National early warning score

国家预警评分
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的探讨血乳酸(BLA)联合国家早期预警评分(NEWS)在脓毒症患者早期筛查及严重程度评估中的应用价值。本工作所使用的数据和资料来自柳州市人民医院紧急救援区537名匿名脓毒症患者的电子病历系统,广西,从2020年7月1日至2020年12月26日。根据脓毒症患者的28天结果,将病历纳入S组(407例存活病例)和D组(130例死亡病例).住院方式等基本信息,初始管理,入院后24小时内使用紧急呼吸机,新闻得分,动脉氧压/肺泡氧压比(PaO2/PAO2),肺泡-动脉血氧差异(A-aDO2),血清肌酐(SCr),血尿素氮(BUN),氧合指数(OI),格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS),D-二聚体,入院后24小时内使用血管活性药物,C反应蛋白(CRP),降钙素原(PCT),白细胞介素-6(IL-6),N末端B型利钠肽原(NT-proBNP),快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分,SOFA得分,BLA级别,含乳酸的新闻(NEWS-L)评分,SOFA评分包括乳酸水平(SOFA-L)评分,重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间,总住院时间,ICU住院时间/总住院时间,比较两组感染性休克情况。进行Logistic回归分析以评估各种预测因素对预后的影响并绘制受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。结果表明,S组和D组的平均年龄差异有统计学意义(t=-5.620;OR=-9.96,95%CI:-13.44~-6.47;P<0.001)。S组在入院方式上差异显著(χ2=9.618,P<0.01),初始管理方法(χ2=51.766,P<0.001),入院24h内使用急诊呼吸机(χ2=98.564,P<0.001),感染性休克发生率(χ2=77.545,P<0.001),入院24h内使用血管活性药物(χ2=102.453,P<0.001),心率(t=-4.063,P<0.001),呼吸频率(t=-4.758,P<0.001),氧合状态(χ2=20.547,P<0.001),新闻评分(t=-6.120,P<0.001),PaO2/PAO2比值(t=2.625,P<0.01),A-aDO2值(Z=-3.581,P<0.001),OI值(Z=-3.106,P<0.01),PLT值(Z=-2.305,P<0.05),SCr值(Z=-3.510,P<0.001),BUN值(Z=-3.170,P<0.01),D-二聚体(Z=-4.621,P<0.001),CRP水平(Z=-4.057,P<0.001),PCT值(Z=-2.783,P<0.01),IL-6水平(Z=-2.904,P<0.001),住院时间(Z=-4.138,P<0.001),总住院时间(Z=-8.488,P<0.001),CCU/总住院时间(Z=-9.118,P<0.001),新闻评分(t=-6.120,P<0.001),SOFA评分(t=-6.961,P<0.001),SOFA-L评分(Z=-4.609,P<0.001),NEWS-L评分(Z=-5.845,P<0.001),BLA水平(Z=-6.557,P<0.001),与D组相比,GCS评分(Z=6.909,P<0.001)。感染性休克,PCT,新闻得分,GCS评分,SOFA得分,SOFA-L得分,新闻-L得分,BLA水平是预测脓毒症患者预后的独立危险因素(P<0.001)。血乳酸ROC曲线下面积(AUC),PCT,新闻,新闻-L,GCS,SOFA,SOFA-L分别为0.695、0.665、0.692、0.698、0.477、0.700和0.653。这些发现表明,BLA与NEWS(NEWS-L)评分和SOFA评分的组合在评估脓毒症的预后方面具有一定的优势。
    This work aimed to investigate the adoption value of blood lactic acid (BLA) combined with the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) in the early screening of sepsis patients and assessing their severity. The data and materials utilized in this work were obtained from the electronic medical record system of 537 anonymized sepsis patients who received emergency rescue in the emergency rescue area of Liuzhou People\'s Hospital, Guangxi, from July 1, 2020, to December 26, 2020. Based on the 28-day outcomes of sepsis patients, the medical records were rolled into Group S (407 survival cases) and Group D (130 dead cases). Basic information such as the mode of hospital admission, initial management, use of emergency ventilator within 24 h of admission, NEWS score, arterial oxygen pressure/alveolar oxygen pressure ratio (PaO2/PAO2), alveolar-arterial oxygen difference (A-aDO2), serum creatinine (SCr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), oxygenation index (OI), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), D-dimer, use of vasoactive drugs within 24 h of admission, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL-6), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score, SOFA score, BLA level, NEWS with lactate (NEWS-L) score, SOFA score including lactate level (SOFA-L) score, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) length of stay, total hospital stay, ICU stay/total hospital stay, and septic shock condition were compared between groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the impact of various predictive factors on prognosis and to plot the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The results suggested marked differences between Group S and Group D in terms of mean age (t = -5.620; OR = -9.96, 95 % CI: -13.44∼-6.47; P < 0.001). Group S showed drastic differences in terms of mode of hospital admission (χ2 = 9.618, P < 0.01), method of initial management (χ2 = 51.766, P < 0.001), use of emergency ventilator within 24 h of admission (χ2 = 98.564, P < 0.001), incidence of septic shock (χ2 = 77.545, P < 0.001), use of vasoactive drugs within 24 h of admission (χ2 = 102.453, P < 0.001), heart rate (t = -4.063, P < 0.001), respiratory rate (t = -4.758, P < 0.001), oxygenation status (χ2 = 20.547, P < 0.001), NEWS score (t = -6.120, P < 0.001), PaO2/PAO2 ratio (t = 2.625, P < 0.01), A-aDO2 value (Z = -3.581, P < 0.001), OI value (Z = -3.106, P < 0.01), PLT value (Z = -2.305, P < 0.05), SCr value (Z = -3.510, P < 0.001), BUN value (Z = -3.170, P < 0.01), D-dimer (Z = -4.621, P < 0.001), CRP level (Z = -4.057, P < 0.001), PCT value (Z = -2.783, P < 0.01), IL-6 level (Z = -2.904, P < 0.001), length of hospital stay (Z = -4.138, P < 0.001), total hospital stay (Z = -8.488, P < 0.001), CCU/total hospital stay (Z = -9.118, P < 0.001), NEWS score (t = -6.120, P < 0.001), SOFA score (t = -6.961, P < 0.001), SOFA-L score (Z = -4.609, P < 0.001), NEWS-L score (Z = -5.845, P < 0.001), BLA level (Z = -6.557, P < 0.001), and GCS score (Z = 6.909, P < 0.001) when compared to Group D. The use of ventilators, septic shock, PCT, NEWS score, GCS score, SOFA score, SOFA-L score, NEWS-L score, and BLA level were identified as independent risk factors for predicting the prognosis of sepsis patients (P < 0.001). The areas under ROC curve (AUC) of blood lactic acid, PCT, NEWS, NEWS-L, GCS, SOFA, and SOFA-L were 0.695, 0.665, 0.692, 0.698, 0.477, 0.700, and 0.653, respectively. These findings indicate that the combination of BLA with NEWS (NEWS-L) score and SOFA score has certain advantages in assessing the prognosis of sepsis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    危重患者的临床恶化是一种常见现象,可能在不良结果发生前几个小时发生。及早发现生命体征的细微变化,比如脉搏率和血压的改变,对于预防不良事件至关重要。然而,这些往往没有足够早的认识到,以迅速干预。在尼日利亚的危重病管理中使用警告评分或评估系统尚未得到很好的评估。我们评估了国家早期预警评分(NEWS)系统与结果之间的关联,尤其是乔斯大学教学医院(JUTH)危重病患者的死亡率。尼日利亚。
    这项研究是一项回顾性研究,涉及2021年1月至2021年7月期间入住内科和外科病房的成年人。患者的医疗记录被用来获取社会人口统计学等数据,和生命体征,用于计算新闻变量,诊断,逗留时间,结果,和并发症。患者被分类为低,中等,根据入院后24小时内和感兴趣的结果(死亡或出院)前24小时的NEWS评分,以及高风险。
    本研究共纳入405例患者。患者低,中等,以及在入院后的24小时内的高风险新闻分数,有11.1%,9%,死亡率分别为17%。在结果(死亡或出院)前24小时的新闻评分高风险组中,死亡风险增加至20.6%,死亡几率增加4倍.
