Background Since bilateral nasal packing entails nasal and airway obstruction, this practice consequently leads to oral breathing. The resulting hypoxemia may then negatively impact vital signs, including blood pressure (BP), blood oxygen saturation (SpO2), and heart rate (HR). These systemic effects have a detrimental effect on patients. Objective The objective of this study is to observe the effects of bilateral nasal packing on patients\' post-operative vital signs. Materials and methods This prospective study was conducted in the department of otolaryngology - head and neck surgery over a six-month period. The study included 83 post-operative patients with nasal surgery, in which bilateral merocele nasal packing was performed. The patients\' pulse oximetry, systolic and diastolic BP, and HR were recorded four times the night before and after surgery. A statistical analysis was performed, and the mean values, standard deviation, and range were calculated. A paired sample t-test was also applied. The results are presented in figures and tables. Results The mean age of the participants was 27.65 ± 10.72 years, and 56 (67.5%) were male. Septoplasty was the most common surgery performed, with 63 participants having undergone this procedure (75.9%). When the pre-operative mean values of systolic and diastolic BP, SpO2, and HR were compared with the post-operative mean values, when a bilateral nasal pack was in place, a significant increase was found in all, with a p-value of <0.001 in each. Conclusion Bilateral nasal packing affects patients\' vital signs by significantly increasing diastolic and systolic BP and decreasing SpO2. The HR is also significantly increased when packing is in place.

BACKGROUND: Correction of asymmetry and irregularity deformities with autologous grafts, without osteotomies, offers advantages to both plastic surgeons and patients with severe deviation. Various autologous tissues such as fat, bone, and cartilage grafts are viable options for this purpose.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of 3 autologous filling materials in patients with bone asymmetry.
METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was conducted on 297 patients seeking aesthetic nose surgery between 2015 and 2022. Only primary patients without prior surgery and those with bone asymmetry from trauma, with dorsum protrusion <3 mm, and without osteotomy were included. Patients were divided into fat, cartilage, and bone groups. Grafts were applied to the concave side during closed rhinoplasty, and evaluations were done 12 months after surgery by blinded plastic surgeons and patients using established assessment tools.
RESULTS: Fat, cartilage, and bone grafts were utilized in 74, 127, and 96 patients, respectively, with a mean follow-up of 19 months. The mean graft volumes were 1.0 cc (bone), 1.3 cc (cartilage), and 1.6 cc (fat). The patient self-assessment scores were 75%, 84.9%, and 86.6%, respectively. The Asher-McDade averages were 77.2%, 86.7%, and 88.4%, respectively. Cartilage and bone graft results were statistically similar in patients\' self-evaluation and significantly higher than those of fat grafts. Blinded assessments showed no significant difference between the cartilage and bone groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Placing autologous grafts on the concave side for patients with minimal nasal bone protrusion (<3 mm) yields successful results. Cartilage grafts offer advantages in volume, result estimation, and preparation time, making them suitable for larger patient cohorts.

BACKGROUND: The nose is a common site for the development of skin cancers. Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is a highly curative treatment for skin cancer of the nose. Reconstruction of MMS defects on the nose, especially on the distal aspect, can be challenging given the proximity of multiple subunits and limited adjacent tissue reservoirs. Our goal was to describe our experience using a nasal tip rotation flap (NTRF) for MMS defects on the distal nose.
METHODS: A retrospective review of all MMS cases at multiple institutions between June 2018 and June 2022 was undertaken. Cases that used an NTRF to repair the MMS defect(s) were selected, and data were collected on patient demographics, tumor type, anatomical location of the tumor, preoperative and postoperative size, number of stages needed to clear the tumor, repair dimensions, and any postoperative complications.
RESULTS: A total of 66 cases that utilized an NTRF for reconstruction were included. The mean preoperative tumor size was 0.8 cm (range: 0.3-1.6 cm), and the mean defect size was 1.2 cm (range: 0.7-1.9 cm). The defects were most commonly on the nasal tip. There were no significant complications observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The nasal tip rotation flap is a reliable reconstruction option for MMS defects of the distal nose. This flap can be used for defects that involve the nasal tip, soft triangle, and/or portions of the ala, including the alar rim.

BACKGROUND: Limited treatment options exist for refractory Rhinitis Medicamentosa (RM). The role of surgery after failed medical management is not well defined. Mucosal contact points and restricted airflow often perpetuate decongestant use. This study assessed the long-term outcomes of nasal surgery in patients with refractory RM.
METHODS: A prospective cohort study of refractory RM treated with nasal surgery was performed with ≥12 months follow-up. Refractory RM was defined as nasal decongestant use once per day continuously for ≥4 weeks despite medical therapy. Patients with concomitant sinus disease and nonrhinitis conditions were excluded. Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT22), Nasal Symptom Score (NSS), and nasal medication use were assessed. Patients who ceased decongestants were compared with ongoing users.
RESULTS: A total of 56 patients (age 48.4 [5.0] years, 50% female) were assessed. Median follow-up was 3.4(1.6-6.2) years. Total cessation of decongestants was achieved in 91.1%, while 5.4% had intermittent use, and 3.6% reported daily use. Ongoing users had higher odds of concomitant asthma (40.0% vs. 3.9%; odds ratio [OR], 16.33 [1.7-159.75]; p = 0.036), reduced symptom improvement (ΔSNOT22, -4.6 [15.7] vs. 27.1 [17], p = 0.009 and ΔNSS, -1.0 [4.2] vs. -6.6 [5.1], p = 0.025), and greater ongoing use of nasal corticosteroid (60.0% vs. 5.9%; OR 24.0 [2.8-203.1]) and saline sprays (40% vs. 3.9%; OR 16.3 [1.7-159.8]) but showed no difference in allergy status (OR, 0.7[0.1-7.1]), previous surgery (OR, 1.0[0.1-10.2]), gastroesophageal reflux (OR 1.0[0.1-10.2], or underlying anxiety/depression (OR 6.1[0.8-45.9]) compared with those who ceased.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgically re-establishing a nasal airway was associated with long-term decongestant cessation and symptom improvement in medically refractory RM.

