Next generation risk assessment

下一代风险评估
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    下一代风险评估(NGRA)是一种暴露主导的安全评估方法,使用新方法方法(NAM)。NGRA的应用主要限于消费者使用化妆品的评估,目前尚未在职业安全评估中实施,例如,根据欧盟协议。相比之下,大部分监管人员的安全评估是以实验动物的毒理学研究为基础的。因此,职业安全评估是一个将受益于NGRA越来越多地应用于安全决策的领域。这里,制定了在职业安全背景下进行NGRA的工作流程,用案例研究化学品说明;2-羟基乙烷磺酸钠(羟乙基磺酸钠或SI)。在对SI进行全面的生命周期评估并考虑特定工厂的数据之后,使用标准职业暴露模型来估算暴露。然后,使用基于生理的动力学(PBK)模型将该模型的输出用于估计内部暴露,它是用SI特异性吸收构造的,Distribution,代谢和排泄(ADME)数据。PBK建模表明,在整个SI生命周期中,最坏情况下的血浆最大浓度(Cmax)为0.8μM。SI生物活性在一系列与全身相关的NAM中进行评估,生殖,和发育毒性;细胞应激小组,三种细胞系(HepG2,HepaRG和MCF-7细胞)中的高通量转录组学,与发育毒性相关的药理学分析和特异性测定(Reprotracker和devTOXquickPredict)。SI的出发点(PoD)范围为104-544µM。将从职业暴露于SI的PBK建模中获得的Cmax值与生物活性测定中的PoD进行比较,以得出生物活性暴露比(BERs),这证明了在当前工厂特定风险管理水平下,暴露于SI的工人的安全性。总之,这里开发的分层和迭代工作流程为整合非动物方法提供了一个机会,用于需要进行系统工作人员安全评估的大量物质。可以遵循这种方法,以确保动物测试仅作为“最后手段”进行,例如根据EUREACH。
    Next Generation Risk Assessment (NGRA) is an exposure-led approach to safety assessment that uses New Approach Methodologies (NAMs). Application of NGRA has been largely restricted to assessments of consumer use of cosmetics and is not currently implemented in occupational safety assessments, e.g. under EU REACH. By contrast, a large proportion of regulatory worker safety assessments are underpinned by toxicological studies using experimental animals. Consequently, occupational safety assessment represents an area that would benefit from increasing application of NGRA to safety decision making. Here, a workflow for conducting NGRA under an occupational safety context was developed, which is illustrated with a case study chemical; sodium 2-hydroxyethane sulphonate (sodium isethionate or SI). Exposures were estimated using a standard occupational exposure model following a comprehensive life cycle assessment of SI and considering factory-specific data. Outputs of this model were then used to estimate internal exposures using a Physiologically Based Kinetic (PBK) model, which was constructed with SI specific Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism and Excretion (ADME) data. PBK modelling indicated a worst-case plasma maximum concentration (Cmax) of 0.8 μM across the SI life cycle. SI bioactivity was assessed in a battery of NAMs relevant to systemic, reproductive, and developmental toxicity; a cell stress panel, high throughput transcriptomics in three cell lines (HepG2, HepaRG and MCF-7 cells), pharmacological profiling and specific assays relating to developmental toxicity (Reprotracker and devTOX quickPredict). Points of Departure (PoDs) for SI ranged from 104 to 5044 µM. Cmax values obtained from PBK modelling of occupational exposures to SI were compared with PoDs from the bioactivity assays to derive Bioactivity Exposure Ratios (BERs) which demonstrated the safety for workers exposed to SI under current levels of factory specific risk management. In summary, the tiered and iterative workflow developed here represents an opportunity for integrating non animal approaches for a large subset of substances for which systemic worker safety assessment is required. Such an approach could be followed to ensure that animal testing is only conducted as a \"last resort\" e.g. under EU REACH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    植物提取物,广泛用于化妆品,由于其复杂的成分,对安全评估提出了挑战。毒理学关注阈值(TTC)方法,提供化妆品成分的安全暴露水平,被证明是确保低暴露水平化妆品成分安全的有前途的解决方案。我们评估了芍药根提取物(PLR)的安全性,常用于皮肤调理产品,与TTC。我们从美国农业部数据库和文献探索中鉴定了50种PLR提取物的成分。PLR提取物的每种成分的浓度用美国农业部参考文献的信息确定,文学,和实验分析。分别在体外和计算机上评估了PLR及其成分的遗传毒性。PLR提取物的组分的Cramer类使用ChemTuns®用Toxtree3.1扩展决策树确定。估算了含有1%浓度PLR的免洗型化妆品中每种成分的全身暴露,并与相应的TTC阈值进行比较。使用硅片工具进一步分析了超过TTC阈值的两种成分的皮肤吸收,这证实了PLR提取物在化妆品中的安全性。总的来说,我们证明了TTC是评估化妆品中植物提取物安全性的有用工具。
