OBJECTIVE: To describe the advantages of Ngenuity 3D digital filters for enhancing visualization during cataract and corneal transplant surgery.
METHODS: All surgeries were performed by the same experienced surgeon (L.M.) using the Ngenuity 3D heads-up visualization system connected to a microscope. Images were simultaneously captured with and without the filter in each of the following phases: endothelial evaluation, capsulorhexis, capsule rupture, vitreous leak, cortex removal, visco removal, corneal suture, descemetorhexis, DMEK graft preparation and insertion.
RESULTS: In cataract surgery, green and monochrome filters facilitate capsulorhexis in difficult situations by highlighting the anterior capsule and can improve visualization of a posterior capsular tear. The enhanced contrast of the monochrome filter is also useful for cortex and viscoelastic removal. In corneal surgery, the green filter highlights the rim of the DMEK graft during tissue preparation, the yellow filter enhances the contrast of the stained DMEK graft in the anterior chamber, the monochrome filter simplifies descemetorhexis by improving visualization of the Descemet/endothelial layer and allows a better view in red saturated images while performing sutures.
CONCLUSIONS: Ngenuity digital filters have the potential to enhance tissue visualization during cataract and corneal surgeries, especially in poor visibility conditions.

UNASSIGNED: This work assesses the educational use of a 3-dimensional (3D) heads-up visualization system for vitreoretinal surgery.
UNASSIGNED: A cross-sectional survey was performed among 18 medical students, 18 residents, 7 VR fellows, 6 nurses, 4 anesthesiologists, and 3 surgeons on their experience with the Ngenuity 3D Visualization System (TrueVision and Alcon) compared with the standard microscope.
UNASSIGNED: Most medical students (88%) reported better identification of surgical landmarks; 63% ranked the Ngenuity as their preferred method of learning (vs microscope or 2-dimensional display). Residents reported a superior understanding of anatomy (69%), an increased ability to ask questions (63%), and improved ergonomics (94%). Epiretinal membrane peel, internal limiting membrane peel, and core vitrectomy were most enhanced (69% to 77%) for residents. Fellows\' experience with trocar placement, vitrectomy, and oil/gas insertion was the same as before (67% to 100%), whereas endolaser and closing were worse (67% to 100%). Regarding autonomy, 83% of fellows reported no change, whereas 17% reported increased levels. Nurses were better able to track case progress (67%) and anticipate which tools were needed (50%). All anesthesiologists reported the same or worse engagement in cases, noting it was difficult to switch between the 3D screen and the anesthesia equipment. All surgeons reported a better awareness of trainees in the room and an improved ability to point out landmarks; 67% reported being more comfortable with resident and fellow autonomy.
UNASSIGNED: The Ngenuity is most helpful to students and residents. Integrating 3D displays into the surgical curriculum is beneficial, with care to ensure nurse and anesthesiologist satisfaction.

Purpose: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and efficiency of the Ngenuity 3-dimensional (3D) heads-up display (HUD) visualization system for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair at a large academic medical center in the United States. Methods: This retrospective review comprised consecutive patients aged 18 years or older who had primary RRD repair (pars plana vitrectomy [PPV] alone or combined PPV and scleral buckle) performed by the same fellowship-trained vitreoretinal surgeon using the 3D visualization system and a traditional standard operating microscope (SOM) at Massachusetts Eye and Ear from June 2017 to December 2021. The minimum follow-up was 90 days. Results: The 3D HUD group comprised 50 eyes of 47 patients and the SOM group, 138 eyes of 136 patients. There were no between-group differences in single surgery anatomic success rates at 3 months (98% HUD vs 99% SOM; P = 1.00) or at the last follow-up (94% HUD vs 98% SOM; P = .40). The rate of postoperative proliferative vitreoretinopathy was similar between the 2 groups (3 months: 3% HUD vs 5% SOM, P = .94; last follow-up, 2% HUD vs 3% SOM, P = .93). There was no difference in the mean duration of surgery (57.4 ± 28.9 minutes HUD vs 59.4 ± 29.9 minutes SOM; P = .68). Conclusions: Anatomic and functional outcomes, in addition to surgical efficiency, of noncomplex primary RRD repair with a 3D HUD system were similar to those of surgery performed with an SOM.

UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the effect of surgeon-controlled parameters on the color performance of the Ngenuity 3-dimensional (3D) visualization system.
UNASSIGNED: A calibrated reference target was placed inside a model eye to assess the Ngenuity 3D camera under different settings. The Ngenuity 3D display was assessed with a commercial colorimeter.
UNASSIGNED: Manufacturer-recommended methodology for white balancing was compared against all common deviations in technique. Following white balance, images of a calibrated reference target were extracted and tested using Imatest Master software to calculate quantitative color differences (delta E and delta C). The Ngenuity monitor was assessed using a SpyderX Elite commercial colorimeter to assess for image burn-in by quantifying color uniformity and maximum luminescence.
UNASSIGNED: Delta E and delta C were calculated for all variables. Color uniformity and luminance were assessed in candelas per square meter (nits).
UNASSIGNED: Color performance using the manufacturer-recommended specifications yielded a delta E of 12.81 ± 1.67. Changing the white balance target to a videography grey card (P = 0.07) and 4 × 4 gauze (P = 0.37) provided similar performance, whereas using white computer paper or the operator\'s palm significantly increased the delta E from 12.81 ± 1.67 to 15.28 ± 1.22 (P = 0.01) and 17.71 ± 2.03 (P < 0.01), respectively. Changes to card position, magnification, stability, or ambient lighting did not significantly impact white balance results, whereas having the card in crisp focus did decrease color accuracy (15.78 ± 1.63; P = 0.03). Minor improvement in performance occurred when the laser filter was off for white balance and image acquisition (9.28 ± 0.25; P < 0.01), but deterioration occurred if the laser filter was placed after balancing (16.59 ± 1.17; P < 0.01). Both light sources of 23-gauge light pipe at 34% intensity and 25-gauge chandelier at 50% intensity gave similar color accuracy (P = 0.37). When comparing different Ngenuity machines, color uniformity and maximum luminescence decreased with increased device use.
UNASSIGNED: Overall, the Ngenuity 3D has robust color performance. A few limitations of both the camera and monitor were identified, and surgeons should be aware of these pitfalls as well as solutions examined herein to mitigate their effects during surgery.

UNASSIGNED: The guarded light pipe is a recently described alternative endoillumination technique to chandelier illumination. We sought to compare the outcomes of scleral buckling (SB) under indirect ophthalmoscopy (ID) to heads-up three-dimensional visualization with a guarded light pipe (3DGLP).
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective comparative study was performed, including 47 eyes that underwent SB for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair with either traditional ID (n = 31) or 3DGLP (n = 16).
UNASSIGNED: The single surgery anatomic success rate was 87.0% in the ID group and 87.5% in the 3DGLP group. The final anatomic success rate was 100% in both groups. The median (interquartile range) post-operative logMAR was 0.10 (0.0-0.20) in the ID group and 0.08 (0.02-0.69) in the 3DGLP group (p = 0.51). The median operative time was 107 (94-123) minutes in the ID group and 100 (90-111) minutes in the 3DGLP group (p = 0.25). Among eyes that underwent subretinal fluid drainage, the operative time was significantly longer in the ID group compared to the 3DGLP group, 113 (100-135) minutes vs 93 (85-111) minutes (p = 0.035). There were no post-operative complications in the ID group and one complication of self-resolving vitreous hemorrhage associated with a malfunctioning cryoprobe in the 3DGLP group (p = 0.34). There were no cases of post-operative cataract progression in either group.
UNASSIGNED: Compared to traditional SB, 3DGLP improves ergonomics and educational value with similar anatomical, visual, intra and post-operative outcomes and may result in shorter operative time in cases requiring subretinal fluid drainage.

