Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    目的:营养不良有不良的术后结局,尤其是在急诊手术中。在众多的营养评估工具中,本研究旨在调查全球领导力营养不良倡议标准和全球领导力营养不良倡议诊断的营养不良对紧急腹部手术后结局的预测价值.
    方法:这是一项前瞻性观察性研究。在2020年6月至2021年12月急诊外科收治的468名接受急诊腹部手术的患者中,有53名患者不符合入学条件,19例患者的数据缺失。因此,最终参与者人数为396。在计算机断层扫描扫描中,通过第三腰椎的骨骼肌指数评估肌肉质量,下四分位数定义为肌肉质量减少的阈值。全球营养不良问题领导倡议协会,全球营养不良领导力倡议(不包括减少肌肉质量),和骨骼肌指数与住院死亡率,术后并发症,术后住院时间采用χ2评价。此外,筛选混杂因素,建立了回归模型,全球领导力倡议对营养不良预测价值进行了临床结局分析。从适当的部门获得了道德批准。
    结果:根据全球营养不良领导力倡议,在396名患者中,有19.9%的患者出现营养不良,在全球营养不良领导力倡议中,有12.4%的患者出现营养不良(不包括肌肉质量减少)。在24.7%的患者中发现了骨骼肌指数的肌肉减少症。单因素分析表明,院内死亡率,术后并发症,感染性并发症发生率,营养不良和肌少症患者的术后住院时间显着增加。多因素分析发现,全球领导力营养不良倡议诊断的营养不良是并发症的预测因素,感染性并发症,术后总并发症:比值比=3.620;95%CI,1.635-8.015;P=0.002;感染性并发症:比值比=3.127;95%CI,1.194-8.192;P=0.020;术后停留时间:回归系数=2.622;P=0.022。营养不良全球领导力倡议(不包括肌肉量减少)确定了术后并发症和术后住院时间(术后总并发症:比值比=3.364;95%CI,1.247-9.075;P=0.017,术后住院时间:回归系数=3.547;P=0.009)。骨骼肌指数的肌肉减少是术后并发症的危险因素(比值比=3.366;95%CI,1.587-7.140;P=0.002)。
    结论:关于营养不良的全球领导力倡议和关于营养不良的全球领导力倡议(不包括肌肉质量减少)对于接受紧急腹部手术的患者由于营养不良导致的不良临床结局具有预测价值。
    OBJECTIVE: Malnutrition has adverse postoperative outcomes, especially in emergency surgery. Among the numerous tools for nutritional assessment, this study aims to investigate malnutrition diagnosed by Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria and the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition predictive value for outcomes after emergency abdominal surgery.
    METHODS: This was a prospective observational study. Among the 468 patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery admitted to a department of emergency surgery from June 2020 to December 2021, 53 patients were not eligible for enrollment, and 19 patients had missing data. Thus, the final number of participants was 396. Muscle mass was evaluated by skeletal muscle index at the third lumbar vertebra on computed tomography scans, and the lower quartile was defined as the threshold of muscle mass reduction. The associations of Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition, Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (muscle mass reduction excluded), and skeletal muscle index with in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, and postoperative stay were evaluated using χ2. In addition, confounding factors were screened, regression models were established, and the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition predictive value was analyzed for clinical outcome. Ethical approval was obtained from the appropriate department.
    RESULTS: Malnutrition was observed in 19.9% of the total 396 patients based on the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition and in 12.4% on the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (muscle mass reduction excluded). Sarcopenia by skeletal muscle index was found in 24.7% of patients. Univariate analysis indicated that in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, infective complication rate, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly higher in malnourished and sarcopenic patients. Multivariate analysis found that malnutrition diagnosed by the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition was predictive for complications, infective complications, and postoperative stay (total postoperative complications: odds ratio = 3.620; 95% CI, 1.635-8.015; P = 0.002; infective complications: odds ratio = 3.127; 95% CI, 1.194-8.192; P = 0.020; and postoperative stay: regression coefficient = 2.622; P = 0.022). The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (muscle mass reduction excluded) identified postoperative complications and postoperative stay (total postoperative complications: odds ratio = 3.364; 95% CI, 1.247-9.075; P = 0.017 and postoperative stay: regression coefficient = 3.547; P = 0.009). Sarcopenia by skeletal muscle index was a risk factor for postoperative complications (odds ratio = 3.366; 95% CI, 1.587-7.140; P = 0.002).
