences in the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) among the scoring systems were analyzed. A total of 4721 patients were included in the analysis. The average 28-day mortality rate was 9.4%. Significant differences were observed in LODS, OASIS, and SOFA scores between the 28-day survival and non-survival groups across different infection sites (p < 0.01). In the pneumonia group and abdominal infection group, both the LODS and OASIS scoring systems emerged as independent risk factors for mortality in septic patients (odds ratio [OR]: 1.165, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.109-1.224, p < 0.001; OR: 1.047, 95% CI: 1.028-1.065, p < 0.001) (OR: 1.200, 95% CI: 1.091-1.319, p < 0.001; OR: 1.060, 95% CI: 1.025-1.095, p < 0.001). For patients with UTI, the LODS, OASIS, and SOFA scoring systems were identified as independent risk factors for mortality (OR: 1.142, 95% CI: 1.068-1.220, p < 0.001; OR: 1.062, 95% CI: 1.037-1.087, p < 0.001; OR: 1.146, 95% CI: 1.046-1.255, p = 0.004), with the AUC of LODS score and OASIS significantly higher than that of the SOFA score (p = 0.006). Among patients with cellulitis, the OASIS and SOFA scoring systems were identified as independent risk factors for mortality (OR: 1.055, 95% CI: 1.007-1.106, p = 0.025; OR: 1.187, 95% CI: 1.005-1.403, p = 0.044), with no significant difference in prognosis prediction observed (p = 0.243). In the bacteremia group, the LODS scoring system was identified as an independent risk factor for mortality (OR: 1.165, 95% CI: 1.109-1.224, p < 0.001). The findings suggest that LODS scores offer better prognostic accuracy for predicting the mortality risk in septic patients with pneumonia, abdominal infections, bacteremia, and UTI compared to SOFA scores.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:用于分析基于声速的婴儿六氟化硫(SF6)多次呼吸冲洗(MBW)测量的现有算法(WBreath)的主要方法学问题导致不合理的结果,并使不同年龄段和中心之间的比较复杂化。
    方法:我们开发了OASIS-一种新颖的算法,用于分析基于声速的婴儿SF6MBW测量值。该算法使用已知的测量上下文来代替WBreath对模型输入参数的依赖性。我们在体外验证了该新算法的功能剩余容量(FRC)测量精度,并调查了其在来自瑞士和南非不同婴儿队列的现有婴儿MBW数据集中的使用情况。
    结果:体外,OASIS在FRC测量精度方面的表现优于WBreath,降低平均(SD)绝对误差从5.1(3.2)%至2.1(1.6)%的婴儿年龄范围相关的体积,在可变温度下,呼吸频率,潮气量和通气不均匀条件。我们发现WBreath输入参数的变化对MBW结果有重大影响,新算法中不存在的方法论缺陷。OASIS在纵向跟踪肺清除指数(LCI)方面比WBreath产生更合理的结果,随着时间的推移,在LCI中提供了改进的测量稳定性,提高了中心之间的可比性。
    结论:这种新算法通过允许一种方法来分析来自不同年龄段和中心的测量结果,在从传统的肺功能测量系统获得结果方面取得了有意义的进步。
    BACKGROUND: Major methodological issues with the existing algorithm (WBreath) used for the analysis of speed-of-sound-based infant sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) multiple-breath washout (MBW) measurements lead to implausible results and complicate the comparison between different age groups and centers.
    METHODS: We developed OASIS-a novel algorithm to analyze speed-of-sound-based infant SF6 MBW measurements. This algorithm uses known context of the measurements to replace the dependence of WBreath on model input parameters. We validated the functional residual capacity (FRC) measurement accuracy of this new algorithm in vitro, and investigated its use in existing infant MBW data sets from different infant cohorts from Switzerland and South Africa.
    RESULTS: In vitro, OASIS managed to outperform WBreath at FRC measurement accuracy, lowering mean (SD) absolute error from 5.1 (3.2) % to 2.1 (1.6) % across volumes relevant for the infant age range, in variable temperature, respiratory rate, tidal volume and ventilation inhomogeneity conditions. We showed that changes in the input parameters to WBreath had a major impact on MBW results, a methodological drawback which does not exist in the new algorithm. OASIS produced more plausible results than WBreath in longitudinal tracking of lung clearance index (LCI), provided improved measurement stability in LCI over time, and improved comparability between centers.