    Botanical extracts, widely used in cosmetics, pose a challenge to safety assessment due to their complex compositions. The threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) approach, offering a safe exposure level for cosmetic ingredients, proves to be a promising solution for ensuring the safety of cosmetic ingredients with low exposure level. We assessed the safety of Paeonia lactiflora root extract (PLR), commonly used in skin conditioning products, with the TTC. We identified 50 constituents of PLR extract from the USDA database and literature exploration. Concentration of each constituent of PLR extract was determined with the information from USDA references, literature, and experimental analysis. The genotoxicity of PLR and its constituents was assessed in vitro and in silico respectively. Cramer class of the constituents of the PLR extract was determined with Toxtree 3.1 extended decision tree using ChemTunes®. Systemic exposure of each constituent from leave-on type cosmetic products containing PLR at a 1% concentration was estimated and compared with respective TTC threshold. Two constituents exceeding TTC threshold were further analyzed for dermal absorption using in silico tools, which confirmed the safety of PLR extract in cosmetics. Collectively, we demonstrated that the TTC is a useful tool for assessing botanical extract safety in cosmetics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    下一代风险评估(NGRA)旨在将新方法方法(NAM)实施到风险评估中,并仅作为最后的手段在动物中进行新的体内测试。然而,各种技术和监管障碍阻碍了它们的监管实施。关于公众期望的假设可能会成为接受NAM的障碍。这项研究旨在调查公众对动物试验和潜在替代品的看法,即体外和计算机模拟测试。进行了在线调查(N=965)。结果表明,人们需要权衡取舍,当他们经历关于体内测试的负面影响时,这在一定程度上可以解释他们对某些替代方案的开放性。体外测试被认为是确定不同终点化学品有害影响的最高能力,其次是体内和电脑测试。我们的结果进一步表明,许多人接受只有替代品才能测试的化学品,对家庭消费产品的接受度最高,食品接触材料或建筑材料,对药品和食品的接受度较低。本文讨论了公众认知可能带来的潜在挑战,因此,有助于自下而上的举措,以克服在监管风险评估中实施NAM的障碍。
    Next-Generation Risk Assessment (NGRA) aims to implement New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) into risk assessment and to rely on new in vivo testing in animals only as a last resort. However, various technical and regulatory hurdles impede their regulatory implementation. Assumptions about the public\'s expectations could act as barriers to the acceptance of NAMs. This study aimed at investigating public views of animal testing and potential alternatives, namely in vitro and in silico testing. An online survey was conducted (N = 965). The results suggest that people make trade-offs, as they experience negative affect regarding in vivo testing, which partly might explain their openness regarding certain alternatives. In vitro tests were attributed the highest ability to determine harmful effects of chemicals for different endpoints, followed by in vivo and in silico tests. Our results further showed that many people accept chemicals to be only tested with alternatives, with highest acceptance for household consumer products, food contact material or building materials and less accepting for medicines and foods. This article addresses potential challenges that might arise from public perceptions and thus, contributes to the bottom-up initiatives to overcome the hurdles to the implementation of NAMs in regulatory risk assessment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    简介:不良结果路径(AOP)可以支持内分泌干扰物(ED)的测试和评估。有,然而,需要进一步发展AOP框架,以提高其在监管背景下的适用性。在这里,我们列出了AOP-wiki,以确定所有现有的与雌激素破坏引起的哺乳动物生殖毒性相关的AOP,雄激素,和类固醇生成模式。还确定了相关AOP之间共享的核心关键事件(KE),以帮助进一步发展AOP网络(AOPN)。方法:采用两种不同方法的系统方法筛选和搜索整个AOP-wiki库。使用Cytoscape可视化AOPN。进行手动细化以去除没有任何KE和/或KER的AOPS。结果:最初鉴定出58种与哺乳动物生殖毒性相关的AOPs,最终AOPN中包含42个AOPs。KE和KE关系(KER)中的几个描述了类似的事件,并且因此被合并以优化AOPN构造。与激素水平或激素活性的影响有关的16个子网络,癌症结果,男性和女性生殖系统,在AOPN中确定了对生育力和生殖的总体影响。26个KER和11个KER被确定为AOPN的核心知识块,其中19个核心KE已经作为当前OECD和美国EPA测试指南的参数。讨论:AOPN强调了知识差距,这些知识差距可以用于进一步开发更完整的AOPN,以支持ED的识别和评估。
    Introduction: Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) can support both testing and assessment of endocrine disruptors (EDs). There is, however, a need for further development of the AOP framework to improve its applicability in a regulatory context. Here we have inventoried the AOP-wiki to identify all existing AOPs related to mammalian reproductive toxicity arising from disruption to the estrogen, androgen, and steroidogenesis modalities. Core key events (KEs) shared between relevant AOPs were also identified to aid in further AOP network (AOPN) development. Methods: A systematic approach using two different methods was applied to screen and search the entire AOP-wiki library. An AOPN was visualized using Cytoscape. Manual refinement was performed to remove AOPS devoid of any KEs and/or KERs. Results: Fifty-eight AOPs relevant for mammalian reproductive toxicity were originally identified, with 42 AOPs included in the final AOPN. Several of the KEs and KE relationships (KERs) described similar events and were thus merged to optimize AOPN construction. Sixteen sub-networks related to effects on hormone levels or hormone activity, cancer outcomes, male and female reproductive systems, and overall effects on fertility and reproduction were identified within the AOPN. Twenty-six KEs and 11 KERs were identified as core blocks of knowledge in the AOPN, of which 19 core KEs are already included as parameters in current OECD and US EPA test guidelines. Discussion: The AOPN highlights knowledge gaps that can be targeted for further development of a more complete AOPN that can support the identification and assessment of EDs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    内分泌干扰物(ED)对人类健康和环境构成严重威胁,需要进行全面评估才能确定。ED的识别需要大量的数据,在体外和体内,由于欧盟目前的科学标准。同时,由于担心动物福利和动物研究的敏感性,以充分检测与人类健康相关的不利影响,欧盟努力减少动物试验。全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)是一种持久性有机污染物,根据学术研究,然而,从监管的角度来看,这并不是这样确定的。以前已经表明,全氟辛烷磺酸有可能引起神经毒性以及影响甲状腺系统,众所周知,特定的甲状腺激素水平在大脑发育过程中至关重要。在这项工作中,目的是评估一种基于机制的方法,以基于不良结果途径(AOP)框架并使用新方法(NAM)来识别全氟辛烷磺酸的ED特性,通过将这种方法与基于当前可用指导文件的ED评估进行比较。为甲状腺模态生成AOP网络(AOPN),并鉴定了导致发育神经毒性(DNT)的AOP。基于AOPN的文献检索和筛选过程,和系统的审查方法,被执行,其次是严格的证据权重(WoE)评估。证据被映射回用于文献检索的AOPN,确定全氟辛烷磺酸可能的内分泌行动模式和两次评估中的数据差距。可以得出结论,全氟辛烷磺酸符合标准ED评估中ED分类的标准,但不是基于机制的评估。对定量信息的需求,例如定量AOP,讨论了基于机制的方法。根据现有的体外数据,还强调了直接神经毒性替代MoA的可能性。在ED的监管评估中实施AOP和NAM的机遇和挑战,并在下一代风险评估中评估危险,正在讨论。本案例研究探索基于机制的ED鉴定方法代表了基于AOP和NAM对ED进行更准确和预测性评估的重要一步。以及下一代风险评估(NGRA)概念。
    Endocrine disruptors (EDs) pose a serious threat to human health and the environment and require a comprehensive evaluation to be identified. The identification of EDs require a substantial amount of data, both in vitro and in vivo, due to the current scientific criteria in the EU. At the same time, the EU strives to reduce animal testing due to concerns regarding animal welfare and sensitivity of animal studies to adequately detect adverse effects relevant for human health. Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) is a persistent organic pollutant that is suspected to be an ED based on academic research, however it is not identified as such from a regulatory perspective. It has previously been shown that PFOS has the potential to cause neurotoxicity as well as affect the thyroid system, and it is known that specific thyroid hormone levels are critical in the development of the brain during. In this work, the aim was to evaluate a mechanism-based approach to identify ED properties of PFOS based on the Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) framework and using New Approach Methods (NAMs), by comparing this approach to an ED assessment based on the currently available guidance document. An AOP network (AOPN) was generated for the thyroid modality, and AOPs leading to developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) were identified. A literature search and screening process based on the AOPN, and systematic review methodology, was performed, followed by a rigorous Weight-of-Evidence (WoE) assessment. Evidence was mapped back onto the AOPN used for the literature search, to identify possible endocrine Modes-of-Action (MoAs) for PFOS and data gaps in the two assessments. It could be concluded that PFOS fulfils the criteria for ED classification in the standard ED assessment, but not in the mechanism-based assessment. The need for quantitative information, such as quantitative AOPs, for the mechanism-based approach is discussed. The possibility of a directly neurotoxic alternative MoA was also highlighted based on available in vitro data. Opportunities and challenges with implementing AOPs and NAMs into the regulatory assessment of EDs, and assessing hazard in the Next Generation Risk Assessment, is discussed. This case study exploring the mechanism-based approach to ED identification represents an important step toward more accurate and predictive assessment of EDs based on AOPs and NAMs, and to the Next Generation Risk Assessment (NGRA) concept.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    该协议描述了用于评估体外研究内部有效性的工具的设计和开发,需要将数据作为证据纳入系统评价和化学品风险评估。该工具将专门设计用于细胞培养研究,包括,但不限于,符合新方法方法论(NAM)定义的研究。该工具被称为INVITES-IN(在视觉实验研究永恒有效性)。在这个协议中,描述了创建INVITES-IN发行版的四项研究中的三项.在第一项研究中,现有评估工具的评估将与焦点小组讨论相结合,以确定体外研究的设计或实施特征如何影响其内部有效性。将确定被认为与体外研究相关的偏置域和项目。在第二项研究中,将通过改良的Delphi方法确定有关内部有效性领域和体外研究重要项目的小组协议。在第三项研究中,将创建该工具的草稿版本,基于研究1和2中收集的偏倚领域和项目的相关性和重要性数据。将为第四项研究准备一个单独的方案,包括工具的用户测试和验证,和用户体验的集合。
    This protocol describes the design and development of a tool for evaluation of the internal validity of in vitro studies, which is needed to include the data as evidence in systematic reviews and chemical risk assessments. The tool will be designed specifically to be applied to cell culture studies, including, but not restricted to, studies meeting the new approach methodology (NAM) definition. The tool is called INVITES-IN (IN VITro Experimental Studies INternal validity). In this protocol, three of the four studies that will be performed to create the release version of INVITES-IN are described. In the first study, evaluation of existing assessment tools will be combined with focus group discussions to identify how characteristics of the design or conduct of an in vitro study can affect its internal validity. Bias domains and items considered to be of relevance for in vitro studies will be identified. In the second study, group agreement on internal validity domains and items of importance for in vitro studies will be identified via a modified Delphi methodology. In the third study, the draft version of the tool will be created, based on the data on relevance and importance of bias domains and items collected in Studies 1 and 2. A separate protocol will be prepared for the fourth study, which includes the user testing and validation of the tool, and collection of users\' experience.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    传统上,环境风险评估依赖于广泛的体内测试来评估化学品在环境中的潜在危害。这些测试通常是耗时且昂贵的,并且可能导致测试生物体遭受痛苦。可靠的低成本替代品的最新发展,无论是基于活体还是基于硅片,为重新考虑目前的毒性评估打开了大门。然而,许多这些新方法方法(NAM)依赖于高质量的注释基因组来进行监管风险评估的替代物种。目前,缺乏基因组信息会减慢NAM发育的过程。这里,我们在调节生态毒理学风险评估中对替代物种缺失的基因组资源进行了系统发育分析。我们呼吁在(监管)生态毒理学社区内部进行有组织和系统的努力,以提供这些缺失的基因组资源。Further,我们讨论了标准化的基因组替代物种景观的潜力,以便在系统生态毒理学时代进行稳健且非动物依赖的生态毒理学风险评估.
    Environmental risk assessment traditionally relies on a wide range of in vivo testing to assess the potential hazards of chemicals in the environment. These tests are often time-consuming and costly and can cause test organisms\' suffering. Recent developments of reliable low-cost alternatives, both in vivo- and in silico-based, opened the door to reconsider current toxicity assessment. However, many of these new approach methodologies (NAMs) rely on high-quality annotated genomes for surrogate species of regulatory risk assessment. Currently, a lack of genomic information slows the process of NAM development. Here, we present a phylogenetically resolved overview of missing genomic resources for surrogate species within a regulatory ecotoxicological risk assessment. We call for an organized and systematic effort within the (regulatory) ecotoxicological community to provide these missing genomic resources. Further, we discuss the potential of a standardized genomic surrogate species landscape to enable a robust and nonanimal-reliant ecotoxicological risk assessment in the systems ecotoxicology era.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    欧盟地平线2020资助的ONTOX项目的第一次利益相关者网络会议于2023年3月13日至14日在布鲁塞尔举行,比利时。讨论围绕确定具体挑战,与实施非动物新方法方法(NAM)和概率风险评估(PRA)有关的障碍和驱动因素,以帮助解决问题,并根据其相关的难度对其进行排名。ONTOX旨在推进对人类化学风险的评估,不使用动物试验,通过开发符合21世纪毒性测试原则的非动物NAMs和PRA。利益相关者团体(监管机构,公司,学术界,非政府组织)被确定并邀请参加会议和调查,由此确定了他们目前在实施NAM和PRA方面的立场,以及强调的具体挑战和驱动因素。调查分析揭示了利益攸关方在能力建设、可持续性监管接受,验证不良结果途径,在风险评估中接受人工智能(AI),保障消费者安全。利益相关者网络会议导致了障碍的识别,驱动因素和需要解决的具体挑战。分组讨论了诸如危害与风险评估,未来对人工智能和机器学习的依赖,行业监管要求和ONTOXHub平台的可持续性。这些讨论的结果为克服障碍和利用驱动因素实施NAM和PRA提供了见解。结论是,利益相关者的参与仍然需要,包括组织“黑客马拉松”来应对挑战,确保化学品风险评估中NAM和PRA的成功实施。
    The first Stakeholder Network Meeting of the EU Horizon 2020-funded ONTOX project was held on 13-14 March 2023, in Brussels, Belgium. The discussion centred around identifying specific challenges, barriers and drivers in relation to the implementation of non-animal new approach methodologies (NAMs) and probabilistic risk assessment (PRA), in order to help address the issues and rank them according to their associated level of difficulty. ONTOX aims to advance the assessment of chemical risk to humans, without the use of animal testing, by developing non-animal NAMs and PRA in line with 21st century toxicity testing principles. Stakeholder groups (regulatory authorities, companies, academia, non-governmental organisations) were identified and invited to participate in a meeting and a survey, by which their current position in relation to the implementation of NAMs and PRA was ascertained, as well as specific challenges and drivers highlighted. The survey analysis revealed areas of agreement and disagreement among stakeholders on topics such as capacity building, sustainability, regulatory acceptance, validation of adverse outcome pathways, acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) in risk assessment, and guaranteeing consumer safety. The stakeholder network meeting resulted in the identification of barriers, drivers and specific challenges that need to be addressed. Breakout groups discussed topics such as hazard versus risk assessment, future reliance on AI and machine learning, regulatory requirements for industry and sustainability of the ONTOX Hub platform. The outputs from these discussions provided insights for overcoming barriers and leveraging drivers for implementing NAMs and PRA. It was concluded that there is a continued need for stakeholder engagement, including the organisation of a \'hackathon\' to tackle challenges, to ensure the successful implementation of NAMs and PRA in chemical risk assessment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    暴露于杀虫剂与患帕金森病(PD)的风险增加有关。目前,由于缺乏针对神经变性的人类相关终点,基于啮齿动物的风险评估研究无法充分捕获农药的神经变性效应.因此,有必要改进风险评估准则。具体来说,机械评估策略,需要基于人类生理学和(病理)生物学,可应用于下一代风险评估。不利结果路径(AOP)框架特别适合为这种策略提供机械基础。这里,我们在Embase和MEDLINE进行了半系统的审查,专注于神经变性和杀虫剂,建立帕金森病运动症状的AOP网络。使用在线平台Sysrev标记并包含/排除文章。只有初级文章,用英语写的,重点介绍了农药或PD模型化合物在大脑模型中的作用。共66条,在1700筛选中,包括在内。PD症状是由黑质(SN)中多巴胺能神经元的功能丧失和最终死亡引起的。我们的文献综述强调,这些细胞增加其脆弱性的独特特征是它们依赖于持续的低水平钙流入。因此,细胞内钙过量被确定为中枢早期关键事件(KE)。这种KE可以导致SN的多巴胺能神经元死亡,最终出现帕金森病运动症状,通过四种不同的途径:1)钙蛋白酶的激活,2)内质网应激,3)蛋白质降解的损害,4)氧化损伤。已经鉴定了几种受体,其可以充当分子起始事件(MIE)以触发这些途径中的一种或多种。拟议的AOP网络提供了生物学基础,可用于开发一种机制测试策略,以捕获农药的神经退行性作用。
    Exposure to pesticides is associated with an increased risk of developing Parkinson\'s disease (PD). Currently, rodent-based risk assessment studies cannot adequately capture neurodegenerative effects of pesticides due to a lack of human-relevant endpoints targeted at neurodegeneration. Thus, there is a need for improvement of the risk assessment guidelines. Specifically, a mechanistic assessment strategy, based on human physiology and (patho)biology is needed, which can be applied in next generation risk assessment. The Adverse Outcome Pathway (AOP) framework is particularly well-suited to provide the mechanistic basis for such a strategy. Here, we conducted a semi-systematic review in Embase and MEDLINE, focused on neurodegeneration and pesticides, to develop an AOP network for parkinsonian motor symptoms. Articles were labelled and included/excluded using the online platform Sysrev. Only primary articles, written in English, focused on effects of pesticides or PD model compounds in models for the brain were included. A total of 66 articles, out of the 1700 screened, was included. PD symptoms are caused by loss of function and ultimately death of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra (SN). Our literature review highlights that a unique feature of these cells that increases their vulnerability is their reliance on