    我们的结果显示,NEWS评分可以预测结果,并可能表明,在乔斯大学教学医院实施NEWS评分作为监测住院患者的常规工具,可以帮助检测患者存在不良事件风险。
    UNASSIGNED: Clinical deterioration in critically ill patients is a common phenomenon that can occur several hours before an adverse outcome. Early detection of subtle changes in vital signs, such as alterations in pulse rate and blood pressure, is crucial for preventing adverse events. However, these are not often recognized early enough to prompt quick intervention. The use of warning scores or assessment systems in the management of the critically ill in Nigeria has not been well evaluated. We assessed the association between the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) system and outcomes particularly mortality among the critically ill at the Jos University Teaching Hospital (JUTH), Nigeria.
    UNASSIGNED: This study is a retrospective study involving adults admitted to the medical and surgical wards between January 2021 and July 2021. Patient medical records were used to obtain data such as socio-demographics, and vital signs, which were used to compute the NEWS variable, diagnosis, length of stay, outcomes, and complications. Patients were classified as low, medium, and high-risk based on their NEWS scores within the first 24 hours of admission and 24 hours prior to the outcome of interest (death or discharge).
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 405 patients were included in this study. Patients with low, medium, and high-risk NEWS scores within the first 24 hours of admission, had an 11.1%, 9%, and 17% chance of death respectively. In the NEWS score high-risk group 24 hours prior to outcome (death or discharge), the risk of mortality increased to 20.6% and there was a four-fold increase in odds of death.
    UNASSIGNED: Our results showed that the NEWS score predicted outcome and may suggest that the implementation of the NEWS score as a routine tool for monitoring inpatients at the Jos University Teaching Hospital could help to detect patients at risk of adverse events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:临床预测模型具有提高护理质量和提高患者安全性的潜力。以前开发了计算机辅助风险评分系统(CARSS),用于根据常规收集的血液检查和生命体征预测急诊入院后的住院死亡率。我们旨在从外部验证CARSS模型。
    方法:在本回顾性外部验证研究中,我们考虑了罗瑟勒姆基金会信托(TRFT)在2020年11月11日至2022年11月11日之间出院的所有成人(≥18岁)紧急医疗入院,英国。我们根据其判别性(c统计量)和校准特性(校准斜率和校准图)评估了CARSS模型的预测性能。
    结果:在32,774名入院中,包括20,422(62.3%)入院。TRFT样本具有与发育样本相似的人口统计学特征,但死亡率较高(6.1%对5.7%)。在重新校准基线死亡率差异(重新校准前,截距=0.96[95%CI0.90-1.03])后,CARSS模型显示出良好的辨别(c统计量0.87[95%CI0.86-0.88])和对TRFT数据集的良好校准(斜率=1.03[95%CI0.98-1.08]截距=0[95%CI-0.06-0.07])。
    结论:总之,在校正开发和验证数据集之间的基线死亡风险后,对CARSS模型进行外部验证.CARSS模型的外部验证表明,它低估了院内死亡率。该模型的重新校准在TRFT数据集中显示出足够的性能。
    BACKGROUND: Clinical prediction models have the potential to improve the quality of care and enhance patient safety outcomes. A Computer-aided Risk Scoring system (CARSS) was previously developed to predict in-hospital mortality following emergency admissions based on routinely collected blood tests and vitals. We aimed to externally validate the CARSS model.
    METHODS: In this retrospective external validation study, we considered all adult (≥18 years) emergency medical admissions discharged between 11/11/2020 and 11/11/2022 from The Rotherham Foundation Trust (TRFT), UK. We assessed the predictive performance of the CARSS model based on its discriminative (c-statistic) and calibration characteristics (calibration slope and calibration plots).
    RESULTS: Out of 32,774 admissions, 20,422 (62.3 %) admissions were included. The TRFT sample had similar demographic characteristics to the development sample but had higher mortality (6.1 % versus 5.7 %). The CARSS model demonstrated good discrimination (c-statistic 0.87 [95 % CI 0.86-0.88]) and good calibration to the TRFT dataset (slope = 1.03 [95 % CI 0.98-1.08] intercept = 0 [95 % CI -0.06-0.07]) after re-calibrating for differences in baseline mortality (intercept = 0.96 [95 % CI 0.90-1.03] before re-calibration).
    CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the CARSS model is externally validated after correcting the baseline risk of death between development and validation datasets. External validation of the CARSS model showed that it under-predicted in-hospital mortality. Re-calibration of this model showed adequate performance in the TRFT dataset.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的几年里,几种尼古丁产品已成为吸烟烟草的替代品。虽然实验室和有限的临床研究表明,与经典烟草香烟相比,这些设备的毒性更低,对其流行病学影响知之甚少。访问急诊科(ED)通常是患者与医疗保健系统的首次甚至唯一联系。因此,在ED进行的一项研究评估这些产品对健康的影响可能是可靠的,并反映了现实生活中的环境。
    这项非干预性观察性研究(SMOPHED研究)的目的是分析使用各种尼古丁产品的患者在ED访视期间观察到的临床表现的严重程度与随后的结果之间的关系。特别是住院和死亡率。
    将检查结果(ED中的住院和死亡率)与尼古丁产品使用的各种模式有关。我们计划在ED分诊期间招募大约2000名参与者。这些人的特征将基于他们的烟草和尼古丁消费模式,通过特定的问卷确定。这种分类将允许详细分析尼古丁产品的不同使用模式如何与ED访视期间的临床诊断以及随之而来的结果相关联。
    这项研究于2024年3月开始注册。我们在1个月内共招募了901名参与者(约300名潜在参与者未提供知情同意书)。一旦数据库完成,数据将由统计学家进行分析。完整数据将于2024年12月公布。
    就戒烟和降低风险的潜力而言,关于替代尼古丁产品的危害降低潜力存在大量争论。这项研究为记录流行病学数据提供了一个机会,说明ED访视期间不同类型尼古丁产品的使用与疾病诊断和严重程度之间的联系。从而评估这些产品的潜在危害减少索赔。
    PRR1-10.2196/54041。
    In the last few years, several nicotine products have become available as alternatives to smoking tobacco. While laboratory and limited clinical studies suggest that these devices are less toxic compared to classic tobacco cigarettes, very little is known about their epidemiological impact. Visiting the emergency department (ED) often represents the first or even the only contact of patients with the health care system. Therefore, a study conducted at the ED to assess the impact of these products on health can be reliable and reflect a real-life setting.
    The aim of this noninterventional observational study (SMOPHED study) is to analyze the association between the severity of clinical presentation observed during ED visits among patients using various nicotine products and the subsequent outcomes, specifically hospitalization and mortality.
    Outcomes (hospitalization and mortality in the ED) will be examined in relation to various patterns of nicotine products use. We plan to enroll approximately 2000 participants during triage at the ED. These individuals will be characterized based on their patterns of tobacco and nicotine consumption, identified through a specific questionnaire. This categorization will allow for a detailed analysis of how different usage patterns of nicotine products correlate with the clinical diagnosis made during the ED visits and the consequent outcomes.
    Enrollment into the study started in March 2024. We enrolled a total of 901 participants in 1 month (approximately 300 potential participants did not provide the informed consent to participate). The data will be analyzed by a statistician as soon as the database is completed. Full data will be published by December 2024.
    There is substantial debate about the harm reduction potential of alternative nicotine products in terms of their smoking-cessation and risk-reduction potential. This study represents an opportunity to document epidemiological data on the link between the use of different types of nicotine products and disease diagnosis and severity during an ED visit, and thus evaluate the harm reduction potential claims for these products.
    PRR1-10.2196/54041.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在英国国民健康服务(NHS)中,监测患者的生命体征,并将其汇总为国家早期预警评分(NEWS)。开发并验证了一套计算机辅助风险评分系统(CARSS),用于使用NEWS和常规血液检查结果预测非计划入院时的住院死亡率和败血症。我们试图评估这些模型的准确性,以预测大流行第一阶段计划外入院时COVID-19的风险。
    方法:2020年3月11日至2020年6月13日,成人(>=18岁)非选择性入院出院(活着/死亡),在入院后±24小时内通过电子记录NEWS指数。我们根据ICD-10代码\“U071”识别COVID-19入院,该代码由COVID-19拭子测试结果确定(医院或社区)。我们评估了CARSS的性能(CARS_N,CARS_NB,CARM_N,CARM_NB)用于从辨别(c统计量)和校准(图形)方面预测COVID-19的风险。
    结果:急诊入院后住院死亡的风险为8.4%(500/6444),9.6%(620/6444)诊断为COVID-19。为了预测COVID-19的入院情况,与其他CARSS模型相比,CARM_N模型具有最高的辨别度0.73(0.71至0.75)和校准斜率0.81(0.72至0.89):CARM_N(辨别度:0.68(0.66至0.70)和校准斜率0.47(0.41至0.54)),CARM_NB(判别:0.68(0.65至0.70)和校准斜率0.37(0.31至0.43)),和CARS_NB(区分:0.68(0.66至0.70)和校准斜率0.56(0.47至0.64))。
    结论:CARS_N模型对于预测COVID-19的风险是相当准确的。它在入院时作为早期预警系统在临床上可能是有用的,特别是对大量计划外入院进行分类,因为它不需要额外的数据收集,并且很容易自动化。
    BACKGROUND: In the UK National Health Service (NHS), the patient\'s vital signs are monitored and summarised into a National Early Warning Score (NEWS) score. A set of computer-aided risk scoring systems (CARSS) was developed and validated for predicting in-hospital mortality and sepsis in unplanned admission to hospital using NEWS and routine blood tests results. We sought to assess the accuracy of these models to predict the risk of COVID-19 in unplanned admissions during the first phase of the pandemic.
    METHODS: Adult ( > = 18 years) non-elective admissions discharged (alive/deceased) between 11-March-2020 to 13-June-2020 from two acute hospitals with an index NEWS electronically recorded within ± 24 h of admission. We identified COVID-19 admission based on ICD-10 code \'U071\' which was determined by COVID-19 swab test results (hospital or community). We assessed the performance of CARSS (CARS_N, CARS_NB, CARM_N, CARM_NB) for predicting the risk of COVID-19 in terms of discrimination (c-statistic) and calibration (graphically).
    RESULTS: The risk of in-hospital mortality following emergency medical admission was 8.4% (500/6444) and 9.6% (620/6444) had a diagnosis of COVID-19. For predicting COVID-19 admissions, the CARS_N model had the highest discrimination 0.73 (0.71 to 0.75) and calibration slope 0.81 (0.72 to 0.89) compared to other CARSS models: CARM_N (discrimination:0.68 (0.66 to 0.70) and calibration slope 0.47 (0.41 to 0.54)), CARM_NB (discrimination:0.68 (0.65 to 0.70) and calibration slope 0.37 (0.31 to 0.43)), and CARS_NB (discrimination:0.68 (0.66 to 0.70) and calibration slope 0.56 (0.47 to 0.64)).
    CONCLUSIONS: The CARS_N model is reasonably accurate for predicting the risk of COVID-19. It may be clinically useful as an early warning system at the time of admission especially to triage large numbers of unplanned admissions because it requires no additional data collection and is readily automated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:国家早期预警评分量表与患者的急性病情强度密切相关。它还可以与护理活动负荷相关,并被证明可用于根据患者的敏锐度定义和重新分配护理资源。
    目的:评估患者入院时的国家预警评分是否与客观护理需求相关,并可用于优化可用护理资源的分配。
    方法:这项单中心前瞻性研究包括2022年9月1日至12月31日在Altovicentino(意大利)民用医院内科住院的患者。入院后前三天记录护理活动,并将其标准化为每日平均值/5分钟/患者/天。线性回归用于评估不同国家早期预警评分的护理需求之间的相关性。
    结果:本研究包括333名患者。他们的平均国家预警评分为3.9(标准差:2.9),61%(203/333)的国家预警评分<5类,国家预警评分5-6类19.5%(65/333),和19.5%(65/333)在国家预警评分>6类。他们的平均每日护理需求从低国家预警评分类别的22(16-30)活动/5分钟/患者/天增加到中等国家预警评分类别的30(20-39)活动/5分钟/患者/天(p<0.001)和高国家预警评分类别的35(23-45)活动/5分钟/患者/天(p<0.001)。
    结论:国家早期预警评分与急性疾病患者的护理活动相关,可用于优化可用护理资源的分配。
    BACKGROUND: The National Early Warning Score scale correlates well with the intensity of the patient\'s acute condition. It could also correlate with the nursing activity load and prove useful in defining and redistributing nursing resources based on the acuity of patients.
