背景:在美国,大约1%的妊娠合并孕前糖尿病.1型糖尿病患者发生不良母婴结局的风险增加。虽然连续血糖监测已证明对1型糖尿病患者有益,它的成本高于传统的间歇性手指监测,特别是如果只在怀孕期间使用。
目的:建立一个经济分析模型,在1型糖尿病孕妇队列中比较连续血糖监测和自我血糖监测的成本。
方法:我们开发了一个经济分析模型来比较1型糖尿病孕妇的两种血糖监测策略:连续血糖监测和自我监测。该模型考虑了妊娠高血压疾病,大的胎龄,剖宫产,新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入院,和新生儿低血糖。主要结果是从卫生系统的角度来看,2022年每个战略的总成本为美元,以自我监测为参照组。概率,相对风险,成本是从文献中提取的,成本调整为2022年美元。敏感性分析是通过根据概率改变参数进行的,相对风险,和成本分配。通过1000次蒙特卡罗模拟测试了结果的鲁棒性。
结果:在基本案例分析中,使用连续血糖监测的怀孕费用为26,837美元,而自我监测为29,039美元,导致每个人的成本减少2,202美元。对增量成本影响最大的参数包括NICU入院的相对风险,NICU入院的费用,连续血糖监测成本,和通常的护理费用。蒙特卡罗模拟表明,连续葡萄糖监测是98.7%时间的最佳策略。单因素敏感性分析显示,连续血糖监测对NICU入院的相对风险与连续血糖监测比较,更经济自我监测低于1.15。
结论:与自我监测相比,连续血糖监测是1型糖尿病孕妇的经济策略.
BACKGROUND: In the United States, approximately 1% of pregnancies are complicated by pregestational diabetes. Individuals with type 1 diabetes have an increased risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. While continuous glucose monitoring has demonstrated benefits for patients with type 1 diabetes, its cost is higher than traditional intermittent fingerstick monitoring, particularly if used only during pregnancy.
OBJECTIVE: To develop an economic analysis model to compare in silico the cost of continuous glucose monitoring and self-monitoring of blood glucose in a cohort of pregnant individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
METHODS: We developed an economic analysis model to compare two glucose monitoring strategies in pregnant individuals with type 1 diabetes: continuous glucose monitoring and self-monitoring. The model considered hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, large for gestational age, cesarean delivery, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and neonatal hypoglycemia. The primary outcome was the total cost per strategy in 2022 USD from a health system perspective, with self-monitoring as the reference group. Probabilities, relative risks, and costs were extracted from the literature, and the costs were adjusted to 2022 US dollars. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by varying parameters based on the probability, relative risk, and cost distributions. The robustness of the results was tested through 1000 Monte Carlo simulations.
RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, the cost of pregnancy using continuous glucose monitoring was $26,837 compared to $29,039 for self-monitoring, resulting in a cost reduction of $2,202 per individual. The parameters with the greatest effect on the incremental cost included the relative risk of NICU admission, cost of NICU admission, continuous glucose monitoring costs, and usual care costs. Monte Carlo simulations indicated that continuous glucose monitoring was the optimal strategy 98.7% of the time. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that continuous glucose monitoring was more economical if the relative risk of NICU admission with continuous glucose monitoring vs. self-monitoring was below 1.15.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared to self-monitoring, continuous glucose monitoring is an economical strategy for pregnant individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus.