Nonoperative management failure

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非手术治疗(NOM)是血液动力学稳定的钝性脾损伤(BSI)的标准治疗方法。然而,NOM失败是发病率和死亡率的重要来源。我们开发了BSI中NOM失败的临床风险评分系统。
    分析了2008年至2018年日本创伤数据库的数据。符合条件的患者仅限于接受高级别BSI(器官损伤量表≥3)的NOM患者。主要结果是基于风险估计的NOM失败的预测评分。
    本分析包括1651例患者,其中110例(6.7%)患者出现NOM失败.多变量分析确定了与失败的NOM相关的七个变量:收缩压,格拉斯哥昏迷量表,伤害严重程度评分,其他伴随的腹部损伤,骨盆损伤,高档BSI,和血管栓塞。开发了一个8分的预测评分,其截止值大于5分(特异性,98.2%;灵敏度,25.5%),曲线下面积为0.81。
    临床预测评分具有良好的预测NOM失败的能力,可能有助于外科医生为BSI做出更好的决策。
    UNASSIGNED: Nonoperative management (NOM) is the standard treatment for hemodynamically stable blunt splenic injury (BSI). However, NOM failure is a significant source of morbidity and mortality. We developed a clinical risk scoring system for NOM failure in BSI.
    UNASSIGNED: Data from the Japanese Trauma Data Bank from 2008 to 2018 were analyzed. Eligible patients were restricted to those who underwent NOM with high-grade BSI (Organ Injury Scale ≥3). The primary outcome was a predictive score for NOM failure based on risk estimation.
    UNASSIGNED: There were 1651 patients included in this analysis, among whom 110 (6.7%) patients had NOM failure. Multivariate analysis identified seven variables associated with failed NOM: systolic blood pressure, Glasgow coma scale, Injury Severity Score, other concomitant abdominal injury, pelvic injury, high-grade BSI, and angioembolization. An eight-point predictive score was developed with a cut-off of greater than 5 points (specificity, 98.2%; sensitivity, 25.5%) with an area under the curve of 0.81.
    UNASSIGNED: The clinical predictive score had good ability to predict NOM failure and may help surgeons to make better decisions for BSI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Angioembolization (AE) is an adjunct to nonoperative management (NOM) of splenic injuries. We hypothesize that failure of AE is associated with blood transfusion, grade of injury, and technique of AE.
    We performed a retrospective (2010-2017) multicenter study (nine Level I trauma centers) of adult trauma patients with splenic injuries who underwent splenic AE. Variables included patient physiology, injury grade, transfusion requirement, and embolization technique. The primary outcome was NOM failure requiring splenectomy. Secondary outcomes were mortality, complications, and length of stay.
    A total of 409 patients met inclusion criteria; only 33 patients (8%) required delayed splenectomy. Patients who failed received more blood in the first 24 h (P = 0.009) and more often received massive transfusion (P = 0.01). There was no difference in failure rates for grade of injury, contrast blush on computed tomography, and branch embolized. After logistic regression, transfusion in the first 24 h was independently associated with failure of NOM (P = 0.02). Patients who failed NOM had more complications (P = 0.002) and spent more days in the intensive care unit (P < 0.0001), on the ventilator (P = 0.0001), and in the hospital (P < 0.0001). Patients who failed NOM had a higher mortality (15% versus 3%, P = 0.007), and delayed splenectomy was independently associated with mortality (odds ratio, 4.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-14.7; P = 0.03).
    AE for splenic injury leads to effective NOM in 92% of patients. Transfusion in the first 24 h is independently associated with failure of NOM. Patients who required a delayed splenectomy suffered more complications and had higher hospital length of stay. Failure of NOM is independently associated with a fourfold increase in mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号