Neutropenic fever

中性粒细胞减少症
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自体干细胞移植(ASCT)是许多血液学癌症的公认的巩固治疗方法,可延长生存期。单独使用粒细胞集落刺激剂(G-CSF)无法实现部分患者的足够干细胞收获。一般来说,G-CSF衰竭及其最担心的并发症发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)的患者采用化学移植。
    方法:这里,我们的目的是研究FN在化学移植中对单采结果和植入的影响.该研究包括在2015年至2020年之间进行化学移植的183例诊断为淋巴瘤或骨髓瘤的患者。
    结果:43例患者出现FN。所有患者均接受G-CSF。所有骨髓瘤患者用4g/m2环磷酰胺动员,但对于淋巴瘤患者来说是异质的。前采集的血液计数,收获的CD34+造血干细胞(HSC)/kg,单采术计数,并记录植入持续时间。FN组白细胞和血小板较低(P=0.004和P=0.001)。外周CD34HSC和总收集的CD34HSC在组间相似(P=0.25和P=0.9)。FN组需要更多的单采术,但不显著(P=0.07)。接受ASCT相似(P=0.7);然而,FN组的血小板和中性粒细胞植入时间较慢(P=0.05和P=0.001).
    结论:从FN患者中收获足够的CD34+HSC仍然是可行的;然而,FN治疗应迅速开始,并且可能需要进一步的单采血液成分。
    BACKGROUND: Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a well-established consolidation treatment for many hematologic cancers which delivers prolonged survival. A subset of patients\' adequate stem cell harvest is not achievable with a solitary use of granulocyte colony-stimulating agents (G-CSF). Generally, chemomobilization is employed for patients failing G-CSF and its most feared complication febrile neutropenia (FN).
    METHODS: Here, we aimed to investigate the impact of the FN in chemomobilization on apheresis outcomes and engraftment. One hundred and eighty-three patients with the diagnosis of lymphoma or myeloma who underwent chemomobilization between 2015 and 2020 were included in the study.
    RESULTS: Forty-three patients experienced FN. All patients received G-CSF. All myeloma patients were mobilized with 4 g/m2 cyclophosphamide, but it was heterogeneous for lymphoma patients. The precollection blood counts, harvested CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs)/kg, apheresis count, and engraftment durations were recorded. Preapheresis leukocyte and platelet were lower in the FN group (P = 0,004 and P = 0,001). Peripheral CD34 HSCs and total harvested CD34 HSCs were similar among groups (P = 0.25 and P = 0.9). More apheresis was needed in the FN group, but it was not significant (P = 0.07). Undergoing ASCT was similar (P = 0.7); however, platelet and neutrophil engraftment durations were slower in the FN group (P = 0.05 and P = 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Harvesting sufficient CD34+ HSCs from patients with FN is still feasible; however, FN treatment should begin promptly, and further apheresis sessions may be required.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对于长期中性粒细胞减少和严重感染的患者,进行粒细胞输注一直是一个有争议的做法。先前的研究表明高剂量粒细胞输血(≥0.6×109/kg)的益处,虽然,直到最近,高剂量单位的一致生产一直具有挑战性。这里,我们展示了我们利用大剂量粒细胞输血的经验和结果,三级学术医学中心,用于治疗成人感染,中性粒细胞减少症患者。
    方法:对接受粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)和地塞米松刺激的供体大剂量粒细胞输血的所有患者进行回顾性图表回顾(2018-2021年)。收集的参数包括患者人口统计,临床病史,感染状态,剂量,临床结果,中性粒细胞绝对计数(ANC)前后,和输血时间,包括粒细胞收集之间的时间,administration,和输血后ANC计数。收集的参数使用描述性统计进行汇总,采用Kaplan-Meier曲线/对数秩/回归检验评估结局.
    结果:总共28名成人,抗微生物剂和/或G-CSF难以治疗的中性粒细胞减少患者总共接受了173种粒细胞浓缩物.中位ANC从输血前的0.7×109/L增加到输血后的1.6×109/L。平均粒细胞产量为77.4×109,每公斤平均剂量为0.90×109±0.30×109粒细胞。第42天的复合生存率和微生物反应为42.9%(n=12/28),无明显不良反应。
    结论:这里,我们证明了对中性粒细胞减少患者进行大剂量粒细胞输血是成功和安全的.鉴于快速和一致的生产,分布,提高了粒细胞质量,现在有可能进一步研究以确定G-CSF引发的粒细胞输注的临床疗效.
    BACKGROUND: Granulocyte transfusions for patients with prolonged neutropenia and severe infections has been a controversial practice. Previous studies suggest a benefit of high-dose granulocyte transfusions (≥0.6 × 109/kg), although, until recently, the consistent production of high-dose units has been challenging. Here, we present our experience and results utilizing high-dose granulocyte transfusions at a large, tertiary academic medical center for the treatment of infections in adult, neutropenic patients.
    METHODS: A retrospective chart review (2018-2021) was conducted for all patients who received high-dose granulocyte transfusions from donors stimulated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and dexamethasone. Gathered parameters included patient demographics, clinical history, infection status, dose, clinical outcomes, pre- and post-absolute neutrophil count (ANC), and transfusion times including time between granulocyte collection, administration, and posttransfusion ANC count. Gathered parameters were summarized using descriptive statistics, outcomes were assessed utilizing Kaplan-Meier curves/log-rank/regression testing.
    RESULTS: Totally 28 adult, neutropenic patients refractory to antimicrobial agents and/or G-CSF received a total of 173 granulocyte concentrates. Median ANC increased from 0.7 × 109/L pre-transfusion to 1.6 × 109/L posttransfusion. The mean granulocyte yield was 77.4 × 109 resulting in an average dose per kilogram of 0.90 × 109 ± 0.30 × 109 granulocytes. Composite day 42 survival and microbial response was 42.9% (n = 12/28) without significant adverse reactions.
    CONCLUSIONS: Here, we demonstrate the successful and safe implementation of high-dose granulocyte transfusions for neutropenic patients. Given the rapid and consistent production, distribution, and improved granulocyte quality, further investigations to determine the clinical efficacy of G-CSF primed granulocyte transfusions is now possible.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    慢性播散性念珠菌病(CDC)是一种严重但很少见的真菌感染,在长时间的中性粒细胞减少后出现在血液系统恶性肿瘤患者中。诊断CDC需要高度怀疑,因为标准的培养检查通常是阴性的。虽然组织活检是诊断的黄金标准,严重血细胞减少和出血风险增加的患者经常避免这种情况。可以对近期中性粒细胞减少症的患者进行推定诊断,持续发烧对抗生素无反应,低回声的影像学发现,脾脏和肝脏中的非边缘增强目标样病变,和真菌学证据.这里,我们描述了1例18岁女性复发性B细胞急性淋巴细胞白血病患者接受再诱导化疗,随后发展为多器官受累的CDC.诊断是根据临床和放射学特征以及皮肤结节和肝脏病变的阳性组织培养物进行的。患者接受抗真菌治疗共11个月,最著名的是两性霉素B和米卡芬净,和脾切除术.初步诊断后,每月对患者进行CT腹部成像监测,显示抗真菌治疗和脾切除术5个月后疾病得到控制.诊断,治疗,这里概述了CDC的共同挑战,以帮助更好地理解,诊断,以及这种罕见疾病的治疗。
    Chronic disseminated candidiasis (CDC) is a severe but rarely seen fungal infection presenting in patients with hematologic malignancies after a prolonged duration of neutropenia. A high index of suspicion is required to diagnose CDC as standard culture workup is often negative. While tissue biopsy is the gold standard of diagnosis, it is frequently avoided in patients with profound cytopenias and increased bleeding risks. A presumptive diagnosis can be made in patients with recent neutropenia, persistent fevers unresponsive to antibiotics, imaging findings of hypoechoic, non-rim enhancing target-like lesions in the spleen and liver, and mycologic evidence. Here, we describe the case of an 18-year-old woman with relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated with re-induction chemotherapy who subsequently developed CDC with multi-organ involvement. The diagnosis was made based on clinical and radiologic features with positive tissue culture from a skin nodule and hepatic lesion. The patient was treated for a total course of 11 months with anti-fungal therapy, most notably amphotericin B and micafungin, and splenectomy. After initial diagnosis, the patient was monitored with monthly CT abdomen imaging that showed disease control after 5 months of anti-fungal therapy and splenectomy. The diagnosis, treatment, and common challenges of CDC are outlined here to assist with better understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of this rare condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    高剂量环磷酰胺(HD-Cy)(3g/m2)加粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)是一种非常有效的外周血干细胞(PBSC)动员方案。不幸的是,它与中性粒细胞减少性发热(NF)的风险增加有关。我们分析了新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者中NF对PBSC单采结果的影响以及预防性抗生素预防与HD-Cy加G-CSF相关的NF对PBSC动员的疗效。首先,根据动员期间是否发生NF分为NF(+)组和NF(-)组。第二,根据在动员期是否使用抗生素预防,我们将患者分为抗生素预防组和非抗生素预防组.我们的研究表明,NF(+)患者(n=44)的CD34+细胞剂量收集较低(中位数为2.60对5.34×106/kg,P<0.001)和较慢的中性粒细胞植入和血小板植入(中位数为11天对10天,P=0.002,中位数为13天对11天,P=0.043,分别)比NF(-)患者(n=234)。值得注意的是,非抗生素预防组患者(n=30)的NF发生率为26.7%.在接受抗生素预防的患者中(n=227),发病率降至9.3%(P=0.01).抗生素预防患者的CD34+细胞聚集率较高(中位数为5.41对2.27×106/kg,P<0.001)和较低的动员住院费用($中位数3108.02对3702.39,p=0.012)。因此,我们的结果表明,NF与较低的CD34+细胞收集有关,并且抗生素预防可以降低NF的发生率并改善干细胞动员和收集结果。降低了住院动员费用。
    High-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-Cy) (3 g/m2) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is a very effective regimen for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization. Unfortunately, it is associated with an increased risk of neutropenic fever (NF). We analyzed the effect of NF on PBSC apheresis results and the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics for the prevention of NF associated with HD-Cy plus G-CSF for PBSC mobilization in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). First, patients were divided into NF ( +) and NF ( -) groups according to whether they suffered from NF during mobilization. Second, we divided patients into an antibiotic prophylaxis group and a nonantibiotic prophylaxis group according to whether antibiotic prophylaxis was used during the mobilization period. Our study showed that NF( +) patients (n = 44) had lower CD34 + cell dose collection (median 2.60 versus 5.34 × 106/kg, P < 0.001) and slower neutrophil engraftment and platelet engraftment (median 11 versus 10 days, P = 0.002, and median 13 versus 11 days, P = 0.043, respectively) than NF( -) patients (n = 234). Of note, the nonantibiotic prophylaxis group patients (n = 30) had a 26.7% incidence of NF. In the patients receiving antibiotic prophylaxis (n = 227), the incidence was reduced to 9.3% (P = 0.01). The antibiotic prophylaxis patients had higher CD34 + cell collection (median 5.41 versus 2.27 × 106/kg, P < 0.001) and lower hospitalization cost of mobilization ($ median 3108.02 versus 3702.39, p = 0.012). Thus, our results demonstrate that NF is associated with lower CD34 + cell collection and that antibiotic prophylaxis can reduce the incidence of NF and improve stem cell mobilization and collection outcomes, which reduces the hospitalization cost of mobilization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    侵袭性真菌病(IFD)仍然是血液系统恶性肿瘤患者死亡的相关原因。尤其是接受缓解诱导化疗的急性髓系白血病(AML)和骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS),以及异基因造血干细胞移植(allo-HSCT)接受者。霉菌活性抗真菌预防(MAP)已被确立为护理标准。然而,突破性的IFD(B-IFD)已经成为一个重要问题,特别是侵袭性曲霉病和非曲霉侵袭性霉菌病。这里,我们进行叙述性审查,讨论过去十年在预防方面的重大进展,在接受AML/MDS和allo-HSCT缓解诱导化疗的高危中性粒细胞减少症患者中,IFDs的诊断和治疗。然后,我们介绍了184例接受泊沙康唑同时接受大剂量化疗的AML/MDS患者的单中心b-IFDs回顾性研究(n=153诱导治疗,n=126个巩固治疗,n=60次抢救处理)。在6例患者中记录了6例可能/证实的b-IFD,总发病率为1.7%(6/339),这与聚焦于唑类MAP的文献一致。b-IFD的发生率(IR)(95%置信区间(95%CI),每100人年随访(PYFU))的诱导率为5.04(0.47,14.45)(n=2),巩固(n=1)为3.25(0.0013,12.76),挽救性化疗(n=3)为18.38(3.46,45.06)。最后,我们强调目前在b-IFD领域的挑战;这些包括改善诊断,使用分子靶向药物(以及与唑类药物相关的药物-药物相互作用)扩大AML的治疗范围,不断发展的移植技术(及其对IFD风险分层的相关影响),和新的抗真菌药及其特征(rezafungin和olorofim)。
    Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) still represent a relevant cause of mortality in patients affected by hematological malignancies, especially acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) undergoing remission induction chemotherapy, and in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients. Mold-active antifungal prophylaxis (MAP) has been established as a standard of care. However, breakthrough IFDs (b-IFDs) have emerged as a significant issue, particularly invasive aspergillosis and non-Aspergillus invasive mold diseases. Here, we perform a narrative review, discussing the major advances of the last decade on prophylaxis, the diagnosis of and the treatment of IFDs in patients with high-risk neutropenic fever undergoing remission induction chemotherapy for AML/MDS and allo-HSCT. Then, we present our single-center retrospective experience on b-IFDs in 184 AML/MDS patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy while receiving posaconazole (n = 153 induction treatments, n = 126 consolidation treatments, n = 60 salvage treatments). Six cases of probable/proven b-IFDs were recorded in six patients, with an overall incidence rate of 1.7% (6/339), which is in line with the literature focused on MAP with azoles. The incidence rates (IRs) of b-IFDs (95% confidence interval (95% CI), per 100 person years follow-up (PYFU)) were 5.04 (0.47, 14.45) in induction (n = 2), 3.25 (0.0013, 12.76) in consolidation (n = 1) and 18.38 (3.46, 45.06) in salvage chemotherapy (n = 3). Finally, we highlight the current challenges in the field of b-IFDs; these include the improvement of diagnoses, the expanding treatment landscape of AML with molecular targeted drugs (and related drug-drug interactions with azoles), evolving transplantation techniques (and their related impacts on IFDs\' risk stratification), and new antifungals and their features (rezafungin and olorofim).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    近年来,由于血液恶性肿瘤(HM)的发病率增加,侵袭性真菌感染(IFIs)的发病率有所增加。IFIs,作为机会性疾病,是这些死亡率高的患者中最重要的问题。这些感染是HM患者发病和死亡的主要原因之一,也是由于住院时间延长和不可避免地需要使用抗真菌药物而增加患者管理成本的重要因素。由于导致国际金融机构的生物模式的变化,缺乏有效和安全的抗真菌药物,耐药率高,缺乏快速准确的诊断方法,这些感染已经成为一个严重和危及生命的问题,需要使用合适的抗真菌药物进行有效的预防和治疗策略,尤其是高危患者。本研究的目的是回顾引起各种类型的IFIs的病原体,诊断方法,根据新发表的研究和临床试验,在HM患者中采用新的预防性和治疗性抗真菌方案。
    The incidence of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) has increased in recent years as a result of increasing the incidence of hematologic malignancies (HMs). IFIs, as the opportunistic diseases, are the most important concern in these patients with a high mortality rate. These infections are one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in HM patients and an important factor in increasing the costs of patients\' management because of the prolonged hospitalization and the inevitable need to use antifungal agents. Due to the changes in the pattern of organisms causing IFIs, unavailability of effective and safe antifungal drugs, and high rate of drug resistance as well as lack of fast and accurate diagnostic methods, these infections have become a serious and life-threatening problem necessitating effective prevention and treatment strategies using suitable antifungal agents, especially in high-risk patients. The aim of the present study was to review the pathogens causing various types of IFIs, diagnostic methods, and novel prophylactic and therapeutic antifungal regimens in HM patients according to the new published studies and clinical trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Sweetsyndrome(SS)是一种罕见的炎症性疾病,其特征是快速发作的特征性皮疹。发烧,和其他全身症状。这些表现经常被误认为是对抗菌药物没有反应的感染,尤其是在免疫受损的宿主中。我们介绍了一名44岁女性的病例,该女性在新诊断的急性髓细胞性白血病(AML)的诱导化疗后发展为SS。她前胸部出现了疼痛的皮疹,离心扩散,以及对广谱抗菌药物无反应的中性粒细胞减少症。皮疹活检显示真皮内有密集的嗜中性粒细胞浸润,确认SS的诊断。患者随后接受全身性类固醇治疗,发烧迅速消退,皮疹得到改善。这个案例强调了SS可以表现出强烈的嗜中性粒细胞浸润,即使是在化疗引起的中性粒细胞减少症的情况下。SS是血液系统恶性肿瘤的重要考虑因素,特别是AML,当患者出现发热和皮疹时。及时识别,然后进行全身性类固醇治疗通常会导致症状缓解。
    Sweet syndrome (SS) is a rare inflammatory disorder characterized by the rapid onset of a characteristically tender rash, fever, and other systemic symptoms. These manifestations are often mistaken for an infection that is not responding to antimicrobials, especially in immunocompromised hosts. We present the case of a 44-year-old woman who developed SS following induction chemotherapy for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). She exhibited a painful rash on the anterior chest, which spread centrifugally, along with neutropenic fever unresponsive to broad-spectrum antimicrobials. Biopsy of the rash revealed a dense neutrophilic infiltrate within the dermis, confirming the diagnosis of SS. The patient was subsequently treated with systemic steroids with prompt resolution of fevers and improvement of her rash. This case highlights that SS can manifest with a robust neutrophilic infiltrate, even in the context of neutropenia stemming from chemotherapy. SS serves as a crucial consideration in hematologic malignancies, particularly AML, when patients present with fever and cutaneous eruptions. Prompt recognition followed by systemic steroid therapy often leads to symptom resolution.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    再生障碍性贫血(AA)是一种造血干细胞(HSC)疾病,其特征是HSC的丢失,骨髓衰竭,和外周全血细胞减少症。AA被归类为非常严重(VSAA),严重(SAA),或非严重(NSAA)基于严重程度标准。该分类系统对患者的预后和治疗选择具有意义。在过去的几十年中,随着支持性护理的进步,AA的预后有所改善,HSC移植(HCT),和免疫抑制治疗(IST)。在这份报告中,我们介绍了一例26岁男性在出现严重中性粒细胞减少和发热后被诊断为VSAA的病例.患者最终接受了HSC移植。
    Aplastic anemia (AA) is a hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) disorder characterized by the loss of HSCs, bone marrow failure, and peripheral pancytopenia. AA is classified as very severe (VSAA), severe (SAA), or non-severe (NSAA) based on the severity criteria. This classification system has implications for the prognosis and treatment options offered to patients. The prognosis of AA has improved over the past several decades with the advancements in supportive care, HSC transplant (HCT), and immunosuppressive therapy (IST). In this report, we present the case of a 26-year-old male diagnosed with VSAA after presenting with severe neutropenia and fever. The patient ultimately underwent HSC transplantation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:使用氟喹诺酮类药物预防患有癌症或接受造血干细胞移植(HSCT)的中性粒细胞减少患者的感染是一个有争议的问题,国际准则提供了相互矛盾的建议。尽管潜在的好处很明显,关注围绕功效,潜在的危害,和抗菌素耐药性(AMR)的影响。
    结论:氟喹诺酮预防可减少中性粒细胞减少性发热(NF)血流感染和其他严重细菌感染,基于系统评价的证据,随机对照试验,以及成人和儿童的观察性研究。氟喹诺酮预防也可以降低与感染相关的发病率和医疗费用;然而,证据是相互矛盾的。氟喹诺酮类药物的不良反应在一般人群中得到了很好的认可;然而,在用于确定的中性粒细胞减少症时期的癌症队列中的研究没有反映这一点。常规使用氟喹诺酮预防的最大问题仍然是AMR,很多,但不是全部,观察性研究发现,氟喹诺酮预防可能会增加AMR的风险,一些研究表明对患者预后的负面影响。
    结论:围绕氟喹诺酮预防的争论呼吁根据患者特征和局部AMR模式进行个体化风险评估,预防应仅限于在最高风险期间发生严重感染风险最高的患者,以确保风险-收益分析有利于个人和社区利益。需要更多的研究来解决关于在患有癌症或接受HSCT的中性粒细胞减少患者中预防氟喹诺酮的重要未解决的问题。
    BACKGROUND: The use of fluoroquinolones to prevent infections in neutropenic patients with cancer or undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a controversial issue, with international guidelines providing conflicting recommendations. Although potential benefits are clear, concerns revolve around efficacy, potential harms, and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) implications.
    CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis reduces neutropenic fever (NF) bloodstream infections and other serious bacterial infections, based on evidence from systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies in adults and children. Fluoroquinolone prophylaxis may also reduce infection-related morbidity and healthcare costs; however, evidence is conflicting. Adverse effects of fluoroquinolones are well recognized in the general population; however, studies in the cancer cohort where it is used for a defined period of neutropenia have not reflected this. The largest concern for routine use of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis remains AMR, as many, but not all, observational studies have found that fluoroquinolone prophylaxis might increase the risk of AMR, and some studies have suggested negative impacts on patient outcomes as a result.
    CONCLUSIONS: The debate surrounding fluoroquinolone prophylaxis calls for individualized risk assessment based on patient characteristics and local AMR patterns, and prophylaxis should be restricted to patients at the highest risk of serious infection during the highest risk periods to ensure that the risk-benefit analysis is in favor of individual and community benefit. More research is needed to address important unanswered questions about fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with cancer or receiving HSCT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号