OBJECTIVE: Single-Port Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (SP-RAPN) can be performed by transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. However, there is a lack of surgical outcomes for novel Retroperitoneal Low Anterior Access (LAA) in SP-RAPN. The study compared outcomes of the standard approach (SA), considering transperitoneal (TP) and posterior retroperitoneal (RP) access vs LAA in SP-RAPN series.
METHODS: 102 consecutive patients underwent SP-RAPN between 2019 and 2023 at a tertiary referral robotic center were identified. Baseline characteristics, peri- and post-operative outcomes were collected. Patients were stratified according to surgical approach into standard (RP or TP) vs LAA and, subsequently, RP vs LAA. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to test the probability of the same-day discharge adjusting for comorbidity indexes.
RESULTS: Overall, 102 consecutive patients were included in this study (68 SA - 26 TP and 42 posterior RP vs 34 LAA). Median age was 60 (IQR 51.5-66) years and median BMI was 31 (IQR 26.3-37.6). No baseline differences were observed. LAA exhibited significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) (median 10 [IQR 8-12] vs 24 [IQR 12-30.2.] hours, p < .0001), reduced post-operative pain (p < .0001) and decreased narcotic use on 0-1 PO Day (p < .001) compared to SA and RP only. Multivariate analysis, adjusting for comorbidities, identified LAA as a strong predictor for Same-Day Discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: LAA is an effective approach as well as RP and TP, regardless of the renal mass location, whether it is anterior or posterior, upper/mid or lower pole, yielding favorable outcomes in LOS, post-operative pain and decreased narcotics use compared to SA in SP-RAPN.

BACKGROUND: The left kidney is often preferred for living donor kidney transplantation because of its anatomical advantages. However, the right kidney may be procured due to donor conditions. Few studies have assessed the safety and graft outcome of right retroperitoneal laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (RDN). This study aimed to compare the outcomes between right and left RDN with respect to donor outcome and the graft function of recipients.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 230 consecutive living donor kidney transplants performed at our institution between May 2019 and March 2023. We reviewed the outcomes of kidney transplant in the right and left kidneys after RDN.
RESULTS: A total of 230 living donor kidney transplants were performed, with 32 donors receiving right RDN (right RDN group) and 198 donors receiving left RDN (left RDN group). The renal veins and ureters were significantly shorter in the right RDN group than in the left RDN group (both p < .001). Donor operation and warm ischemia time were significantly longer in the right RDN group than in the left RDN group (p = .012 and p < .001, respectively). None of the groups exhibited any cases of delayed graft function owing to donor-related reasons. Perioperative changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate of recipients and death-censored graft survival were not significantly different between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In RDN, the outcomes of right donor nephrectomy were comparable to those of left donor nephrectomy in terms of donor safety and recipient renal function.

BACKGROUND: Nefopam and propacetamol are the most commonly used analgesics in postoperative multimodal analgesic regimens. Distinct mechanisms are involved in each drug\'s anti-nociceptive effects. No studies have compared pain relief efficacy between the two drugs in patients undergoing transplantation surgery. Here, we investigated whether the administration of nefopam or propacetamol to healthy living kidney donors who underwent rectus sheath block (RSB) for parietal pain could reduce the subsequent opioid dose necessary to produce adequate analgesia.
METHODS: This prospective, randomized controlled trial included 72 donors undergoing elective hand-assisted living donor nephrectomy into two groups: propacetamol (n = 36) and nefopam (n = 36). Intraoperative RSB was performed in all enrolled donors. The primary outcome was the total volume of intravenous opioid-based patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) used on postoperative day 1 (POD 1). Additionally, the Numeric Rating Scale scores for flank (visceral) and umbilicus (parietal) pain at rest and during coughing were compared, and the Korean adaptation of the Quality of Recovery-15 Questionnaire (QoR-15 K) was evaluated on POD 1.
RESULTS: Both groups had similar preoperative and intraoperative characteristics. On POD 1, the total amount of PCA infusion was significantly lower in the nefopam group than in the propacetamol group (44.5 ± 19.3 mL vs. 70.2 ± 29.0 mL; p < 0.001). This group also reported lower pain scores at the flank and umbilical sites and required fewer rescue doses of fentanyl in the post-anesthesia care unit. However, pain scores and fentanyl consumption in the ward were comparable between groups. The QoR-15 K scores were similar between groups; there were substantial improvements in breathing, pain severity, and anxiety/depression levels in the nefopam group. The incidences of postoperative complications, including sweating and tachycardia, were similar between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with propacetamol, nefopam provides a greater analgesic effect for visceral pain and enhances the effects of blocks that reduce the opioid requirement in living kidney donors with parietal pain managed by RSB.
BACKGROUND: The trial was registered prior to patient enrollment in the clinical trial database using the Clinical Research Information Service (registration no. KCT0007351 , Date of registration 03/06/2022).

To assess the robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) trifecta rate within a fellowship program. Patients undergoing RAPN 01/01/2010-01/07/2023 were enrolled from a prospectively maintained database. All cases were performed jointly with surgical fellows, except when privately insured. Patients were excluded if they were converted to open or radical nephrectomy. The primary outcome was achieving the \'trifecta\' of negative surgical margins, no complications < 30 days post-operatively and warm ischaemia time (WIT) < 25 min. The secondary outcomes were factors associated with trifecta success. Ethics approval was obtained. In the enrolment period, 355 patients underwent intended RAPN, of whom seven were excluded due to conversion to conversion to radical nephrectomy (6 patients) or conversion to open (one). Amongst the 348 eligible patients, median age was 60 years, 115 (33%) were female and 19 were private patients. WIT was < 25 min for 324/337 patients (96%), surgical margins were negative in 325 (93%), 294 (84%) were complication-free at 30 days and 301/320 (94%) had a < 30% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3-6 months postoperatively. Subsequently, trifecta outcomes were achieved in 253/337 (75%) patients. Comparing with patients without those with trifecta success were similar in all thirteen measured patients and tumour factors. In a teaching hospital, with a fellowship training programme, trifecta outcome is achievable for most RAPN patients, and at a rate comparable to international standards. Fellowship centres should monitor their outcomes to ensure high patient outcomes are maintained alongside training requirements.

Bevezetés: A vese rosszindulatú daganatai a gyakrabban végzett hasi ultrahangvizsgálatoknak köszönhetően egyre gyakrabban kerülnek felismerésre korai stádiumban. A robotasszisztált részleges nephrectomia a vesére lokalizált daganat szervmegtartó kezelési lehetősége, mely 2022 óta Magyarországon is elérhető. Célkitűzés: Robotasszisztált részleges nephrectomiaműtéttel kapcsolatos kezdeti tapasztalataink összegzése, értékelése és közreadása. Módszer: A műtétek retrospektív vizsgálata. A műtétre került betegek és daganataik preoperatív jellemzőinek, a műtéti paramétereknek és szövődményeknek, valamint az eltávolított daganatok szövettani eredményeinek áttekintése. Eredmények: 2022. június és 2024. március között 78 robotasszisztált részleges nephrectomiaműtétre került sor. A daganatok 59%-ban egyszerű, 41%-ban közepes és magas PADUA-ponttal rendelkeztek. Az átlagos műtéti idő 123 perc, az átlagos ischaemiás idő 18 perc volt. Clavien–Dindo II. és III. szövődmény 2-2 esetben fordult elő. Konverzióra egy esetben került sor. Reoperáció nem volt. A betegeket átlagosan a második posztoperatív napon bocsátották el a kórházból. A daganatok 80%-ban voltak rosszindulatúak. A sebésziszél-pozitivitás 10% volt. Megbeszélés: A robotasszisztált részleges nephrectomia alkalmas a szervre lokalizált komplex vesedaganatok kimetszésére. Funkcionális eredményessége jobb, mint a nyitott műtété. Kevesebb perioperatív szövődménnyel jár, mint a nyitott és a laparoszkópos műtétek, ugyanakkor onkológiai eredményessége megegyezik a nyitott és a laparoszkópos műtétekével. A betanulási időszak során a műtéti és a melegischaemiás idő 20 műtét után optimalizálódik. Az eredmények fenntartásához évi legalább 18–20 műtét elvégzése szükséges. Következtetés: A robotasszisztált részleges nephrectomia biztonsággal alkalmazható, eredményes minimálinvazív eljárás a vese rosszindulatú daganatainak kezelésében. Orv Hetil. 2024; 165(26): 997–1001.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a combination of multimodal pathways to improve surgical outcomes. Recommendations for radical cystectomy have been published by the ERAS society for the cystectomy but a lack of evidence is observed for urological procedures such as nephrectomy (Ne) and radical prostatectomy (RP). The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of enhanced recovery protocol implementation for Ne ad RP at our academic institution.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective, monocentric, comparative analysis, pre and post implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy or nephrectomy (partial or total) for cancer. The primary endpoint was the mean length of stay (LOS). Secondary endpoints included 30-days readmission, postoperative complications, 90 days survival, and oncologic outcome at 6 months.
RESULTS: We included 264 patients between January, 2019, and December, 2020. Statistical analysis was performed separately by type of surgery. The LOS of patients included in the ERP protocol was decreased on average by 1,3 days IC95% [ -2.50; -0.08], p<0.001 for nephrectomies and by 2.2 days IC95% [-3.72; -0.62] p<0.001 for prostatectomies, compared to non-ERP patients. There were no more re-admisson, death or oncologic recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, ERP for oncological nephrectomy and prostatectomy reduced the length of stay, without increasing postoperative complications and readmission.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the predictive value of individual components of the R.E.N.A.L scoring system for Laparoscopic (LPN) and Robotic Partial Nephrectomy (RPN).
METHODS: Patients that had undergone a Laparoscopic (LPN) or Robotic Partial Nephrectomy (RPN) between 2018 and 2023 were reviewed. Our data collection included Race, Ethnicity, Age, BMI, R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score, and complications. Cases that achieved trifecta outcomes were designated as \"Group A\" and cases that did not achieve trifecta were \"Group B\". All the data were collected using REDCap database.
RESULTS: A total of 111 cases were included, Group A consisted of 82% of all cases, whereas Group B 18%. Radius score demonstrated significant distinction concerning trifecta attainment and was the most predictive component of the 5 scoring metrics of the nephrometry system. In a subgroup analysis, R-score of 3 or a renal mass measuring ≥ 7 cm, was a significant independent negative predictor for trifecta outcomes, as well as tumor size at presentation.
CONCLUSIONS: Renal nephrometry score is predictive of trifecta outcomes for patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic partial nephrectomy. Radius of mass was the most effective predictive component of the nephrometry score for trifecta prediction.

We investigated the use of robotic objective performance metrics (OPM) to predict number of cases to proficiency and independence among abdominal transplant fellows performing robot-assisted donor nephrectomy (RDN). 101 RDNs were performed by 5 transplant fellows from September 2020 to October 2023. OPM included fellow percent active control time (%ACT) and handoff counts (HC). Proficiency was defined as ACT ≥ 80% and HC ≤ 2, and independence as ACT ≥ 99% and HC ≤ 1. Case number was significantly associated with increasing fellow %ACT, with proficiency estimated at 14 cases and independence at 32 cases (R2 = 0.56, p < 0.001). Similarly, case number was significantly associated with decreasing HC, with proficiency at 18 cases and independence at 33 cases (R2 = 0.29, p < 0.001). Case number was not associated with total active console time (p = 0.91). Patient demographics, operative characteristics, and outcomes were not associated with OPM, except for donor estimated blood loss (EBL), which positively correlated with HC. Abdominal transplant fellows demonstrated proficiency at 14-18 cases and independence at 32-33 cases. Total active console time remained unchanged, suggesting that increasing fellow autonomy does not impede operative efficiency. These findings may serve as a benchmark for training abdominal transplant surgery fellows independently and safely in RDN.

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has become the standard treatment for small renal tumors, including highly complex cases. However, applying RAPN to renal tumors in the horseshoe kidney (HSK) is clinically challenging due to malformations and complex blood supply. Herein, we present two cases of RAPN in patients with HSK treated using selective artery clamping methods.
METHODS: A 61-year-old male with a 15 mm renal tumor located on the upper pole of the right HSK was referred to our Department. The patient underwent RAPN via the transperitoneal approach, following a three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) assessment. Additionally, before surgery, we confirmed which renal arteries would be clamped in surgery by examining the kidney regions supplied by each renal artery. The second patient referred to our Department, a 45-year-old male, had a 46 mm renal tumor located on the isthmus of the HSK. His tumor received blood supply from two renal arteries, with the bilateral collecting systems converging and forming a ureter on 3D-CT. The patient underwent RAPN through an intraperitoneal approach in the semi-lateral position, with port placement lower than in standard RAPN. Pathological examinations revealed clear-cell renal cell carcinoma with negative surgical margins in both cases. Both patients had no recurrences or metastases at 53 and 13 months post-surgery, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: We present cases successfully treated with RAPN with selective artery clamping methods for HSK using 3D-CT without encountering complications, even in isthmus tumors.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the follow-up rate of living kidney donors and explored the factors related to continuous follow-up and remnant renal function, enabling the optimal management of living kidney donors.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 180 living kidney donors who underwent donor nephrectomies at our institute. Clinical information was obtained from medical charts, and remnant renal function was defined as the estimated glomerular filtration rate 12 months after donor nephrectomy.
RESULTS: Overall, 6/180 donors (3.3%) were lost to follow-up within a year, and the follow-up rate gradually declined yearly. Independent risk factors for loss to follow-up included a follow-up period <60 months and graft survival of the recipient (p=0.002 and p=0.043, respectively). Recipient survival was correlated with loss to follow-up; however, this was not significant (p=0.051). Regarding remnant renal function, age ≥60 years, preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate <74 ml/min/1.73 m2, and a Δsingle-kidney estimated glomerular filtration rate <9.3 ml/min/1.73m2 were independent risk factors for poorly preserved remnant renal function (p=0.036, p<0.0001, and p<0.0001, respectively). Using propensity score matching to adjust for preoperative factors, a Δsingle-kidney estimated glomerular filtration rate <9.3 ml/min/1.73 m2 was the only significant postoperative factor for poorly preserved remnant renal function (p=0.023).
CONCLUSIONS: An increased 5-year follow-up rate could lead to an increase in long-term follow-up, and recipient prognosis may be correlated with the living kidney donor follow-up status. Furthermore, Δsingle-kidney estimated glomerular filtration rate was identified as a factor for establishing the optimal precision follow-up management of living kidney donors.