Laboratory diagnosis of orthohantavirus infection is primarily based on serology. However, for a confirmed serological diagnosis, evaluation of a follow-up serum sample is essential, which is time consuming and causes delay. Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests, if positive, provide an immediate and definitive diagnosis, and accurately identify the causative agent, where the discriminative nature of serology is suboptimal. We re-evaluated sera from orthohantavirus-suspected clinical cases in the Dutch regions of Twente and Achterhoek from July 2014 to April 2016 for the presence of Puumala orthohantavirus (PUUV), Tula orthohantavirus (TULV), and Seoul orthohantavirus (SEOV) RNA. PUUV RNA was detected in 11% of the total number (n = 85) of sera tested, in 50% of sera positive for anti-PUUV/TULV IgM (n = 16), and in 1.4% of sera negative or indeterminate for anti-PUUV/TULV IgM (n = 69). No evidence was found for the presence of TULV or SEOV viral RNA. Based on these findings, we propose two algorithms to implement real-time RT-PCR testing in routine orthohantavirus diagnostics, which optimally provide clinicians with early confirmed diagnoses and could prevent possible further invasive testing and treatment.
OBJECTIVE: The addition of a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test to routine orthohantavirus diagnostics may better aid clinical decision making than the use of standard serology tests alone. Awareness by clinicians and clinical microbiologists of this advantage may ultimately lead to a reduction in over-hospitalization and unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures.

Quantitation of cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA load in specimens other than blood such as bronchoalveolar lavages, intestinal biopsies, or urine has become a common practice as an ancillary tool for the diagnosis of CMV pneumonitis, intestinal disease, or congenital infection, respectively. Nevertheless, most commercially available CMV PCR platforms have not been validated for CMV DNA detection in these specimen types. In this study, a laboratory-developed test based on Alinity m CMV (\"Alinity LDT\") was evaluated. Reproducibility assessment using spiked bronchial aspirate (BAS) or urine samples showed low standard deviations of 0.08 and 0.27 Log IU/mL, respectively. Evaluating the clinical performance of Alinity LDT in comparison to a laboratory-developed test based on RealTime CMV (\"RealTime LDT\") showed good concordance across 200 clinical specimens including respiratory specimens, intestinal biopsies, urine, and stool. A high Pearson\'s correlation coefficient of r = 0.92, a low mean bias of -0.12 Log IU/mL, a good qualitative agreement of 90%, and a Cohen\'s kappa value of 0.76 (substantial agreement) were observed. In separate analyses of the sample types BAS, tracheal aspirates, bronchoalveolar lavage, biopsies, and urine, the assay results correlated well between the two platforms with r values between 0.88 and 0.99 and a bias <0.5 Log IU/mL. Overall, the fully automated, continuous, random access Alinity LDT yielded good reproducibility, high concordance, and good correlation to RealTime LDT in respiratory, gastrointestinal, and urine samples and may enhance patient management with rapid result reporting.IMPORTANCEIn transplant recipients, a major cause for morbidity and mortality is end-organ disease by primary or secondary CMV infection of the respiratory or gastrointestinal tract. In addition, sensorineural hearing loss and neurodevelopmental abnormalities are frequent sequelae of congenital CMV infections in newborns. Standard of care for highly sensitive detection and quantitation of the CMV DNA load in plasma and whole blood specimens is real-time PCR testing. Beyond that, there is a need for quantitative determination of CMV DNA levels in respiratory, gastrointestinal, and urinary tract specimens using a highly automated, random access CMV PCR assay with a short turnaround time to enable early diagnosis and treatment. In the present study, clinical performance of the fully automated Alinity m analyzer in comparison to the current RealTime LDT assay was evaluated in eight different off-label sample types.

Diagnostic tests were heralded as crucial during the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic with most of the key methods using bioanalytical approaches that detected larger molecules (RNA, protein antigens or antibodies) rather than conventional clinical biochemical techniques. Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs), like the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), and other molecular methods, like sequencing (that often work in combination with NAATs), were essential to the diagnosis and management during COVID-19. This was exemplified both early in the pandemic but also later on, following the emergence of new genetic SARS-CoV-2 variants. The 100 day mission to respond to future pandemic threats highlights the need for effective diagnostics, therapeutics and vaccines. Of the three, diagnostics represents the first opportunity to manage infectious diseases while also being the most poorly supported in terms of the infrastructure needed to demonstrate effectiveness. Where performance targets exist, they are not well served by consensus on how to demonstrate they are being met; this includes analytical factors such as limit of detection (LOD) false positive results as well as how to approach clinical evaluation. The selection of gold standards or use of epidemiological factors such as predictive value, reference ranges or clinical thresholds are seldom correctly considered. The attention placed on molecular diagnostic tests during COVID-19 illustrates important considerations and assumptions on the use of these methods for infectious disease diagnosis and beyond. In this manuscript, we discuss state-of-the-art approaches to diagnostic evaluation and explore how they may be better tailored to diagnostic techniques like NAATs to maximise the impact of these highly versatile bioanalytical tools, both generally and during future outbreaks.

Accurate detection and quantification of cytomegalovirus (CMV) is crucial to preventing adverse outcomes in immunocompromised individuals. Current assays were developed for use with plasma specimens, but CMV may be present in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). We evaluated the performance of the Abbott Alinity m CMV assay compared to the Abbott RealTime CMV assay for quantification of CMV in plasma, BAL, and CSF specimens. To evaluate clinical performance, 190 plasma, 78 BAL, and 20 CSF specimens were tested with the Alinity m assay and compared to the RealTime assay. The Alinity m CMV assay showed high precision (SD <0.01 to 0.13) for all 3 specimen types. Clincal plasma and BAL specimens with quantifiable CMV DNA demonstrated strong correlation to RealTime CMV assay results (r2 = 0.9779 for plasma, r2 = 0.9373 for BAL). The Alinity m CMV assay may be useful for quantification of CMV in plasma, BAL, and CSF specimens.

BK virus (BKV) infection or reactivation in immunocompromised individuals can lead to adverse health consequences including BKV-associated nephropathy (BKVAN) in kidney transplant patients and BKV-associated hemorrhagic cystitis (BKV-HC) in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Monitoring BKV viral load plays an important role in post-transplant patient care. This study evaluates the performance of the Alinity m BKV Investigational Use Only (IUO) assay. The linearity of the Alinity m BKV IUO assay had a correlation coefficient of 1.000 and precision of SD ≤ 0.25 Log IU/mL for all panel members tested (2.0-7.3 Log IU/mL). Detection rate at 50 IU/mL was 100%. Clinical plasma specimens tested comparing Alinity m BKV IUO to ELITech MGB Alert BKV lab-developed test (LDT) on the Abbott m2000 platform using specimen extraction protocols for DNA or total nucleic acid (TNA) resulted in coefficient of correlation of 0.900 and 0.963, respectively, and mean bias of 0.03 and -0.54 Log IU/mL, respectively. Alinity m BKV IUO compared with Altona RealStar BKV and Roche cobas BKV assays demonstrated coefficient of correlation of 0.941 and 0.980, respectively, and mean bias of -0.47 and -0.31 Log IU/mL, respectively. Urine specimens tested on Alintiy m BKV IUO and ELITech BKV LDT using TNA specimen extraction had a coefficient of correlation of 0.917 and mean bias of 0.29 Log IU/mL. The Alinity m BKV IUO assay was performed with high precision across the dynamic range and correlated well with other available BKV assays.
OBJECTIVE: BK virus (BKV) in transplant patients can lead to adverse health consequences. Viral load monitoring is important in post-transplant patient care. This study evaluates the Alinity m BKV assay with currently available assays.

UNASSIGNED: On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared a pandemic caused by the recently emerged severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This led to increased clinical testing and decentralizing of this testing from provincial health laboratories to regional and private facilities. Leveraging the results from the Canadian Laboratory Response Network\'s National SARS-CoV-2 Proficiency Test (PT) Program, this study compares multiple commercial and laboratory-developed nucleic acid amplification tests, assessing both sensitivity and specificity across multiple users.
UNASSIGNED: Each panel consisted of six blinded, contrived-clinical samples. Panels were distributed to international, provincial and territorial laboratories and subsequently to partner facilities. Participating laboratories were asked to run these sample through their respective extraction/PCR workflows and submit results to the National Microbiology Laboratory, outlining the nucleic acid extraction platform and nucleic acid amplification test employed, as well as the viral gene target and Ct values or equivalent obtained. Data were compiled for each molecular platform and gene target used.
UNASSIGNED: The PT schemes were deployed in May 2020, November 2020 and June 2021, resulting in 683 data sets using 37 different nucleic acid amplification tests. Over the course of three PT schemes, the average score obtained was 99.3% by participants demonstrating consistent testing between laboratories and testing platforms.
UNASSIGNED: This study confirmed the rapid and successful implementation of a Canadian PT Program and provided comparative analysis of the various emergency use authorized and laboratory developed tests employed for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 and demonstrated an overall 99.3% test concordance nationwide.

Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) is an emerging sexually transmitted infection, which appears to be a cause of urethritis and cervicitis and has been associated with pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), epididymitis, proctitis, infertility, complications during pregnancy, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission. Three Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved tests are available. Testing should be focused to avoid inappropriate antibiotic use. The Center of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines recommend testing for persistent male urethritis, cervicitis, and proctitis and state that testing should be considered in cases of PID. Testing is also recommended for sexual contacts of patients with MG. Testing is not recommended in asymptomatic patients, including pregnant patients, who do not have a history of MG exposure. Although resistance-guided therapy is recommended, there are currently no FDA approved tests for MG macrolide resistance, and tests are not widely available in the United States. The CDC recommends 2-step treatment with doxycycline followed by azithromycin or moxifloxacin. Moxifloxacin is recommended if resistance testing is unavailable or testing demonstrates macrolide resistance..

Diagnosing osteoarticular tuberculosis (OATB) and detecting drug resistance is a challenge in an endemic country like India.
Truenat MTB Plus assay (TruPlus), a chip-based portable machine, was compared with GeneXpert Ultra (GxUltra) for diagnosing drug-resistant OATB.
115 synovial fluid and pus specimens [22 culture-positive confirmed, 58 culture-negative clinically-suspected, 35 non-TB controls] processed between 2017 and 2023 were subjected to TruPlus, GxUltra and multiplex-PCR for diagnosing OATB. They were further screened for rifampicin resistance using TruRif chip. The performance was evaluated against composite reference standard, phenotypic drug susceptibility testing and rpoB gene sequencing.
TruPlus, GxUltra and MPCR detected 77.5 %, 71.25 %, and 83.75 %, cases of OATB, respectively. TruPlus detected five additional cases missed by GxUltra. The performance of TruPlus was comparable to GxUltra (p = 0.074) and to MPCR (p = 0.074), while performance of GxUltra was significantly inferior to MPCR (p = 0.004). The overall agreement with reference standard was substantial for TruPlus and MPCR and moderate for GxUltra. Both TruRif and GxUltra reported 4 cases as rifampicin resistant.
TruPlus along with TruRif offers better sensitivity than GxUltra. Its compact and portable platform allows wider application in peripheral settings, thus making it a pragmatic solution for diagnosing OATB and its drug resistance.

Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are frequently used in Clostridioides difficile research and diagnostic testing, but the effect of freezing specimens on C. difficile NAAT performance is not well characterized. This study evaluated the concordance of NAAT results between fresh and frozen specimens (fecal and rectal swabs) and found it to be very good to excellent. The results indicate that frozen fecal and rectal swab specimens may be used for C. difficile NAAT testing in research when fresh specimens are not available.

The prompt and accurate identification of the etiological agents of viral respiratory infections is a critical measure in mitigating outbreaks. In this study, we developed and clinically evaluated a novel melting-curve-based multiplex real-time PCR (M-m-qPCR) assay targeting the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) and nucleocapsid phosphoprotein N of SARS-CoV-2, the Matrix protein 2 of the Influenza A virus, the RdRp domain of the L protein from the Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus, and the polyprotein from Rhinovirus B genes. The analytical performance of the M-m-qPCR underwent assessment using in silico analysis and a panel of reference and clinical strains, encompassing viral, bacterial, and fungal pathogens, exhibiting 100% specificity. Moreover, the assay showed a detection limit of 10 copies per reaction for all targeted pathogens using the positive controls. To validate its applicability, the assay was further tested in simulated nasal fluid spiked with the viruses mentioned above, followed by validation on nasopharyngeal swabs collected from 811 individuals. Among them, 13.4% (109/811) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, and 1.1% (9/811) tested positive for Influenza A. Notably, these results showed 100% concordance with those obtained using a commercial kit. Therefore, the M-m-qPCR exhibits great potential for the routine screening of these respiratory viral pathogens.