    OBJECTIVE: To assess whether patients\' National Early Warning Score at hospital admission correlates with objective nursing demands and can be used to optimize the distribution of available care resources.
    METHODS: This single-center prospective study included patients admitted to the Department of Internal Medicine at the Civil Hospital in Altovicentino (Italy) between September 1 and December 31, 2022. Nursing activities were recorded for the first three days after admission and standardized to the daily mean as performance/5 min/patient/day. Linear regression was used to assess the correlation between nursing demands for different National Early Warning Scores.
    RESULTS: This study included 333 patients. Their mean National Early Warning Score was 3.9 (standard deviation: 2.9), with 61 % (203/333) in the National Early Warning Score <5 category, 19.5 % (65/333) in the National Early Warning Score 5-6 category, and 19.5 % (65/333) in the National Early Warning Score >6 category. Their average daily care requirements increased from 22 (16-30) activities/5 min/patient/day in the low National Early Warning Score category to 30 (20-39) activities/5 min/patient/day in the intermediate National Early Warning Score category (p < 0.001) and 35 (23-45) activities/5 min/patient/day in the high National Early Warning Score category (p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: The National Early Warning Score correlates with nursing care activities for patients with an acute condition and can be used to optimize the distribution of available care resources.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:快速反应小组(RRTs)旨在改善院内心脏骤停(IHCA)的“预防链”。我们研究了在IHCA之前24小时内通过RRT检查的患者的30天生存率,与未接受RRT检查的患者相比。
    方法:一项基于瑞典心肺复苏注册的全国性队列研究,1月1日之间,2014年12月31日,2021年。一个探索性的,在由RRTs审查的普通病房患者的一个小亚组中,从病历中收集了假设-产生额外的深入数据.
    结果:总而言之,纳入12,915例IHCA患者。接受RRT审查的患者(n=2,058)的30天生存率较低(25%vs33%,p<0.001),30天生存的基于倾向评分的比值比为0.92(95%置信区间0.90-0.94,p<0.001),并且更可能有IHCA的呼吸原因(22%vs15%,p<0.001)。在子群中(n=82),呼吸窘迫是最常见的RRT触发因素,24%的RRT审查被推迟。患者转移到更高水平的护理与更高的30天生存率相关(20%vs2%,p<0.001)。
    结论:IHCA之前进行RRT检查与较低的30天生存率和更大的呼吸原因导致心脏骤停的可能性相关。在小探索性亚组中,呼吸窘迫是最常见的RRT触发因素,延迟的RRT激活很常见.早期发现呼吸异常和及时干预可能有可能改善接受RRT检查的患者的预后,并防止进一步进展为IHCA。
    BACKGROUND: Rapid response teams (RRTs) are designed to improve the \"chain of prevention\" of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). We studied the 30-day survival of patients reviewed by RRTs within 24 hours prior to IHCA, as compared to patients not reviewed by RRTs.
    METHODS: A nationwide cohort study based on the Swedish Registry of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, between January 1st, 2014, and December 31st, 2021. An explorative, hypothesis-generating additional in-depth data collection from medical records was performed in a small subgroup of general ward patients reviewed by RRTs.
    RESULTS: In all, 12,915 IHCA patients were included. RRT-reviewed patients (n = 2,058) had a lower unadjusted 30-day survival (25% vs 33%, p < 0.001), a propensity score based Odds ratio for 30-day survival of 0.92 (95% Confidence interval 0.90-0.94, p < 0.001) and were more likely to have a respiratory cause of IHCA (22% vs 15%, p < 0.001). In the subgroup (n = 82), respiratory distress was the most common RRT trigger, and 24% of the RRT reviews were delayed. Patient transfer to a higher level of care was associated with a higher 30-day survival rate (20% vs 2%, p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: IHCA preceded by RRT review is associated with a lower 30-day survival rate and a greater likelihood of a respiratory cause of cardiac arrest. In the small explorative subgroup, respiratory distress was the most common RRT trigger and delayed RRT activation was frequent. Early detection of respiratory abnormalities and timely interventions may have a potential to improve outcomes in RRT-reviewed patients and prevent further progress into IHCA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:人口老龄化是大多数国家面临的社会问题。
    目的:应用国家早期预警评分(NEWS)对胃肠外科住院老年患者的生命体征和意识进行预警,通过研究NEWS值与病情严重程度变化的相关性,为早期发现老年患者病情严重程度变化提供参考。
    方法:我们招募了2020年6月至2021年5月在贵州省某三级甲等医院胃肠外科住院的528名老年患者,分析NEWS最大值与疾病严重程度的相关性,并使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线获得潜在危重和危重老年患者的最佳NEWS临界值。
    结果:不同严重程度的老年患者NEWS值差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。NEWS值与疾病严重程度呈正相关(r=0.605,P<0.001)。根据ROC曲线,用于新闻识别潜在危重病的预警触发值,重症和绝症老年患者分别为6、7和8。潜在危重病的曲线下面积(AUC),重症和绝症老年患者分别为0.907、0.921和0.939。在AUC中,新闻在检测患者疾病严重程度方面比改良早期预警评分(MEWS)表现更好,灵敏度,特异性,和Youden\的索引,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。
    结论:使用NEWS对住院老年患者的生命体征和意识进行预警,有助于医务人员提前发现老年患者的病情严重程度变化,及时治疗,从而显著降低疾病恶化的风险。
    UNASSIGNED: Population aging is a social problem that is being faced in most countries.
    UNASSIGNED: To apply the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) for an early warning on the vital signs and consciousness of elderly patients who are hospitalized in the gastrointestinal surgical department and to provide a reference for early detection of changes in illness severity in elderly patients by studying the correlation between NEWS value and changes in illness severity.
    UNASSIGNED: We enrolled 528 elderly patients who were hospitalized in the gastrointestinal surgical department of a tertiary grade A hospital in Guizhou Province between June 2020 and May 2021, to analyze how NEWS max value correlates with illness severity and obtain the optimal NEWS cutoff value for both potentially critically ill and critically ill elderly patients using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
    UNASSIGNED: There were statistically significant differences in NEWS values between elderly patients with various illness severities (P< 0.05). NEWS values correlated positively with illness severity (r= 0.605, P< 0.001). Based on the ROC curve, early warning trigger values for NEWS to identify potentially critically ill, critically ill and terminally ill elderly patients were 6, 7 and 8, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) for potentially critically ill, critically ill and terminally ill elderly patients was 0.907, 0.921 and 0.939, respectively. NEWS performed better in detecting patient illness severity than Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) in AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and Youden\'s index, with statistically significant differences (P< 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: An early warning on the vital signs and consciousness of hospitalized elderly patients using NEWS can facilitate advanced detection of changes in illness severity of elderly patients by medical staff and enable timely treatment, thus significantly lowering the risks of illness deterioration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:先前的研究表明,院前国家早期预警评分(preNEWS)升高与创伤患者的不良结局水平升高相关。然而,目前尚不清楚preNEWS是否是创伤患者大量输血(MT)的预测因子.这项研究调查了preNEWS在预测创伤患者的MT和医院死亡率方面的准确性。
    方法:我们分析了2018年1月至2019年12月期间接受急诊医疗服务(EMS)治疗和转运的成年创伤患者。主要曝光是针对场景计算的新闻。主要结果是MT的预测能力,次要结局是24h死亡率。我们比较了新闻前的预后表现与休克指数,修改后的冲击指数,和反向冲击指数,在院前设置中,反向休克指数乘以格拉斯哥昏迷量表。
    结果:总计,包括41,852名患者,1456(3.5%)收到MT。PreNEWS显示了用于预测MT的接收器工作特征(AUROC)曲线下的最高面积(0.8504;95%置信区间[CI],0.840-0.860)和24小时死亡率(AUROC0.873;95%CI,0.863-0.883)。preNEWS对MT的敏感性为0.755,preNEWS对MT的特异性为0.793。所有指标均具有较高的阴性预测值和较低的阳性预测值。
    结论:preNEWS是一个有用的,MT和24小时死亡率的快速预测。前新闻的计算将有助于在现场做出决定,例如直接转移到创伤中心和高级治疗。
    BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that an elevated prehospital National Early Warning Score (preNEWS) is associated with increased levels of adverse outcomes in patients with trauma. However, whether preNEWS is a predictor of massive transfusion (MT) in patients with trauma is currently unknown. This study investigated the accuracy of preNEWS in predicting MT and hospital mortality among trauma patients.
