Upper extremity amputation can lead to significant functional morbidity. The main goals after amputation are to minimize pain and maintain or improve functional status while optimizing the quality of life. Postamputation pain is common and can be addressed with regenerative peripheral nerve interface surgery or targeted muscle reinnervation surgery. Both modalities are effective in treating residual limb pain and phantom limb pain, as well as improving prosthetic use. Differences in surgical technique between the 2 approaches need to be weighed when deciding what strategy may be most appropriate for the patient.

Nerve transfer surgery utilizes the redundant and synergistic innervation of intact muscle groups to rehabilitate motor function. This is achieved by transferring functional nerves or fascicles to damaged nerves near the target area, thereby reducing the reinnervation distance and time. The techniques encompass both proximal and distal nerve transfers, customized according to the specific injury. Successful nerve transfer hinges on accurate diagnosis, innovative surgical approaches, and the judicious choice of donor nerves to maximize functional restoration. This study explores nerve transfer strategies and their integration with other procedures, emphasizing their importance in enhancing outcomes in brachial plexus injury management.

Upper extremity peripheral nerve injuries present functional deficits that are amenable to management by tendon or nerve transfers. The principles of tendon and nerve transfers are discussed, with technical descriptions of preferred tendon and nerve transfers for radial, median, and ulnar nerve injuries.

OBJECTIVE: The Oberlin II double fascicular nerve transfer has been evaluated extensively for objective outcomes for elbow flexion in brachial plexus injuries (BPI). However, there is limited information available on the recovery pattern of supination and patient-reported activity in the long-term. Our study aimed to assess the functional results with a minimum of five years of follow-up.
METHODS: We evaluated patients with a minimum of five years after the Oberlin II procedure for post-traumatic BPI. They were evaluated using MRC grading, range of active movements, QuickDASH score and activity to check elbow flexion and forearm supination independent of finger and wrist flexion.
RESULTS: 18 out of 26 patients responded with a mean follow-up of 79.4 months (range: 61-98). 16 (88.9%) (p < 0.000) patients recovered to achieve active elbow flexion and forearm supination of either MRC grade 3 power or more. The average range of active elbow flexion was 113.9° (range: 0-140°) and active supination was 67.8° (0-90°). Patients who achieved grade 3 flexion or higher were found to regain supination after a delay. The recovery continues even after two years of surgery. The mean QuickDASH score was 21.8 (range: 2.3-63.6). There\'s a significant inverse correlation between QuickDASH with both flexion and supination (p < .001 and < 0.05). 15 patients (83.3%) could demonstrate a dissociation of elbow and forearm movements from digital and wrist movements.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated reliable functional results with independent elbow flexion, forearm supination and acceptable patient-reported outcomes for Oberlin II procedure in BPI.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes of pediatric facial reanimation beyond 10 years are not known. This cross-sectional study evaluated long-term surgical and patient-reported outcomes of adults who underwent smile reconstruction as children with either a cross-face nerve graft (CFNG) or masseter nerve transfer at least 10 years previously.
METHODS: Commissure excursion was quantified with FACE-Gram software at 3 time points: preoperatively, early postoperatively within 2 years, and at long-term follow-up. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated with validated questionnaires (Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale, FACE-Q 1.0) and thematic analysis of semistructured interviews. Results are reported as median (interquartile range [IQR]).
RESULTS: A total of 42 patients were included (26 women and 16 men). Median long-term follow-up was 19.3 years (IQR, 8.8 years) for CFNG and 17.6 years (IQR, 5.8 years) for masseter nerve transfer. For both groups, commissure excursion increased significantly from preoperative to early postoperative time points and remained stable at long-term follow-up (P < 0.0001). Commissure excursion at long-term follow-up between the 2 groups was not significantly different (CFNG, 5.0 mm [IQR, 9.4 mm]; masseter nerve transfer, 8.4 mm [IQR, 4.1 mm]); P > 0.05). For patient-reported outcomes, median Facial Clinimetric Evaluation Scale score was 72 of 100, and 95% of respondents agreed with the statement \"I am pleased with the result\" on the FACE-Q 1.0. Overall quality of life was rated at 7 of 10 or greater by 97% of participants, and all participants would recommend the surgery to other children.
CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric facial reanimation with CFNG or masseter nerve transfer reliably improves commissure excursion with longevity beyond 10 years. Adult patients report overall high satisfaction and social functioning.

