UNASSIGNED: Patients with coronary artery disease and impaired renal function are at higher risk for both bleeding and ischemic adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
UNASSIGNED: This study assessed the efficacy and safety of a prasugrel-based de-escalation strategy in patients with impaired renal function.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a post hoc analysis of the HOST-REDUCE-POLYTECH-ACS study. Patients with available estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (n = 2,311) were categorized into 3 groups. (high eGFR: >90 mL/min; intermediate eGFR: 60 to 90 mL/min; and low eGFR: <60 mL/min). The end points were bleeding outcomes (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 2 or higher), ischemic outcomes (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, repeated revascularization, and ischemic stroke), and net adverse clinical event (including any clinical event) at 1-year follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: Prasugrel de-escalation was beneficial regardless of baseline renal function (P for interaction = 0.508). The relative reduction in bleeding risk from prasugrel de-escalation was higher in the low eGFR group than in both the intermediate and high eGFR groups (relative reductions, respectively: 64% (HR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.15-0.83) vs 50% (HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.28-0.90) and 52% (HR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.21-1.13) (P for interaction = 0.646). Ischemic risk from prasgurel de-escalation was not significant in all eGFR groups (HR: 1.18 [95% CI: 0.47-2.98], HR: 0.95 [95% CI: 0.53-1.69], and HR: 0.61 [95% CI: 0.26-1.39]) (P for interaction = 0.119).
UNASSIGNED: In patients with acute coronary syndrome receiving PCI, prasugrel dose de-escalation was beneficial regardless of the baseline renal function.

UNASSIGNED: The AFIRE (Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events With Rivaroxaban in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease) trial showed both noninferiority for efficacy and superiority for safety endpoints of rivaroxaban monotherapy compared with those of rivaroxaban plus antiplatelet therapy (combination therapy) in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease.
UNASSIGNED: This study sought to evaluate outcomes of rivaroxaban monotherapy in those patients across body mass index (BMI) categories.
UNASSIGNED: Patients were categorized into 4 groups: underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2), normal weight (BMI 18.5 to <25 kg/m2), overweight (BMI 25 to <30 kg/m2), and obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). Efficacy (a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring revascularization, stroke, or systemic embolism) and safety (major bleeding defined according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria) were compared between rivaroxaban monotherapy and combination therapy across BMI categories.
UNASSIGNED: This study analyzed 2,054 patients with a median age of 75.0 years and CHA2DS2-VASc score of 4. A significant interaction was not observed between BMI categories and effect of monotherapy for efficacy (P = 0.83) and safety (P = 0.07), although monotherapy was superior to combination therapy for efficacy in normal weight (HR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.44-0.95) and safety in overweight (HR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.10-0.62), whereas a significant difference in the endpoints was not observed in the other BMI categories.
UNASSIGNED: Rivaroxaban monotherapy had a similar effect on prognosis across all BMI categories in patients with atrial fibrillation and stable coronary artery disease. (Atrial Fibrillation and Ischemic Events With Rivaroxaban in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease [AFIRE]; UMIN000016612, NCT02642419).