    METHODS: We analyzed adult trauma patients who were treated and transported by emergency medical services (EMS) between January 2018 and December 2019. The main exposure was the preNEWS calculated for the scene. The primary outcome was the predictive ability for MT, and the secondary outcome was 24 h mortality. We compared the prognostic performance of preNEWS with the shock index, modified shock index, and reverse shock index, and reverse shock index multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale in the prehospital setting.
    RESULTS: In total, 41,852 patients were included, and 1456 (3.5%) received MT. preNEWS showed the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve for predicting MT (0.8504; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.840-0.860) and 24 h mortality (AUROC 0.873; 95% CI, 0.863-0.883). The sensitivity of preNEWS for MT was 0.755, and the specificity of preNEWS for MT was 0.793. All indicies had a high negative predictive value and low positive predictive value.
    CONCLUSIONS: preNEWS is a useful, rapid predictor for MT and 24 h mortality. Calculation of preNEWS would be helpful for making the decision at the scene such as transfer straightforward to trauma center and advanced treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景由于其表达和非特异性症状的模糊性,在急诊科(ED)诊断败血症很困难。多种评分工具已被用于检测脓毒症的严重程度和预后。本研究旨在评估在ED使用初始国家早期预警评分2(NEWS-2)作为血液透析患者住院死亡率的预测工具。方法我们进行了回顾性研究,观察性研究,利用方便的采样技术,回顾2019年1月1日至12月31日利雅得阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王医疗城收治的疑似脓毒症血液透析患者的记录.结果结果显示,与快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)相比,NEWS-2在预测脓毒症方面具有更高的敏感性(16.28%vs.11.54%)。然而,与NEWS-2评分系统相比,qSOFA在预测脓毒症方面具有更高的特异性(81.16%vs.74.14%)。结果发现,与qSOFA相比,NEWS-2评分系统在预测死亡率方面更敏感(26%vs.20%)。然而,与NEWS-2相比,qSOFA在预测死亡率方面更具体(88.50%与82.98%)。结论我们的研究结果表明,初始NEWS-2是血液透析患者败血症和住院死亡率的次要筛查工具。与NEWS-2相比,在ED呈递时使用qSOFA在预测脓毒症和死亡率方面具有相对较高的特异性。为了评估初始NEWS-2在ED设置中的应用,应该进行更多的研究。
    Background The diagnosis of sepsis in the emergency department (ED) is difficult due to the ambiguous nature of its expression and its non-specific symptoms. Multiple scoring tools have been utilized to detect the severity and prognosis of sepsis. This study aimed to evaluate the use of the initial National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS-2) at the ED as a predictive tool of in-hospital mortality in hemodialysis patients. Methodology We performed a retrospective, observational study to review the records of hemodialysis patients admitted to King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh with suspected sepsis from the 1st of January to the 31st of December 2019 using a convenient sampling technique. Results The results showed that NEWS-2 had a higher sensitivity in predicting sepsis compared to the Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) (16.28% vs. 11.54%). However, qSOFA had a higher specificity in predicting sepsis compared to the NEWS-2 scoring system (81.16% vs. 74.14%). It was found that the NEWS-2 scoring system was more sensitive in predicting mortality compared to qSOFA (26% vs. 20%). However, qSOFA was more specific in predicting mortality compared to NEWS-2 (88.50% vs. 82.98%). Conclusions Our findings demonstrated that the initial NEWS-2 is a subpar screening tool for sepsis and in-hospital mortality in hemodialysis patients. The use of qSOFA at the time of ED presentation was found to have a relatively higher specificity in predicting sepsis and mortality when compared to NEWS-2. To assess the application of the initial NEWS-2 in the ED setting, additional research should be conducted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号