    CONCLUSIONS: This new algorithm represents a meaningful advance in obtaining results from a legacy system of lung function measurement by allowing a single method to analyze measurements from different age groups and centers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)后分娩的大约50%的妇女在其一生中会出现肛门失禁(AI)。
    目的:评估目前的证据,证明计划剖腹产(CS)预防OASI后发生AI的保护性益处。
    方法:MEDLINE/PubMed,Embase1974-2024,CINAHL和Cochrane至2024年2月7日(PROSPEROCRD42022372442)。
    方法:所有报告OASI和随后出生后结局的研究,任何模式。
    方法:2646项筛选研究中有86项符合纳入标准,有9项研究适合荟萃分析OASI和随后出生后的“调整AI”的主要结局。亚组:短期AI,长期的AI,无症状妇女的AI。
    结果:总AI,生活质量,满意/遗憾,固体/液体/尿失禁,粪便紧迫性,AI在有和没有随后出生的妇女中,人工智能在出生前后的变化。
    结果:在所有时间段内,与OASI后的CS相比,随后的阴道分娩后的校正AI没有差异的证据(OR=0.92,95%CI0.72-1.20;9项研究,2104名与会者,I2=0%p=0.58),用于亚组分析或次要结局。没有证据表明有或没有后续分娩的女性的AI差异(OR=1.0095%CI0.65-1.54;10项研究,970名与会者,I2=35%p=0.99),或出生前后(OR=0.7995%CI0.51-1.25;13项研究,5496名参与者,I2=73%p=0.31)。
    结论:由于证据质量低,我们无法确定计划剖腹产是否对OASI后的AI具有保护作用.需要更高质量的证据来指导无症状妇女的个性化决策,并确定后续出生模式对长期AI结果的影响。
    BACKGROUND: Approximately 50% women who give birth after obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) develop anal incontinence (AI) over their lifetime.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate current evidence for a protective benefit of planned caesarean section (CS) to prevent AI after OASI.
    METHODS: MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase 1974-2024, CINAHL and Cochrane to 7 February 2024 (PROSPERO CRD42022372442).
    METHODS: All studies reporting outcomes after OASI and a subsequent birth, by any mode.
    METHODS: Eighty-six of 2646 screened studies met inclusion criteria, with nine studies suitable to meta-analyse the primary outcome of \'adjusted AI\' after OASI and subsequent birth. Subgroups: short-term AI, long-term AI, AI in asymptomatic women.
    RESULTS: total AI, quality of life, satisfaction/regret, solid/liquid/flatal incontinence, faecal urgency, AI in women with and without subsequent birth, change in AI pre- to post- subsequent birth.
    RESULTS: There was no evidence of a difference in adjusted AI after subsequent vaginal birth compared with CS after OASI across all time periods (OR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.72-1.20; 9 studies, 2104 participants, I2 = 0% p = 0.58), for subgroup analyses or secondary outcomes. There was no evidence of a difference in AI in women with or without subsequent birth (OR = 1.00 95% CI 0.65-1.54; 10 studies, 970 participants, I2 = 35% p = 0.99), or pre- to post- subsequent birth (OR = 0.79 95% CI 0.51-1.25; 13 studies, 5496 participants, I2 = 73% p = 0.31).
