Esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence is increasing in Western nations. There has been a shift toward minimally invasive approaches for transhiatal esophagectomy (THE). This study compares the outcomes of robotic THE for esophageal adenocarcinoma resection at our institution with the predicted metrics from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP). With Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, we prospectively followed 83 patients who underwent robotic THE from 2012 to 2023. Predicted outcomes were determined using the ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator. Our outcomes were compared with these predicted outcomes and with general outcomes for transhiatal esophagectomy reported in ACS NSQIP, which includes a mix of surgical approaches. The median age of patients was 70 years, with a body mass index (BMI) of 26.4 kg/m2 and a male prevalence of 82%. The median length of stay was 7 days. The rates of any complications and in-hospital mortality were 16% and 5%, respectively. Seven patients (8%) were readmitted within a 30-day postoperative window. The median survival is anticipated to surpass 95 months. Our outcomes were generally aligned with or surpassed the predicted ACS NSQIP metrics. The extended median survival of over 95 months highlights the potential effectiveness of robotic THE in the resection of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Further exploration into its long-term survival benefits and outcomes is warranted, along with studies that provide a more direct comparison between robotic and other surgical approaches.

UNASSIGNED: Although there have been several studies describing risk factors for complications after outpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA), data describing the timing of such complications is lacking.
UNASSIGNED: Patients who underwent outpatient or inpatient primary THA were identified in the 2012-2019 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. For 9 different 30-day complications, the median postoperative day of diagnosis was determined. Multivariable regressions were used to compare the risk of each complication between outpatient vs inpatient groups. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to evaluate the differences in the timing of each adverse event between the groups.
UNASSIGNED: After outpatient THA, the median day of diagnosis for readmission was 12.5 (interquartile range 5-22), surgical site infection 15 (2-21), urinary tract infection 13.5 (6-19.5), deep vein thrombosis 13 (8-21), myocardial infarction 4.5 (1-7), pulmonary embolism 15 (8-25), sepsis 16 (9-26), stroke 2 (0-7), and pneumonia 6.5 (3-10). On multivariable regressions, outpatients had a lower relative risk (RR) of readmission (RR = 0.73), surgical site infection (RR = 0.72), and pneumonia (RR = 0.1), all P < .05. On multivariable cox proportional hazards modeling, there were no statistically significant differences in the timing of each complication between outpatient vs inpatient procedures (P > .05).
UNASSIGNED: The timing of complications after outpatient THA was similar to inpatient procedures. Consideration should be given to lowering thresholds for diagnostic testing after outpatient THA for each complication during the at-risk time periods identified here. Although extremely rare, this is especially important for catastrophic adverse events, which tend to occur early after discharge.

BACKGROUND: Both cognitive impairment/dementia (CID) and falls occur more commonly in older adults compared to younger patients. This study aims to analyze the association of a history of CID or falls with the postoperative outcomes of older adults undergoing major intraabdominal surgeries on a national level.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) 2022 Participant Use Data File. Our primary outcome was postoperative mortality. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square test, and multivariate regression analysis.
RESULTS: On multivariable regression analyses, both a history of CID (OR: 1.9; CI: 1.5-2.5; p <0.01) and a fall (OR: 1.8, CI: 1.4 -2.3; p <0.01) were independently associated with higher adjusted odds of mortality. History of CID or falls was also a predictor of overall complications, major complications, and discharge to a care facility.
CONCLUSIONS: A history of CID or falls in older adults prior to major intraabdominal surgeries is associated with a high risk of postoperative mortality and morbidity. Further studies are required to establish the causal relation of these factors and the steps to mitigate the risk of associated adverse outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: While existing literature reports adverse effects of chronic steroid use on surgical wound outcomes, there remains lack of data exploring the effect of steroids on postoperative outcomes following lower extremity arterial bypass surgery. This study aims to explore the effect of chronic steroid use on surgical outcomes in patients undergoing open revascularization for lower extremity arterial occlusive disease.
METHODS: Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) files between 2005 and 2020, all patients receiving aortoiliac or infrainguinal arterial bypass for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) were identified by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Patient characteristics and 30-day outcomes were compared using χ2 test and independent t-test, and association of chronic steroid use with wound complications was studied using multivariable logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 44,675 patients undergoing open lower extremity revascularization were identified, of which 1,807 patients were on chronic steroids and 42,868 patients were not on chronic steroids. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, being on chronic steroids was associated with higher rates of deep SSI (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.03-1.83), any SSI (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.04-1.43) and wound dehiscence (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.03-1.96). Chronic steroid users also had significantly increased odds of developing sepsis (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.19-2.04), pneumonia (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.08-1.91), UTI (OR 1.54, 95% CI 11.13-2.09), DVT (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.01-2.53), and 30-day readmission (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.12-1.50), reoperation (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.01-1.37) and mortality (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.01-1.76) compared to non-chronic steroid users.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that chronic corticosteroid use is associated with higher risk of surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing lower extremity arterial bypass surgery. These patients typically have various underlying health issues, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment and management to reduce steroid-related postoperative complications and improve survival.