continuous low-level influx of calcium. As such, excess intracellular calcium was identified as a central early Key Event (KE). This KE can lead to death of dopaminergic neurons of the SN, and eventually parkinsonian motor symptoms, via four distinct pathways: 1) activation of calpains, 2) endoplasmic reticulum stress, 3) impairment of protein degradation, and 4) oxidative damage. Several receptors have been identified that may serve as molecular initiating events (MIEs) to trigger one or more of these pathways. The proposed AOP network provides the biological basis that can be used to develop a mechanistic testing strategy that captures neurodegenerative effects of pesticides.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    组学技术越来越被认为是下一代风险评估的有前途的工具。靶向代谢组学提供了提供关于扰动的生物途径的容易解释的机械信息的优点。在这项研究中,基于高通量LC-MS/MS的广泛靶向代谢组学系统被用于研究呋喃妥因随时间和浓度的代谢动力学,并为出发点(PoD)推导提供一种机制锚定方法.在五个浓度(7.5µM,15µM,20µM,30µM和120µM)和四个时间点(3、6、24和48h),评估了HepG2细胞的细胞内代谢组。总的来说,测量了256种独特鉴定的代谢物,注释,并分配给13种不同的代谢物类别。主成分分析(PCA)和单变量统计分析显示出明显的基于代谢组的时间和浓度效应。机制信息证明了指示早期适应性和肝毒性反应的细胞途径的差异激活。在低浓度下,影响主要表现在能量和脂质代谢,在中等浓度范围内,抗氧化剂细胞反应的激活由谷胱甘肽(GSH)和来自从头GSH合成途径的代谢物水平的增加证明。在最高浓度下,GSH的耗尽,连同反映线粒体损伤的变化,指示肝毒性反应。最后,基于代谢组学的PoD是通过多变量PCA使用整套测量的代谢物得出的.这种方法允许使用整个数据集并导出可以机械地锚定到已建立的关键事件的PoD。我们的结果表明,高通量靶向代谢组学适合研究肝毒性机制,并得出可以与现有不良结果途径相关并有助于开发新途径的偏离点。
    Omics techniques have been increasingly recognized as promising tools for Next Generation Risk Assessment. Targeted metabolomics offer the advantage of providing readily interpretable mechanistic information about perturbed biological pathways. In this study, a high-throughput LC-MS/MS-based broad targeted metabolomics system was applied to study nitrofurantoin metabolic dynamics over time and concentration and to provide a mechanistic-anchored approach for point of departure (PoD) derivation. Upon nitrofurantoin exposure at five concentrations (7.5 µM, 15 µM, 20 µM, 30 µM and 120 µM) and four time points (3, 6, 24 and 48 h), the intracellular metabolome of HepG2 cells was evaluated. In total, 256 uniquely identified metabolites were measured, annotated, and allocated in 13 different metabolite classes. Principal component analysis (PCA) and univariate statistical analysis showed clear metabolome-based time and concentration effects. Mechanistic information evidenced the differential activation of cellular pathways indicative of early adaptive and hepatotoxic response. At low concentrations, effects were seen mainly in the energy and lipid metabolism, in the mid concentration range, the activation of the antioxidant cellular response was evidenced by increased levels of glutathione (GSH) and metabolites from the de novo GSH synthesis pathway. At the highest concentrations, the depletion of GSH, together with alternations reflective of mitochondrial impairments, were indicative of a hepatotoxic response. Finally, a metabolomics-based PoD was derived by multivariate PCA using the whole set of measured metabolites. This approach allows using the entire dataset and derive PoD that can be mechanistically anchored to established key events. Our results show the suitability of high throughput targeted metabolomics to investigate mechanisms of hepatoxicity and derive point of departures that can be linked to existing adverse outcome pathways and contribute to the development of new ones.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号