BACKGROUND: The surgical time duration, the postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and the incidence rate of intraoperative complications, alongside the vision and posturing parameters, were estimated by systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the three-dimensional (3D) heads-up visualization system (HUVS) and standard operating microscope (SOM) in cataract surgery.
METHODS: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus on 26 June 2022. The weighted mean difference (WMD) was used to present postoperative BCVA and the mean surgical time duration, whereas the risk ratio (RR) was used to present the incidence rate of intraoperative complications. Publication bias was evaluated with Egger\'s test. The Cochrane Collaboration\'s Tool for randomized clinical trials, the methodological index for non-randomized, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to assess the risk of bias. The research has been registered with the PROSPERO database (identifier, CRD42022339186).
RESULTS: In the meta-analysis of five studies with 1021 participants, the pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) of the postoperative BCVA showed no significant difference between patients who underwent HUVS versus SOM cataract surgery (WMD = -0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.01 -0.02). In the meta-analysis of nine studies with 5505 participants, the pooled WMD of mean surgical time duration revealed no significant difference between patients who underwent HUVS versus SOM cataract surgery (WMD = 0.17, 95% CI: -0.43-0.76). In the meta-analysis of nine studies with 8609 participants, the pooled risk RR associated with intraoperative complications was 1.00 (95% CI, 1.00-1.01).
CONCLUSIONS: 3D HUVS and SOM provide comparable surgical time duration, postoperative BCVA, and incidence rate of intraoperative complications.

UNASSIGNED: Novel 3D digital display systems, such as NGENUITY 3D digitally assisted visualization system (DAVS), can provide enhanced illumination, depth of field, and digital filtering. This study compared vitreous removal using NGENUITY 3D DAVS with a standard surgical microscope.
UNASSIGNED: This was an in vivo, 2-arm laboratory study in 15 Yorkshire pig eyes. The LuxOR LX3 microscope with NGENUITY 3D DAVS (arm 1) and the LuxOR LX3 microscope alone (arm 2) were used with 5× optical magnification and Oculus BIOM 200 mm optics. Standard core and peripheral vitrectomy without scleral depression was performed using the CONSTELLATION Vision System. Residual vitreous weight was assessed in enucleated eyes by a masked observer. Axial length and vitreous weight of contralateral eyes were compared from an additional 14 Yorkshire pigs to confirm that eyes from a single animal were essentially identical.
UNASSIGNED: After vitrectomy, mean ± SD residual vitreous was significantly smaller with NGENUITY versus standard microscope (0.143 ± 0.146 versus 0.580 ± 0.269 g, respectively; P < 0.0001). Based on a mean initial vitreous weight of 2.5 g, as determined by assessment in contralateral eyes from an additional 14 Yorkshire pigs, the mean percentage vitreous removal was 94% ± 6% versus 77% ± 11%, respectively. Further, vitreous weight and axial length for contralateral eyes from any single animal in these additional 14 animals were essentially identical, as mean differences were 0.046 ± 0.035 g and 0.11 ± 0.08 mm, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: Vitrectomy with NGENUITY 3D DAVS resulted in significantly less residual vitreous in pig eyes compared with standard microscopy. NGENUITY may improve vitreous removal during vitreoretinal surgery by enhancing visualization.

BACKGROUND: To compare outcomes and complications of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) using a three-dimensional heads-up visualisation system (digitally assisted vitreoretinal system, DAVS) versus conventional analog microscope (CAM) in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).
METHODS: This prospective interventional institutional study evaluated 60 eyes of 60 subjects with primary RRD undergoing PPV between September 2017 and February 2018. Subjects were randomly put into DAVS and CAM group and pre-operative ocular characteristics and final outcomes recorded at each visit. All subjects were followed up for a duration of 6 months. Main outcome measures recorded were post-operative retinal status, visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and surgical complications.
RESULTS: Overall final retinal attachment at 6 months was 91.7% (90% in DAVS eyes and 93.3% in CAM eyes; p = 0.999). Final VA improved significantly from baseline in both groups (p < 0.001). Overall, VA improved to >  = 20/40 in 18.3% eyes (6 DAVS, 5 CAM). Median duration of silicone oil endotamponade was 3.5 months (3.5 months in DAVS, 3 months in CAM). Redetachment rate in the series was 25% (20% in DAVS, 30% in CAM). Post-operative proliferative vitreoretinopathy grade C and more was present in 15% of eyes (10% in DAVS, 20% in CAM). Average duration of surgery was 37 ± 6.2 min in DAVS group and 39.8 ± 6.6 min in CAM group (p = 0.09). All steps of vitrectomy could be performed with relative ease and comfort with the DAVS platform.
CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical and functional outcomes of RRD were favourable with DAVS and comparable to that with conventional microscope surgery.

