OARs

OARS
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在我们的部门,我们有一个专用的1.5特斯拉MRI/HDR近距离放射治疗套件,这提供了重复MRI扫描的可能性,在插入涂药器期间和之后以及晚期宫颈癌患者的照射之前和/或之后。在这项研究中,我们分析了这种自适应工作流程的效果。我们调查了干预措施的数量,它们对器官剂量(OAR)的影响以及总处方剂量和总输送剂量之间的各自剂量差异。
    70例局部晚期宫颈癌FIGO2009分期IB-IVA,2016年6月至2020年8月接受治疗,回顾性分析。标准的近距离放射治疗方案由两个施加器插入和三个或四个HDR部分的递送组成。OAR在重复的MRI扫描中重新轮廓。膀胱的总处方剂量和总输送剂量之间的D2cm3剂量差,直肠,计算乙状结肠和肠。
    总共进行了153次干预,3更换涂药器,23针位置的调整,改变膀胱充盈74次,重复直肠脱气53次。直肠干预的影响平均为-1.2GyEQD23。膀胱的总输送量和总处方D2cm3之间的剂量差异,直肠,乙状结肠和肠EQD23分别为-0.6、0.3、2.2和-0.6Gy。
    集成到近距离放射治疗套件中的MRI扫描仪可以在治疗计划和剂量交付之前根据扫描进行多种干预。这允许根据个体患者的变化的解剖结构和对递送剂量的更好估计来定制治疗。
    UNASSIGNED: At our department we have a dedicated 1.5 Tesla MRI/HDR brachytherapy suite, which provides the possibility of repeated MRI scanning before, during and after applicator insertion and before and/or after irradiation for patients with advanced cervical cancer. In this study we analysed the effect of this adaptive workflow. We investigated the number of interventions, their impact on organ doses (OAR) and the respective dose differences between total prescribed and total delivered doses.
    UNASSIGNED: Seventy patients with locally advanced cervical cancer FIGO2009 stages IB-IVA, treated from June 2016 till August 2020, were retrospectively analysed. The standard brachytherapy schedule consisted of two applicator insertions and delivery of three or four HDR fractions.OARs were recontoured on the repeated MRI scans. The D2cm3 dose difference between total prescribed and total delivered dose for bladder, rectum, sigmoid and bowel were calculated.
    UNASSIGNED: In total 153 interventions were performed, 3 replacements of the applicator, 23 adaptations of needle positions, bladder filling was changed 74 times and repeated rectal degassing 53 times. The impact of the rectal interventions was on average -1.2 Gy EQD23. Dose differences between total delivered and total prescribed D2cm3 for bladder, rectum, sigmoid and bowel were -0.6, 0.3, 2.2 and -0.6 Gy EQD23, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: An MRI scanner integrated into the brachytherapy suite enables multiple interventions based on the scans before treatment planning and dose delivery. This allows for customized treatment according to the changing anatomy of the individual patient and a better estimation of the delivered dose.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在单个机构临床应用中,使用两种不同的商用基于深度学习的自动分割(DLAS)工具,评估计算机断层扫描图像的头颈部区域中的危险器官(OAR)自动分割。
    根据已发布的40例临床头颈部癌(HNC)病例的计算机断层扫描(pCT)图像规划指南,临床医生对22例OAR进行了手动轮廓绘制。使用两个基于深度学习的自动分割模型ManteiaAccuContour和MIMProtégéAI为每位患者生成自动轮廓。然后使用Sørensen-Dice相似性系数(DSC)和平均距离(MD)指标将自动轮廓(AC)的准确性和完整性与专家轮廓(EC)进行比较。
    使用AccuContour生成22个OAR和使用ProtégéAI生成17个OAR的AC,平均轮廓生成时间分别为1分钟/患者和5分钟/患者。下颌骨的EC和AC一致性最高(DSC0.90±0.16)和(DSC0.91±0.03),AccuContour和ProtégéAI的chiasm(DSC0.28±0.14)和(DSC0.30±0.14)分别最低。使用AccuContour,22个OAR轮廓中有10个的平均MD<1mm,6OAR为1-2mm,6OAR为2-3mm。对于ProtégéAI,17个OAR中有8个的平均距离<1mm,6OAR为1-2mm,3OAR为2-3mm。
    两种DLAS程序都被证明是有价值的工具,可以显着减少在头颈部区域生成大量OAR轮廓所需的时间,即使在实施治疗计划之前可能需要手动编辑AC。获得的DSC和MD与评估各种其他DLAS解决方案的其他研究中报道的相类似。尽管如此,CT图像中具有非理想对比度的小体积结构,比如神经,非常具有挑战性,需要额外的解决方案才能取得足够的成果。
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate organ at risk (OAR) auto-segmentation in the head and neck region of computed tomography images using two different commercially available deep-learning-based auto-segmentation (DLAS) tools in a single institutional clinical applications.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty-two OARs were manually contoured by clinicians according to published guidelines on planning computed tomography (pCT) images for 40 clinical head and neck cancer (HNC) cases. Automatic contours were generated for each patient using two deep-learning-based auto-segmentation models-Manteia AccuContour and MIM ProtégéAI. The accuracy and integrity of autocontours (ACs) were then compared to expert contours (ECs) using the Sørensen-Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Mean Distance (MD) metrics.
    UNASSIGNED: ACs were generated for 22 OARs using AccuContour and 17 OARs using ProtégéAI with average contour generation time of 1 min/patient and 5 min/patient respectively. EC and AC agreement was highest for the mandible (DSC 0.90 ± 0.16) and (DSC 0.91 ± 0.03), and lowest for the chiasm (DSC 0.28 ± 0.14) and (DSC 0.30 ± 0.14) for AccuContour and ProtégéAI respectively. Using AccuContour, the average MD was<1mm for 10 of the 22 OARs contoured, 1-2mm for 6 OARs, and 2-3mm for 6 OARs. For ProtégéAI, the average mean distance was<1mm for 8 out of 17 OARs, 1-2mm for 6 OARs, and 2-3mm for 3 OARs.
    UNASSIGNED: Both DLAS programs were proven to be valuable tools to significantly reduce the time required to generate large amounts of OAR contours in the head and neck region, even though manual editing of ACs is likely needed prior to implementation into treatment planning. The DSCs and MDs achieved were similar to those reported in other studies that evaluated various other DLAS solutions. Still, small volume structures with nonideal contrast in CT images, such as nerves, are very challenging and will require additional solutions to achieve sufficient results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:采用神经网络方法建立鼻咽癌(NPC)调强放疗(IMRT)过程中危险器官(OAR)的剂量预测模型。
    方法:总共,随机选择103例鼻咽癌患者进行IMRT。使用基于到目标的距离的环结构使用MATLAB程序为OAR自动生成Suborgans,并确定每个子器官的相应体积。分析了每个子器官的体积与每个OAR剂量之间的相关性,并使用MATLAB神经网络拟合应用程序建立了OAR剂量的神经网络预测模型。回归分析中的R值和均方误差用于评估预测模型。
    结果:OAR剂量与相应亚OAR的体积有关。训练集中平行器官和系列器官的归一化平均剂量(Dnmean)和系列器官的归一化最大剂量(Dn0)的平均R值分别为0.880、0.927和0.905。预测模型中每个OAR的均方误差较低(范围为1.72×10-4至7.06×10-3)。
    结论:基于神经网络的预测鼻咽癌IMRT期间OAR剂量的模型很简单,可靠,值得进一步研究和应用。
    A neural network method was used to establish a dose prediction model for organs at risk (OARs) during intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
    In total, 103 patients with NPC were randomly selected for IMRT. Suborgans were automatically generated for OARs using ring structures based on distance to the target using a MATLAB program and the corresponding volume of each suborgan was determined. The correlation between the volume of each suborgan and the dose to each OAR was analysed and neural network prediction models of the OAR dose were established using the MATLAB Neural Net Fitting application. The R-value and mean square error in the regression analysis were used to evaluate the prediction model.
    The OAR dose was related to the volume of the corresponding sub-OAR. The average R-values for the normalised mean dose (Dnmean) to parallel organs and serial organs and the normalised maximum dose (Dn0) to serial organs in the training set were 0.880, 0.927 and 0.905, respectively. The mean square error for each OAR in the prediction model was low (ranging from 1.72 × 10-4 to 7.06 × 10-3).
    The neural network-based model for predicting OAR dose during IMRT for NPC is simple, reliable and worth further investigation and application.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: Radiotherapy is one of the most important treatments for high-grade glioma (HGG), but the best way to delineate the target areas for radiotherapy remains controversial, so our aim was to compare the dosimetric differences in radiation treatment plans generated based on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and National Research Group (NRG) consensus to provide evidence for optimal target delineation for HGG.
    UNASSIGNED: We prospectively enrolled 13 patients with a confirmed HGG from our hospital and assessed dosimetric differences in radiotherapy treatment plans generated according to the EORTC and NRG-2019 guidelines. For each patient, two treatment plans were generated. Dosimetric parameters were compared by dose-volume histograms for each plan.
    UNASSIGNED: The median volume for planning target volume (PTV) of EORTC plans, PTV1 of NRG-2019 plans, and PTV2 of NRG-2019 plans were 336.6 cm3 (range, 161.1-511.5 cm3), 365.3 cm3 (range, 123.4-535.0 cm3), and 263.2 cm3 (range, 116.8-497.7 cm3), respectively. Both treatment plans were found to have similar efficiency and evaluated as acceptable for patient treatment. Both treatment plans showed well conformal index and homogeneity index and were not statistically significantly different (P = 0.397 and P = 0.427, respectively). There was no significant difference in the volume percent of brain irradiated to 30, 46, and 60 Gy according to different target delineations (P = 0.397, P = 0.590, and P = 0.739, respectively). These two plans also showed no significant differences in the doses to the brain stem, optic chiasm, left and right optic nerves, left and right lens, left and right eyes, pituitary, and left and right temporal lobes (P = 0.858, P = 0.858, P = 0.701 and P = 0.794, P = 0.701 and P = 0.427, P = 0.489 and P = 0.898, P = 0.626, and P = 0.942 and P = 0.161, respectively).
    UNASSIGNED: The NRG-2019 project did not increase the dose of organs at risk (OARs) radiation. This is a significant finding that further lays the groundwork for the application of the NRG-2019 consensus in the treatment of patients with HGGs.
    UNASSIGNED: The effect of radiotherapy target area and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) on the prognosis of high-grade glioma and its mechanism, number ChiCTR2100046667. Registered 26 May 2021.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: To analyze the effects of different bladder and rectal volumes on the dose of organ at risks (OARs) and primary tumors following uniform preparation procedure.
    UNASSIGNED: In this retrospective study, a total of 60 patients with cervical cancer treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) combined with chemotherapy and brachytherapy (BT) during 2019-2022 were included (300 insertions). Then, tandem-ovoid applicators were placed and computed tomography (CT) scanning was performed after each insertion. Delineation of OARs and clinical target volumes (CTVs) were done according to GEC-ESTRO group recommendations. Finally, doses of high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) and OARs were obtained from dose volume histogram (DVH) automatically generated by BT treatment planning system.
    UNASSIGNED: Following a uniform preparation procedure, the median bladder volume of 68.36 cc (range, 29.9-235.68 cc) was in optimal agreement with the recommended bladder volume of ≤ 70 ml, which avoided more manipulation and possible risk of adverse events during general anesthesia. As the bladder filling volume increased, there was no corresponding increase in rectal, HR-CTV, and small bowel volumes, while the sigmoid colon volume decreased. The median rectal volume was 54.95 cc (range, 24.92-168.1 cc), and as the rectal volume increased, HR-CTV, sigmoid colon, and rectum volumes increased, and conversely, small bowel volume decreased. HR-CTV changes with volume affected the rectum, bladder, and HR-CTV, but not the sigmoid colon and small intestine.