    CONCLUSIONS: The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition and Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutritison (muscle mass reduction excluded) had predictive value for adverse clinical outcomes due to malnutrition in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    (1)背景:尽管最近全球认识到临床营养不良是医疗保健的优先事项,但中东地区对医院营养不良的患病率研究仍然很少。这项研究的目的是使用新开发的全球营养不良领导倡议工具(GLIM)来测量黎巴嫩成年住院患者的营养不良患病率,并探讨营养不良与作为临床结局的住院时间(LOS)之间的关系。(2)方法:从黎巴嫩五个地区的医院随机抽样中选择代表性的住院患者横断面样本。使用营养风险筛查工具(NRS-2002)和GLIM标准对营养不良进行筛查和评估。使用中上臂肌围(MUAC)和握力来测量和评估肌肉质量。出院时记录停留时间。(3)结果:本研究共纳入343例成人患者。根据NRS-2002,营养不良风险的患病率为31.2%,根据GLIM标准,营养不良的患病率为35.6%。最常见的营养不良相关标准是体重减轻和低食物摄入量。与具有足够营养状况的患者相比,营养不良患者的LOS明显更长(11天比4天)。握力和MUAC测量值与住院时间呈负相关。(4)结论和建议:该研究记录了GLIM在评估黎巴嫩住院患者营养不良的患病率和程度方面的有效和实际应用。并强调需要采取循证干预措施,以解决黎巴嫩医院营养不良的根本原因。
    (1) Background: Prevalence studies on hospital malnutrition are still scarce in the Middle East region despite recent global recognition of clinical malnutrition as a healthcare priority. The aim of this study is to measure the prevalence of malnutrition in adult hospitalized patients in Lebanon using the newly developed Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition tool (GLIM), and explore the association between malnutrition and the length of hospital stay (LOS) as a clinical outcome. (2) Methods: A representative cross-sectional sample of hospitalized patients was selected from a random sample of hospitals in the five districts in Lebanon. Malnutrition was screened and assessed using the Nutrition Risk Screening tool (NRS-2002) and GLIM criteria. Mid-upper arm muscle circumference (MUAC) and handgrip strength were used to measure and assess muscle mass. Length of stay was recorded upon discharge. (3) Results: A total of 343 adult patients were enrolled in this study. The prevalence of malnutrition risk according to NRS-2002 was 31.2%, and the prevalence of malnutrition according to the GLIM criteria was 35.6%. The most frequent malnutrition-associated criteria were weight loss and low food intake. Malnourished patients had a significantly longer LOS compared to patients with adequate nutritional status (11 days versus 4 days). Handgrip strength and MUAC measurements were negatively correlated with the length of hospital stay. (4) Conclusion and recommendations: the study documented the valid and practical use of GLIM for assessing the prevalence and magnitude of malnutrition in hospitalized patients in Lebanon, and highlighted the need for evidence-based interventions to address the underlying causes of malnutrition in Lebanese hospitals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们根据营养风险筛查(NRS)-2002估计的基线营养状况,调查了晚期BTC患者的生存预测因素。我们回顾了2006年9月至2017年7月601例BTC住院患者的数据。人口统计学和临床参数的数据是从电子病历中收集的,采用Kaplan-Meier法和逐步Cox回归分析对总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期进行分析.NRS-2002评分≤2、3和≥4的患者分别被归类为“无风险”。“”中等风险,\"\"高风险。“根据NRS-2002的初始分数,333名患者(55%)被归类为“无风险”,“109名患者(18%)为中等风险,159名患者(27%)为“高风险”。“生存分析显示中位OS:“无风险”:12.6个月(95%置信区间[CI],11.5-13.7);\“中等风险\”:6.1个月(95%CI,4.3-8.0);和\“高风险\”:3.9个月(95%CI,3.2-4.6)(p<0.001)。NRS-2002评分是OS的独立因素(风险比[HR],“中等风险”1.616,95%CI,1.288-2.027,p<0.001;HR,2.121代表“高风险”,95%CI,1.722-2.612,p<0.001),伴随着肝转移,腹膜播种,白细胞计数,血小板计数,中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞的比率,胆固醇,癌胚抗原,和糖类抗原19-9.总之,基线NRS-2002是区分晚期BTC患者中已经营养不良和预后不良的人的合适方法。这些结果的重要性值得进一步验证,以纳入常规实践,以提高BTC患者的护理质量。
    We investigated the predictors of survival in patients with advanced BTC according to their baseline nutritional status estimated by the Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS)-2002. From September 2006 to July 2017, we reviewed the data of 601 inpatients with BTC. Data on demographic and clinical parameters was collected from electronic medical records, and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the stepwise Cox regression analysis. Patients with an NRS-2002 score of ≤ 2, 3, and ≥ 4 were respectively classified as \"no risk,\" \"moderate risk,\" \"high risk.\" Following initial NRS-2002 score, 333 patients (55%) were classified as \"no-risk,\" 109 patients (18%) as \"moderate-risk,\" and 159 patients (27%) as \"high-risk.\" Survival analysis demonstrated significant differences in the median OS: \"no-risk\": 12.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.5-13.7); \"moderate-risk\": 6.1 months (95% CI, 4.3-8.0); and \"high-risk\": 3.9 months (95% CI, 3.2-4.6) (p < 0.001). NRS-2002 score was an independent factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.616 for \"moderate-risk\", 95% CI, 1.288-2.027, p < 0.001; HR, 2.121 for \"high-risk\", 95% CI, 1.722-2.612, p < 0.001), along with liver metastasis, peritoneal seeding, white blood cell count, platelet count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, cholesterol, carcinoembryonic antigen, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9. In conclusion, baseline NRS-2002 is an appropriate method for discriminating those who are already malnourished and who have poor prognosis in advanced BTC patient. Significance of these results merit further validation to be integrated in the routine practice to improve quality of care in BTC patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号