OBJECTIVE: While existing literature reports variable results of general anesthesia (GA) and regional anesthesia (RA) in patients undergoing lower extremity amputation (LEA), the effect of RA on patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) has not been explored. This study aims to assess whether the choice of anesthesia plays a role in influencing outcomes within this vulnerable population.
METHODS: Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) files between 2005-2022, all patients receiving LEA were identified, and the subset of patients with CHF was included. Patient characteristics and 30-day outcomes were compared using χ2 or Fischer\'s exact test as appropriate for categorical variables and the independent t-test or Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate for continuous variables. The association between anesthesia modality and post-operative outcomes was studied using multivariable logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 5,831 patients (4,779 undergoing GA, 1,052 undergoing RA) with a diagnosis of CHF undergoing LEA were identified. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, RA was associated with lower mortality (aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.97), pneumonia (aOR 0.76, 95% CI 0.58-0.99), septic shock (aOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47-0.88), post-operative blood transfusion (aOR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70-0.97), and 30-day readmission (aOR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64-0.97).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that RA for LEA in patients with CHF is associated with decreased morbidity and mortality compared to GA. While further research is needed to confirm this association, RA should be at least considered in CHF patients undergoing LEA when feasible.

The optimal surgical approach for differentiated thyroid cancer remains controversial, with debate regarding the comparative risks of upfront total thyroidectomy versus staged completion thyroidectomy following the initial lobectomy. This study aimed to assess the complication rates associated with these two strategies and identify the optimal timing for completion thyroidectomy using a multi-dimensional analysis of four cohorts: an institutional series (n = 148), the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database (n = 39,992), the TriNetX repository (n > 30,000), and a pooled literature review (10 studies, n = 6015). Institutional data revealed higher overall complication rates with total thyroidectomy (18.3%) compared to completion thyroidectomy (6.8%), primarily due to increased temporary hypocalcemia (10% vs. 0%, p = 0.004). The NSQIP analysis demonstrated that total thyroidectomy was associated with a 72% increased risk of transient hypocalcemia (p < 0.001) and a 25% increased risk of permanent hypocalcemia (p < 0.001). TriNetX data confirmed these findings and identified obesity and concurrent neck dissection as risk factors for complications. A meta-analysis showed that total thyroidectomy increased the rates of transient (RR = 1.63) and permanent (RR = 1.23) hypocalcemia (p < 0.001). Institutional and TriNetX data suggested that performing completion thyroidectomy between 1 and 6 months after the initial lobectomy minimized permanent complication rates compared to delays beyond 6 months. In conclusion, for differentiated thyroid cancer, total thyroidectomy is associated with higher risks of transient and permanent hypocalcemia compared to staged completion thyroidectomy. However, performing completion thyroidectomy within 1-6 months of the initial lobectomy may mitigate the risk of permanent complications. These findings can inform personalized surgical decision-making for patients with differentiated thyroid cancer.

UNASSIGNED: 30-day readmission is an important quality metric evaluated following primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) that has implications for hospital performance and reimbursement. Differences in how 30-day readmissions are defined between Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and other quality improvement programs (i.e., National Surgical Quality Improvement Program [NSQIP]) may create discordance in published 30-day readmission rates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate 30-day readmission rates following primary TJA using two different temporal definitions.
UNASSIGNED: Patients undergoing primary total hip and primary total knee arthroplasty at a single academic institution from 2015-2020 were identified via common procedural terminology (CPT) codes in the electronic medical record (EMR) and institutional NSQIP data. Readmissions that occurred within 30 days of surgery (consistent with definition of 30-day readmission in NSQIP) and readmissions that occurred within 30 days of hospital discharge (consistent with definition of 30-day readmission from CMS) were identified. Rates of 30-day readmission and the prevalence of readmission during immortal time were calculated.
UNASSIGNED: In total, 4,202 primary TJA were included. The mean hospital length of stay (LOS) was 1.79 days. 91% of patients were discharged to home. 30-day readmission rate using the CMS definition was 3.1% (130/4,202). 30-day readmission rate using the NSQIP definition was 2.7% (113/4,202). Eight readmissions captured by the CMS definition (6.1%) occurred during immortal time.
UNASSIGNED: Differences in temporal definitions of 30-day readmission following primary TJA between CMS and NSQIP results in discordant rates of 30-day readmission. Level of Evidence: III.

UNASSIGNED: As state, regional, and national registries have rapidly expanded, the goal of this study is to assess the frequency of registry abstracts accepted for both podium and poster presentations at the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons between 2012 and 2022.
UNASSIGNED: Final programs and poster e-collections were examined over the past 11 years. Two reviewers evaluated each abstract to determine if they utilized large datasets and the location of each registry. Studies were excluded if they used institutional registries. Reviewers also identified the most frequently utilized registries to determine how their use has fluctuated over this time frame.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 3354 abstracts were reviewed and included. Of those, 577 abstracts utilized data obtained from orthopaedic registries (17.2%): 450 of which were poster presentations (16.5% of total poster acceptances), and 127 were podium presentations (20.5% of accepted podiums). The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) was the most frequent dataset utilized, with 118 (20.5%) abstracts. Of note, NSQIP\'s use peaked between 2018 and 2020 and has since slowly trended downward. On the other hand, use of both American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) and PearlDiver registry have drastically increased since 2019, with only 6 abstracts chosen in 2019 and 28 abstracts in 2022 (10 AJRR [3 podiums] and 18 PearlDiver [6 podiums]). The proportion of registry data has increased, with the registry abstracts peaking in 2022 as 24% of posters and 37% of podium utilized data from large registry data sets (P < .001).
UNASSIGNED: There has been a significant increase in the number of studies utilizing registry data for both podium and poster presentations at the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons annual meeting. While NSQIP was the most utilized, its use has steadily declined while AJRR and PearlDiver use have increased over the past 3 years. Individuals should understand the strengths and weaknesses of each registry before making conclusions on study results.
UNASSIGNED: Level IV.

BACKGROUND: Malnutrition frequently is associated with increased complications and worse outcomes after surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine whether malnutrition status determined using the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) can serve as an independent risk factor for complications in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).
METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried from 2011 to 2016 for patients age ≥65 years who underwent ACDF. Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on the GNRI: >98, normal nutritional status; 92-98, moderately malnourished; and <92, severely malnourished. Multivariate logistic regression models adjusted for covariates of demographics, comorbidities, and operative metrics were used to evaluate GNRI as an independent risk factor for postoperative outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 3148 patients who underwent ACDF were analyzed, of whom 78.9% had normal nutrition, 16.1% were moderately malnourished, and 5.0% patients were severely malnourished. On multivariate analysis, moderate and severe malnutrition were found to be independent risk factors for any complication, pulmonary complications, pneumonia, unplanned intubation, and hospital length of stay >6 days (P < 0.05 for all). In addition, moderate malnutrition was a risk factor for failure to wean from ventilation for >48 hours and 30-day readmission. Severe malnutrition was an independent risk factor for septic shock and nonhome discharge.
CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients after ACDF, malnutrition determined using GNRI is an independent risk factor for 30-day complications, readmissions, prolonged hospital length of stay, and nonhome discharge.

OBJECTIVE: Distal femur fractures remain a significant cause of morbidity and mortality for elderly patients. There is a lack of large population studies investigating short-term outcomes after distal femur c in elderly patients. The purpose of this study is to assess the incidence of and risk factors for various short-term outcomes after distal femur open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) in the geriatric population.
METHODS: The American College of Surgeons\' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was used to identify all primary distal femur ORIF cases in patients 60+ years old between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2020 using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes 27511, 27513, and 27514. Demographic, medical, and surgical variables were extracted for all patients. Propensity score matching was used to match cases in the two age groups based on various demographic and medical comorbidity variables. Several 30-day outcome measures were compared between the 60-79-year-old and 80+-year-old groups both before and after matching. Subsequent multivariate logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for 30-day outcome measures in the matched cohort.
RESULTS: A total of 2913 patients were included in the final cohort: 1711 patients in the 60-79-year-old group and 1202 patients in the 80+-year-old group. Most patients were female (n = 2385; 81.9%). Prior to matching, the older group had a higher incidence of 30-day mortality (1.9% vs. 6.2%), readmission (3.7% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.024), and non-home discharge (74.3% vs. 89.5%, p < 0.001). Additionally, the older group had a higher rate of blood loss requiring transfusion (30.9% vs. 42.3%, p < 0.001) and medical complications (10.4% vs. 16.4%, p < 0.001), including myocardial infarction (0.7% vs. 2.7%, p < 0.001), pneumonia (2.7% vs. 4.6%, p = 0.008), and urinary tract infection (4.1% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.0188). After matching, the older group consistently had a higher incidence of mortality, non-home-discharge, blood loss requiring transfusion, and myocardial infarction. Various independent risk factors were identified for 30-day morbidity and mortality, including American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, body mass index (BMI) status, operative duration, and certain medical comorbidities.
CONCLUSIONS: Geriatric patients undergoing distal femur ORIF are at significant risk for 30-day morbidity and mortality. After matching, octogenarians and older patients specifically are at increased risk for mortality, non-home discharge, and surgical complications compared to patients aged 60-79 years old. Multiple factors, such as BMI status, ASA classification, operative time, and certain medical comorbidities, are independently associated with poor 30-day outcomes.