Second allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT2) is potentially curative for adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic neoplasm (MDS)/AML experiencing relapse after a first allograft (HCT1), but prognostic factors for outcomes are poorly characterized. To provide a detailed analysis of HCT2 outcomes and associated prognostic factors in a large single-center cohort, with a focus on identifying predictors of relapse and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). We studied adults ≥18 years who underwent HCT2 at a single institution between April 2006 and June 2022 for relapsed AML (n = 73) or MDS/AML (n = 8). With a median follow-up among survivors of 74.0 (range: 10.4 to 187.3) months, there were 30 relapses and 57 deaths, of which 29 were NRM events, contributing to the estimates for relapse, overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and NRM. Three-year estimates for relapse, RFS, and OS were 37% (95% confidence interval: 27% to 48%), 32% (23% to 44%), and 35% (26% to 47%). The rate of NRM at 100 days and 18 months was 20% (12% to 29%) and 28% (19% to 39%). Outcomes differed markedly across patient subsets and were substantially worse for patients who underwent HCT2 with active disease (ie, morphologic evidence of bone marrow and/or extramedullary disease), for patients who relapsed ≤6 months after HCT1, and for patients with higher HCT-specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI) or treatment-related mortality (TRM) scores. After multivariable adjustment, active disease was associated with a higher risk of relapse (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.19, P = .006) and shorter RFS (HR = 2.41, P = .008) as well as OS (HR = 2.17, P = .027) compared to transplant in morphologic remission without multiparameter flow cytometric evidence of measurable residual disease. Similarly, a relapse-free interval ≤6 months after the first allograft was associated with higher risk of relapse (HR = 5.86, P < .001) and shorter RFS (HR = 2.86; P = .001) and OS (HR = 2.45, P = .003). Additionally, a high HCT-CI score was associated with increased NRM (HR = 4.30, P = .035), and shorter RFS (HR = 3.87, P = .003) and OS (HR = 3.74, P = .006). Likewise, higher TRM scores were associated with increased risk of relapse (HR = 2.27; P = .024) and NRM (HR = 2.01, P = .001), and inferior RFS (HR = 1.90 P = .001) and OS (HR = 1.88, P = .001). A significant subset of patients with AML or MDS/AML relapse after HCT1 are alive and leukemia-free 3 years after undergoing HCT2. Our study identifies active leukemia at the time of HCT2 and early relapse after HCT1 as major adverse prognostic factors, highlighting patient subsets in particular need of novel therapeutic approaches, and supports the use of the HCT-CI and TRM scores for outcome prognostication.

Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurs frequently after haplo-identical allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy), increasing nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and decreasing survival. Data on CRS in HLA-matched alloSCT are limited and effects of specific HLA-mismatches on CRS development unknown. We hypothesized that in HLA-matched alloSCT increasing degrees of HLA-mismatching influence CRS incidence, NRM and survival. Retrospective analysis of 126 HLA-matched PTCy-alloSCT patients showed that higher degrees of HLA-mismatching significantly increased CRS incidence (26%, 75% and 90% CRS with 12/12, 10/10 and 9/10 matched donors, respectively). Maximum temperature during CRS increased with higher HLA-mismatch. Specific associations between HLA-mismatches and CRS could be determined. Grade 2 CRS and CRS-induced grade 3 fever were associated with significantly increased NRM (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively) and inferior survival (p < 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). NRM was mainly caused by disease conditions that may be considered CRS-induced inflammatory responses (encephalopathy, cryptogenic organizing pneumonia and multi-organ failure).

Despite therapeutic advances for acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) with the emergence of all-trans retinoic acid, arsenic trioxide, and gemtuzumab-ozogamycin, approximately 10% of patients still experience disease relapse, typically occurring within 24 to 36 months following completion of front-line treatment. Traditionally, both allogeneic (allo) and autologous (auto) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) have been considered reasonable treatment options for relapsed APL; however, no randomized controlled studies have been conducted comparing allo-HCT and auto-HCT in patients with relapsed APL. We performed a systematic review/meta-analysis to assess the totality of evidence pertaining to allo-HCT or auto-HCT in relapsed APL. Our search identified 1158 references, of which 23 met our inclusion criteria. While acknowledging the limitations of comparing these 2 treatment modalities indirectly, based on results from separate meta-analyses, it appears that pooled rates of event-free survival (71% versus 54%), progression-free survival (63% versus 43%), and overall survival (82% versus 58%) are higher after auto-HCT. This difference can be explained in part by the higher risk of pooled nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in patients undergoing allo-HCT (29% versus 5%), owing to inherent risks associated with this modality. In the absence of a randomized prospective clinical trial comparing allo-HCT and auto-HCT, our results show that both modalities are acceptable in patients with relapsed APL. The higher pooled NRM rate with allo-HCT is an important consideration when choosing this option. Additionally, the comparable pooled relapse rate for auto-HCT and allo-HCT (24% versus 23%) provides a rationale for evaluating post-HCT consolidative strategies to mitigate this risk.

Tacrolimus (TAC) plus short-term methotrexate (stMTX) is used for graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). TAC blood concentrations are frequently adjusted to enhance the graft-versus-leukemia/lymphoma effect or attenuate severe GVHD. Limited information is available on the clinical impact of these adjustments and the optimal time to perform them in order to achieve good clinical outcomes.
We retrospectively analyzed 211 patients who underwent allo-HSCT at our institutes.
Higher TAC concentrations in week 3 correlated with a significantly higher cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) (P = 0.03) and lower nonrelapse mortality (P = 0.04). The clinical impact of high TAC concentrations in week 3 on CIR was detected in the refined disease risk index: low/intermediate (P = 0.04) and high (P < 0.01), and conditioning regimens other than cyclophosphamide/total body irradiation and busulfan/cyclophosphamide (P = 0.07). Higher TAC concentrations in week 1 correlated with a lower grade 2-4 acute GVHD rate (P = 0.01). Higher TAC concentrations in weeks 2 and 3 correlated with slightly lower (P = 0.05) and significantly lower (P = 0.02) grade 3-4 acute GVHD rates, respectively. Higher TAC concentrations in weeks 1 and 3 were beneficial for severe acute GVHD in patients with a human leukocyte antigen-matched donor (P = 0.03 and P < 0.01, respectively), not treated with anti-thymocyte globulin (P = 0.02 and P = 0.02, respectively), and receiving three stMTX doses (P = 0.03 and P = 0.02, respectively).
The clinical impact of TAC concentrations varied according to patient characteristics, including disease malignancy, conditioning regimens, donor sources, and GVHD prophylaxis. These results suggest that TAC management needs to be based on patient profiles.

The overall response rate (ORR) 28 days after treatment has been adopted as the primary endpoint for clinical trials of acute graft versus host disease (GVHD). However, physicians often need to modify immunosuppression earlier than day (D) 28, and non-relapse mortality (NRM) does not always correlate with ORR at D28. We studied 1144 patients that received systemic treatment for GVHD in the Mount Sinai Acute GVHD International Consortium (MAGIC) and divided them into a training set (n=764) and a validation set (n=380). We used a recursive partitioning algorithm to create a Mount Sinai model that classifies patients into favorable or unfavorable groups that predicted 12 month NRM according to overall GVHD grade at both onset and D14. In the Mount Sinai model grade II GVHD at D14 was unfavorable for grade III/IV GVHD at onset and predicted NRM as well as the D28 standard response model. The MAGIC algorithm probability (MAP) is a validated score that combines the serum concentrations of suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (ST2) and regenerating islet-derived 3-alpha (REG3α) to predict NRM. Inclusion of the D14 MAP biomarker score with the D14 Mount Sinai model created three distinct groups (good, intermediate, poor) with strikingly different NRM (8%, 35%, 76% respectively). This D14 MAGIC model displayed better AUC, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive value, and net benefit in decision curve analysis compared to the D28 standard response model. We conclude that this D14 MAGIC model could be useful in therapeutic decisions and may offer an improved endpoint for clinical trials of acute GVHD treatment.

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), negatively impacting quality of life (QoL) and increasing the risk of death. Complexity in cGVHD diagnosis and treatment causes significant variations in cGVHD management strategies across medical centers and physicians despite the existence of published guidelines. Thus, we hypothesized that center volume is associated with cGVHD incidence and outcomes after cGVHD develops. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of center volume on the incidence of cGVHD in patients who underwent HSCT and outcomes in patients with cGVHD. Our retrospective study included 28,786 patients who underwent their first HSCT (overall cohort) and 7664 who developed cGVHD (cGVHD cohort). We categorized institutions into quartiles (very low, low, high, and very high) using the number of HSCTs performed during the study period. We assessed cGVHD incidence in overall cohort and overall survival (OS) in cGVHD cohort. The very high-volume group showed significantly higher cGVHD incidence (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.30 to 1.46) compared to the very low-volume group. However, the cGVHD incidence was similar among very low-, low- and high-volume groups. Low, high, and very high-volume groups showed significantly higher OS with adjusted HRs of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.73 to 0.94), 0.69 (95% CI: 0.61 to 0.79), and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.60 to 0.76), respectively, compared with the very low-volume group. In conclusion, we revealed a higher incidence of cGVHD in the very high-volume group and a poor survival outcome in the very low-volume group in patients with cGVHD.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major infectious complication following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). Although letermovir (LMV) prophylaxis dramatically reduces the incidence of early clinically significant CMV (csCMV) infection, it remains unclear whether it has a beneficial effect on nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and overall survival (OS). Herein, we evaluated the impact of LMV prophylaxis on posttransplant outcomes using the registry database of the Japanese Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Adult patients who underwent allo-HCT between 2017 and 2019 were analyzed (n = 6004). LMV prophylaxis was administered to 1640 patients (LMV group) and it significantly reduced the incidence of csCMV infection compared with those not administered LMV prophylaxis (15.4% vs 54.1%; p < 0.01). However, it did not improve the 1-year NRM (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; p = 0.40) and OS (HR, 0.96; p = 0.49). In the LMV group, 74 patients had breakthrough csCMV infection and showed inferior NRM (HR, 3.44; p < 0.01) and OS (HR, 1.93; p = 0.02) compared with those without infection. After completing LMV prophylaxis, 252 patients had late csCMV infection and showed inferior NRM (HR, 1.83; p < 0.01) and OS (HR, 1.58; p < 0.01). Our findings suggest that managing breakthrough and late csCMV infections is important for improving long-term outcomes.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation is a major cause of morbidity and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) in pediatric allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) recipients. Approximately 80% of CMV seropositive alloHCT recipients will experience CMV reactivation without prophylaxis. The impacts of ganciclovir prophylaxis and subsequent CMV viremia on 1-year survival and 1-year NRM are unknown. The primary objective of this study was to determine the effect of CMV viremia on the probability of 1-year survival and 1-year NRM in pediatric alloSCT recipients receiving 100 days of ganciclovir prophylaxis. The secondary objective was to determine the effect of other risk factors on 1-year survival and 1-year NRM. All patients age 0 to 26 years who underwent alloSCT between June 2011 and May 2020 and received ganciclovir prophylaxis for 100 days at Westchester Medical Center, an academic medical center, were analyzed. Ganciclovir was administered to at-risk alloSCT recipients (donor and or recipient CMV+ serostatus) as 5 mg/kg every 12 hours from the first day of conditioning through day -1 (recipient CMV+ only) followed by 6 mg/kg every 24 hours on Monday through Friday beginning on the day of an absolute neutrophil count >750/mm3 and continuing through day +100. National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events 5.0 criteria were used to grade toxicity. NRM was analyzed using competing survival analysis with relapse death as a competing event. The log-rank and Gray tests were performed to compare the 1-year survival probabilities and NRM cumulative incidence between patients who experienced CMV viremia post-alloSCT and those who did not. Univariate Cox regression analysis was performed for the following risk factors: CMV viremia, donor source, sex, malignant disease, disease risk index, conditioning intensity, receipt of rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG)/alemtuzumab, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, CMV donor/recipient serostatus, grade II-IV acute GVHD, and grade 3/4 neutropenia necessitating discontinuation of ganciclovir, treating the last 3 factors as time-dependent covariates. Those with P values < .2 were included in the multivariate Cox regression analysis. Eighty-four alloSCT recipients (41 males, 43 females; median age, 10.8 years [range, .4 to 24.4 years]) were analyzed. Multivariate analysis showed significantly lower 1-year survival and significantly higher 1-year NRM in patients who developed CMV viremia compared to those who did not (P = .0036). No other risk factors were significantly associated with 1-year survival or 1-year NRM. One-year survival was significantly decreased and 1-year NRM was significantly increased in pediatric alloSCT recipients who developed CMV viremia following ganciclovir prophylaxis. No other risk factors were found to be associated with 1-year survival or 1-year NRM. Alternative CMV prophylaxis regimens that reduce CMV viremia should be investigated in pediatric alloSCT recipients at risk for CMV infection.

The Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) is a laboratory-based score used to estimate endothelial damage occurring after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The EASIX score exhibits dynamic changes during the course of transplantation and has been identified as a predictor of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and worse overall survival (OS) in studies focused mainly on patients who received matched related or unrelated donor allogeneic HCT. However, the role of EASIX score in the setting of cord blood transplantation (CBT) is unclear. This study examined the association between pretransplant EASIX score and post-transplantation outcomes in adult patients undergoing single-unit CBT. We retrospectively evaluated the impact of EASIX score at different time points on post-transplantation outcomes in adults following single-unit unrelated CBT between 1998 and 2022 at our institution. EASIX scores were calculated at the start of conditioning (EASIX-PRE), at day 30 post-CBT (EASIX-d30), at day 100 post-CBT (EASIX-d100), and at the onset of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (EASIX-GVHD II-IV). A total of 317 patients were included in this study. In the multivariate analysis, log2-EASIX-PRE (continuous variable) was significantly associated with lower risks of neutrophil engraftment (hazard ratio [HR], .87; 95% confidence interval [CI], .80 to .94; P < .001) and platelet engraftment (HR, .91; 95% CI, .83 to .99; P = .047), lower risk of grade II-IV acute GVHD (HR, .85; 95% CI, .76 to .94; P = .003), and higher risk of veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS) (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.02; P = .032). Log2-EASIX-PRE also was significantly associated with higher NRM (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.86; P = .011) and worse OS (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.46; P = .003), but not with relapse (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, .88 to 1.18; P = .780). Similarly, log2-EASIX-d30 (HR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.26 to 2.05; P < .001), and log2-EASIX-d100 (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.63 to 2.48; P < .001) were also significantly associated with higher NRM, but log2-EASIX-GVHD II-IV was not (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, .85 to 1.55; P = .360). Pretransplantation EASIX score is a powerful predictor of engraftment, VOS/SOS, NRM, and OS in adult patients undergoing single-unit unrelated CBT who mainly received intensified conditioning regimens. EASIX is an easily evaluable and dynamic prognostic score for accurately predicting post-transplantation outcomes in patients at any time during the course of allogeneic HCT, particularly for CBT.

OBJECTIVE: High-dose total body irradiation (TBI) is considered a cornerstone of myeloablative conditioning for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). We retrospectively compared the main outcomes of an HLA matched or 1-allele mismatched related or unrelated allo-SCT in adult patients affected by acute leukemia (AL) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).
METHODS: Fifty-nine patients received cyclophosphamide (Cy)-TBI (13.5 Gy) and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with a calcineurin-inhibitor plus methrotrexate (CyTBI group) and 28 patients received fludarabine-TBI (8.8-13.5 Gy) and GVHD prophylaxis with PTCy and tacrolimus (FluTBI-PTCy group).
RESULTS: Median follow-up for survivors was 82 and 22 months. The 12-month probability of overall survival and progression-free survival were similar (p = .18, p = .7). The incidence of Grades 2-4 and 3-4 acute GVHD, and the incidence of moderate-to-severe chronic GVHD were higher in the CyTBI group (p = .02, p < .01and p = .03). Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at 12 months posttransplant was higher in the CyTBI group (p = 0.05), while the incidence of relapse was similar in both groups (p = 0.7). The number of GVHD-free and relapse-free patients without systemic immunosuppression (GRFS) at 1-year posttransplant was higher in the FluTBI-PTCy group (p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The study confirms the safety and efficacy of a novel FluTBI-PTCy platform with reduced incidence of severe acute and chronic GVHD, and early improvement of NRM.