Nasal surgery

鼻部手术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    探讨富血小板血浆(PRP)对鼻部手术后鼻黏膜愈合的影响。
    这个前景,随机化,对40例患者进行了比较分析研究。患者随机分为两组:A组,受制于PRP,B组,鼻部手术后未接受PRP的患者。对两种技术的结果进行了分析和比较。
    在干燥方面发现了显着差异,结壳,PRP组术后愈合天数。然而,两组在原发性出血方面无显著差异,继发性出血,鼻粘连,疼痛,愈合时间,回到体力活动,患者满意度。
    我们的研究发现了PRP对鼻粘膜术后伤口愈合的潜在希望作用,干燥度,和鼻腔结痂。根据这些结果,鼻手术后PRP的应用可以被认为是维持鼻手术后粘膜的有效方法。
    UNASSIGNED: To investigate the effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on the healing of nasal mucosa after surgery of the nose.
    UNASSIGNED: This prospective, randomized, Comparative Analytic study was conducted on 40 patients. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: Group A, subjected to PRP, and Group B, who were not subjected to PRP after nasal surgery. The outcome of both Techniques was analyzed and compared.
    UNASSIGNED: Significant differences were found in dryness, encrustations, and postoperative healing days in the PRP group. However, no significant differences between the two groups were observed in primary bleeding, secondary bleeding, nasal synechiae, pain, healing time, return to physical activity, and patient satisfaction.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study detects the potential hopeful effect of PRP on postoperative wound healing of nasal mucosa, dryness, and nasal crustations. According to these results, the application of PRP post-nasal surgery can be considered an effective method for maintaining post-nasal surgery Mucosa.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    鼻部手术(例如:鼻整复术,鼻中隔成形术)和鼻窦手术(例如:功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术)是耳鼻咽喉科的常见程序。氨甲环酸(TXA),一种抗纤维蛋白溶解药物,最近越来越多地用于减少出血。虽然在解剖学上很接近,鼻窦和鼻部手术的出血性质可能不同。我们提出了第一个荟萃分析,该分析对鼻腔和鼻窦手术进行了综合回顾,并对两者进行了比较。Pubmed,Embase,搜索CochraneLibrary和WoS直到2023年4月。感兴趣的结果包括Boezart评分,凝血时间,术后并发症和手术野质量。评估了27项研究,其中25项研究进行了定量评估。在27项研究中,15项研究涉及鼻窦手术,而12项研究涉及鼻部手术。氨甲环酸的使用在失血评估中特别有益,减少操作时间,手术野质量和外科医生满意度。TXA已被证明在不同程度上在鼻和鼻窦手术中均有效。与鼻部手术相比,TXA在鼻窦手术中具有更多的效果,如减少失血量和手术时间等客观指标,但对于主观标记,如外科医生满意度评分,则相反。
    在线版本包含补充材料,可在10.1007/s12070-024-04579-x获得。
    Nasal surgeries (e.g.: rhinoplasties, septoplasties) and sinus surgeries (e.g.: Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgeries) are common procedures in Otorhinolaryngology. Tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic drug, has been increasingly utilized to reduce hemorrhage recently. While close in proximity anatomically, the bleeding nature of sinus and nasal surgeries may differ. We present the first meta-analysis that has reviewed both nasal and sinus surgery collectively and compares the two. Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and WoS were searched until April 2023. Outcomes of interest include Boezart Scoring, clotting time, postoperative complications and surgical field quality. 27 Studies were assessed, of which 25 studies were evaluated quantitatively. Of the 27 studies, 15 studies involved Sinus surgery while 12 involved Nasal surgery. The use of tranexamic acid was notably beneficial in the evaluation of blood loss, reduction of operating time, surgical field quality and surgeon satisfaction. TXA has proven to be efficacious in both nasal and sinus surgeries to varying degrees. TXA has more effects in sinus surgeries compared to nasal surgeries in objective markers such as reducing blood loss and operating time, but the converse occurs for subjective markers such as surgeon satisfaction scores.
    UNASSIGNED: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-024-04579-x.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究是一项随机对照干预研究,旨在确定术前手册辅助教育对计划进行鼻中隔成形术的患者的手术恐惧和焦虑的影响。该研究于2022年5月至2023年2月在土耳其南部地区的一家培训和研究医院的耳鼻咽喉科服务和诊所进行。该研究包括61名患者,教育组29人,对照组32人。所有患者术前接受常规护理,教育团体透过资料丰富的小册子接受额外的教育。数据是使用“个人信息表”收集的,“手术恐惧问卷”,和“手术焦虑问卷”。手术早晨各组间手术恐惧的平均得分无显著差异(p>0.05)。然而,两组间手术焦虑的平均得分差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。总之,与对照组相比,接受术前手册辅助教育的教育组患者的焦虑更低.
    This study is a randomized controlled interventional study aimed to determine the effect of preoperative brochure-assisted education on surgical fear and anxiety in patients scheduled for septorhinoplasty surgery. The study was conducted between May 2022 and February 2023 in the Otorhinolaryngology services and clinics of a training and research hospital in the southern region of Turkey. The study included 61 patients, with 29 in the education group and 32 in the control group. All patients received routine nursing care before surgery, with the education group receiving additional education through an informative brochure. The data were collected using the \"Personal Information Form\", \"Surgical Fear Questionnaire\", and \"Surgical Anxiety Questionnaire\". There was no significant difference in the mean scores of surgical fear between the groups on the morning of the surgery (p > 0.05). However, a significant difference was found in the mean scores of surgical anxiety between the groups (p < 0.05). In conclusion, patients in the education group who received preoperative brochure-assisted education had lower anxiety compared with the control group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:中鼻甲(MT)手术在内窥镜鼻窦手术中非常常见,尽管在哪种技术提供最佳结果方面没有达成一致。这项符合PRISMA的系统评价旨在评估哪种MT手术技术产生的术后不良反应最少,客观和主观结果最佳。
    方法:截至2023年7月3日,在多个数据库中进行了全面的搜索标准,以确定报告MT手术治疗的研究。经过筛选和质量评估,共纳入14篇文章进行分析。患者人口统计数据,手术方法,术后治疗和随访,提取并回顾了客观和主观结果.
    结果:在确定的173篇独特论文中,14篇文章符合纳入标准,主要是随机对照试验(n=9)。正下中鼻甲切除术是主要的手术方法。大多数研究通过术后内窥镜检查评估结果,干预组(11例病例中有10例)有较好的结局.在使用SNOT-22的五项研究中,有四项与统计学上的显着改善相关。嗅觉问卷在三项研究中的两项中强调了优越的嗅觉结果。UPSIT评分显示两组之间没有显着差异。在两项使用嗅觉测定法的研究中,客观嗅觉评估对治疗组有利。
    结论:与保守措施相比,部分MT手术方法似乎始终能产生主观和客观的改善。也表明对嗅觉功能有积极的影响。尽管看起来更好的结果和更少的并发症是一致的部分技术,确定哪种部分技术超越其他技术仍然具有挑战性,由于研究之间的显著异质性。
    OBJECTIVE: Middle turbinate (MT) surgery is extremely common during endoscopic sinus surgery procedures, though no agreement exists on which techniques provide the best outcomes. This PRISMA-compliant systematic review aims to assess which MT surgery technique yields the least postoperative adverse effects and the best objective and subjective outcomes.
    METHODS: A comprehensive search criteria was conducted in multiple databases up to July 3, 2023, to identify studies reporting surgical treatments of the MT. After screening and quality assessment, 14 articles were included for analysis. Data on patients demographics, surgical approaches, postoperative treatment and follow-up, objective and subjective outcomes were extracted and reviewed.
    RESULTS: Out of 173 unique papers identified, 14 articles met the inclusion criteria, predominantly randomized controlled trials (n = 9). Antero-inferior middle turbinectomy was the predominant surgical approach. Most studies evaluated results with postoperative endoscopy, a superior outcome was documented in the intervention group (ten out of eleven cases). In four out five studies using the SNOT-22, the treatment group was associated with a statistically significant improvement. Olfactory questionnaires highlighted superior olfactory outcome in two out of three studies. The UPSIT score revealed no significant difference between groups. Objective olfactory assessments favored treatment groups in both studies utilizing olfactometry.
    CONCLUSIONS: It seems that a partial MT surgical approach consistently yields subjective and objective improvements compared to conservative measures, also suggesting a positive impact on smell function. Despite it appears that better outcomes with fewer complications are consistently achieved with partial techniques, it remains challenging identifying which partial technique surpasses the others, due to significant heterogeneity among the studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    鼻窦手术,尤其是使用内窥镜检查,依靠足够的止血是安全有效的。通常其他止血方法,比如烧灼是不可行的,必须采用其他方法。这项研究检查了右美托咪定在内窥镜鼻窦手术和其他鼻手术中控制性降压和手术视野可见性的有效性。
    在PubMed进行了文献检索,Scopus,CINAHL和Central用于使用右美托咪定对接受内窥镜鼻窦手术或其他鼻腔手术的成年患者进行控制性降压的随机对照试验。进行均数差异和单一均数的Meta分析。
    在935项确定的研究中,31符合纳入标准。比较右美托咪定与安慰剂(p<0.00001)和异丙酚(p<0.0001),发现Fromme-Boezaart手术视野能见度评分有统计学差异,但不是其他特工。与安慰剂相比,术中失血量存在显着差异(51.5mL,p<0.00001)和异丙酚(13.6mL,p<0.0001),但不是其他特工。
    右美托咪定与安慰剂和异丙酚相比,手术视野能见度和失血量显著改善,但不是其他特工。右美托咪定可用于鼻腔手术中的控制性降压。控制性降压药物的选择应遵循患者和特定程序的考虑。
    UNASSIGNED: Nasal and sinus surgery, especially using endoscopy, relies upon adequate haemostasis to be safe and effective. Often other haemostatic methods, such as cautery are not viable, and other methods must be employed. This study examines the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine in controlled hypotension and for surgical field visibility in endoscopic sinus surgery and other nasal surgeries.
    UNASSIGNED: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL and Central for randomised controlled trials using dexmedetomidine for controlled hypotension in adult patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery or other nasal surgery. Meta-analysis of mean differences and single means were performed.
    UNASSIGNED: Of 935 identified studies, 31 met the inclusion criteria. A statistically significant difference in Fromme-Boezaart surgical field visibility scores was found comparing dexmedetomidine to placebo (p < 0.00001) and propofol (p < 0.0001), but not other agents. A significant difference in intraoperative blood loss volume was found compared with placebo (51.5mL, p < 0.00001) and propofol (13.6mL, p < 0.0001), but not other agents.
    UNASSIGNED: Dexmedetomidine demonstrated significantly improved surgical field visibility and blood loss volume compared with placebo and propofol, but not other agents. Dexmedetomidine is viable and useful for controlled hypotension in nasal surgery. Choice of controlled hypotension agent should follow patient and procedure-specific considerations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:鼻部手术,解决形式和功能的解剖学变化,需要仔细的麻醉管理,包括右美托咪定和瑞芬太尼。这项荟萃分析评估了它们在鼻手术中的安全性和有效性变化,强调患者的舒适度和最佳结果。
    方法:四个电子数据库(PubMed,Scopus,WebofScience,和CINAHLComplete)搜索英文记录。包括测量右美托咪定与瑞芬太尼对鼻腔手术患者的影响的研究。Cochrane协作工具用于评估纳入研究的质量。优选随机效应模型,并通过Stata软件版本17进行统计分析。
    结果:在最初的63篇文章中,本分析选择了5项研究.所有这些选择的研究都是随机对照试验(RCTs)。荟萃分析共涉及302名参与者,瑞芬太尼组152例,右美托咪定组150例。比较右美托咪定和瑞芬太尼对术中心率(HR)和平均动脉压(MAP)的影响。两组均表现出相似的MAP和HR,瑞芬太尼组在手术第15分钟时的HR略低(标准化平均差:-0.24[-0.83,0.34])。此外,在评估这些药物对术后结果的影响时,包括疼痛程度,使用止痛药,患者-外科医生满意度,躁动分数,和恢复时间,两种药物在这些方面均无显著差异.
    结论:总之,本研究比较了右美托咪定和瑞芬太尼在鼻部手术麻醉中的应用。在心率方面没有发现显著差异,血压,满意,疼痛,激动,或恢复时间。这项研究有局限性,未来的研究应该建立标准化的方案,并考虑各种手术因素。
    BACKGROUND: Nasal surgeries, addressing anatomical variations for form and function, require careful anesthesia administration, including dexmedetomidine and remifentanil. This meta-analysis evaluates their safety and efficacy variations in nasal surgeries, emphasizing patient comfort and optimal outcomes.
    METHODS: Four electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CINAHL Complete) were searched for records in English. Studies that measure the effect of dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil on patients underwent nasal surgery were included. The Cochrane Collaboration\'s tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. A random-effect model was preferred and statistical analysis was performed by Stata software version 17.
    RESULTS: Out of an initial pool of 63 articles, five studies were selected for this analysis. All of these chosen studies were Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). The meta-analysis involved a total of 302 participants, with 152 in the remifentanil group and 150 in the dexmedetomidine group. The analysis aimed to compare the effects of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil on heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) during surgery. Both groups exhibited similar MAP and HR, with the exception of a slightly lower HR in the remifentanil group at the 15th minute of surgery (Standardized Mean Difference: -0.24 [-0.83, 0.34]). Furthermore, when evaluating the impact of these medications on post-surgery outcomes, including pain levels, the use of pain relief medications, patient-surgeon satisfaction, agitation scores, and recovery time, no significant differences were observed between the two medications in any of these aspects.
    CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the study compared Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil in nasal surgeries anesthesia. No significant differences were found in heart rate, blood pressure, satisfaction, pain, agitation, or recovery time. The study had limitations, and future research should establish standardized protocols and consider various surgical factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:评估经中间隔缝合中隔成形术在老年人中的有效性。方法:本研究中使用的方法涉及将65岁以上的鼻中隔成形术候选者前瞻性分离为2组。第一组做了鼻腔填塞,而第二组采用经中隔缝合技术。术后疼痛采用视觉模拟量表测量,手术的有效性采用标准化的Cosmesis和健康的鼻部结局梗阻量表进行评估.此外,使用脉搏血氧计监测患者的氧饱和度,并对2组的结果进行比较。结果:本研究纳入26例患者,平均年龄66岁,从65岁到74岁不等。在这些病人中,13收到鼻塞,另外13例采用了经中隔缝合技术。结果显示,标准化检查和健康鼻部阻塞评分之间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。然而,第1组的氧饱和度水平明显较低,疼痛评分明显高于其他组(P<0.05)。结论:我们的结论是经中隔缝合术是一种有效的,安全,老年人更舒适的手术选择。
    Objectives: Assessing the effectiveness of transseptal suturing septoplasty in elderly individuals. Methods: The method used in this study involved the prospective separation of septoplasty candidates over 65 into 2 groups. The first group underwent nasal packing, while the transseptal suture technique was used on the second group. Postoperative pain was measured using the visual analog scale, and the effectiveness of the surgery was assessed using the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes-Obstruction scale. In addition, the patients\' oxygen saturation levels were monitored using a pulse oximeter, and the results of the 2groups were compared. Results: The study included 26 patients with an average age of 66 years, ranging from 65 to 74 years. Of these patients, 13 received nasal packing, and the transseptal suture technique was used on the other 13. The results showed no statistically significant difference between the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes-Obstruction scores (P > .05). However, the oxygen saturation levels in group 1 were significantly lower, and the pain scores were significantly higher (P < .05) than those recorded for the other group. Conclusions: We concluded that transseptal suturing septoplasty is an effective, safe, and more comfortable surgical option for the elderly.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:全身麻醉后出现躁动很常见,可能会导致不良后果,如损伤以及呼吸和循环并发症。全身麻醉后出现的躁动在鼻手术中比在其他外科手术中更常见。这项研究旨在评估在深度麻醉下或完全清醒时接受鼻手术的患者出现躁动的发生。
    方法:共202名患者(18-60岁,美国麻醉医师协会分类:I-II)在全身麻醉下进行鼻手术,随机分为两组:深拔管组(D组)和清醒拔管组(A组)。主要结果是出现躁动的发生率。次要结果包括出现波动的数量,镇静评分,生命体征,和不良事件的发生率。
    结果:D组苏醒期躁动发生率低于A组(34.7%vs.72.8%;p<0.001)。与A组相比,D组患者的里士满激动镇静量表评分较低,更高的Ramsay镇静评分,更少的激动发作,拔管时和手术后30分钟的平均动脉压降低,而这些指标在手术后90分钟没有差异。两组不良事件发生率无差异。
    结论:深度麻醉下拔管可显著减少全麻鼻部手术后苏醒期躁动,且不增加不良事件的发生率。
    背景:于2021年4月14日在Clinicaltrials.gov(NCT04844333)注册。
    BACKGROUND: Post-anesthetic emergence agitation is common after general anesthesia and may cause adverse consequences, such as injury as well as respiratory and circulatory complications. Emergence agitation after general anesthesia occurs more frequently in nasal surgery than in other surgical procedures. This study aimed to assess the occurrence of emergence agitation in patients undergoing nasal surgery who were extubated under deep anesthesia or when fully awake.
    METHODS: A total of 202 patients (18-60 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification: I-II) undergoing nasal surgery under general anesthesia were randomized 1:1 into two groups: a deep extubation group (group D) and an awake extubation group (group A). The primary outcome was the incidence of emergence agitation. The secondary outcomes included number of emergence agitations, sedation score, vital signs, and incidence of adverse events.
    RESULTS: The incidence of emergence agitation was lower in group D than in group A (34.7% vs. 72.8%; p < 0.001). Compared to group A, patients in group D had lower Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale scores, higher Ramsay sedation scores, fewer agitation episodes, and lower mean arterial pressure when extubated and 30 min after surgery, whereas these indicators did not differ 90 min after surgery. There was no difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Extubation under deep anesthesia can significantly reduce emergence agitation after nasal surgery under general anesthesia without increasing the incidence of adverse events.