BACKGROUND: Isolated musculocutaneous nerve injuries occur rarely due to their anatomical location. We present our patient with a musculocutaneous nerve injury in a motorcyclist.
METHODS: The patient was initially treated for a motorcycle accident. Further examination of the patient revealed impaired elbow flexion and numbness of the lateral forearm. Electromyography confirmed impaired function of the musculocutaneous nerve. After 3 months, the patient\'s condition did not show any improvement, neither electromyography confirmed recovery of the nerve activity, so surgical treatment was planned. In the surgical revision, neuroma-in-continuity was discovered and resected. The resulting nerve defect was 6 cm long. We provided nerve grafting using sural nerve from the right lower limb. After surgery, the patient began physical therapy and electrical stimulation. Two years later, the patient reached complete recovery of muscle strength.
CONCLUSIONS: Due to the lack of improvement after a 3-month period, we proceeded with a surgical revision, which demonstrated a complete lesion of the nerve that could not heal spontaneously. Therefore, we opted for the nerve graft method and the patient regained full function of elbow flexors.

BACKGROUND: Upper limb spasticity is a surgical challenge, both in diminishing agonists spasticity and reconstructing antagonist function. Brachioradialis (BR) is often involved in elbow flexors spasticity. Finger extension is often impaired in spastic patients. This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of BR motor branch to posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) during BR selective neurectomies, and to describe fascicles topography inside the radial nerve to facilitate PIN dissection.
METHODS: Ten upper limbs from 10 fresh frozen anatomical specimens were dissected. Motor branches to the BR, wrist extensors, supinator, PIN and radial sensory branch were identified. BR to PIN transfer was realized and its feasibility was studies (donor length, tensionless suture).
RESULTS: BR to PIN transfer was achievable in 9 out of 10 cases. The position of the sensory branch of the radial nerve was inferior or medial in all cases. The position of the PIN was lateral in 90% of the cases.
CONCLUSIONS: BR to PIN nerve transfer is achievable in most cases (90%). The lateral topography of the PIN and the inferomedial topography of the sensory branch in most cases allows for an easier intraoperative finding of the PIN when stimulation is not possible.
UNASSIGNED: IV, feasibility study.

\"State of the Art\" Learning Objectives: This manuscript serves to provide the reader with a general overview of the contemporary approaches to peripheral nerve reconstruction as the field has undergone considerable advancement over the last 3 decades. The learning objectives are as follows: To provide the reader with a brief history of peripheral nerve surgery and some of the landmark developments that allow for current peripheral nerve care practices.To outline the considerations and management options for the care of patients with brachial plexopathy, spinal cord injury, and lower extremity peripheral nerve injury.Highlight contemporary surgical techniques to address terminal neuroma and phantom limb pain.Review progressive and future procedures in peripheral nerve care, such as supercharge end-to-side nerve transfers.Discuss rehabilitation techniques for peripheral nerve care.
Le présent manuscrit vise à fournir au lecteur un aperçu général des approches contemporaines de la reconstruction des nerfs périphériques puisque le domaine a beaucoup progressé depuis trois décennies. Les objectifs d’apprentissage s”établissent comme suit : Fournir au lecteur un bref historique de la chirurgie des nerfs périphériques et quelques-unes des avancées historiques qui ont donné lieu aux pratiques de soins actuelles des nerfs périphériques.Décrire les considérations et les possibilités de prise en charge pour les soins des patients ayant une plexopathie brachiale, une lésion médullaire ou une lésion des nerfs périphériques des membres inférieurs.Souligner les techniques chirurgicales contemporaines pour traiter les neurones terminaux et les douleurs des membres fantômes.Examiner les interventions progressives et futures pour les soins des nerfs périphériques, comme l’amplification du transfert du nerf terminal au nerf latéral.Parler des techniques de réadaptation pour les soins des nerfs périphériques.