    CONCLUSIONS: Due to low evidence quality, we are unable to determine whether planned caesarean is protective against AI after OASI. Higher quality evidence is required to guide personalised decision-making for asymptomatic women and to determine the effect of subsequent birth mode on long-term AI outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:阴道分娩后发生任何形式的会阴损伤的产妇损伤非常常见,全球范围为16.2%至90.4%。产科肛门括约肌损伤的频率和宫颈裂伤的发生率迅速增加。然而,在埃塞俄比亚,关于阴道分娩后产妇产伤的患病率及其决定因素的证据有限。
    目的:评估冈达尔大学综合专科医院阴道分娩后产妇分娩创伤的程度和相关因素,Gondar,埃塞俄比亚西北部,2022年。
    方法:一项基于机构的横断面研究于2022年5月9日至8月9日在Gondar大学综合专科医院对424名研究参与者进行了单胎阴道分娩的母亲。使用了预先测试的半结构化提问器。Epi-Data4.6版用于数据输入,并导出到SPSS25版进行数据管理和分析。为了确定决定因素,拟合二元逻辑回归模型,并考虑p值<0.2的变量进行多变量二元逻辑回归分析.在多变量二元逻辑回归分析中,P值<0.05的变量被认为与结果变量具有统计学显著关联。据报道,具有95%CI的调整赔率比(AOR)表明产妇出生创伤与自变量之间的统计学意义和关联强度。
    结果:共纳入424例阴道分娩的母亲。参与者的平均年龄为26.83岁(±5.220岁)。产妇经阴道分娩后发生产伤的比例为47.4%(95CI:43.1,51.7)。不同形式的会阴创伤,一级撕裂占42.8%,OASIs占1.5%,宫颈裂伤占2.5%。在初产妇的多变量二元逻辑回归分析中(AOR=3.00;95CI:1.68,5.38),分娩时妊娠年龄≥39周(AOR=2.96;95CI:1.57,5.57),出生体重较重(AOR=12.3;95CI:7.21,40.1),头围较大(AOR=5.45;95CI:2.62,11.31),手术阴道分娩(AOR=6.59;95CI:1.44,30.03)和无会阴和/或胎儿头部支持分娩(AOR=6.30;95CI:2.21,17.94)与产妇产伤的存在显著相关.
    结论:本研究中阴道分娩后产妇的产伤相对较高。初级奇偶校验,分娩时胎龄超过39周,出生体重较重,更大的头围,手术阴道分娩和无会阴和/或胎头支持的分娩是影响会阴结局的因素。埃塞俄比亚卫生部应定期提供干预培训,以减少产妇的出生创伤。
    BACKGROUND: Maternal injury with any form of perineal trauma following vaginal delivery is very common which ranges globally from 16.2 to 90.4%. The frequency of Obstetric anal sphincter Injuries and the incidence of cervical laceration increases rapidly. However, in Ethiopia, there is limited evidence on the prevalence of maternal birth trauma and its determinant factors after vaginal delivery.
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the magnitude and associated factors of Maternal Birth Trauma after vaginal delivery at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Gondar, North-West Ethiopia, 2022.
    METHODS: An Institution based cross-sectional study was conducted among mothers with singleton vaginal delivery at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital from 9th May to 9th August 2022 among 424 study participants. Pre-tested semi-structured questioner was utilized. Epi-Data version 4.6 was used for data entry and exported to SPSS version 25 for data management and analysis. To identify the determinant factors, binary logistic regression model was fitted and variables with p-value < 0.2 were considered for the multivariable binary logistic regression analysis. In the multivariable binary logistic regression analysis, Variables with P-value < 0.05 were considered to have statistical significant association with the outcome variable. The Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) with 95% CI was reported to declare the statistical significance and strength of association between Maternal Birth Trauma and independent variables.
    RESULTS: A total of 424 mothers who delivered vaginally were included. The mean age of participants was 26.83 years (± 5.220 years). The proportion of birth trauma among mothers after vaginal delivery was47.4% (95%CI: 43.1, 51.7). Of different forms of perineal trauma, First degree tear in 42.8%, OASIs in 1.5% and Cervical laceration in 2.5% study participants. In the multivariable binary logistic regression analysis being primiparous (AOR = 3.00; 95%CI: 1.68, 5.38), Gestational age ≥ 39 weeks at delivery (AOR = 2.96; 95%CI: 1.57, 5.57), heavier birth weight (AOR = 12.3; 95%CI: 7.21, 40.1), bigger head circumference (AOR = 5.45; 95%CI: 2.62, 11.31), operative vaginal delivery (AOR = 6.59; 95%CI: 1.44, 30.03) and delivery without perineum and/or fetal head support (AOR = 6.30; 95%CI: 2.21, 17.94) were significantly associated with the presence of maternal birth trauma.
    CONCLUSIONS: Maternal birth trauma following vaginal delivery was relatively high in this study. Prim parity, gestational age beyond 39 weeks at delivery, heavier birth weight, bigger head circumference, operative vaginal delivery and delivery without perineum and/or fetal head supported were factors affecting perineal outcome. The Ministry of Health of Ethiopia should provide regular interventional training as to reduce maternal birth trauma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在评估引产是否与严重会阴裂伤的风险增加有关。
    方法:在MEDLINE中进行了系统搜索,奥维德,Scopus,ClinicalTrials.gov,Cochrane中央控制试验登记册,和CINHAL使用与“引产”相关的关键词和文本词的组合,严重会阴裂伤,\"\"三度撕裂伤,四度撕裂伤,“和”OASIS“从每个数据库开始到2023年1月。
    方法:我们纳入了所有比较引产与单胎期待管理的随机对照试验,足月妊娠的头部妊娠报告了严重的会阴裂伤的发生率。
    感兴趣的主要结果是严重的会阴裂伤,定义为第三或第四度会阴撕裂。我们使用DerSimonian和Laird的随机效应模型进行了荟萃分析,以确定95%置信区间的相对风险或平均差异。使用Cochrane干预措施系统审查手册制定的指南评估偏差。
    结果:共筛选了11,187条独特记录,最终纳入了8项随机对照试验,涉及13,297名患者。引产组和期待管理组会阴严重撕裂的发生率无统计学差异(209/6655(3.1%)vs.202/6641(3.0%);相对风险(RR)1.03,95%置信区间(CI)0.85,1.26)。剖宫产率显着下降(1090/6655(16.4%)与1230/6641(18.5%),RR0.89,95%CI0.82,0.95)和胎儿巨大儿(734/2696(27.2%)与964/2703(35.7%);引产组的RR0.67:95%CI0.50,0.90)。
    结论:在这项随机对照试验的荟萃分析中,引产和期待治疗之间严重会阴撕裂的风险没有显着差异。此外,引产组的剖宫产率较低,表明阴道分娩更成功,严重会阴裂伤发生率相似。应该建议患者除了已知的诱导益处外,严重会阴撕裂的风险没有增加.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate if induction of labor (IOL) is associated with an increased risk of severe perineal laceration.
    METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Ovid, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINHAL using a combination of keywords and text words related to \"induction of labor,\" \"severe perineal laceration,\" \"third-degree laceration,\" \"fourth-degree laceration,\" and \"OASIS\" from inception of each database until January 2023.
    METHODS: We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IOL to expectant management of a singleton, cephalic pregnancy at term gestation that reported rates of severe perineal laceration.
    UNASSIGNED: The primary outcome of interest was severe perineal laceration, defined as 3rd- or 4th-degree perineal lacerations. We conducted meta-analyses using the random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird to determine the relative risks (RR) or mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Bias was assessed using guidelines established by Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
    RESULTS: A total of 11,187 unique records were screened and ultimately eight RCTs were included, involving 13,297 patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of severe perineal lacerations between the IOL and expectant management groups (209/6655 [3.1%] vs 202/6641 [3.0%]; RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.85, 1.26). There was a statistically significant decrease in the rate of cesarean birth (1090/6655 [16.4%] vs 1230/6641 [18.5%], RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82, 0.95) and fetal macrosomia (734/2696 [27.2%] vs 964/2703 [35.7%]; RR 0.67: 95% CI 0.50, 0.90) in the IOL group.
    CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant difference in the risk of severe perineal lacerations between IOL and expectant management in this meta-analysis of RCTs. Furthermore, there is a lower rate of cesarean births in the IOL group, indicating more successful vaginal deliveries with similar rates of severe perineal lacerations. Patients should be counseled that in addition to the known benefits of induction, there is no increased risk of severe perineal lacerations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    阿尔茨海默氏症是一种进行性神经退行性疾病,可导致认知障碍并最终导致死亡。为了选择最有效的治疗方案,早期诊断和分类至关重要,因为目前的治疗只能延缓其进展。然而,以前对阿尔茨海默病(AD)的研究有局限性,比如不准确和对一小部分的依赖,不平衡的二进制数据集。在这项研究中,我们的目标是使用三个多类数据集评估AD的早期阶段:OASIS,脑电图,和ADNIMRI。研究包括三个阶段:预处理,特征提取,和使用混合学习技术进行分类。对于OASIS和ADNIMRI数据集,我们计算平均RGB值,并使用平均滤波器来增强图像。我们平衡并增强了数据集以增加其大小。在EEG数据集的情况下,我们使用带通滤波器进行数字滤波以降低噪声,并使用随机过采样平衡数据集。要提取和分类特征,我们使用了一种由四种算法组成的混合技术:AlexNet-MLP,AlexNet-ETC,AlexNet-AdaBoost,AlexNet-NB结果表明,AlexNet-ETC混合算法对OASIS数据集的准确率最高,达到95.32%。在EEG数据集的情况下,AlexNet-MLP混合算法以97.71%的最高准确率优于其他方法。对于ADNIMRI数据集,AlexNet-MLP混合算法的准确率达到92.59%。将这些结果与现有技术进行比较证明了我们的发现的有效性。
    Alzheimer\'s is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that leads to cognitive impairment and ultimately death. To select the most effective treatment options, it is crucial to diagnose and classify the disease early, as current treatments can only delay its progression. However, previous research on Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) has had limitations, such as inaccuracies and reliance on a small, unbalanced binary dataset. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the early stages of AD using three multiclass datasets: OASIS, EEG, and ADNI MRI. The research consisted of three phases: pre-processing, feature extraction, and classification using hybrid learning techniques. For the OASIS and ADNI MRI datasets, we computed the mean RGB value and used an averaging filter to enhance the images. We balanced and augmented the dataset to increase its size. In the case of the EEG dataset, we applied a band-pass filter for digital filtering to reduce noise and also balanced the dataset using random oversampling. To extract and classify features, we utilized a hybrid technique consisting of four algorithms: AlexNet-MLP, AlexNet-ETC, AlexNet-AdaBoost, and AlexNet-NB. The results showed that the AlexNet-ETC hybrid algorithm achieved the highest accuracy rate of 95.32% for the OASIS dataset. In the case of the EEG dataset, the AlexNet-MLP hybrid algorithm outperformed other approaches with the highest accuracy of 97.71%. For the ADNI MRI dataset, the AlexNet-MLP hybrid algorithm achieved an accuracy rate of 92.59%. Comparing these results with the current state of the art demonstrates the effectiveness of our findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:如果在阴道分娩过程中发生严重的会阴裂伤伴直肠粘膜损伤,则通常缝合直肠和阴道壁。在修复后肛门失禁的情况下,肛门括约肌的重新缝合是标准程序。然而,此程序可能不会导致功能的充分改善。
    方法:一名41岁女性因分娩时会阴四度裂伤而对阴道和直肠壁进行缝合修复。她在抱怨肠胃胀气和大便失禁后被转诊到我们部门。她的Wexner得分为15分。检查显示肛门张力降低,腹侧收缩较弱。我们在分娩时修复会阴裂伤后诊断为括约肌功能障碍引起的肛门失禁。随后,我们通过缝合位于会阴体外侧的筋膜并在腹背方向上运行,进行了括约肌再缝合并进行了会阴成形术,以重组会阴体。填补了肛门和阴道之间的空间,增加了肛门张力。手术后一个月,肛门失禁症状消失(Wexner评分降至0分),与术前相比,肛门直肠测压值增加。根据最近关于女性会阴区解剖结构的报道,女性的球海绵状肌不会向中线移动以附着在会阴体上,正如以前所相信的那样。相反,它附着在肛门外括约肌的同侧表面。我们认为会阴体外侧的筋膜是球海绵状肌的筋膜。
    结论:在严重会阴裂伤修复后,由于括约肌功能障碍导致产后肛门失禁的病例中,通过重新缝合肛门括约肌进行的腔内成形术可改善肛门括约肌功能。与仅对直肠壁进行常规简单缝合修复相比,这种手术技术可以在更大程度上改善括约肌功能。
    BACKGROUND: The rectal and vaginal walls are typically sutured if severe perineal lacerations with rectal mucosal damage occur during vaginal delivery. In case of anal incontinence after the repair, re-suturing of the anal sphincter muscle is standard procedure. However, this procedure may not result in sufficient improvement of function.