    UNASSIGNED: Following a uniform preparation procedure, the bladder and rectum can also be controlled to an optimal volume (B ≤ 70 cc, R ≈ 40 cc), which is related to the dose of the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    放射治疗计划的一个重要阶段是对危险器官(OAR)的准确轮廓。这是剂量分布计算所必需的。目前临床实践中使用的手动轮廓绘制方法很繁琐,耗时,并且容易出现观察者间和观察者内的变化。因此,基于深度学习的自动轮廓工具可以通过在计算机断层扫描(CT)图像上准确描绘OAR来解决这些问题。本文提出了一种基于两阶段深度学习的分割模型,该模型具有自动描绘胸部CT图像中OAR的注意力机制。对输入的CT量进行预处理后,3DU-Net架构将定位每个器官以生成用于分割网络的裁剪图像。接下来,两种不同配置的基于U-Net的网络将执行大器官的分割-左肺,右肺,心,和小器官——食道和脊髓,分别。后处理步骤整合所有单独分割的器官以生成最终结果。就肺和心脏的骰子相似系数(DSC)值而言,建议的模型优于现有技术。值得一提的是,所提出的模型获得了0.941的骰子得分,比之前最好的骰子得分高1.1%,在心脏的情况下,人体的重要器官。此外,使用剂量学分析验证了结果的临床接受度。要在CT扫描上描绘所有五个器官的大小[公式:见正文],我们的模型只需要8.61秒。所提出的开源自动轮廓工具可以在最短的时间内生成准确的轮廓,从而加快治疗时间,降低治疗成本。
    An important phase of radiation treatment planning is the accurate contouring of the organs at risk (OAR), which is necessary for the dose distribution calculation. The manual contouring approach currently used in clinical practice is tedious, time-consuming, and prone to inter and intra-observer variation. Therefore, a deep learning-based auto contouring tool can solve these issues by accurately delineating OARs on the computed tomography (CT) images. This paper proposes a two-stage deep learning-based segmentation model with an attention mechanism that automatically delineates OARs in thoracic CT images. After preprocessing the input CT volume, a 3D U-Net architecture will locate each organ to generate cropped images for the segmentation network. Next, two differently configured U-Net-based networks will perform the segmentation of large organs-left lung, right lung, heart, and small organs-esophagus and spinal cord, respectively. A post-processing step integrates all the individually-segmented organs to generate the final result. The suggested model outperformed the state-of-the-art approaches in terms of dice similarity coefficient (DSC) values for the lungs and the heart. It is worth mentioning that the proposed model achieved a dice score of 0.941, which is 1.1% higher than the best previous dice score, in the case of the heart, an important organ in the human body. Moreover, the clinical acceptance of the results is verified using dosimetric analysis. To delineate all five organs on a CT scan of size [Formula: see text], our model takes only 8.61 s. The proposed open-source automatic contouring tool can generate accurate contours in minimal time, consequently speeding up the treatment time and reducing the treatment cost.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    单室(UKA)和全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的早期术后恢复期是研究日益敏感的指标和新技术的重要领域。这项研究使用2个最近开发的患者报告的评分来比较UKA和TKA后的恢复情况。
    在第1、2、3、7、14天和第6周,由37个UKAs和33个TKAs组成的两个连续队列完成了牛津关节成形术早期恢复评分(OARS)和牛津关节成形术早期变化评分(OACS)。ShortForm-36版本2也在第1、2和6周完成。评估队列内的改善和队列之间的比较。
    对于UKA和TKA,恢复速度在早期迅速,然后逐渐下降。在所有时间点,UKA队列报告的评分与TKA队列相似或显著优于TKA队列.整体OARS(P<.001)显示UKA恢复,在OARS上显示为改进,比TKA快2-3倍。OARS分量表表明UKA具有更好的功能/移动性(P=.003),特别是在恢复早期,和更好的恶心/感觉不适(P<.001)和疲劳/睡眠(P=.009)后恢复。UKA在2周时疼痛也较少(P=0.03)。UKA和TKAOACS之间无显著差异。UKA在8个ShortForm-36领域中的3个领域中得分明显更好,最大的差异是角色-情绪(P=0.003)。
    OARS可用于评估术后恢复情况。这项研究提供了直接证据,表明UKA后的恢复比TKA后的恢复更好,快2-3倍。所有差异都可以通过UKA的侵入性较小来解释。
    The early postoperative recovery period following unicompartmental (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an important area for research with increasingly sensitive metrics and new technologies. This study uses 2 recently developed patient-reported scores to compare the recovery following UKA and TKA.
    Two consecutive cohorts of 37 UKAs and 33 TKAs completed the Oxford Arthroplasty Early Recovery Score (OARS) and the Oxford Arthroplasty Early Change Score (OACS) on days 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, and week 6. The Short Form-36 version 2 was also completed on weeks 1, 2, and 6. Improvements within cohorts and comparisons between cohorts were assessed.
    For both UKA and TKA the speed of recovery was rapid early on and then progressively decreased. At all time points, the UKA cohort reported similar or significantly better scores than the TKA cohort. The overall OARS (P < .001) showed that UKA recovered, shown as improvement on the OARS, 2-3 times faster than TKA. OARS subscales demonstrated that UKA had better Function/Mobility (P = .003) particularly early in the recovery, and better Nausea/Feeling Unwell (P < .001) and Fatigue/Sleep (P = .009) later in the recovery. UKA also had less pain at 2 weeks (P = .03). There was no significant difference between UKA and TKA OACS. UKA had significantly better scores in 3 of the 8 Short Form-36 domains, with the largest difference being in Role-Emotional (P = .003).
    The OARS is useful for the assessment of postoperative recovery. This study provides direct evidence that recovery following UKA is better and 2-3 times faster than following TKA. All differences may be explained by the less invasive nature of UKA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在评估在左侧乳腺癌的三维(3D)适形治疗计划期间,不同切向场布置的危险器官(OAR)在目标体积和剂量范围内的剂量分布变化。包括25例乳腺癌患者的计算机断层扫描(CT)图像,和三种不同的单等中心半块(MIHB)治疗计划-平行中心轴技术(PCAXT),后边界平行技术(PBPT),每位患者均考虑了平行象限技术(PQUDT)。然后为计划目标体积(PTV)和OAR提取与每个遵循的计划相关的剂量学和几何参数,和比较。结果表明,对于不同的计划,提取的OAR的剂量学和几何参数之间没有显着差异。而Dmax,V95%,同质性指数(HI),与PTV相关的一致性指数(CI)值差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。PTV内的最低Dmax和V95%值与PCAXT计划相关。最佳HI是通过PBPT计划实现的,而PCAXT计划观察到bestCI。在所有计划中,OAR的几何参数和剂量学参数之间的最佳相关性是同侧肺的V5Gy中央肺距离与心脏的V5Gy最大心脏距离之间。这些结果证明,用于PTV的最佳覆盖的后边界处的切向场布置的变化可能不会显著影响OAR接收的剂量。
    This study aimed to evaluate variations in dose distribution within the target volume and dose received by the organs at risk (OARs) for different tangential field arrangements during three-dimensional (3D) conformal treatment planning for left-sided breast cancer. Computed tomography (CT) images of 25 breast cancer patients were included, and three different mono-isocentric half-block (MIHB) treatment plans-parallel central axis technique (PCAXT), posterior border parallel technique (PBPT), and parallel quadrant technique (PQUDT)-were considered for each patient. The dosimetric and geometric parameters related to each followed plan were then extracted for the planning target volume (PTV) and the OARs, and compared. The results showed no significant differences among the extracted dosimetric and geometric parameters of the OARs for the different plans, while the Dmax, V95%, homogeneity index (HI), and conformity index (CI) values related to the PTV were significantly different (P < 0.05). The lowest Dmax and V95% values inside the PTV were related to the PCAXT plan. The best HI was achieved with the PBPT plan, whereas the best CI was observed for the PCAXT plan. The best correlation between the geometric and dosimetric parameters of the OARs was between V5Gy-central lung distance for the ipsilateral lung and the V5Gy-maximum heart distance for the heart in all plans. These results demonstrate that variations in the tangential field arrangement at the posterior border for optimal coverage of the PTV may not considerably affect the dose received by the OARs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    记录农村地区中老年人功能损害的患病率,并确定城乡差异。
    我们使用正在进行的基于人群的队列研究的数据进行了二次分析。加拿大老龄化纵向研究(CLSA)。我们使用了来自“跟踪队列”基线波的横截面样本。“乡村的定义与CLSA抽样框架中使用的定义相同,并基于2006年的人口普查。这个定义包括农村地区,定义为位于人口中心之外的所有领土,和人口中心,它们共同覆盖了整个加拿大。我们把这些分成“城市”,\"\"城市周边地区,\"\"混合\"(农村和城市地区),和“农村”,“并比较了这些组的功能状态。使用美国老年人资源调查(OARS)测量功能状态,并将其归类为未受损与具有任何功能损害。针对功能状态的结果构建Logistic回归模型,并针对协变量进行校正。
    居住在农村的人在功能状态上没有发现差异,混合,城郊,和城市地区在未经调整的分析和社会人口统计学和健康相关因素的分析中。OARS量表上的任何单个项目都没有城乡差异。
    我们没有发现功能地位的城乡差异。
    To document the prevalence of functional impairment in middle-aged and older adults from rural regions and to determine urban-rural differences.
    We have conducted a secondary analysis using data from an ongoing population-based cohort study, the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA). We used a cross-sectional sample from the baseline wave of the \"tracking cohort.\" The definition of rurality was the same as the one used in the CLSA sampling frame and based on the 2006 census. This definition includes rural areas, defined as all territory lying outside of population centers, and population centers, which collectively cover all of Canada. We grouped these into \"Urban,\" \"Peri-urban,\" \"Mixed\" (areas with both rural and urban areas), and \"Rural,\" and compared functional status across these groups. Functional status was measured using the Older Americans Resource Survey (OARS) and categorized as not impaired versus having any functional impairment. Logistic regression models were constructed for the outcome of functional status and adjusted for covariates.
    No differences were found in functional status between those living in rural, mixed, peri-urban, and urban areas in unadjusted analyses and in analyses adjusting for sociodemographic and health-related factors. There were no rural-urban differences in any of the individual items on the OARS scales.
    We found no rural-urban differences in functional status.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this paper is to describe the impact of COVID-19 on spine surgery services in a district general hospital in England in order to understand the spinal service provisions that may be required during a pandemic.
    UNASSIGNED: A prospective cohort study was undertaken between 17 March 2020 and 30 April 2020 and compared with retrospective data from same time period in 2019. We compared the number of patients requiring acute hospital admission or orthopaedic referrals and indications of referrals from our admission sheets and obtained operative data from our theatre software.
    UNASSIGNED: Between 17 March to 30 April 2020, there were 48 acute spine referrals as compared to 68 acute referrals during the same time period last year. In the 2019 period, 69% (47/68) of cases referred to the on-call team presented with back pain, radiculopathy or myelopathy compared to 43% (21/48) in the 2020 period. Almost 20% (14/68) of spine referrals consisted of spine trauma as compared to 35% (17/48) this year. There were no confirmed cases of cauda equine last year during this time. Overall, 150 spine cases were carried out during this time period last year, and 261 spine elective cases were cancelled since 17 March 2020.
    UNASSIGNED: We recommend following steps can be helpful to deal with similar situations or new pandemics in future:24 hours on-call spine service during the pandemic.Clinical criteria in place to prioritize urgent spinal cases.Pre-screening spine patients before elective operating.Start of separate specialist trauma list for patients needing urgent surgeries.
    UNASSIGNED: This paper highlights the impact of COVID-19 pandemic in a district general hospital of England. We demonstrate a decrease in hospital attendances of spine pathologies, despite an increase in emergency spine operations.Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:281-286.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号