UNASSIGNED: Cerebral vasospasm (CVS) is a common complication that occurs after neurosurgical clipping of intracranial aneurysms in patients with aSAH. This complication can lead to clinical deterioration and a poor prognosis. The aim of this study is to explore the risk factors for CVS in aSAH patients who have undergone neurosurgical clipping, develop a nomogram for CVS, and evaluate its performance.
UNASSIGNED: Patients with aSAH who underwent neurosurgical clipping in the Department of Neurosurgery from January 2018 to January 2023 were selected as the subjects of this research. The clinical data of these patients were retrospectively analyzed. Logistic multivariate regression analysis was employed to identify the independent risk factors of CVS. A clinical prediction model in the form of a nomogram for CVS was developed using the R programming language and subsequently evaluated for its performance and quality.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 156 patients with aSAH were included in the analysis, comprising 109 patients in the training set and 47 patients in the validation set. In the training cohort, 27 patients (24.77%) developed CVS after neurosurgical clipping, while in the validation cohort, 15 patients (31.91%) experienced CVS. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that age, Hcy, WBC, glucose/potassium ratio, aneurysm location, and modified Fisher grade were independent risk factors for CVS. The nomogram exhibited excellent discriminative performance in both the training set (AUC = 0.885) and the validation set (AUC = 0.906).
UNASSIGNED: CVS was a prevalent complication following neurosurgical clipping in patients with aSAH, with a highly intricate pathogenesis and pathophysiological course. Early prediction of CVS represented a significant challenge in clinical practice. In this study, age, Hcy, WBC, glucose/potassium ratio, aneurysm location, and modified Fisher grade emerged as independent risk factors for CVS. The resulting nomogram demonstrated substantial predictive value.

To compare the safety and efficacy of clipping and coiling in patients with ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms. A systematic search of four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase) was conducted to identify comparative articles on endovascular coiling and surgical clipping in patients with ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models. Nineteen studies, including 1983 patients, were included. The meta-analysis showed that neurosurgical clipping was associated with a lower incidence of retreatment (OR:0.28, 95% CI (0.11, 0.70), P = 0.006) than endovascular coiling, which seemed to be a result of incomplete occlusion (OR:0.22, 95% CI (0.11, 0.45), P < 0.001). Neurosurgical clipping was associated with lower mortality (OR:0.45, 95% CI (0.25, 0.82), P = 0.009) at short-term follow-up than endovascular coiling. However, neurosurgical clipping showed a higher incidence of ischemic infarction (OR:2.28, 95% CI (1.44, 3.63), P < 0.001) and a longer length of stay (LOS) (WMD:6.12, 95% CI (4.19, 8.04), P < 0.001) after surgery than endovascular coiling. Furthermore, the pooled results showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding poor outcome, long-term mortality, rebleeding, vasospasm, and hydrocephalus. Evidence from this systematic review illustrates that neurosurgical clipping may be superior to endovascular coiling for ruptured anterior circulation aneurysms. Large-scale RCTs should be conducted to verify these outcomes and provide results according to patient status.

OBJECTIVE: Middle cerebral aneurysms were underrepresented in the two largest trials (BRAT and ISAT) for the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Recent institutional series addressing the choice between endovascular or open repair for this subset of aneurysms are few and have not yielded a definitive conclusion. We compare clinical outcomes of patients presenting with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage from ruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms undergoing either open or endovascular repair.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 138 consecutive patients with ruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms admitted into our institution from January 2008 to March 2019 to compare endovascular and open surgical outcomes.
RESULTS: Of the ruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms, 57 underwent endovascular repair while 81 were treated with open surgery. Over the study period, there was a notable shift in practice toward more frequent endovascular treatment of ruptured MCA aneurysms (31% in 2008 vs. 91% in 2018). At discharge (49.1% vs 29.6%; p = .002) and at 6 months (84.3% vs 58.6%; p = 0.003), patients who underwent endovascular repair had a higher proportion of patients with good clinical outcomes (mRS 0-2) compared to those undergoing open surgery. Long-term follow-up data (endovascular 54.9 ± 37.9 months vs clipping 18.6 ± 13.4 months) showed no difference in rebleeding (1.8% vs 3.7%, p = 0.642) and retreatment (5.3% vs 3.7%, p = 0.691) in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Our series suggests equipoise in the treatment of ruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms and demonstrates endovascular repair as a potentially feasible treatment strategy. Future randomized trials could clarify the roles of these treatment modalities.