    METHODS: A 41-year-old woman underwent suture repair of the vaginal and rectal walls for fourth-degree perineal laceration at delivery. She was referred to our department after complaining of flatus and fecal incontinence. Her Wexner score was 15 points. Examination revealed decreased anal tonus and weak contractions on the ventral side. We diagnosed anal incontinence due to sphincter dysfunction after repair of a perineal laceration at delivery. We subsequently performed sphincter re-suturing with perineoplasty to restructure the perineal body by suturing the fascia located lateral to the perineal body and running in a ventral-dorsal direction, which filled the space between the anus and vagina and increased anal tonus. One month after surgery, the symptoms of anal incontinence disappeared (the Wexner score lowered to 0 points), and the anorectal manometry values increased compared to the preoperative values. According to recent reports on the anatomy of the female perineal region, bulbospongiosus muscle in women does not move toward the midline to attach to the perineal body, as has been previously believed. Instead, it attaches to the ipsilateral surface of the external anal sphincter. We consider the fascia lateral to the perineal body to be the fascia of the bulbospongiosus muscle.
    CONCLUSIONS: In a case of postpartum anal incontinence due to sphincter dysfunction after repair of severe perineal laceration, perineoplasty with re-suturing an anal sphincter muscle resulted in improvement in anal sphincter function. Compared to conventional simple suture repair of the rectal wall only, this surgical technique may improve sphincter function to a greater degree.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:医疗保险数据系统中种族和族裔信息质量的局限性限制了评估美国老年人护理差异的努力。使用来自标准化患者评估的人口统计信息可能是提高医疗保险数据系统中种族和种族信息的准确性和完整性的有效方法。但至关重要的是,首先要确定这些数据的准确性,因为它们可能容易出现不准确的观察者报告或基于第三方的信息。这项研究评估了家庭保健机构提交的结果和评估信息集(OASIS)中包含的患者水平种族和种族信息的准确性。
    方法:我们将2017-2022年OASIS-D种族和种族数据与来自Medicare消费者对医疗保健提供者和系统®调查的Medicare消费者评估的黄金标准自我报告信息进行了比较。我们还将OASIS数据与使用Medicare贝叶斯改良姓氏和地理编码(MBISG)2.1.1方法生成的种族和种族的间接估计进行了比较,并与现有的Medicare和Medicaid服务中心(CMS)管理记录进行了比较。
    结果:与现有CMS管理数据相比,OASIS数据对西班牙裔来说要准确得多,亚裔美国人和夏威夷原住民或其他太平洋岛民,和白人种族和种族;对于美洲印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民种族和种族而言,准确性稍低;对于黑人种族和种族而言,也同样准确。然而,MBISG2.1.1的准确性超过了OASIS和CMS每个种族和族裔类别的行政数据。在OASIS和医疗保健提供者和系统的消费者评估(CAHPS)数据集中有多次观察的人群中,种族和族裔信息报告不一致的模式表明,OASIS数据中的某些不准确性可能是由于基于观察的报告减少了与自我报告数据的对应关系。
    结论:当有关种族和族裔的健康记录数据包括观察者报告的信息时,它可能比真实的自我报告和高性能的归因方法更不准确。需要努力鼓励收集关于种族和族裔信息来源的真实自我报告数据和明确的记录级数据。
    BACKGROUND: Limitations in the quality of race-and-ethnicity information in Medicare\'s data systems constrain efforts to assess disparities in care among older Americans. Using demographic information from standardized patient assessments may be an efficient way to enhance the accuracy and completeness of race-and-ethnicity information in Medicare\'s data systems, but it is critical to first establish the accuracy of these data as they may be prone to inaccurate observer-reported or third-party-based information. This study evaluates the accuracy of patient-level race-and-ethnicity information included in the Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) submitted by home health agencies.