Introduction: Upper limb function loss in cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) contributes to substantial disability, and negatively impacts quality of life. Nerve transfer and tendon transfer surgery can provide improved upper limb function. This study assessed the utilization of nerve and tendon transfer surgery for individuals with tetraplegia in Canada. Methods: Data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information\'s Discharge Abstracts Database and the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System were used to identify the nerve and tendon transfer procedures performed in individuals with tetraplegia (2004-2020). Cases were identified using cervical SCI ICD-10-CA codes and Canadian Classification of Intervention codes for upper extremity nerve and tendon transfers. Data on sex, age at time of procedure, province, and hospital stay duration were recorded. Results: From 2004 to 2020, there were ≤80 nerve transfer procedures (81% male, mean age 38.3 years) and 61 tendon transfer procedures (78% male, mean age 45.0 years) performed (highest in Ontario and British Columbia). Using an estimate of 50% eligibility, an average of 1.3% of individuals underwent nerve transfer and 1.0% underwent tendon transfer. Nerve transfers increased over time (2004-2009, n = <5; 2010-2015, n = 27; 2016-2019, n = 49) and tendon transfers remained relatively constant. Both transfer types were performed as day-surgery or single night stay. Conclusions: Nerve and tendon transfer surgery to improve upper limb function in Canadians with tetraplegia remains low. This study highlights a substantial gap in care for this vulnerable population. Identification of barriers that prevent access to care is required to promote best practice for upper extremity care.
Introduction : La perte de fonction du membre supérieur en cas de lésion de la moelle épinière cervicale (SCI0 contribue à un handicap substantiel avec des répercussions négatives sur la qualité de vie. La chirurgie de transfert des nerfs et des tendons peut apporter une amélioration du fonctionnement du membre supérieur. Cette étude a évalué l\'utilisation de la chirurgie de transfert de nerfs et de tendons pour les patients tétraplégiques au Canada. Méthodes : Des données issues de la base de données des résumés de congés de l\'Institut canadien d\'information sur la santé du système national d\'information sur les soins ambulatoires ont été utilisées pour identifier les procédures de transfert de nerfs et de tendons pratiquées sur des patients tétraplégiques entre 2004 et 2020. Les cas ont été identifiés en utilisant les codes de SCI cervicales du CIM-10-CA et des codes canadiens de classification des interventions pour les transferts de nerfs et de tendons du membre supérieur. Les données sur le sexe et l\'âge au moment de la procédure, la province et la durée de séjour à l\'hôpital ont été consignées. Résultats : Entre 2004 et 2020, il y a eu ≤ 80 procédures de transferts de nerfs (hommes : 81 %, âge moyen : 38,3 ans) et 61 procédures de transfert de tendons (hommes : 78 %, âge moyen : 45,0 ans) pratiquées (principalement en Ontario et en Colombie-Britannique). En estimant une admissibilité de 50 %, une moyenne de 1,3 % des patients a subi un transfert de nerfs et 1,0 % des patients a subi un transfert tendineux. Les transferts de nerfs ont augmenté au fil des années (2004-2009, n = < 5; 2010-2015, n = 27; 2016-2019, n = 49) tandis que le nombre de transferts tendineux est resté relativement stable. Les deux types de transferts ont été pratiqués das le cadre de la chirurgie d\'un jour ou avec une hospitalisation d\'une seule nuit. Conclusions : La chirurgie de transfert de nerfs et de tendons pour l\'amélioration des fonctions des membres supérieurs reste peu utilisée pour les Canadiens tétraplégiques. Cette étude souligne une lacune substantielle des soins pour cette population vulnérable. Il est nécessaire d\'identifier les obstacles qui empêchent l\'accès aux soins afin de promouvoir une meilleure pratique pour les soins du membre supérieur.

OBJECTIVE: Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) and lower trunk brachial plexus injury (BPI) commonly result in hand paralysis. Although restoring hand function is complex and challenging to achieve, regaining volitional hand control drastically enhances functionality for these patients. The authors aimed to systematically review the outcomes of hand-opening function after supinator to posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) transfer.
METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS: A total of 16 studies with 88 patients and 119 supinator to PIN transfers were included (87 transfers for SCI and 32 for BPI). In most studies, the time interval from injury to surgery was 6-12 months. Finger extension and thumb extension (Medical Research Council grade ≥ 3/5) recovered in 86.5% (103/119) and 78.1% (93/119) of cases, respectively, over a median follow-up of 19 months. The rates of recovery were similar for the SCI and BPI populations (finger extension, 87.3% in SCI and 84.3% in BPI; thumb extension, 75.8% in SCI and 84.3% in BPI). Type of injury (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.17-6.4, p = 0.95), time from injury to surgery (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.8-1.29, p = 0.88), and age (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.90-1.06, p = 0.60) were not associated with odds of a successful outcome. Duration of follow-up was significantly associated with successful finger extension (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.01-1.30, p = 0.026). No donor-associated supinator weakness was reported postoperatively given that patients had an intact bicep muscle preoperatively contributing to supination.
CONCLUSIONS: Supinator to PIN transfer is a safe and effective procedure that can achieve successful restoration of digital extension in the SCI and BPI population at similar rates. Duration of follow-up was associated with superior outcomes, which was expected.