Neostigmine/glycopyrrolate

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:术后尿潴留(POUR)是已知的疝气手术并发症。微创腹股沟疝修补术(IHR)通常在神经肌肉阻滞(NMB)的全身麻醉下完成。通常用抗胆碱酯酶抑制剂与抗胆碱能药配对逆转。Sugammadex是一种独特的NMB逆转剂,不必与抗胆碱能药物配对。我们试图探索sugammadex在降低POUR率方面的作用。
    方法:数据是在2016年2月至2019年10月期间在单个机构进行回顾性收集的。我们确定并研究了接受微创IHR并接受Sugamadex或新斯的明/格隆溴铵逆转NMB的患者。主要终点是POUR需要膀胱导管插入术。次要终点包括术后和30天再入院。
    结果:本研究包括274例患者(143例接受了新斯的明和格隆溴铵,131sugammadex)。Sugammadex患者平均比新斯的明/格隆铵患者大5岁(63.2vs58.2,p=0.003),接受的中位静脉输液(IVF)较少(900mlvs1000ml;p=0.015)。Sugamadex和新斯的明/格隆溴铵患者的POUR发生率存在显着差异(0.0%vs8.4%,p≤0.001)。在控制年龄和IVF后,差异仍然显着。接受新斯的明/格隆溴铵的人的POUR几率比接受sugammadex的人高25倍。
    结论:本研究结果反映了Sugammadex在微创IHR病例中对POUR的保护作用。
    OBJECTIVE: Post-operative urinary retention (POUR) is a known complication of hernia surgery. Minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair (IHR) is typically done under general anesthesia with neuromuscular blockade (NMB), which is commonly reversed with an anticholinesterase inhibitor paired with an anticholinergic agent. Sugammadex is a unique NMB reversal agent that does not have to be paired with an anticholinergic. We sought to explore the role of sugammadex in reducing the rate of POUR following these procedures.
    METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively at a single institution between February 2016 and October 2019. We identified and studied patients who underwent minimally invasive IHR and received either sugammadex or neostigmine/glycopyrrolate for NMB reversal. The primary endpoint was POUR requiring bladder catheterization. Secondary endpoints included post-operative and 30-day readmissions.
    RESULTS: 274 patients were included in this study (143 received neostigmine and glycopyrrolate, 131 sugammadex). The sugammadex patients were on average 5 years older than the neostigmine/ glycopyrrolate patients (63.2 vs 58.2, p = 0.003), and received less median intravenous fluids (IVF) (900 ml vs 1000 ml; p = 0.015). There was a significant difference in the rate of POUR between the sugammadex and neostigmine/glycopyrrolate patients (0.0% vs 8.4%, p ≤ 0.001). The difference remained significant after controlling for age and IVF. The odds of POUR for those who received neostigmine/glycopyrrolate were 25 × higher than the odds of those who received sugammadex.
    CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study reflect the protective role of sugammadex against POUR in minimally invasive IHR cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    术后肠功能障碍对患者在手术恢复过程中造成困难,和逆转剂可能会影响肠功能。这项研究旨在研究和比较sugamadex和新斯的明/格隆铵联合治疗对机器人甲状腺切除术患者术后排便的影响。122名病人的电子病历,我们对2018年3月至2020年12月期间接受机器人甲状腺切除术的患者进行了回顾性分析.人口统计,临床,评估了实验室检查结果和手术后的首次气体通过时间。新斯的明组的首次气体排放时间超过24小时的患者人数明显高于sugamadex组(p=0.008)。多因素logistic回归分析表明,sugammadex是24h内首次排气时间的预后因素(比值比=4.60,95%置信区间1.47-14.36,p=0.005)。尽管术后肠蠕动,根据第一次气体排放时间,具有可比性,sugamadex组24h内首次气体排放时间的患者人数明显高于新斯的明组。这表明sugammadex的使用不会影响机器人甲状腺切除术后术后肠动力的延迟恢复。
    Postoperative bowel dysfunction poses difficulty to patients during their recovery from surgery, and reversal agents may affect bowel function. This study aimed to investigate and compare the effects of sugammadex and a neostigmine/glycopyrrolate combination on postoperative bowel movement in patients undergoing robotic thyroidectomy. The electronic medical records of 122 patients, who underwent robotic thyroidectomy between March 2018 and December 2020, were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory findings and the first gas-passing time after surgery were assessed. The number of patients with a first gas emission time over 24 h was significantly higher in the neostigmine group than in the sugammadex group (p = 0.008). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that sugammadex was a prognostic factor for the first gas-passing time within 24 h (odds ratio = 4.60, 95% confidence interval 1.47-14.36, p = 0.005). Although postoperative bowel motility, based on the first gas emission time, was comparable, the number of patients with a first gas emission time within 24 h was significantly higher in the sugammadex group than in the neostigmine group. This shows that the use of sugammadex did not affect the delayed recovery of postoperative bowel motility after robotic thyroidectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate whether reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex reduced the incidence of residual blockade and facilitated operating room discharge readiness.
    METHODS: Adult patients undergoing abdominal surgery received rocuronium, followed by randomized allocation to sugammadex (2 or 4 mg kg(-1)) or usual care (neostigmine/glycopyrrolate, dosing per usual care practice) for reversal of neuromuscular blockade. Timing of reversal agent administration was based on the providers\' clinical judgement. Primary endpoint was the presence of residual neuromuscular blockade at PACU admission, defined as a train-of-four (TOF) ratio <0.9, using TOF-Watch® SX. Key secondary endpoint was time between reversal agent administration and operating room discharge-readiness; analysed with analysis of covariance.
    RESULTS: Of 154 patients randomized, 150 had a TOF value measured at PACU entry. Zero out of 74 sugammadex patients and 33 out of 76 (43.4%) usual care patients had TOF-Watch SX-assessed residual neuromuscular blockade at PACU admission (odds ratio 0.0, 95% CI [0-0.06], P<0.0001). Of these 33 usual care patients, 2 also had clinical evidence of partial paralysis. Time between reversal agent administration and operating room discharge-readiness was shorter for sugammadex vs usual care (14.7 vs. 18.6 min respectively; P=0.02).
    CONCLUSIONS: After abdominal surgery, sugammadex reversal eliminated residual neuromuscular blockade in the PACU, and shortened the time from start of study medication administration to the time the patient was ready for discharge from the operating room.
    BACKGROUND: Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT01479764.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号