    BACKGROUND: Registered in Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04844333) on 14/04/2021.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    引言术后咽喉痛(POST)是全身麻醉相当常见的副作用。K-Y果冻是许多医疗程序中使用的众所周知的润滑剂。目的在这项随机研究中,我们评估了接受鼻部手术的患者使用K-Y果冻浸泡的咽喉部包装后的结局.方法本双盲法,随机化,对照研究包括140例ASAI-II在全身麻醉下接受鼻手术的患者。患者接受或K-Y果冻或浸水的X射线可检测喉包完全插入口腔以阻塞口咽。结果通过视觉模拟量表评估的POST严重程度,研究组之间的比较显示,麻醉恢复后,K-Y果冻组的POST水平显着降低,以及术后2、4和6小时。结论使用K-Y果冻浸泡的咽喉包装与鼻腔手术后较少严重的POST相关。
    Introduction  Postoperative sore throat (POST) is a fairly common side effect of general anesthesia. The K-Y jelly is a well-known lubricant used in many medical procedures. Objective  In this randomized study, we evaluated the use of throat packs soaked with K-Y jelly for POST outcomes in patients submitted to nasal surgery. Methods  The present double-blinded, randomized, controlled study included 140 ASA I-II patients undergoing nasal surgery under general anesthesia. Patients received either or K-Y jelly or water-soaked X-ray detectable throat packs fully inserted into the mouth to occlude the oropharynx. Results  Comparison between the studied groups regarding the severity of POST assessed by visual analog scale revealed significantly lower POST levels in the K-Y jelly group on recovery from anesthesia, and at 2, 4, and 6 hours postoperatively. Conclusions  The use of K-Y jelly-soaked throat packs was associated with less severe POST after nasal surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    多年来,鼻塞与阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停之间的关系引起了耳鼻喉科医师的兴趣。有研究表明,手术矫正鼻塞可以改善睡眠质量并减少睡眠呼吸暂停的症状。这导致我们的研究了解鼻部手术对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征(OSAHS)的影响。
    目的:通过多导睡眠图(PSG)评估鼻腔手术在改善鼻塞患者阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征中的作用。
    方法:本研究纳入了30例鼻塞患者,这些患者接受了鼻中隔成形术和/或鼻甲复位术,术前和术后评估呼吸窘迫指数(RDI),包括呼吸暂停低呼吸指数(AHI)。阻塞性呼吸暂停指数(OAI),使用多导睡眠图(PSG)的打鼾指数(SI)。
    结果:鼻腔矫正手术显示,通过多导睡眠图评估,RDI从13.66到6.66,OAI从6.34到3.18以及打鼾指数从161.77到62.23具有统计学上的显着改善(p值<0.001)。在最小饱和度(睡眠期间)和位置性睡眠呼吸暂停方面有统计学上的显着改善。
    结论:对于患有静态鼻塞和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停/低呼吸综合征的患者,隔离鼻部手术如鼻中隔成形术和/或减少鼻甲可改善睡眠参数并减轻OSA症状。然而,有多级或动态气道阻塞的患者可能需要进一步干预.
    The relationship between nasal obstruction and obstructive sleep apnea has raised interest among otolaryngologists since years. There are studies that suggest that surgical correction of nasal obstruction improves sleep quality and reduces symptoms of sleep apnea. This lead to our study to understand the effect of nasal surgery on obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS).
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of nasal surgery in improvement in Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Hypopnoea Syndrome in patients with nasal obstruction by Polysomnography (PSG).
    METHODS: This study included 30 patients with nasal obstruction who underwent septoplasty and/or turbinate reduction procedure with pre and post operative assessment of respiratory distress index (RDI) including apnoea hypopnoea index (AHI), obstructive apnoea index (OAI), Snoring Index (SI) using polysomnography (PSG).
    RESULTS: Nasal correction surgery showed statistically significant improvement (p-value < 0.001) in RDI from 13.66 to 6.66, OAI from 6.34 to 3.18 and Snoring Index from 161.77 to 62.23 as assessed by polysomnography. There was statistically significant improvement in minimal saturation levels (during sleep) and positional sleep apnoea.
    CONCLUSIONS: Isolated nasal surgery like septoplasty and/or turbinate reduction improved sleep parameters and alleviated OSA symptoms in patients with static nasal obstruction and obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome. However, patients with multilevel or dynamic airway obstruction may need further intervention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号