Mycotic brain aneurysms are rare and unusual cerebrovascular lesions arising from septic emboli that degrade the elastic lamina and vessel wall of intracranial arteries, which results in pathologic dilatation. Mycotic aneurysms are nonsaccular lesions that are not often suitable for clipping and instead require bypass, trapping, and flow reversal. This case demonstrates the use of indocyanine green \"flash fluorescence\" to identify the cortical distribution supplied by an aneurysm\'s outflow, facilitating safe treatment with a double-barrel extracranial-intracranial bypass and partial trapping and conversion of a deep bypass to a superficial one. The video can be found here: https://stream.cadmore.media/r10.3171/2021.10.FOCVID21163.

Endovascular coiling (EC) has been identified in systematic reviews and meta-analyses to produce more favourable clinical outcomes in comparison to neurosurgical clipping (NC) when surgically treating a subarachnoid haemorrhage from a ruptured aneurysm. Cost-effectiveness analyses between both interventions have been done, but no cost-utility analysis has yet been published. This systematic review aims to perform an economic analysis of the relative utility outcomes and costs from both treatments in the UK. A cost-utility analysis was performed from the perspective of the National Health Service (NHS), over a 1-year analytic horizon. Outcomes were obtained from the randomised International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) and measured in terms of the patient\'s modified Rankin scale (mRS) grade, a 6-point disability scale that aims to quantify a patient\'s functional outcome following a stroke. The mRS score was weighted against the Euro-QoL 5-dimension (EQ-5D), with each state assigned a weighted utility value which was then converted into quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). A sensitivity analysis using different utility dimensions was performed to identify any variation in incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) if different input variables were used. Costs were measured in pounds sterling (£) and discounted by 3.5% to 2020/2021 prices. The cost-utility analysis showed an ICER of - £144,004 incurred for every QALY gained when EC was utilised over NC. At NICE\'s upper willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of £30,000, EC offered a monetary net benefit (MNB) of £7934.63 and health net benefit (HNB) of 0.264 higher than NC. At NICE\'s lower WTP threshold of £20,000, EC offered an MNB of £7478.63 and HNB of 0.374 higher than NC. EC was found to be more \'cost-effective\' than NC, with an ICER in the bottom right quadrant of the cost-effectiveness plane-indicating that it offers greater benefits at lower costs. This is supported by the ICER being below the NICE\'s threshold of £20,000-£30,000 per QALY, and both MNB and HNB having positive values (> 0).

Although delayed postoperative clip slippage has been reported in previous case reports and case series, its true incidence with high rate of follow-up imaging has not been reported. We attempted to determine the incidence of clip slippage in a cohort of consecutive aneurysm clippings.
We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of 115 consecutive saccular aneurysm clippings at a single institution. Postoperative imaging was reviewed for clip slippage within 24 hours and at 3-12 months. Eighty-six aneurysms (75.8%) were exclusively clipped with Sugitaclip (Mizuho Medical, Tokyo, Japan) Titanium II clips, 16 aneurysms were exclusively clipped with Yaşargil (Aesculap, Center Valley, PA) titanium clips (13.9%), 5 aneurysms were only clipped with Sugita aneurysm clips (4.3%), and 3 aneurysms were only clipped with Peter Lazic (Peter Lazic Microsurgical Innovations, Tuttlingen, Germany) clips (2.6%).
In this cohort, 94.7% of clipped aneurysms had follow-up imaging within 24 hours, and 51.3% had delayed follow-up imaging within 3-12 months. We identified 3 cases of clip slippage in 115 consecutive aneurysm clippings, resulting in an incidence of 2.6%. The average cumulative closing force of clips per aneurysm across the study was 2.32 N, and the median number of clips placed was 1. Two of the 3 cases of clip slippage had a closing force <2.32 N and only placement of a single clip.
Because our series showed a 2.6% incidence of clip slippage, clipped aneurysms should be monitored with early and delayed vascular follow-up imaging. Lower cumulative clip closing force, single clip placement, and oversized clip blade length may be risk factors for postoperative aneurysmal clip slippage.