    METHODS: We compared 2017-2022 OASIS-D race-and-ethnicity data to gold-standard self-reported information from the Medicare Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems® survey in a matched sample of 304,804 people with Medicare coverage. We also compared OASIS data to indirect estimates of race-and-ethnicity generated using the Medicare Bayesian Improved Surname and Geocoding (MBISG) 2.1.1 method and to existing Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) administrative records.
    RESULTS: Compared with existing CMS administrative data, OASIS data are far more accurate for Hispanic, Asian American and Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, and White race-and-ethnicity; slightly less accurate for American Indian or Alaska Native race-and-ethnicity; and similarly accurate for Black race-and-ethnicity. However, MBISG 2.1.1 accuracy exceeds that of both OASIS and CMS administrative data for every racial-and-ethnic category. Patterns of inconsistent reporting of racial-and-ethnic information among people for whom there were multiple observations in the OASIS and Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) datasets suggest that some of the inaccuracies in OASIS data may result from observation-based reporting that lessens correspondence with self-reported data.
    CONCLUSIONS: When health record data on race-and-ethnicity includes observer-reported information, it can be less accurate than both true self-report and a high-performing imputation approach. Efforts are needed to encourage collection of true self-reported data and explicit record-level data on the source of race-and-ethnicity information.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们的研究旨在确定预测脓毒症相关急性呼吸衰竭(SA-ARF)患者预后的最佳评分系统。所有数据均来自重症监护医学市场(MIMIC-IV)数据库的第四版。通过回归分析证实了医院死亡的独立危险因素。通过接收操作特征(ROC)曲线来评估五个评分系统的预测值。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示急性生理学评分III(APSIII)对SA-ARF患者生存和预后的影响。决策曲线分析(DCA)确定了具有最高净临床收益的评分系统。ROC曲线分析显示,APSIII(AUC:0.755,95%Cl0.714-0.768)和逻辑器官功能障碍系统(LODS)(AUC:0.731,95%Cl0.717-0.7745)优于简化急性生理评分II(SAPSII)(AUC:0.727,95%CI0.713-0.741),牛津急性疾病严重程度评分(OASIS)(AUC:0.706,95%CI0.691-0.720)和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)(AUC:0.606,95%CI0.590-0.621)评估院内死亡率。高APSIII评分组的Kaplan-Meier生存分析患者的中位生存时间明显较差。DCA曲线显示APSIII可能为患者提供更好的临床益处。我们证明APSIII评分是住院死亡率的极好预测指标。
    Our study aimed to identify the optimal scoring system for predicting the prognosis of patients with sepsis-associated acute respiratory failure (SA-ARF). All data were taken from the fourth version of the Markets in Intensive Care Medicine (MIMIC-IV) database. Independent risk factors for death in hospitals were confirmed by regression analysis. The predictive value of the five scoring systems was evaluated by receiving operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Kaplan‒Meier curves showed the impact of acute physiology score III (APSIII) on survival and prognosis in patients with SA-ARF. Decision curve analysis (DCA) identified a scoring system with the highest net clinical benefit. ROC curve analysis showed that APS III (AUC: 0.755, 95% Cl 0.714-0.768) and Logical Organ Dysfunction System (LODS) (AUC: 0.731, 95% Cl 0.717-0.7745) were better than Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) (AUC: 0.727, 95% CI 0.713-0.741), Oxford Acute Severity of Illness Score (OASIS) (AUC: 0.706, 95% CI 0.691-0.720) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) (AUC: 0.606, 95% CI 0.590-0.621) in assessing in-hospital mortality. Kaplan‒Meier survival analysis patients in the high-APS III score group had a considerably poorer median survival time. The DCA curve showed that APS III may provide better clinical benefits for patients. We demonstrated that the APS III score is an excellent predictor of in-hospital mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号