Purpose: To assess the efficacy and outcomes of 23-gauge vitreoretinal surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using a three-dimensional heads-up display (3D HUD) surgical platform as compared to a standard operating microscope (SOM) setting. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Participants: One hundred and forty consecutive eyes of 140 patients with primary retinal detachment. Methods: All eyes underwent 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for primary retinal detachment using either a 3D HUD (NGENUITY; Alcon Inc., Fort Worth, Texas, USA; n = 70 eyes) or a SOM setting (n = 70 eyes); in cases of significant cataract, additional phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation was performed. Minimum follow-up was 2 months. Main Outcome Measures: Primary retinal reattachment rate, rate of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and duration of surgery. Results: There were 70 eyes each in the 3D HUD and the SOM group. Both groups did not differ concerning age (p = 0.70), extent of retinal detachment (p = 0.07), number of retinal tears (p = 0.40), macular involvement (p = 0.99), and preoperative BCVA (p = 0.99). Postoperatively, 3D HUD and SOM were comparable concerning the primary retinal reattachment rate (88.6 vs. 94.3%; p = 0.37), the development of postoperative PVR (12.9% vs. 7.1%; p = 0.40) and final BCVA (0.26 ± 0.40 vs. 0.21 ± 0.38 logMAR; p = 0.99). Duration of surgery was significantly longer in the 3D HUD group (66.2 ± 16.5 vs. 61.2 ± 17.1 min; p = 0.04), an effect which however vanished after a \"learning curve\" of the first 35 eyes (p = 0.49). Conclusions: On par results to a conventional operating microscope can be achieved with a 3D HUD setting when performing 23-gauge vitreoretinal surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, including the primary retinal reattachment rate, the incidence of postoperative PVR and final BCVA. However, duration of surgery might initially be slightly longer with 3D HUD, suggesting the effect of a learning curve.

BACKGROUND: Significant advances in three-dimensional (3D) imaging technology have allowed for the incorporation of 3D digital displays into medical and surgical devices. Despite initial adoption of the NGENUITY® 3D Visualization System in vitreoretinal surgery, there are limited publications regarding its use. The generally accepted main benefits include improved ergonomics, enhanced surgical team communication and education, reduced retinal phototoxicity, increased depth of field, and display image manipulation. Despite these potential benefits, many retina specialists have questioned its universal applicability to a wide variety of vitreoretinal surgeries.
OBJECTIVE: To report on the variety of indications and surgical efficacy of the NGENUITY® 3D Visualization System in vitreoretinal surgery via a review of surgical experience at two vitreoretinal practices in both the academic and community settings.
METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of consecutive surgical cases performed on the NGENUITY® 3D Visualization System at Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary and Florida Retina Institute from June 1st, 2017 to November 1st, 2018. Age, presenting diagnosis, surgical procedure, and intraoperative details were recorded.
RESULTS: 272 vitreoretinal surgeries on the Alcon NGENUITY® 3D Visualization System were identified between June 1st, 2017 and November 1st, 2018 at the participating institutions. A detailed breakdown of the indications for surgery and related procedures is reported. During all 272 cases on the 3D digital system, there were no complications attributed to the visualization system.
CONCLUSIONS: This series illustrates the diversity of vitreoretinal surgeries that can be performed on this system without compromising surgical viewing or increasing surgical complications. The Alcon NGENUITY® 3D Visualization System possesses favorable ergonomics, illumination levels, depth of field, display filters, and trainee experience.