BACKGROUND: Subclavian steal phenomenon causes retrograde flow through the vertebral artery, ipsilateral to the affected subclavian artery, which rarely leads to flow-related vertebrobasilar junction (VBJ) aneurysms.
METHODS: We describe two cases of subarachnoid hemorrhage from such ruptured aneurysms in which the retrograde flow direction in the vertebral artery complicated surgical and endovascular treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Reversed flow in the vertebral artery, ipsilateral to the stenotic subclavian artery leads to a lack of proximal control in surgical clipping of these VBJ aneurysms and jeopardizes stability of coil and stent placement in endovascular aneurysm treatments in this setting.
CONCLUSIONS: From these 2 experiences over 7 years, treatment considerations emerged for future cases.

Neurosurgical clipping and endovascular coiling are both standard therapies to prevent rebleeding after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). However, controversy still exists about which is the optimal treatment. This meta-analysis aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of two treatments with high-quality evidence. Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Pubmed, Sinomed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data databases were systematically searched on August 5, 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies that evaluated the effectiveness and safety of clipping versus coiling in aSAH patients at discharge or within 1-year follow-up period were eligible. No restriction was set on the publication date. Meta-analyses were conducted to calculate the pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of relative risk (RR). Eight RCTs and 20 prospective cohort studies were identified. Compared to coiling, clipping was associated with a lower rebleeding rate at discharge (RR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.29--0.94) and a higher aneurysmal occlusion rate (RR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.19-1.48) at 1-year follow-up. In contrast, coiling reduced the vasospasm rate at discharge (RR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.23-1.71) and 1-year poor outcome rate (RR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.16-1.39). Subgroup analyses presented that among patients with a poor neurological condition at admission, no statistically significant outcome difference existed between the two treatments. The overall prognosis was better among patients who received coiling, but this advantage was not significant among patients with a poor neurological condition at admission. Therefore, the selection of treatment modality for aSAH patients should be considered comprehensively.

The number of elderly patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage is increasing. Elderly patients have been postulated to benefit more from endovascular coiling, compared with neurosurgical clipping. However, we based our therapeutic modality on the morphology and location of the aneurysms, rather than patients\' age or their World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grade. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity of our therapeutic modality over earlier approaches by assessing their clinical outcomes.
The study sample included 539 patients who underwent surgical procedures between January 2010 and May 2019. Baseline characteristics, aneurysmal morphology and location, surgical and clinical complications, and clinical outcomes were compared between elderly (defined as aged 75 years or older) and young patients.
There were 124 elderly patients (23.0%) in the sample. Eighty-five elderly patients (68.5%) received neurosurgical clipping, whereas 67.0% of the young patients (P = 0.827) received neurosurgical clipping. Of the elderly patients who had a poor World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grade, 49.4% and 48.7% underwent neurosurgical clipping and endovascular coiling, respectively (P = 1.000). Elderly patients had fewer favorable outcomes (21.8%) relative to young patients (61.8%; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the rate of favorable outcomes between patients undergoing neurosurgical clipping relative to endovascular coiling (21.2% vs. 23.1%; P = 0.818).
Neurosurgical clipping and endovascular coiling yield comparable clinical outcomes in elderly and young patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. These findings indicate that using a therapeutic modality based on aneurysmal morphology and location may be an effective treatment approach.

We compared the efficacy and safety of neurosurgical clipping with those of endovascular coiling for patients with intracranial aneurysm (IA) stratified by country, publication year, study design, sample size, mean age, percentage of male patients, percentage of aneurysms located in the anterior circulation, and follow-up duration.
We identified 64 studies (7 randomized controlled trials, 21 prospective cohort studies, and 36 retrospective studies) of clipping versus coiling for IA from PubMed, EmBase, and the Cochrane Library up to September 2019.
No significant differences were found in the incidence of poor outcomes observed between clipping and coiling for patients with ruptured IAs. In contrast, the incidence of a poor outcome was significantly increased for unruptured IAs treated by clipping. Clipping was associated with a lower risk of mortality for ruptured IAs, although no significant differences were found between clipping and coiling for unruptured IAs. Clipping was associated with a lower risk of rebleeding for ruptured IAs and an increased risk of bleeding for unruptured IAs. When only randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis, patients with ruptured IAs treated by clipping had an increased incidence of poor outcomes compared with those treated by coiling. Clipping reduced the risk of hydrocephalus and incomplete occlusion and increased the rate of complete occlusion for ruptured IAs. No significant differences in the risk of ischemic infarct and vasospasm were found between clipping and coiling.
Surgical clipping might be superior to endovascular coiling for ruptured IAs. However, clipping was associated with a greater incidence of poor outcomes and bleeding compared with coiling for unruptured IAs.