Nasal brush

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项纵向前瞻性研究旨在研究循环钙卫蛋白(cCLP)作为COVID-19感染后持续嗅觉功能障碍的生物标志物的潜力。
    方法:纳入36例COVID-19后持续性食欲不振或食欲不振患者(HT0),并在嗅觉训练(HT1)三个月后重新评估。两个对照组包括18例COVID-19术后无嗅觉缺陷的受试者(CG1)和18例健康个体(CG2)。进行嗅裂的鼻刷和血液收集以评估循环钙卫蛋白水平。
    结果:与对照组(CG1和CG2)相比,在低血症患者(HT0)的血清和鼻上清液中观察到更高的钙卫蛋白水平。嗅觉训练(HT1)嗅觉功能明显改善,同时血清和鼻腔样本中钙卫蛋白水平降低。循环钙卫蛋白具有作为COVID-19后持续嗅觉功能障碍的生物标志物的潜力。嗅觉训练后钙卫蛋白水平的降低意味着在监测和评估治疗反应中的作用。
    结论:这些发现有助于有关COVID-19后嗅觉功能障碍的潜在生物标志物的文献不断增加,并强调了研究新型生物标志物对个性化患者管理的重要性。然而,钙卫蛋白检测在鼻部疾病中的应用及其与鼻部细胞学的相关性尚需进一步研究。
    BACKGROUND: This longitudinal prospective study aims to investigate the potential of circulating calprotectin (cCLP) as a biomarker in persistent olfactory dysfunctions following COVID-19 infection.
    METHODS: Thirty-six patients with persistent hyposmia or anosmia post COVID-19 were enrolled (HT0) and re-evaluated after three months of olfactory training (HT1). Two control groups included 18 subjects without olfactory defects post COVID-19 (CG1) and 18 healthy individuals (CG2). Nasal brushing of the olfactory cleft and blood collection were performed to assess circulating calprotectin levels.
    RESULTS: Higher calprotectin levels were observed in serum and nasal supernatant of hyposmic patients (HT0) compared to control groups (CG1 and CG2). Post-olfactory training (HT1), olfactory function improved significantly, paralleled by decreased calprotectin levels in serum and nasal samples. Circulating calprotectin holds potential as a biomarker in persistent olfactory dysfunctions after COVID-19. The decrease in calprotectin levels post-olfactory training implies a role in monitoring and evaluating treatment responses.
    CONCLUSIONS: These findings contribute to the growing literature on potential biomarkers in post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunctions and underscore the importance of investigating novel biomarkers for personalized patient management. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to validate the application of calprotectin assay in nasal diseases and its correlation with nasal cytology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    Background Rhinitis is a highly prevalent yet often misdiagnosed condition. Patients who have local allergic rhinitis are regularly mislabeled as having a nonallergic etiology. Thus, a highly accurate, reproducible, and noninvasive assessment, which can be performed quickly and with minimal discomfort to the patient, is required. Objective The aim of this research was to identify the efficiency of various nasal brushes as tools for harvest and collection of epithelial proteins and its suitability for identification of rhinitis. Methods Nasal epithelial mucosa samples were taken from patients undergoing turbinate surgery using a cytology brush, a dental brush, and a nasal curette in random order. After washing in phosphate-buffered saline, the suspended cells were sonicated. Total protein content was assessed for all samples by bicinchoninic acid assay measured using a Nanodrop machine. Identification of nasal-specific immunoglobulin E (spIgE) was then assessed using immunoassay and compared to the patient\'s allergic status from epicutaneous and serum testing. The lower threshold limit for the spIgE in nasal brushings was determined using the results of serum spIgE tests as the reference. The diagnostic accuracy of this new established cutoff value was determined. Results The cytology brush was found to be the optimal tool for maximal nasal mucosa protein collection followed by dental brush and nasal curette (0.75 ± 0.45 mg/mL vs 0.43 ± 0.24 mg/mL vs 0.071 ± 0.55 mg/mL, respectively; P < .01). The optimal cutoff value of nasal spIgE from the cytology nasal brushings was 0.14 kUA/L to predict allergic status from serum testing. This gave a sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 86%, positive predictive value of 74%, likelihood ration positive of 5.40, and diagnostic odds ratio of 18.62. Conclusion The cytology brush is the optimal tool for protein collection. This is an easy and direct method to sample the nasal mucosa for assessment of nasal allergy or future biomarkers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号