BACKGROUND: Septoplasty is one of the most common surgeries performed by otorhinolaryngologists. The gold standard for the evaluation of septal deviation is anterior rhinoscopy and nasal endoscopy. Frequently, computed tomography (CT) is also performed, although the correlation between septal deviation on CT and physical examination is unclear.
OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship between symptoms and physical and radiological evaluation in patients who underwent septoplasty.
METHODS: A prospective study of patients with nasal obstruction and septal deviation who underwent septoplasty. Anterior rhinoscopy and nasal endoscopy were performed by the surgeon, and the CT was evaluated by a radiologist. The degree of obstruction was evaluated in three distinct septal locations. The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score was used before the surgery and two months after the surgery.
RESULTS: The study included 43 patients, of whom 60.5% were male, with an average age of 37.09 years (±12.56). The degree of septal deviation in the physical examination was significantly different from that observed in CT (p˂0.05). Cartilaginous or maxillary crest septal deviations >75% were more commonly recognized by physical examination, while osseous septum deviations of 25%-50% were more easily detected by CT. There was no difference between the degree of septal deviation and the preoperative NOSE. The median preoperative NOSE was 60, and the postoperative was 5, with significant improvement (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: CT doesn\'t appear to be useful in the evaluation of septal deviation since it is different from the findings of a physical examination and isn\'t associated with the NOSE score. Clinical decisions should be based on a physical examination and patient complaints.

Merkel cell carcinoma is a pathologic diagnosis mainly observed in sun-exposed cutaneous areas, like the head and neck. Ultraviolet (UV) exposure and immunosuppression are the common predisposing factors. Merkel cell carcinoma of the head and neck is quite an uncommon disease. This case report involves a 56-year-old man who exhibited a skin lesion on the nasal dorsum with a mass in the right maxillary sinus. The biopsies from both sides were diagnostic for Merkel cell carcinoma. The patient underwent endoscopic sinus surgery and removal of the skin lesion with free margins. The patient has been free of disease for the last 20 months now and maintains follow-up with endoscopy and imaging in the Ear Nose Throat office. Only a few cases of Merkel cell carcinoma of the nasal mucosa have been reported in the literature. We report our approach and management of this rare pathologic presentation.

Neurinomas in the nose and the nasal sinuses are rare. In the present work, we present an exceedingly rare case of a disfiguring neurinoma involving the nasal columella. Treatment of choice is complete resection of the tumor. For an optimal view for tumor resection and esthetic and functional reconstruction, we recommend an open surgical approach.

Revision rhinoplasties and saddle nose deformities usually require grafting for reconstruction. Between January 1, 2000, and January 1, 2017, autologous rib grafts were used in 127 secondary and tertiary rhinoplasty patients [(57/127 females) and (70/127 males)]. Osseous-cartilaginous rib grafts (OCRGs) were divided into three parts (i.e., 1/3 upper peripheral, 1/3 central, and 1/3 lower peripheral). The harvested OCRGs were also shaped as vertical strips using a number 11 scalpel blade. These OCRGs were shaped to form the L-strut cartilaginous graft (LSCGs), osseous-cartilaginous spreader grafts (OCSGs), osseous-cartilaginous onlay grafts, nasal valve grafts (NVGs), and lower lateral cartilaginous grafts (LLCGs). The upper peripheral portion of the rib was usually used as an onlay graft for dorsal reshaping. The shape of this part was minimally convex after being cut from the main graft, and the convex shape was very appropriate for use as an onlay graft. The middle portion of the graft that consisted of the osseous and cartilaginous structure was used for the OCSGs. The middle portion of the graft that contained only cartilage was used for the LSCGs, NVGs, and LLCGs. OCRGs were used for the dorsal, alar, septal, upper lateral, and columellar struts for all patients. OCSGs were used for all of the septal grafts to provide further stability. In the nasal valve failure patients, the rib cartilage was fixed onto the lower lateral and upper lateral cartilage and was sutured using polyglactin to improve nasal valve function. One edge of the graft was sutured over the septum, and the other edge was positioned against the maxillary crest to allow for air flow at the nasal valve. After an OCSG was sutured to the septum, a flat and smooth dorsum was shaped before the dorsal onlay graft was placed and fixed. The bone fragments of the grafts that consisted of spreader and onlay grafts were tied to the radix nasi bone without any space. After 6 months of follow-up, a minimally warping defect was apparent in 8 patients but none of these patients requested another surgery. The analysis of the questionnaire responses revealed that >90% of the patients were satisfied with the outcome of the procedure. Level of evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .